Author: PAPERLINK

  • NURS 6003 Transition to Graduate Study for Nursing

    The post NURS 6003 Transition to Graduate Study for Nursing is a property of College Pal
    College Pal writes Plagiarism Free Papers. Visit us at College Pal – Connecting to a pal for your paper

    In this course students are introduced to Walden University and online learning. Students explore strategies for the successful participation in an online curriculum. Students also will receive a foundation for academic and professional success as scholar-practitioners and social change agents. Course assignments introduce students to resources that support success, development of graduate-level writing skills and use of APA Style, academic integrity, and the creation of a professional development plan based on each student’s chosen specialization.

    Week 1: Networking for Academic and Professional Success
    Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2018). The Foundation of Success [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2018). The Walden Journey to a Masters in Nursing: The Journey Begins [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2018). The Walden Journey to a Masters in Nursing: Networking and Collaboration [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Analyze relationships among Walden’s vision, mission, goals, and social change initiatives to professional and academic goals (D, A)
    Analyze the relationship between MSN program outcomes and perspectives to professional and academic goals (D, A)
    Identify academic and professional collaborators for academic and professional success (D, A)
    Identify concepts for Walden student readiness (Q)
    Identify individuals or teams to collaborate with for success in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse (A)
    Learning Resources

    Required Readings
    Nurse.org. (n.d.). List of nursing organizations. Retrieved October 12, 2018, from https://nurse.org/orgs.shtml

    Schmidt, K. (n.d.). 5 reasons nurses should engage in professional networking [Blog post]. Retrieved October 12, 2018, from https://blog.bluepipes.com/5-reasons-nurses-should-take-professional-networking-seriously/

    Walden University (n.d.). Connect to Walden. Retrieved October 12, 2018, from https://www.waldenu.edu/connect

    Walden University. (n.d.). College of Nursing. Retrieved October June 5, 2020, from https://www.waldenu.edu/about/colleges-schools/college-of-nursing
    Review the College of Nursing’s vision and mission.

    Walden University. (n.d.). Walden University catalog. Retrieved October 4, 2019, from https://catalog.waldenu.edu
    Select College of Nursing, then Master of Science in Nursing (MSN). Review the MSN Learning Outcomes on this page.

    Walden University. (n.d.). Walden University catalog. Retrieved October 4, 2019, from https://catalog.waldenu.edu
    Select Introduction, then the link “Vision, Mission, and Goals” under the Introduction header. Review Walden’s vision, mission, and goals.

    Walden University. (n.d.). Writing Center. Retrieved October 12, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter

    Wofford, P. (2018, May 24). 10 networking tips for nurses who hate networking. Retrieved from https://nurse.org/articles/tips-for-nurse-networking/

    Document: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template (Word document)

    Document: Discussion Posting Exemplars (PDF)

    Optional Resources

    Walden University. (n.d.). Subject Research: Nursing. Retrieved November 9, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/subject/nursing

    Discussion: Networking Opportunities
    This week you begin to lay the foundation for your academic and professional success. Your efforts begin with a vision, which includes your own definition of success. Your vision may vary from those of your colleagues, but this does not mean you have to take these first steps alone.

    Walden University and the College of Nursing also have a vision and mission, which include helping you to make your own vision a reality. Members of your new academic community, such as faculty, support teams, and fellow students, can also be helpful. Current practitioners and other members of the professional community can also help you to clarify your vision.

    This week’s Discussion asks you to think about how the Walden mission and vision and the College of Nursing mission and vision apply to your professional and academic goals. You will also begin to identify individuals and teams that can help you along the way, as you begin to design the “blueprint”—your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan—that will guide you toward your own vision for academic and professional success.

    To Prepare:
    Review the Walden and the College of Nursing mission and vision statements, Walden’s goals and University Outcomes, and the MSN Program Learning Outcomes presented in this week’s Learning Resources.
    Reflect on your professional and academic goals as they relate to your program/specialization.
    Consider how the information in these resources fit with your own goals and to your becoming a scholar-practitioner.
    Also consider academic and professional individuals and teams that you may collaborate with in support of your efforts as a student at the University and as a professional within your organization and career.
    By Day 3

    Post a brief post introducing yourself to your colleagues. Include an explanation for how Walden’s vision, mission, goals, and social change initiatives relate to your professional and academic goals and to your becoming a scholar-practitioner. Also include an explanation for how the Walden MSN program outcomes and perspectives relate to your professional and academic goals and to your becoming a scholar-practitioner.

    Support main post with 3 of more current, credible sources and cite source within content of posting and on a reference list in proper APA.

    By Day 6

    Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days, by suggesting additional individuals and/or teams with whom to collaborate or by offering additional networking strategies.

    Be sure to offer support from at least 2 current, credible sources in each required response to classmates’ main post and cite per APA.

