Blog

  • Why is strategic management important for a corporation’s competitive advantage?

    Why is strategic management important for a corporation’s competitive advantage?
    How does strategic management typically evolve in a corporation? Give examples
    Why does a corporation need a board of directors? What is the relationship between corporate governance and social responsibility? Give examples from the actual market.
    Choose any corporation from the Saudi market and discuss the forces driving its industry competition (review chapter 4-slide 18).

  • You are a real estate and property management bu

    You are a real estate and property management business analyst in a big city. Your company’s leadership team supports building reasonably priced housing in areas that have well-performing schools with low school dropout rates (home price and dropout rate are the key factors). You wish to commission a consulting team of business and data analysts to build a full dashboard that will address the best locations for new construction projects within the five boroughs of the city based on the company’s mission and various performance metrics.
    You decide to build a basic prototype model of the dashboard using the home price and dropout rate data for one borough. This prototype model will help you explain the project to your company’s leadership before you meet with the consultants who will build the full dashboard with many other predictive factors. You also want to be able to clearly report a data story about the project to the leadership team using your prototype.
    To ensure you understand the data that will be included in the dashboard model, you will first need to connect your Excel data with Tableau and look at it visually.
    Use the provided “D466 Task 1 Data Set” to complete this task.
    Provided model data for the borough:
    average three-bedroom home prices by year
    average dropout % by year
    Requirements
    Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. The similarity report that is provided when you submit your task can be used as a guide.
    You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.
    Tasks may not be submitted as cloud links, such as links to Google Docs, Google Slides, OneDrive, etc., unless specified in the task requirements. All other submissions must be file types that are uploaded and submitted as attachments (e.g., .docx, .pdf, .ppt).
    A. Describe the two main factors—home price and dropout rate—in the scenario.
    1. Explain, using data from the “D466 Task 1 Data Set,” the current state of home prices.
    a. Use Tableau to create an appropriate data visualization that shows the current state of home prices.
    b. Identify one design technique you used in the visualization from part A1a and explain how it addresses a common accessibility issue.
    c. Identify one design technique different than the one identified in part A1b and explain how it contributes to effective representation of the information in the data set.
    2. Explain, using data from the “D466 Task 1 Data Set,” how a change in school dropout rates would affect home prices.
    a. Use Tableau to create an appropriate data visualization that shows how a change in school dropout rates (independent variable) would affect home prices (dependent variable).
    b. Identify one design technique you used in the visualization from part A2a and explain how it addresses a common accessibility issue.
    c. Identify one different design technique than the one used in part A2b and explain how it contributes to effective representation of the information in the data set.

  • Complete the following in your own words. It will be run through a plagiarism ch

    Complete the following in your own words. It will be run through a plagiarism checker. Thanks
    Create a reflective and applied statement describing how data mining, TAM, DIKW models,and Technology Acceptance has affected your thought processes, development, and professional disposition. Reflect on your learning process (i.e., challenges, moments of discovery, life experiences, and interactions) in your statement, in addition to addressing:
    What did you learn about data mining, TAM, DIKW models,and Technology Acceptance?
    How did it change your thinking?
    How will this learning change your future behavior and approach to these topics?
    Format any citations and references in your reflective statement according to APA guidelines.
    ****There is no additional info, thanks***

  • Discuss the importance of teams in the decision-making process. How does the tea

    Discuss the importance of teams in the decision-making process. How does the team decision-making approach contribute to a strong and healthy workforce?

  • Safe Injection Practices: One Syringe/One Drug   Slides 13-19:  Discuss topics

    Safe Injection Practices: One Syringe/One Drug
     
    Slides 13-19: 
    Discuss topics and issues related to the chosen patient safety practice. 
    What types of strategies have been tried to improve this safety issue in the past? 
    What is the current approach to addressing this safety issue-what is, the current practice that you are describing?
      
    Research 5 years old
    i.https://rapm.bmj.com/content/35/6/496-499.abstract ii.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28625701/ iii.chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/83952477/5-libre.pdf?1649775347=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DA_Systematic_Review_of_the_Literature_on.pdf&Expires=1727486739&Signature=QFtap6va3I8PnWf6eK3Zf4UMdNCMcWnEufg4hk7N~HIoIwC8NQHIwKxigME2quytydUNpO2-uN5VkawaWpN-rusDwHjHJYD61WUOklpjmbHKtwkYO47L7Oqi2d~CBHfiYLu9pf56JczGpf3kP5NRsojdyy5BaUangTObhy-fZmf121poduweuZj~Ulo1J0z-oqY9JIqP2SfKLbb-0A7UZA5KOVJdFW2KHvSv1xQms0eZQscsCWfTt5zG55rSploaNs~4bXV5kleTfSXTh~z1hIJWNQ72RCSggPIZf-QXwshcUM-wM2FYGN7qZYYGdpdUSynOud2NalGeUzVym~aA2w__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA  

