Blog

Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:
One of the amazing things about the brain is how fast neuronal signaling occurs. There are about 100 billion brain cells, and neurons can fire about 200 times per second. Please describe how this process occurs:
Describe the action potential. What are the steps in this process?
What role do neurotransmitters play in relaying signals in the brain?

The post Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:
One of the amazing things a appeared first on Versed Papers.

Prepare an evaluation (5 pages) of an existing QI initiative to determine if the initiative is effective.
● Please do not plagiarize or use AI in writing this paper. It must be written in Times Roman, 12 Font, and APA edition 7. Use at least six scholarly writers to complete the assignment, and articles have to be published within the last five years old. The analysis has to be logically structured? Please ensure to read all the detail information before answering the question . If you need more information to understand the process for quality improvement plans for this assignment you can view the CDC template . Project Quality Management Plan.
Introduction: Too often, discussions about quality health care, care costs, and outcome measures take place in isolation—various groups talking among themselves about results and enhancements. Nurses are critical to the delivery of high-quality, efficient health care. As a result, they must develop their skills in reviewing and evaluating performance reports. They also need to be able to communicate outcome measures related to quality initiatives effectively. Patient safety and positive institutional health care outcomes mandate collaboration among nursing staff members to ensure the integration of their perspectives in all quality care initiatives.
Overview: In the first assessment, you analyzed an adverse event or a near miss, and outlined a QI initiative to address it. This assessment will give you practice and the confidence to evaluate a quality care initiative in much the same way you might in your health care setting to help determine if the initiative is effective.
Too often, discussions about quality health care, care costs, and outcome measures take place in isolation—each group talking among themselves about results and enhancements. Because nurses are critical to the delivery of high-quality, efficient health care, it is essential that they develop the proficiency to review, evaluate performance reports, and be able to effectively communicate outcome measures related to quality initiatives. The nursing staff’s perspective and the need to collaborate on quality care initiatives are fundamental to patient safety and positive institutional health care outcomes.
Imagine you have been asked to prepare and deliver an analysis of an existing QI initiative at your workplace. The QI initiative you choose to analyze should be related to a specific disease, condition, or public health issue of personal or professional interest to you. The purpose of the report is to assess whether the specific quality indicators point to improved patient safety, quality of care, cost and efficiency goals, and other desired metrics. Your target audience is nurses and other health professionals with specializations or interest in your chosen condition, disease, or public health issue.
In your report, you will: Analyze a current QI initiative in a health care setting.
Identify what prompted implementation of the QI initiative.
Evaluate problems that arose during the initiative or problems that were not addressed.
Evaluate the success of a current QI initiative through recognized benchmarks and outcome measures as required to meet national, state, or accreditation requirements.
Identify the core performance measurements related to successful treatment or management of the condition.
Evaluate the impact of the quality indicators on the health care facility.
Incorporate interprofessional perspectives related to the success of actions used in the QI initiative as they relate to functionality and outcomes.
Recommend additional indicators and protocols to improve and expand outcomes of a current quality initiative.
Ensure your analysis conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.
Be sure to address all of the bullet points. You may also want to read the Quality Improvement Initiative Evaluation Scoring Guide to better understand the performance levels that relate to each grading criterion. Additionally, be sure to review the document for additional clarification about things to consider when creating your assessment using the guiding questions of the Quality Improvement Initiative Evaluation provided below:
Guiding Questions: Quality Improvement Initiative Evaluation:
This document is designed to give you questions to consider and additional guidance to help you successfully complete the Quality Improvement Initiative Evaluation assessment. You may find it useful to use this document as a prewriting exercise, an outlining tool, or a final check to ensure you have sufficiently addressed all the grading criteria for this assessment. This document is a resource to help you complete the assessment. Do not turn in this document as your assessment submission.
Remember, you are analyzing a current QI initiative that is already in place. You are not creating a new QI initiative Analyze a current quality improvement initiative in a health care setting. ● What prompted the implementation of the quality improvement initiative? ● What problems were not addressed?
● What problems arose from the initiative?
Evaluate the success of a current quality initiative through recognized benchmarks and outcome measures. ● What benchmarks or outcome measures were used to evaluate success? Consider requirements for national, state, or accreditation standards.
● What was most successful?
Incorporate interprofessional perspectives related to initiative functionality and outcomes. ● How does the interprofessional team contribute to the success of the QI initiative?
● What are the perspectives of interprofessional team members involved in the initiative?
● Who did you talk to? From what other professions? How did their input impact your analysis? Recommend additional indicators and protocols to improve and expand outcomes of a current quality initiative.
● What process or protocol changes would you recommend?