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 1 Discussion Rubric

    Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6

    To participate in this Discussion:

    Week 1 Discussion
    Quiz: Walden’s Student Readiness Orientation
    You probably have a lot of questions (and perhaps some hesitation) about the journey you are undertaking. How do I navigate the online classroom? How can I have access to a library in this environment? The Student Readiness Orientation (SRO) mini-course available on your MyWalden page provide answers to such questions and helped ensure you understand how to navigate the online classroom and utilize the many resources available to you as a student at Walden.

    The Readiness Check will help you determine how well prepared you are for navigating the online classroom.

    The questions presented on the quiz are derived from the Readiness Check presented in the Student Readiness orientation.

    Click on the Week 1 Quiz link after you have read the directions carefully.

    The Readiness Check includes 15 questions in various format: true/false and multiple choice. If you score 12 or below, please retake the exam. You may retake the exam as many times as you would like to achieve the desired score. Your highest score will be recorded. To retake the quiz, click on “take test again” (this does not appear as a hyperlink but works as a hyperlink when you click on the area).

    To view the questions you answered correctly and incorrectly, click on your score in the My Grades area.

    To Prepare:

    Review the Walden’s Student Readiness Orientation found on your MyWalden page.
    By Day 7

    Complete the quiz.

    Submission and Grading Information

    Submit Your Quiz by Day 7

    To submit your Quiz:

    Week 1 Quiz
    Assignment: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 1: Developing an Academic and Professional Network
    When was the last time you read Devotions Upon Emergent Occasions and Several Steps in my Sickness—Meditation XVII?

    Unless you are a student of 17th-century poetry, you may not be all that familiar with this piece by author John Donne. However, you may be much more familiar with one of its well-known phrases: “No man is an island.”

    As you begin your journey toward achieving your academic and professional goals, you have a great opportunity to network with academics and professionals who can help ensure you do not travel alone. This network can help to clarify your own vision for success and can help guide you now and in the future. To paraphrase Donne, no one is an island.

    Begin creating an academic and professional network by identifying which academic and professional connections and resources you need to collaborate with to be successful in your MSN program and as a practicing nurse.

    To Prepare:
    Consider individuals, departments, teams, and/or resources within Walden University and within your profession that you believe can support your academic and professional success.
    Identify at least two academic and at least two professional individuals, colleagues, or teams to collaborate with to help you be successful in your MSN program and as a practicing nurse.
    Download the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template.
    The Assignment:
    Academic and Professional Network
    Complete Part 1 of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template. Be sure to address the following:

    Clearly and accurately identify at least two academic individuals or teams to collaborate with to be successful in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse.
    Clearly and accurately identify at least two professional individuals or teams to collaborate with to be successful in your MSN program and as a practicing nurse.
    Clearly and thoroughly explain in detail why the academic and professional individuals/teams were selected to support success in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse.
    Clearly and accurately explain how the academic and professional individuals/teams will support success in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse.
    By Day 7

    Submit Part 1 of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template.

    Remember to include an introduction paragraph which contains a clear and comprehensive purpose statement which delineates all required criteria, and end the assignment Part with a conclusion paragraph.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK1Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
    Click the Week 1 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
    Click the Week 1 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK1Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
    Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 1 Assignment Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 1 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 1 Assignment

    Next Week

    To go to the next week:

    Week 2: Academic and Professional Strategies and Resources
    Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2018). Your Toolbox for Success [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2018). The Walden Journey to a Masters in Nursing: Strategies and Resources for Success [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Recommend solutions for academic questions or concerns (D)
    Analyze resources and strategies for academic success (A)
    Analyze resources and strategies for professional success (A)
    Formulate strategies for effective online learning related to planning, time management, communication, and technology use (A)
    Construct elements of an Academic Success and Professional Development Plan (A)
    Learning Resources

    Required Readings
    ANA Enterprise. (n.d.). Resources to succeed. Retrieved October 12, 2018, from https://www.nursingworld.org/resources/

    Kaufffman, H. (2015). A review of predictive factors of student success in and satisfaction with online learning. Research in Learning Technology, 23, 1–13.

    Online Colleges. (2011, July 14). 10 traits of a successful online learner. Retrieved October 12, 2018, from https://www.onlinecollege.org/2011/07/14/10-traits-of-a-successful-online-learner/

    Walden University. (2018). Field Experience: College of Nursing. Retrieved from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/fieldexperience/son/home

    Walden University. (2019). Master of Science in Nursing (MSN). Retrieved from https://www.waldenu.edu/online-masters-programs/master-of-science-in-nursing

    Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Scholarly voice: Active and passive voice. Retrieved October 12, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/scholarlyvoice/activepassive

    Walden University. (n.d.). Subject Research: Nursing. Retrieved November 9, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/subject/nursing

    Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Walden templates: Overview. Retrieved from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates

    NOTE: Download and review the College of Nursing template by navigating to ‘Program-Specific Templates’, ‘College of Nursing’, and selecting ‘College of Nursing Writing Template With Instructions’.

    Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Writing a paper: Revising. Retrieved from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/writingprocess/revising

    Document: 10 Tips for Being a Successful Online Learner (PDF)

    Document: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template (Word document)

    Required Media

    Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2018). Tips for effective online composition and communication [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Discussion: Strategies for Addressing Questions
    In Week 1 you began building a foundation for your success by considering a network; individuals and teams that can help you to clarify and execute on the vision. A network is most helpful when you are comfortable asking questions. Chances are other members of your network have experienced similar questions and may have helped guide others toward resolutions that can be helpful now.

    In this Discussion, focus on the questions you are ready to ask as your journey begins. Keep in mind that sharing questions is often a great way to help others who have similar questions—even if they do not realize it!

    To Prepare:

    Reflect on questions or concerns you might have as you begin the MSN program.
    Consider the individuals, teams, and departments you previously considered in Week 1 and how they may provide support to address these questions and concerns. Then, identify potential individuals, teams, or departments within Walden or your network that you can turn to for assistance in answering these questions and/or concerns.
    By Day 3

    Post any questions or concerns that you are willing to share with the group. The Discussion Board represents an opportunity to network with your course colleagues, and others may have the same questions or concerns.

    Support main post with 3 of more current, credible sources and cite source within content of posting and on a reference list in proper APA.

    By Day 6

    Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days, by offering a possible resolution to their question/concern with supporting documentation, if possible, or expanding on their thinking and providing an example as support.

    Be sure to offer support from at least 2 current, credible sources in each required response to classmates’ main post and cite per APA.

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 2 Discussion Rubric

    Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6

    To participate in this Discussion:

    Week 2 Discussion
    Assignment: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 2: Academic Resources and Strategies
    New construction projects begin with a design phase, where architects blueprint the vision complete with design details. They work in collaboration with builders who use the designs to prepare the appropriate strategies, tools, and materials to bring the vision to reality. You are both architect and builder of your success. You have started to blueprint your vision in your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan. You have identified others with whom you will collaborate. Now you can begin to prepare the appropriate strategies, tools, and materials

    How will you approach your studies? What types of resources are available to you, and how will you access and utilize them? Taking the opportunity to prepare these strategies, tools, and materials will help ensure you can “break ground” without incident and successfully move to the phase where you begin building your vision.

    To Prepare:
    Consider your goals for academic accomplishments while a student of the MSN program.
    Reflect on the strategies presented in the Resources for this week.
    The Assignment:
    Clearly identify and accurately describe in detail at least three academic resources or strategies that can be applied to the MSN program.
    Clearly identify and accurately describe in detail at least three professional resources that can be applied to success in the nursing practice in general or in a specialty.
    Clearly and thoroughly explain in detail how you intend to use these resources, and how they might benefit you academically and professionally.
    Note: Add your work for this Assignment to the original document you began in the Week 1 Assignment, which was built off the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template.

    By Day 7

    Submit your completed Assignment.

    Remember to include an introduction paragraph which contains a clear and comprehensive purpose statement which delineates all required criteria, and end the assignment Part with a conclusion paragraph.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
    Click the Week 2 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
    Click the Week 2 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
    Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 2 Assignment Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 2 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 2 Assignment

    Next Week

    To go to the next week:

    Week 3
    Week 3: Academic and Professional Integrity
    Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2018). Academic and Professional Integrity [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2018). The Walden Journey to a Masters in Nursing: Academic and Professional Integrity [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Identify APA formatting rules (Q)
    Analyze the relationship between academic integrity and writing (A)
    Analyze the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics (A)
    Analyze strategies for maintaining integrity and ethics in academic work (A)
    Analyze strategies for maintaining integrity and ethics in professional work (A)
    Analyze how paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity (A)
    Learning Resources

    Required Readings
    American Nurses Association. (2015). Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements. Retrieved from https://www.nursingworld.org/coe-view-only

    American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000

    Chapter 6, “The Mechanics of Style”
    Chapter 8, “Works Credited in the Text”
    Section 8.2, “Plagiarism”
    Section 8.3, “Self-Plagiarism”
    Paraphrases and Quotations
    Chapter 10, “Reference Examples”
    Alba, B. (2018). Factors that impact on emergency nurses’ ethical decision-making ability. Nursing Ethics, 25(7), 855–866. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733016674769

    Bahrieni, F., Azodi, P. Hajivandi, A. & Jahanpour, F. (2017). The effect of education in nurse’s moral sensitivity. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, 9(10), 1817–1821. Retrieved from http://jpsr.pharmainfo.in/Documents/Volumes/vol9Issue10/jpsr09101735.pdf

    Glasper, A. (2016). Does cheating by students undermine the integrity of the nursing profession? British Journal of Nursing, 25(16), 932–933.