  •   Assignment Instructions: 1.      Submit: Once revisions from the academic int

     
    Assignment Instructions:
    1.      Submit: Once revisions from the academic integrity check are completed, submit your publish for grading.  
    2.      Review: After grading, review feedback from the professor to make any final edits to your work before final grading.
    publish Grading Rubrics:
    CRITERION
    BEGINNING
    DEVELOPING
    ACCOMPLISHED
    publish Submission
    Did not include updates or revision based on feedback from professor.
    Included a significant amount of quoted material.
     Spelling and grammar included significant mistakes.
    Used APA format but with significant mistakes.
    Reference citations not included in-text and or in the reference list.
    work Included some updates and revision based on feedback from the professor.
    Wrote in own words and used quoted material sparingly.
     Used correct spelling and grammar with only minor mistakes. 
    Used correct APA format with minimal mistakes. 
    Reference citations incomplete or with significant errors.
    work was revised and included feedback from professor.
    Wrote in own words and used quoted material sparingly.
      Used correct spelling and grammar with no mistakes. 
     Used correct APA format with no mistakes.
     Reference citations included both in-text and in the reference list with minimal or no errors.
    References
    King, L.A. (2023). The Science of Psychology: An Appreciative View (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
    National Association of College and Employers. (2021). Career readiness: Competencies for a career ready workforce. https://www.naceweb.org/uploadedfiles/files/2021/resources/nace-career-readiness-competencies-revised-apr-2021.pd
    6C publish Submission Fall 24.docx August 14 2024, 11:48 AMAdd submission
    Grading criteria
    publish Submission
    This week is all about making edits to your work based on the feedback from your professor, double checking the reference citations are in the correct format in-text and in the reference list and correcting any grammar and spelling errors.  
    No more than 15% of your work should be identified as direct quotes, and any areas you have paraphrased that are flagged should be reviewed. Verify you have included in-text citations to properly give credit for your text, two required website sources, and any other sources used.   
    Your Assignment Instructions:
    Utilizing the sample work provided incorporate feedback and suggestions from your professor and submit a revised publish for review.
    Student Response:
    Once completed, you will submit your revised assignment for grading.
    publish Grading Rubrics:
    CRITERION
    BEGINNING
    DEVELOPING
    ACCOMPLISHED
    publish Submission
    Included a significant amount quoted material.
    Few relevant terms and concepts from course and websites included.
     Spelling and grammar included significant mistakes.
    Used APA format but with significant mistakes.
    Reference citations not included in-text and  or in the reference list.
    Wrote in own words and used quoted material sparingly.
    Used terms and concepts from course and websites.
     Used correct spelling and grammar with only minor mistakes. 
    Used correct APA format with minimal mistakes. 
    Reference citations incomplete or with significant errors.
    Wrote in own words and used quoted material sparingly.
    Used appropriate terms and concepts from course and websites.
     Used correct spelling and grammar with no mistakes. 
     Used  correct APA format with no mistakes.
     Reference citations included both in-text and in the reference list with minimal or no errors.
    References
    King, L.A. (2023). The Science of Psychology: An Appreciative View (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
    National Association of College and Employers. (2021). Career readiness: Competencies for a career ready workforce. https://www.naceweb.org/uploadedfiles/files/2021/resources/nace-career-readiness-competencies-revised-apr-2021.pd
    The Writing Center (2023). Introduction. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/introductions/
    RubricParaphrased vs Quoted Material.Not submitted0 pointsIncluded a significant amount quoted material. (More than 20%)0.5 pointsWrote in own words and used quoted material sparingly. (15%)1 pointsWrote in own words and used quoted material sparingly. (Less than 15%)2 pointsRelevant Terms and ConceptsNot submitted0 pointsFew relevant terms and concepts from course and websites included.0.5 pointsUsed terms and concepts from course and websites.1 pointsUsed appropriate terms and concepts from course and websites.2 pointsSpelling and GrammarNot submitted0 pointsSpelling and grammar included significant mistakes.0.5 pointsUsed correct spelling and grammar with only minor mistakes.1 pointsUsed correct spelling and grammar with no mistakes.2 pointsAPA FormatNot submitted.0 pointsUsed APA format but with significant mistakes.0.5 pointsUsed correct APA format with minimal mistakes.1 pointsUsed correct APA format with no mistakes.2 pointsReference CitationsNot Submitted0 pointsReference citations not included in-text and or in the reference list.0.5 pointsReference citations incomplete or with significant errors.1 pointsReference citations included both in-text and in the reference list with minimal or no errors.2 points 