● What added technologies would improve quality outcomes?
● What outcome measures are missing, or could be added?
Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.
Competencies Measured: By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
• Competency 2: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to routine data surveillance.
o Recommend additional indicators and protocols to improve and expand outcomes of a quality initiative.
• Competency 3: Evaluate quality improvement initiatives using sensitive and sound outcome measures.
o Analyze a current quality improvement initiative in a health care setting.
o Evaluate the success of a current quality improvement initiative through recognized benchmarks and outcome measures as required to meet national, state, or accreditation requirements.
• Competency 4: Integrate interprofessional perspectives to lead quality improvements in patient safety, cost effectiveness, and work life quality.
o Incorporate interprofessional perspectives related to the success of actions utilized in a quality improvement initiative as they relate to functionality and outcomes.
• Competency 5: Apply effective communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care.
Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards
o Criteria that this essay must address are as follows:
• 1.Analyzes a current quality improvement initiative in a health care setting, and identifies knowledge gaps, unknowns, missing information, unanswered questions, or areas of uncertainty (where further information could improve the analysis).
• 2 Evaluates the success of a current quality improvement initiative through recognized national, state, or accreditation benchmarks and outcome measures. Identifies assumptions on which the analysis is based.
• 3 Incorporates interprofessional perspectives and actions related to initiative functionality and outcomes, and identifies areas of uncertainty, knowledge gaps, and additional information that would be needed to gain a more complete understanding.
• 4 Recommends additional indicators and protocols to improve and expand outcomes of a quality initiative, and impartially explains the pros and cons of these recommendations.
• 5 Conveys clear purpose, in a tone and style well-suited to the intended audience. Supports assertions, arguments, and conclusions with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards, including APA 7 edition and formatting. In order to complete this assessment, the following three captions must also be addressed and the suggested resources has to be used
• Caption 1: Quality Improvement Models:
These examples of QI models take different approaches to accounting for all the different organizational structures that can get in the way of successful implementation. You’ll find them useful as you begin to think about how to analyze QI initiatives for this assessment.
Some Resources to be used :- Title:1. Using a quality improvement model to implement distress screening in a community cancer setting.
Author:Bush, N. J., Goebel, J. R., Hardan-Khalil, K., & Matsumoto, K.
Journal Title:Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology
Publication Date:2020
Volume:11
Issue:8
Start page:825 End page:834
Leading sustainable quality improvement.
Title:Leading sustainable quality improvement.
Author: O’Donoghue, S. C., DiLibero, J., & Altman, M.
Journal Title:
Nursing Management
Publication Date:2021
Volume:52
Issue:2
Start page:42 End page:50
2.Reaching the summit of discharge summaries: A quality improvement project.
Title:Reaching the summit of discharge summaries: A quality improvement project.
Author:Richmond, R. T., McFadzean, I. J., & Vallabhaneni, P.
Journal Title:BMJ Open Quality
Publication Date:2021
Volume:10
Issue:1
Start page:1 End page:7 Caption 2 : Quality Performance Measures
Read or review these articles, with an eye on quality performance measures and benchmarks. Familiarity with core measures, such as Medicaid and Medicare measures, will also be important
for you in completing this assessment.
Title:Dashboards and report cards: Using staff performance to drive outcomes.
Author:Piech, L. K., Burke, C., & Johansen, M. L.
Journal Title:Nursing Management
Publication Date:2021
Volume:52
Issue:3 Start page:10 End page:13
Title:Core measures.
Author:Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Publication Date:2020
Caption: 3 Work Environment And Quality
These resources provide different examples of the correlations between work environment and
nurse-sensitive patient outcomes. They also give examples of the kind of environment-related factors that need to be taken into account when designing QI initiatives. This is something for you to consider as you analyze an existing QI initiative for Assessment 2.
Title:Embracing the quadruple aim: One hospital’s experience.
Author:Lapaine, M.
Journal Title:Healthcare Management Forum
Publication Date:2021
Volume:34
Issue:1
Start page:
26 End page:28
Title:
Using nurse-sensitive indicators to assess the impact of primary care RNs on quality ambulatory patient care.
Author:Alley, R., Carreira, E., Wilson, C., & Pickard, K.
Journal Title:Nursing Economics
Publication Date:2021
Volume:39
Issue:4
Start page:200 End page:207
P.S. You have to use/reference some of these reading materials suggested under these three Captions
As a health care leader, you will become very used to benchmarks. That’s because in any quality improvement effort, benchmarks play a role. They tell you where you currently are and point the way to where you’d like to be.
In this activity you’ll learn more about benchmarks and see how they support QI initiatives — and your assignment !Look at HRQ Data Tools Page.
Data Analysis
Quality improvement initiatives are a critical tool in the ongoing effort to improve patient care at health care organizations. But without data, many QI initiatives would fail — or the problem behind them might never be detected. That’s why data, and the dashboards that present data in a comprehensible fashion, are essential for QI efforts to succeed.
Educational Goals
After completing the activity, you will be prepared to:
• Analyze data to identify a health care issue or area of concern.
• Outline a QI initiative proposal based on a selected health issue and supporting data analysis.
• Integrate interprofessional perspectives to lead quality improvements in patient safety, cost effectiveness, and work–life quality.