    Hoskins, K., Grady, C. & Ulrich, C. (2018). Ethics education in nursing: Instruction for future generations of nurses. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 23(1). Retrieved from http://ojin.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Vol-23-2018/No1-Jan-2018/Ethics-Education-in-Nursing.html

    Walden University Academic Skills Center. (n.d.). ASC success strategies: Plagiarism. Retrieved October 12, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/ASCsuccess/ASCplagiarism

    Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). APA style: Overview. Retrieved October 12, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa

    Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.) Grammarly: Overview. Retrieved October 12, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly

    Document: APA Basics Checklist: Citations, Reference List, and Style (PDF)

    Document: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template (Word document)

    Document: Citing a Discussion Posting in APA Style (PDF)

    Document: Citing a Laureate Video in APA Style (PDF)

    Document: Common APA Style and Formatting Challenges (PDF)

    Document: Introduction to Scholarly Writing: Plagiarism and Academic Integrity (PDF)

    Optional Resources

    Walden University. (n.d.). Subject Research: Nursing. Retrieved November 9, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/subject/nursing

    Quiz: APA Style and Format
    As a nurse embarking on an advanced degree, you are developing the characteristics of a scholar-practitioner, which includes strong communication skills. Writing in a scholarly manner involves supporting your thoughts with evidence from the literature and appropriately using APA formatting.

    One of the challenges of scholarly writing is paraphrasing the thoughts of others in your work. Paraphrasing, and correctly citing the original author for his or her ideas, allows you to take the ideas of others, summarize them, and incorporate them into your own writing. When summarizing the ideas of others, it is important to avoid plagiarizing (copying the words and ideas of others as though they were your own). In addition to expanding your knowledge of APA, this week’s Resources help you to distinguish between paraphrasing and plagiarizing.

    This Quiz will help you determine how well you understand these concepts and how prepared you are to reflect them in your work. The questions presented on the quiz are derived from the Learning Resources related to APA writing standards, plagiarism, and academic integrity.

    To Prepare:
    Review the Resources related to APA style and format presented to you this week.
    Click on the Week 3 Quiz link to begin.

    By Day 7

    Complete the quiz.

    Note: To view the questions you answered correctly and incorrectly, click on your score in the My Grades area.

    Submission and Grading Information

    Submit Your Quiz by Day 7

    To submit your Quiz:

    Week 3 Quiz
    Assignment: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 3: Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity and Professional Ethics
    Nurse-scholars have a significant obligation to their community as well. Their work must have academic and professional integrity. Their efforts are designed to add to the body of knowledge, advance the profession, and ultimately help in the care of patients. Work that lacks integrity is subject to quickly erode…or worse.

    Fortunately, there are strategies and tools that can help ensure integrity in academic and professional work. This Assignments asks you to consider these and how you might apply them to your own work.

    In this Assignment you will continue developing your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan by appending the original document you began in the previous assignment.

    To Prepare:
    Reflect on the strategies presented in the Resources for this week in support of academic style, integrity, and scholarly ethics.
    Also reflect on the connection between academic and professional integrity.
    The Assignment:
    Part 3, Section 1: Writing Sample: The Connection Between Academic and Professional Integrity
    Using the Academic and Professional Success Development Template you began in Week 1 and continued working on in Week 2, write a 2- 3-paragraph analysis that includes the following:

    Clearly and accurately explains in detail the relationship between academic integrity and writing.
    Clearly and accurately explains in detail the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics.
    Accurately cite at least 2 resources that fully support your arguments, being sure to use proper APA formatting.
    Use Grammarly and SafeAssign to improve the product.y
    Clearly and accurately describe in detail how Grammarly, SafeAssign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity. Include sufficient evidence that Grammarly and SafeAssign were utilized to improve responses.

    Part 3, Section 2: Strategies for Maintaining Integrity of Work
    Expand on your thoughts from Section 1 by:

    Clearly identifying and accurately describing strategies you intend to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of your 1) academic work while a student of the MSN program, and 2) professional work as a nurse throughout your career.
    Include a clearly developed review of resources and approaches you propose to use as a student and a professional.
    Note: Add your work for this Assignment to the original document you began in the Week 1 Assignment, which was built off the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template.

    By Day 7

    Submit both Section 1 and Section 2 of Part 3.

    Remember to include an introduction paragraph which contains a clear and comprehensive purpose statement which delineates all required criteria, and end the assignment Part with a conclusion paragraph.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK1Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
    Click the Week 3 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
    Click the Week 3 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK3Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
    Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 3 Assignment Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 3 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 3 Assignment

    Next Week

    To go to the next week:

    Week 4
    Week 4: Scholarship and Nursing Practice
    Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2018). Scholarship [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2018). The Walden Journey to a Masters in Nursing: Scholarship [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Analyze research databases for identifying peer-reviewed articles (D)
    Analyze peer-reviewed research (A)
    Justify the use of peer-reviewed research in professional practice (A)
    Analyze strategies for finding peer-reviewed research (D, A)
    Learning Resources

    Required Readings
    Al-Jundi, A., & Sakka, S. (2017). Critical appraisal of clinical research. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research: JCDR, 11(5), JE01–JE05. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/26047.9942