  • Case Study 2 Review the video: Project Controls Presentation – Lessons Learned

    Case Study 2
    Review the video: Project Controls Presentation – Lessons Learned from delivering the Olympics – NDA ODA CLM Links to an external site. and then discuss the following questions: 
    1.  What does the video suggest about project controls?  Please explain with details.
    2.  What are 3 practices you thought were extremely important in the success of the project?  Please explain with details.
    3.  Were there any areas for improvement, that you would have changed?  Please explain with details.
     You MUST provide original answers using your own words and justification. You MUST provide proper citation if you use other’s works. and add references

  •   Reflect on an organization you are familiar with, whether it’s your current w

     
    Reflect on an organization you are familiar with, whether it’s your current workplace, a previous employer, or an organization you have studied. Consider the following questions to guide your response:
    1. Examples of Positivity: Can you identify specific practices or policies that this organization has implemented to create a positive work culture? How have these initiatives impacted employee morale and performance?
    2. Leadership and Positivity: How do leadership styles within the organization contribute to or hinder the development of POB? Provide examples of positive or negative leadership behaviors and their effects on the workplace environment.
    3. Challenges and Solutions: What challenges has the organization faced in maintaining a positive work environment? What strategies could be implemented to overcome these obstacles and sustain a positive organizational climate?
    Please integrate theories, models, or concepts covered so far in this course into your responses. Be sure to provide specific examples and evidence to support your observations and recommendations. The inclusion of these elements will weigh into the overall score for this discussion. 
    Instructions: 
    The initial post should be at least 300 words

  •   Scenario: You are the HIM Director at Sacred Heart Hospital. After completing

     
    Scenario: You are the HIM Director at Sacred Heart Hospital. After completing a documentation audit, you have identified three significant issues that you believe do not align with Joint Commission requirements:
    History and physical examinations (H&Ps) are not complete (missing chief complaint and review of systems) and are not being done within the required time frame following admission.
    Discharge summaries are not complete (missing elements or lack detail) and are not being done promptly upon discharge.
    Progress notes are brief, use prohibited abbreviations, and do not describe patient’s condition, including improvement or decline.
    You must now create an action plan to correct these issues and improve documentation. You will also conduct a focused audit of three additional charts.
    Answer the following questions and submit as a word document or pdf. See the rubric for detailed grading information.
    List the JC standard(s) relevant to each of the three identified issues. Include the Standard Label, Standard Text, and the specific Elements of Performance that apply. You must also briefly explain why you think these standards apply.

    You may copy and paste the JC standard information, but make sure to strip out all formatting/links. For the Elements of Performance, you only need to copy/paste the relevant portions of text. See the example below.

    Create an action plan that answers the following questions:

    Which issue(s) would you prioritize and why?
    What specific steps would you take to address these three identified issues? 
    Who would you involve (i.e., physicians, other providers, admin, HIM, etc.) and why?
    What type of follow-up would be needed? When/how often would the follow-up occur?

    Select three charts (different from the one you selected for the Chart Review project) from the Example Medical Records module (located at bottom of the Modules page). Conduct a focused audit on the three identified issues (H&P, d/c summary, progress notes) and share your findings in a narrative format. Make sure to include the chart IDs (use file name – if I cannot tell what charts you are discussing, you will receive a zero for this question!).
    Example for Question #1
    Identified Issue: Providers are sharing signature stamps.
    JC Standard:
    RC.01.02.01 Entries in the medical record are authenticated.
    EP 4 Entries in the medical record are authenticated by the author.
    EP 5 The individual identified by the signature stamp or method of electronic authentication is the only individual who uses it.
    I think that these apply because EP5 states only the individual can use their signature stamp, which sharing clearly violates. Also, EP4 states that the author must authenticate their entry, and if they are sharing signature stamps, authorship/authentication is put into question.

  • The resident nurse anesthesiologist will critically evaluate the clinical exp

    The resident nurse anesthesiologist will critically evaluate the clinical experience, and learning environment at the clinical site for reflection and growth in learning.(induction of patient, intubation and maintenance of anesthesia using Sevoflurane. Learned in pharmacology) 
    Compare and contrast what is learned in the classroom setting and what is common clinical practice and challenges this brings to the students growth in learning. What can you change and learn from your experience?