The post Prepare an evaluation (5 pages) of an existing QI initiative to determine if the appeared first on Versed Papers.

The paper have to include invisible work movement women did during black power movement? Use some sources from Robert collins book the precolonial Africa I have the attachment with this assignment. It has to be Chicago style foot notes end notes. I have attached the information for this assignment.

The post The paper have to include invisible work movement women did during black power m appeared first on Versed Papers.

Essay Question
After viewing the video, think about a time when you were the victim of a single story. Write an essay that addresses one of the topics listed below:
Elaborate upon a moment that exposed YOUR vulnerability to the “single story epidemic.” (Did you ever judge someone based on one story?)
When was a time that you falsely judged someone, or a group, through the lens of a single story? How were you wrong in your judgments and what made you realize this?
Have you ever been the victim of a stereotype? Describe the situation and how it made you feel. What was the stereotype or single story that was used to describe you? Why was it made and why was it surprising to you?
How is your perception influenced by the world around you? (i.e. What stories are you told in books, movies, pictures, music, the news, or by friends and family?)
Instructions
Essay must take the form of an normal essay: Intro paragraph, main body and conclusion.
Essay must include references to the assigned material.
Required length is a minimum of 400 words.
This is the like to the Ted Talk video: Adichie, C. N. (2009, July). The danger of a single story [Video]. TED Conferences. https://www.ted.com/talks/chimamanda_ngozi_adichie_the_danger_of_a_single_story

The post Essay Question
After viewing the video, think about a time when you were the vic appeared first on Versed Papers.

I need to answer attached assignment – two parts the answers should at least 200 words for each question. General Instructions – PLEASE READ THEM CAREFULLY
The Assignment must be submitted on Blackboard (WORD format only) via allocated folder.
Assignments submitted through email will not be accepted.
Students are advised to make their work clear and well presented, marks may be reduced for poor presentation. This includes filling your information on the cover page.
Students must mention question number clearly in their answer.
Late submission will NOT be accepted.
Avoid plagiarism, the work should be in your own words, copying from students or other resources without proper referencing will result in ZERO marks. No exceptions. All answered must be typed using Times New Roman (size 12, double-spaced) font. No pictures containing text will be accepted and will be considered plagiarism).
Submissions without this cover page will NOT be accepted.

The post I need to answer attached assignment – two parts the answers should at least 200 appeared first on Versed Papers.

Work needs to be adjusted according to feedback. Please strongly adhere to word count- in red and bold.

The post Work needs to be adjusted according to feedback. Please strongly adhere to word appeared first on Versed Papers.

