Reflect on an organization you are familiar with, whether it’s your current workplace, a previous employer, or an organization you have studied. Consider the following questions to guide your response:
1. Examples of Positivity: Can you identify specific practices or policies that this organization has implemented to create a positive work culture? How have these initiatives impacted employee morale and performance?
2. Leadership and Positivity: How do leadership styles within the organization contribute to or hinder the development of POB? Provide examples of positive or negative leadership behaviors and their effects on the workplace environment.
3. Challenges and Solutions: What challenges has the organization faced in maintaining a positive work environment? What strategies could be implemented to overcome these obstacles and sustain a positive organizational climate?
Please integrate theories, models, or concepts covered so far in this course into your responses. Be sure to provide specific examples and evidence to support your observations and recommendations. The inclusion of these elements will weigh into the overall score for this discussion.
Instructions:
The initial post should be at least 300 words
Blog
-
Reflect on an organization you are familiar with, whether it’s your current w
-
Scenario: You are the HIM Director at Sacred Heart Hospital. After completing
Scenario: You are the HIM Director at Sacred Heart Hospital. After completing a documentation audit, you have identified three significant issues that you believe do not align with Joint Commission requirements:
History and physical examinations (H&Ps) are not complete (missing chief complaint and review of systems) and are not being done within the required time frame following admission.
Discharge summaries are not complete (missing elements or lack detail) and are not being done promptly upon discharge.
Progress notes are brief, use prohibited abbreviations, and do not describe patient’s condition, including improvement or decline.
You must now create an action plan to correct these issues and improve documentation. You will also conduct a focused audit of three additional charts.
Answer the following questions and submit as a word document or pdf. See the rubric for detailed grading information.
List the JC standard(s) relevant to each of the three identified issues. Include the Standard Label, Standard Text, and the specific Elements of Performance that apply. You must also briefly explain why you think these standards apply.You may copy and paste the JC standard information, but make sure to strip out all formatting/links. For the Elements of Performance, you only need to copy/paste the relevant portions of text. See the example below.
Create an action plan that answers the following questions:
Which issue(s) would you prioritize and why?
What specific steps would you take to address these three identified issues?
Who would you involve (i.e., physicians, other providers, admin, HIM, etc.) and why?
What type of follow-up would be needed? When/how often would the follow-up occur?Select three charts (different from the one you selected for the Chart Review project) from the Example Medical Records module (located at bottom of the Modules page). Conduct a focused audit on the three identified issues (H&P, d/c summary, progress notes) and share your findings in a narrative format. Make sure to include the chart IDs (use file name – if I cannot tell what charts you are discussing, you will receive a zero for this question!).
Example for Question #1
Identified Issue: Providers are sharing signature stamps.
JC Standard:
RC.01.02.01 Entries in the medical record are authenticated.
EP 4 Entries in the medical record are authenticated by the author.
EP 5 The individual identified by the signature stamp or method of electronic authentication is the only individual who uses it.
I think that these apply because EP5 states only the individual can use their signature stamp, which sharing clearly violates. Also, EP4 states that the author must authenticate their entry, and if they are sharing signature stamps, authorship/authentication is put into question. -
The resident nurse anesthesiologist will critically evaluate the clinical exp
The resident nurse anesthesiologist will critically evaluate the clinical experience, and learning environment at the clinical site for reflection and growth in learning.(induction of patient, intubation and maintenance of anesthesia using Sevoflurane. Learned in pharmacology)
Compare and contrast what is learned in the classroom setting and what is common clinical practice and challenges this brings to the students growth in learning. What can you change and learn from your experience? -
Need a response 1. Description of the Purpose: The purpose of the study is to
Need a response
1. Description of the Purpose: The purpose of the study is to explore the experiences and perceptions of registered nurses involved in the administration of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and medications. This aligns with your PICOT question by focusing on the intersection of nursing care and mental health treatment modalities.
2. Explanation of Research Design: The research employs a mixed methods design, which is effective for capturing the complexities of integrating CBT with pharmacological treatments. This approach allows for a rich, in-depth understanding of participants’ experiences, with procedures that ensure informed consent and adherence to ethical standards.
3. Discussion of Sample: The sample consists of 20 registered nurses with diverse backgrounds. Participants were selected using a holistic approach that considered their roles in care, medication administration, and involvement in CBT. This method helps ensure that the sample accurately represents the population of nurses engaged in this multifaceted care process.
4. Description of Data Collection Methods: Data were collected through interviews, focus groups, and surveys. This combination allows for deeper engagement with participants and facilitates nuanced responses. All nurses had a minimum of 5 years of clinical experience and 2 years of training in CBT, ensuring that their insights are grounded in substantial professional experience.
5. Summary of Findings: The findings indicate that patients expressed a significant need for improved communication with healthcare providers. This highlights critical areas for intervention and sheds light on the challenges faced in delivering integrated care that combines CBT and medication management.
