Post a brief description of each article you identified, along with their citations and URLs. Then, address the following: Compare and contrast the two articles, and further explain the differences you noticed between them. Explain how the use of peer-review articles can improve the arguments you make in your scholarly writing. As a forensic psychology professional, which of the two articles would you use as evidence to support your ideas, and why? Although there is no specific word count required for Discussion posts, a good initial post can typically be expressed in 200–300 words. Regardless of length, posts should be reflective, substantive, and evidence based.
Compare and contrast the two articles, and further explain the differences you noticed between them. Explain how the use of peer-review articles can improve the arguments you make in your scholarly writing