1. WW88 cam kết thanh toán nhanh chóng và an toàn
WW88 là một trong những nhà cái uy tín hàng đầu tại Việt Nam, và cam kết thanh toán nhanh chóng và an toàn cho các thành viên tham gia. Với hệ thống thanh toán đa dạng và hiện đại, người chơi có thể yên tâm về việc rút tiền từ tài khoản cá cược của mình.
Không chỉ vậy, WW88 còn hỗ trợ nhiều phương thức thanh toán khác nhau như chuyển khoản ngân hàng, thẻ cào điện thoại, ví điện tử, và nhiều hình thức khác. Quá trình thanh toán được thực hiện nhanh chóng trong vòng vài phút, giúp người chơi không phải chờ đợi lâu.
Đặc biệt, WW88 đảm bảo tính bảo mật thông tin cá nhân và tài khoản của người chơi, không tiết lộ cho bên thứ ba. Vì vậy, bạn hoàn toàn có thể tin tưởng vào việc thanh toán tại WW88 mà không lo lắng về việc thông tin của mình sẽ bị đánh cắp.
2. Đảm bảo tính minh bạch và đáng tin cậy khi sử dụng dịch vụ thanh toán của WW88
Khi sử dụng dịch vụ thanh toán của WW88, bạn có thể yên tâm về tính minh bạch và đáng tin cậy. WW88 cam kết cung cấp thông tin đầy đủ và chi tiết về các giao dịch thanh toán của bạn.
Việc sử dụng các phương thức thanh toán an toàn và tiện lợi như thẻ tín dụng, chuyển khoản ngân hàng, ví điện tử,… giúp cho quá trình giao dịch trở nên thuận lợi hơn.
Công nghệ bảo mật hiện đại được áp dụng để bảo vệ thông tin cá nhân và tài khoản của người chơi, giúp tránh khỏi những rủi ro liên quan đến việc sử dụng dịch vụ thanh toán trực tuyến.
Bên cạnh đó, hệ thống kiểm soát nội bộ của WW88 được thiết lập chặt chẽ để đảm bảo rằng mọi giao dịch thanh toán diễn ra một cách minh bạch và công bằng, không có sự can thiệp từ bất kỳ bên thứ ba nào.
Với cam kết đảm bảo tính minh bạch và đáng tin cậy khi sử dụng dịch vụ thanh toán, WW88 mong muốn mang lại trải nghiệm chơi game online tốt nhất cho người chơi của mình.
>>> Xem thêm: Đăng nhập WW88
3. Uy tín và đổi mới trong dịch vụ thanh toán tại WW88
WW88 luôn cam kết mang đến cho khách hàng dịch vụ thanh toán uy tín và đổi mới nhất. Với hệ thống thanh toán an toàn và tiện lợi, khách hàng có thể dễ dàng thực hiện giao dịch mọi lúc mọi nơi.
Chúng tôi không ngừng nâng cấp cơ sở hạ tầng để đảm bảo tính bảo mật và tin cậy cho người chơi. Các thông tin cá nhân và tài khoản của khách hàng đều được bảo vệ chặt chẽ.
Ngoài ra, WW88 cũng không ngừng đổi mới trong dịch vụ thanh toán để mang đến trải nghiệm tốt nhất cho khách hàng. Không chỉ giúp người chơi tiết kiệm thời gian mà còn tạo điều kiện linh hoạt cho họ trong việc nạp và rút tiền.
Với sự kết hợp giữa uy tín và đổi mới trong dịch vụ thanh toán, WW88 tự tin khiến khách hàng hài lòng và tin tưởng lựa chọn chúng tôi là đối tác tin cậy khi tham gia các trò chơi trực tuyến.
Xem thêm: Cá độ bóng đá

The post 1. WW88 cam kết thanh toán nhanh chóng và an toàn
WW88 là một trong những nhà c appeared first on Versed Papers.

 Based on the theory of attachment, what behaviors would a nurse attempt to stimulate when working with parent to promote health attachment?
Please include 400 words  
2 reference

The post  Based on the theory of attachment, what behaviors would a nurse attempt to sti appeared first on Versed Papers.