6. Strengths of the Study: A significant strength of the study is its diverse sampling and the rigorous data analysis methods employed. This enhances the credibility and transferability of the findings, allowing for insights that can be applicable in various clinical settings. The study also emphasizes building alliances, goal setting, and socializing patients, which are crucial for effective care delivery.
7. Limitations of the Study: A notable limitation is the small sample size, which may affect the generalizability of the results. Additionally, most participants dealt with patients who had comorbid conditions, which might limit the applicability of the findings to a broader population.
8. Recommendations for Potential Application: Based on the findings, it is recommended that healthcare institutions implement training programs aimed at improving communication skills among providers. This aligns with current best practices and addresses the identified gaps in care delivery.
Conclusion
This appraisal underscores the importance of qualitative research in nursing, particularly in understanding the perspectives of both patients and providers. Future research could build on these findings by conducting follow-up studies to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions after a six-month period, especially regarding the need for reevaluating care plans in integrated treatment contexts.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235201321830187X -
Need a response Qualitative/Mixed Methods Critique Description of the purpo
Need a response
Qualitative/Mixed Methods CritiqueDescription of the purpose: The purpose of this article is to help us understand how social media impacts depression and adolescent well-being. There has been a simultaneous uprise in mental health issues, and it is estimated that half of them become established by the age of 14. Generalized anxiety disorder and depression are the two most common disorders in children and adolescents. The intention of the article is to inform policy and practice and provide information for further research on the topic (Keles et al., 2019).
Explanation of research design: The research designs used in this article is a systemic review along with a narrative synthesis that examined evidence looking for a meaningful correlation between social media and depression. The studies were cross-sectional, with one being longitudinal.
Discussion of the sample: The sample age group was 13 to 18 years old, and it measured exposure to social media use. The sample group used validated instruments to assess depression, anxiety, and psychological distress using studies published in peer-reviewed journals.
Description of data collection methods: All journal articles from the database searches were combined using Mendeley reference management software. Duplicates were then deleted, and screening was completed to ensure eligibility criteria were met. The quality was assessed using the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies and rated good, fair, or poor.
Summary of findings: The systemic review found a putative relationship between social media and mental health issues in adolescents during evidence review, although it was not found to be entirely consistent. This review is said to likely be multifactorial, noting it is fair to say there is an association between mental health and social media, but it is not necessarily scientifically valid.
Strengths of the study: The study utilized literature from five databases and narrowed it down to 13 articles being eligible for review. This screening process was specific as it started with 6598 articles, which is a strength when it comes to conciseness and accuracy.
Limitations of the study: Twelve out of the thirteen articles were cross-sectional and unable to determine a causal relationship between the variables of interest as they did not answer the review question. The studies were self-reported measures and may not be accurate and dependable due to risk of bias.
Recommendations regarding potential application for future practice that are insightful and appropriate: A recommendation regarding future practice would be to investigate mediating and moderating factors that may contribute to the relationship of social media and depression. Closing the gaps in literature in regard to methods, study design and sampling would also benefit future research and practice.
References
Keles, B., McCrae, N., & Grealish, A. (2019). A systematic review: The influence of social media on depression, anxiety and psychological distress in adolescents. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2019.1590851Links to an external site.
A systematic review the influence of social media on depression anxiety and psychological distress in adolescents.pdf -
Week 7: Discussion Forum The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is a
Week 7: Discussion Forum
The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is a complex endocrine system that controls blood pressure, fluid balance, and sodium retention. Elaborate your knowledge on the following aspects of the RAAS system:
Explain the RAAS system step by step.
What is an example of a pharmaceutical drug that acts on this system and what is the intended effect?
How does this system ultimately affect renal regulation in terms of GFR and blood volume, blood pressure, and reabsorption?
“250 words- 2 citations” -
. My topic is DYNAMIC PROCESSES IN THE ORGANIZATION AND POWER DYNAMICS. And my
. My topic is DYNAMIC PROCESSES IN THE ORGANIZATION AND POWER DYNAMICS. And my two OD tools are Decentralized and Centralized structures. and The Institutional View and Organization Design.
This week, choose one of the two OD tools that you identified and outlined in Week 3 and expand on it, providing more depth and support. Write a 1-2 page resource for the chosen tool that includes more than 1 reference (at least 3). You could also consider interviewing someone who has experience with the tool for advice!
Provide detailed descriptions of the selected tool, including:
Purpose: Explain the purpose of the tool and what it aims to achieve.
Application Guidelines: Provide step-by-step guidelines on how to use the tool in an organizational context. You could even write about a real or hypothetical scenario.
OD Practitioner Overview: Write a generic overview of how an OD practitioner would approach helping a client with an issue on your topic, and how/if the tool would be beneficial.