    Shellenbarger, T. (2016). Simplifying synthesis. Nurse Author & Editor, 26(3). Retrieved from http://naepub.com/reporting-research/2016-26-3-3/

    Walden University Library. (n.d.). Databases A-Z: Nursing. Retrieved October 4, 2019 from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981

    Walden University Library. (n.d.). Evaluating resources: Journals. Retrieved October 4, 2019, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/resource-types/journals

    Walden University Library. (n.d.). Instructional media: Fundamentals of library research. Retrieved October 4, 2019 from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/instructionalmedia/researchfundamentals

    Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Retrieved October 12, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/home

    Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Common assignments: Synthesizing your sources. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/literaturereview/synthesizing

    Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Scholarly writing: Overview. Retrieved October 12, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/scholarly

    Walden University. (n.d.). Subject Research: Nursing. Retrieved November 9, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/subject/nursing

    Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Webinars: Technical information. Retrieved October 12, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/webinars/technical

    Document: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template (Word document)

    Document: Introduction to scholarly writing: Tips for success (PDF)

    Required Media

    Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2018). Introduction to Scholarly Writing: Purpose, Audience, and Evidence [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2018). Introduction to Scholarly Writing: Tips for Success [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Discussion: Using the Walden Library
    Where can you find evidence to inform your thoughts and scholarly writing? Throughout your degree program, you will use research literature to explore ideas, guide your thinking, and gain new insights. As you search the research literature, it is important to use resources that are peer-reviewed and from scholarly journals. You may already have some favorite online resources and databases that you use or have found useful in the past. For this Discussion, you explore databases available through the Walden Library.

    To Prepare:
    Review the information presented in the Resources for using the Walden Library, searching the databases, and evaluating online resources.
    Begin searching for a peer-reviewed article that pertains to your practice area and is of particular interest to you.
    By Day 3

    Post the following:
    Using proper APA formatting, cite the peer-reviewed article you selected that pertains to your practice area and is of particular interest to you and identify the database that you used to search for the article. Explain any difficulties you experienced while searching for this article. Would this database be useful to your colleagues? Explain why or why not. Would you recommend this database? Explain why or why not

    Support main post with 3 of more current, credible sources and cite source within content of posting and on a reference list in proper APA.

    By Day 6

    Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days, by offering suggestions/strategies for working with this database from your own experience, or offering ideas for use of alternative resources.

    Be sure to offer support from at least 2 current, credible sources in each required response to classmates’ main post and cite per APA.

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 4 Discussion Rubric

    Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6

    To participate in this Discussion:

    Week 4 Discussion
    Assignment: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 4: Research Analysis
    Architect Daniel Libeskind is credited with saying “To provide meaningful architecture is not to parody history, but to articulate it.” The suggestion is that his work does not copy the efforts of others but relies on it.

    Understanding the work of others is critically important to new work. Contributions to the nursing body of knowledge can happen when you are able to analyze and articulate the efforts of previous research. Hence research analysis skills are critical tools for your toolbox.

    In this Assignment, you will locate relevant existing research. You also will analyze this research using a tool helpful for analysis.

    To Prepare:
    Reflect on the strategies presented in the Resources this week in support of locating and analyzing research.
    Use the Walden Library to identify and read one peer-reviewed research article focused on a topic of interest to you in your specialty field.
    Review the article you selected and reflect on the professional practice use of theories/concepts as described by the article
    The Assignment:
    Using the ‘Week 4 | Part 4’ section of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template presented in the Resources, conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:

    Clearly identify the topic of interest you have selected.
    Provide an accurate and complete APA formatted citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.
    Clearly identify and describe in detail a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.
    Provide a clear and accurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.
    Write a 1-paragraph justification that clearly and accurately explains in detail whether you would recommend the use of this article to inform professional practice. Note: You can use the CARP method as presented in the Resources for this week on evaluating resources.
    Write a 2- to 3-paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:
    Clearly and accurately describe in detail your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.
    Clearly identify and accurately describe in detail at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.
    Provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.
    Integrate at least one outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources to fully support your summary.
    Note: Add your work for this Assignment to the original document you began in the Week 1 Assignment, which was built off the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template.

    By Day 7

    Submit your analysis, including your competed section of the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template sections including your matrix and summary.

    Remember to include an introduction paragraph which contains a clear and comprehensive purpose statement which delineates all required criteria, and end the assignment Part with a conclusion paragraph.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
    Click the Week 4 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
    Click the Week 4 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
    Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 4 Assignment Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 4 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 4 Assignment

    Next Week

    To go to the next week:

    Week 5
    Week 5: Professional Development Plan
    Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2018). The Blueprint to Success [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2018). The Walden Journey to a Masters in Nursing: Your Professional Development Plan [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Analyze strategies for including academic activities and accomplishments into professional portfolios (D)
    Create curriculum vitae (A)
    Develop professional development goals (A)
    Align professional development goals to Walden’s social change initiatives (A)
    Construct elements of an Academic Success and Professional Development Plan (A)
    Learning Resources

    Required Readings
    Burns, M. K. (2018). Creating a nursing portfolio. Ohio Nurses Review, 93(3), 16-17.