Summarize the post .
For each discussion activity, you are responsible for posting a reply to at least to one postings made by your classmates.
After you have made your original post, read some of the posts from your classmates and construct one reply post of 100-150 words that responds to one of your group-mate’s original posts. Your reply post should be written such that it does one or more of: identifies something that you find especially interesting or insightful about your classmate’s original post; poses an engaging and relevant question and/or builds on the ideas from your classmate’s original post; raises a real-life experience or observation that you feel would be relevant to illustrate or help further develop an idea or point in your classmate’s original post.
Please note that you will need to make an original post before you can read and respond to your peers’ posts.
Some points to keep in mind:
Be clear and to the point in your postings.
Edit your work. Your posts should be coherent and use proper grammar and spelling.
Keep postings to 100-150 words. Quality is better than quantity.
Contribute your own thoughts about the material you have read.
Support your thoughts by referencing the readings used, and references used in post below or other outside literature.
Raise additional questions or points of discussion to stimulate further discussion.
If you have questions, show that you have already tried to find a solution.
Respect the viewpoints of your peers. Ask for clarification if you don’t understand a point. Assume good intentions.
Use the proper terminology introduced in the course readings.
When using literature in your postings, make sure to provide references in proper APA 7 Style.
Show respect and sensitivity to peers’ gender, cultural and linguistic background, political, and religious beliefs.
You are strongly encouraged to take the time to review the following documents on writing quality discussion posting and on taking roles in discussions.
Taking a role in online discussion.
Taking a Role in Online Discussions Below are some roles that anyone in an online discussion can fulfill in order to help move an online discussion forward in productive ways. See if you can determine what role is required in your online discussion and then write a message that takes on that role. Devil’s Advocate • Takes opposing points of view to those currently under discussion Pollinator • Travels to other groups, reads their postings and summarizes points made in other groups not made in home group. Facilitator • Comments on the groups process (e.g. “Perhaps we should all remember to put a subject line in our messages.”) • Encourages others to participate, • Starts a thread or an idea on the topic, if the discussion lags. Summarizer / Discussion Weaver • Summarizes the discussion for the group at specific intervals in 1 or 2 short paragraphs. Usually summarizes twice per week or if the discussion lags • Reminds others about what has already been discussed. • Asks the group what issues have been concluded and what ones are still to be discussed. • Relates ideas in posted messages to one another. Researcher • Assumes responsibility for looking at what is available on the net, journals etc. and brings ideas back to the group. Responder • Replies to others and builds on the ideas of others. This is a role that everyone in the group must perform for every discussion.
POST -1
Ava Matsumoto
Homicide is widely perceived as a crime and criminal justice issue as outlined in Unit 01 of the course. Society often focuses on the individual punishment and legal process of these crimes, and not always the broader health implications of homicides. I find that media and pop culture plays a role in glorifying the criminal details of homicides only, which impacts society’s view on this type of violence.
Emphasizing a sociological understanding of homicide has many benefits (Barkan, 2015). Analyzing the social background, behaviours, influences and attitudes of murderers can aid in determining the structural roots of crime (Barkan, 2015). The inequality, poverty,gender and community concepts of homicide are also understood through the sociological view (Barkan, 2015).
Prevention is another benefit of the Public Health approach (Pridemore, 2003). By following the 4 stages of the public health approach (1. Define and monitor the problem, 2. Identify risk and protective factors, 3. Develop and test prevention strategies & 4. Ensure widespread adoption of effective approaches) the rates of homicide can be decreased (Association, 1999).
Overall, with the knowledge of the negative health and wellbeing effects of homicide, society’s outlook of the issue could be improved (Pridemore, 2003).
References
Association, O. P. H. (1999). Violence prevention: Continued call to action for Ontario. Ontario Public Health Association. https://ares.lib.uoguelph.ca/ares/ares.dll?Action=10&Type=10&Value=343506
Barkan, S. E. (2016). Criminology: A sociological understanding (6th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall. https://ares.lib.uoguelph.ca/ares/ares.dll?Action=10&Type=10&Value=343450
Pridemore, W. (2003). Recognizing Homicide as a Public Health Threat: Toward an Integration of Sociological and Public Health Perspectives in the Study of Violence. Homicide Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767903251105