Next, it’s time to bring everything together. Write a 1-2 page conclusion that ties together the insights from your exploration. Here’s a step-by-step guide to help you craft a clear and engaging conclusion:
Summarize Your Key Findings: Begin by highlighting the most important points you discovered during your research. What were the central themes or key takeaways?
Compare and Contrast Sources: Discuss how the scholarly articles in your literature review compare with the “pop” or scholarly sources in your toolbox. Do they align, or are there discrepancies? Provide specific examples to illustrate this.
Effectiveness of the Tool: Evaluate the evidence (or lack thereof) supporting the effectiveness of the tool you reviewed. What did your sources say about its utility and impact?
Practical Application: Reflect on how a practitioner might use the tool in real-world scenarios. How could their experiences with the tool further inform or advance research on the topic? -
Technology Standards Infographic Assignment Instructions Overview Understanding the foundations of educational technology enables us to build an applicable curriculum for our students (ISTE, 2022). For those striving to incorpora
Technology Standards Infographic Assignment Instructions
Overview
Understanding the foundations of educational technology enables us to build an applicable curriculum for our students (ISTE, 2022). For those striving to incorporate technology into education, this means that we must understand three key publications: The ISTE Standards for Students and Educators (2021), TPACK (2021), and UDL Guidelines (2021). The purpose of this assignment is threefold: first, to encourage you to investigate educational technology’s current standards and guidelines. Second, we want to reflect on our readings regarding differentiation. Therefore, practice selecting a variety of lesson examples for your Infographic. Finally, we want to allow you to expand your own technology toolbelt by learning how to create an Infographic. These can be a fantastic tool for student assessments. Take time to learn how to create an Infographic.
Instructions
Become familiar with the standards, components, and guidelines that have been written to help shape the direction and use of educational technology. Using the links provided with this assignment, visit the ISTE Standards: Educators, What is TPACK?: The Seven Components of TPACK, and The UDL Guidelines websites and review the information in each resource. Additionally, find and review other sources that discuss TPACK in practice.
Create an Infographic which reviews each set of standards, components, and guidelines. Include the following for each:
- A brief description and summary of the purpose of the set of standards/components/guidelines. What is its purpose?
- A discussion of its impact on classroom instruction. How does this set of standards/components/guidelines direct instruction?
- An example demonstrating how each might be observed in the classroom. Emphasize differentiation here. For example, suppose a teacher incorporates a WebQuest and VR trip into their students’ investigation of Egyptian tombs. This is an example of TPACK in the classroom because it combines the teacher’s content knowledge of Egyptian tombs demonstrated by selecting age-appropriate websites for students to explore with their pedagogical knowledge and use of technology.
Use a free Infographic generator site such as Canva, Piktochart, Venngage, or a different one of your choice. Do not submit a PowerPoint slide or SmartArt graphic from Word. If you have never made an Infographic, you are encouraged to use YouTube for tutorials.
Include references for any outside sources in current APA format.
Submission Procedures
Be sure to publish your Infographic once you have finished it. Then, copy and paste the published URL of your Infographic into the submission area for this assignment. If you choose to submit the URL in a Word document, please make sure the hyperlink is live.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
-
Create an Infographic which reviews each set of standards, components, and guidelines. Include the following for each: 1. A brief description and summary of the purpose of the set of standards/
Create an Infographic which reviews each set of standards, components, and guidelines. Include the following for each: 1. A brief description and summary of the purpose of the set of standards/components/guidelines. What is its purpose? 2. A discussion of its impact on classroom instruction. How does this set of standards/components/guidelines direct instruction? 3. An example demonstrating how each might be observed in the classroom. Emphasize differentiation here. For example, suppose a teacher incorporates a WebQuest and VR trip into their students’ investigation of Egyptian tombs. This is an example of TPACK in the classroom because it combines the teacher’s content knowledge of Egyptian tombs demonstrated by selecting age-appropriate websites for students to explore with their pedagogical knowledge and use of technology.
-
Choose one Instructional Design Model such as ADDIE, ASSURE, SAM, or another of your choosing, and analyze it using one of the above assumptions. In other words, answer the question,
Choose one Instructional Design Model such as ADDIE, ASSURE, SAM, or another of your choosing, and analyze it using one of the above assumptions. In other words, answer the question, “How can your chosen instructional design model effectively address one of these assumptions about the differences among individuals and their learning?” For example, you might choose to answer the question, “How can the ADDIE model effectively address the assumption that individual differences in learning affect the learner’s ability to perform learning tasks and accomplish learning outcomes?” Substitute your Instructional Design Model and your chosen “assumption” and use this as the title of your paper. The body of your paper must be 4–6 pages (not including the title, abstract, and reference pages) and be supported by at least three scholarly sources in addition to the textbook. Sources must have a publish date within the last five years. The paper must be submitted as a Word document in the current APA format.