    Casey, D. & Egan, D. (2013). The use of professional portfolios for career enhancement. British Journal of Nursing, 15(11), 547–552.

    East, R. (2015). Developing a nurse practitioner portfolio. ACORN: The Journal of Perioperative Nursing in Australia, 28(4), 35.

    Hannans, J. & Olivo, Y. (2017). Craft a positive nursing digital identity with an ePortfolio. American Nurse Today, 12(11), 48–49 https://www.americannursetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/ant11-Digital-Identity-1017a-1.pdf

    Leahy, R., & Filiatrault, A. (2017). Employers’ perceptions of the benefits of employment electronic portfolios. International Journal of ePortfolio, 7(2), 217-223.

    McMillan, L. R., Parker, F., & Sport, A. (2014). Decisions, decisions! E-portfolio as an effective hiring assessment tool. Nursing Management, 45(4), 52-54.

    Spear, M. (2016). Taking charge of your professional growth and development: Where do I start? Plastic Surgical Nursing, 36(3), 100–102. Retrieved from https://www.nursingcenter.com/journalarticle?Article_ID=3764611&Journal_ID=496448&Issue_ID=3764599

    Walden University. (n.d.). Walden University catalog. Retrieved October 4, 2019, from https://catalog.waldenu.edu
    Select College of Health Professions, then Master of Science in Nursing (MSN). Review the MSN Learning Outcomes on this page.

    Walden University (2018). Creating your curriculum vitae: A building block to your future. Retrieved from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/careerservices/careerwebinars/resumesandCVs

    Walden University. (2018). Curriculum Vitae guide: Build your curriculum vitae (c.v.). Retrieved from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/careerservices/cvguide

    Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Walden templates: Overview. Retrieved October 12, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates

    NOTE: Download and review the College of Nursing template by navigating to “Program-Specific Templates,” “College of Nursing,” and selecting “College of Nursing Writing Template With Instructions.”

    Document: APA Basics Checklist: Citations, Reference List, and Style (PDF)

    Document: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template (Word document)

    Document: PDP Sample Paper (PDF)

    Required Media

    Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2018). Scholars of Change: Reis Woolen [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2018). Scholars of Change: Jackie Kundert [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2018). Scholars of Change: Joan Kempagno [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Optional Resources

    American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000

    Note: If the print editions of these books are referenced here, electronic versions also may be available and may be acceptable for use in this course. If electronic versions are listed, no print versions are available.

    Walden University. (n.d.). Subject Research: Nursing. Retrieved November 9, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/subject/nursing

    Discussion: Strategies for Academic Portfolios
    In the realm of marketing, a successful branding strategy is one of the most important contributors to organizational success. A solid branding strategy can help add visibility and credibility to a company’s products.

    Similarly, nurse-scholars can build a personal brand to add visibility and credibility to their work. You can begin building your brand by developing and maintaining an academic portfolio. Such an activity can help share the results of your efforts and contribute to your success. This week’s Discussion asks you to consider and share strategies for building your portfolio.

    To Prepare:
    Reflect on strategies that you can pursue in developing portfolios or portfolio elements that focus on academic achievements.
    Review one or more samples from your own research of resources focused on portfolio development.
    By Day 3

    Post an explanation of at least two strategies for including academic activities and accomplishments into your professional development goals. Then, explain how those goals may align with the University’s emphasis on social change. Be specific and provide examples.

    Support main post with 3 of more current, credible sources and cite source within content of posting and on a reference list in proper APA.

    By Day 6

    Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days, by offering additional ideas regarding academic achievements to include or offering alternative ways of presenting the current achievements.

    Be sure to offer support from at least 2 current, credible sources in each required response to classmates’ main post and cite per APA.

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 5 Discussion Rubric

    Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6

    To participate in this Discussion:

    Week 5 Discussion
    Assignment: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 5: Professional Development
    In this week’s Discussion you were introduced to the concept of an academic portfolio to begin building your own brand. Portfolios have value that go beyond brand-building however. An academic and professional portfolio can also help you to build your own vision and mission and establish your development goals. In this regard, a portfolio becomes yet another tool in your toolbox as you build your success.

    In this Assignment you will continue developing your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan by developing the fifth component: a portfolio for your academic and professional efforts.

    To Prepare:
    Consider your goals for academic accomplishments while a student of the MSN program.
    The Assignment:
    Using the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template in which you began to work on in Week 1, and have continued working on through this course, in Part 5, you will create a fully developed and accurate curriculum vitae (CV) based on your current education and professional background.
    Note: Add your work for this Assignment to the original document you began in the Week 1 Assignment, which was built off of the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template.

    By Day 7

    Submit Part 5.