POST – 2
Homicide is traditionally viewed as a crime, with societal norms and media portrayals reinforcing this narrow perspective. The criminal justice system, focused on police, courts, and corrections dominates the public’s understanding of how to handle homicide, primarily through punishment and deterrence. This focus is deeply rooted in the way society perceives moral and legal wrongs, where offenders are held accountable for their actions, often to the exclusion of other considerations such as the well-being of victims and their families. The media plays a significant role in shaping these perceptions. By dramatising violent crimes, especially in news reports, TV shows, and documentaries, the media tends to frame homicide as a criminal justice issue, centering the narrative on the criminal act itself and the process of capturing and punishing the perpetrator. This reinforces the public belief that legal mechanisms are the primary and most effective response to homicide (Barkan, 2015). Additionally, the criminal justice approach often frames homicide as an isolated incident, focusing on the morality of the act and the potential danger the perpetrator poses to society. The broader impacts such as the trauma inflicted on the families of victims and the effects on community health, are frequently overlooked. This limited view fails to address the social and environmental conditions that contribute to homicide, such as poverty, systemic inequality, and lack of access to resources like education and healthcare. Historically, homicide and other forms of violence have been managed primarily through legal frameworks, with punishment seen as the ultimate form of justice. Over time, this punitive approach has become entrenched, and the concept of rehabilitation or prevention has taken a back seat. The idea of addressing the root causes of violence is often seen as secondary to the immediate goal of deterrence and retribution (OPHA, 1999).
As aforementioned, this focus on punishment aligns with a cultural emphasis on individual accountability, where the crime is seen as a personal moral failure rather than a symptom of broader societal issues. As a result, the system overlooks how factors like socioeconomic status, mental health, and community infrastructure contribute to violent behaviour. The criminal justice system, in its traditional form, is reactive, addressing crime after it happens, rather than proactive in preventing it. This limitation is part of why society continues to see homicide primarily through the lens of crime and punishment, rather than as an issue intertwined with public health (Pridemore, 2003). A public health perspective that focuses on improving the well-being of communities affected by homicide, offering psychological support to victims’ families and helping to restore a sense of safety and cohesion in neighbourhoods would be extremely beneficial (Barkan, 2015). This holistic approach would combine criminal justice measures with public health strategies, creating a more comprehensive solution to homicide. It not only addresses the immediate crime but also works to mitigate the long-term societal factors that contribute to violence. In this way, broadening our view of homicide allows for more effective prevention strategies and improved overall societal well-being.
Citations Association, O. P. H. (1999). Violence prevention: Continued call to action for Ontario. Ontario Public Health Association. Barkan, S. E. (2016). Criminology: A sociological understanding (6th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
Pridemore, W. (2003). Recognizing Homicide as a Public Health Threat: Toward an Integration of Sociological and Public Health Perspectives in the Study of Violence. Homicide Studies
Label post -1 as Ava Matsumoto
Post -1 summary reply in 8-12 lines also add personal opnion it should be personal opnion about other post and also add ceative atttrcative question.Donot use AI AND CHATGPT AS MAM HAS SOFTWARE TO DETECT EACH AND EVERY LINE . She has software to detect each and every single word.
THEN WRITE POST-2
LABEL POST 2 AS Alyssa Speyer Post -2 summary reply in 8-12 lines also add personal opnion it should be personal opnion about other post and also add cReative atttrcative question.Donot use AI AND CHATGPT AS MAM HAS SOFTWARE TO DETECT EACH AND EVERY LINE . She has software to detect each and every single word.
Grading criteria is
Criteria A+ Discussion Post
Reply
Post
(4-5 points) All response posts engaged classmates in further dialogue on the topic.
Length guidelines met; writing clear and compelling; poses an engaging and relevant question and/or builds on the ideas from a classmate’s original post OR raises a real-life experience or observation relevant to illustrating or further developing an idea or point in a classmate’s original post.

The post Summarize the post .
For each discussion activity, you are responsible for posti appeared first on Versed Papers.

Samantha Hurn argues, “There is a very clear divide between humans and other animals.” Drawing from chapters 1 to 4 of her book, Humans and Other Animals, please identify and discuss the major differences between humans and other animals.

The post Samantha Hurn argues, “There is a very clear divide between humans and other ani appeared first on Versed Papers.