    Remember to include an introduction paragraph which contains a clear and comprehensive purpose statement which delineates all required criteria, and end the assignment Part with a conclusion paragraph.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK1Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
    Click the Week 5 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
    Click the Week 5 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK5Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
    Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 5 Assignment Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 5 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 5 Assignment

    Next Week

    To go to the next week:

    Week 6
    Week 6: Standards of Practice
    Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2018). Standards of Practice [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2018). The Walden Journey to a Masters in Nursing: Standards of Practice [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2018). The Walden Journey to a Masters in Nursing: Final Thoughts [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Analyze difficulties in determining nursing specializations (D)
    Compare nursing specialties (A)
    Justify selection of MSN specialization (A)
    Analyze nursing specialization professional organization engagement strategies (A)
    Create Academic Success and Professional Development Plans(A)
    Learning Resources

    Required Readings
    Cherry, B., Caramanica, L, Everett, L. Q., Fennimore, L., & Elaine, S. (2019). Leveraging the power of board leadership in professional nursing organizations. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 49(11), 517-519.

    Echevarria, I. M. (2018). Make connections by joining a professional nursing organization. Nursing, 48(12), 35–38.

    Quinn-Szcesuil, J. (2016). Why you should join a nursing association. Retrieved from https://dailynurse.com/join-nursing-association/

    Truant, R., & Chan, R. J. (2017). Future ready: Strengthening oncology nursing leadership in the context of professional oncology nursing organizations. Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal, 27(1), 2-4.

    Walden University. (n.d.). Master of Science in Nursing (MSN). Retrieved October 12, 2018, from https://www.waldenu.edu/masters/master-of-science-in-nursing

    Document: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template (Word document)

    Choose among the following to review your specialization’s Scope and Standards of Practice or Competencies:

    American Nurses Association. (2015). Nursing informatics: Scope and standards of practice (2nd ed.). Silver Spring, MD: Author.

    Nursing Informatics

    E-book: Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice

    “The Scope of Nursing Informatics Practice: Functional Areas of Nursing Informatics” (pp. 18–3

    Nursing Education
    Website: Competencies for the Academic Nurse Educator

    National League for Nursing. (2019). Nurse educator core competency. Retrieved from http://www.nln.org/professional-development-programs/competencies-for-nursing-education/nurse-educator-core-competency
    Note: The competencies for the Academic Nurse Educator do not encompass the competencies or scope and standards of practice for the Nursing Professional Developer. The set of competencies associated with that specific role within the Nurse Education specialization will be examined in future competencies throughout your specialization program of study.

    Nurse Executive
    Website: Nurse Executive Competencies

    American Organization for Nursing Leadership. (2015). AONL Nurse Executive competencies. Retrieved from https://www.aonl.org/resources/nurse-leader-competencies

    Public Health Nursing
    Website: Public Health Nurse Competencies

    Quad Council Coalition. (2018). Community/Public Health Nursing [C/PHN] competencies. Retrieved from http://www.quadcouncilphn.org/documents-3/2018-qcc-competencies/

    American Nurses Association. (2013). Public health nursing: Scope and standards of practice (2nd ed.) Silver Spring, MD: Author.

    Public Health Nursing
    E-book: Public Health Nursing: Scope and Standards of Practice

    Optional Resources

    Walden University. (n.d.). Subject Research: Nursing. Retrieved November 9, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/subject/nursing

    Discussion: Examining Nursing Specialties
    You have probably seen one or more of the many inspirational posters about decisions. A visual such as a forked road or a street sign is typically pictured, along with a quote designed to inspire.

    Often decisions are not so easily inspired. Perhaps you discovered this when choosing a specialty within the MSN program. This decision is a critical part of your plan for success, and you no doubt want to get it right. This is yet another area where your network can help, as well as other sources of information that can help you make an informed choice.

    To Prepare:
    Reflect on your decision to pursue a specialty within the MSN program, including your professional and academic goals as they relate to your program/specialization.
    By Day 3

    Post an explanation of your choice of a nursing specialty within the program. Describe any difficulties you had (or are having) in making your choice, and the factors that drove/are driving your decision. Identify at least one professional organization affiliated with your chosen specialty and provide details on becoming a member.

    Support main post with 3 of more current, credible sources and cite source within content of posting and on a reference list in proper APA.

    By Day 6

    Be sure to offer support from at least 2 current, credible sources in each required response to classmates’ main post and cite per APA.

    Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days, by sharing your thoughts on their specialty, supporting their choice or offering suggestions if they have yet to choose.

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 6 Discussion Rubric

    Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6

    To participate in this Discussion:

    Week 6 Discussion
    Assignment: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 6: Finalizing the Plan
    At some point in every construction project, efforts turn from design and the focus moves to actual construction. With the vision in place and the tools secured, the blueprint can be finalized and approved. Then it is time to put on hardhats and begin work.

    Throughout the course you have developed aspects of your Academic and Professional Development Plan. You have put a great deal of thought into your vision and goals, your academic and professional network of support, research strategies and other tools you will need, the integrity of your work, and the value of consulting the work of others. With your portfolio in place, it is now time to finalize your blueprint for success.

    Much as builders remain cognizant of the building standards as they plan and begin construction, nurses must remain mindful of the formal standards of practice that govern their specialty. A good understanding of these standards can help ensure that your success plan includes any steps necessary to excel within your chosen specialty.

    In this Assignment you will continue developing your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan by developing the final component: a review of your specialty standards of practice. You will also submit your final version of the document, including Parts 1–5.

    To Prepare:
    Review the scope and standards of practice or competencies related to your chosen specialty.
    Download the Nursing Specialty Comparison Matrix.
    Examine professional organizations related to the specialization you have chosen and identify at least one to focus on for this assignment.
    Reflect on the thoughts you shared in the Discussion forum regarding your choice of a specialty, any challenges you have encountered in making this choice, and any feedback you have received from colleagues in the Discussion.
    The Assignment:
    Complete the following items and incorporate them into the final version of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan.

    Write a paragraph that provides a detailed comparison at least two nursing specialties, including your selected specialization and second-preferred specialization.
    Write a clear and accurate 2- to 3-paragraph justification statement identifying your reasons for choosing your MSN specialization. Provide sufficient evidence of incorporating feedback you received from colleagues in this week’s Discussion Forum.
    Clearly identify and accurately describe in detail the professional organization related to the specialization you have chosen to focus on for this assignment and explain how you can become an active member of this organization.
    Note: Your final version of the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan should include all components as presented the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan template. Make all corrections to each part based on faculty feedback and submit a final and edited copy of the template (Part 1-Part 6) in correct APA format.

    By Day 7

    Submit Parts 1-6 of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan.

    Remember to include an introduction paragraph which contains a clear and comprehensive purpose statement which delineates all required criteria, and end the assignment Part with a conclusion paragraph.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK1Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
    Click the Week 6 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
    Click the Week 6 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK6Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
    Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 6 Assignment Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 6 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 6 Assignment

    Congratulations! After you have finished all of the assignments for this week, you have completed the course. Please submit your Course Evaluation by Day 7.

    The post NURS 6003 Transition to Graduate Study for Nursing appeared first on College Pal. Visit us at College Pal – Connecting to a pal for your paper

  • NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health

    The post NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health is a property of College Pal
    College Pal writes Plagiarism Free Papers. Visit us at College Pal – Connecting to a pal for your paper

    In today’s rapidly changing healthcare delivery system, decisions made within the political arena impact the future of healthcare systems and the populations that healthcare professionals serve. In this course, students examine healthcare reform and its impact on healthcare delivery, population health, and nursing practice. They evaluate policies that influence the structure, financing, and quality in healthcare and examine healthcare delivery from a global perspective. Through discussions, case studies, and other activities, students examine the effects of legal and regulatory processes on nursing practice, healthcare delivery, and population health outcomes. Students also examine ways to advocate for promotion and preservation of population health and gain the necessary skills to influence policy and support changes effected by the passing of new healthcare reform legislation.

    Module 1: Agenda Setting (Weeks 1-2)
    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Meet the Experts: Pioneers in Policy [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). The Policy Process [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Compare U.S. presidential agenda priorities
    Evaluate ways that administrative agencies help address healthcare issues
    Analyze how healthcare issues get on administrative agendas
    Identify champions or sponsors of healthcare issues
    Create fact sheets for communicating with policymakers or legislators
    Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues
    Due By Assignment
    Week 1, Days 1–2 Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources.
    Compose your initial Discussion post.
    Week 1, Day 3 Post your initial discussion post.
    Week 1, Days 4-5 Review peer Discussion posts.
    Compose your peer Discussion responses.
    Begin to compose your Assignment.
    Week 1, Day 6 Post at least two peer Discussion responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post).
    Continue to compose your final draft of your Assignment.
    Week 1, Day 7 Wrap up Discussion.
    Week 2, Day 1–6 Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 2, Day 7 Deadline to submit your Assignment.
    Learning Resources
    Required Readings
    Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Chapter 1, “Informing Public Policy: An Important Role for Registered Nurses” (pp. 11–13 only)
    Chapter 2, “Agenda Setting: What Rises to a Policymaker’s Attention?” (pp. 17–36)
    Chapter 10, “Overview: The Economics and Finance of Health Care” (pp. 171–180)
    Chapter 12, “An Insider’s Guide to Engaging in Policy Activities”
    “Creating a Fact Sheet” (pp. 217-221)

    DeMarco, R., & Tufts, K. A. (2014). The mechanics of writing a policy brief. Nursing Outlook, 62(3), 219–224. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2014.04.002

    Kingdon, J.W. (2001). A model of agenda-setting with applications. Law Review M.S.U.-D.C.L., 2(331)

    Lamb, G., Newhouse, R., Beverly, C., Toney, D. A., Cropley, S., Weaver, C. A., Kurtzman, E., … Peterson, C. (2015). Policy agenda for nurse-led care coordination. Nursing Outlook, 63(4), 521–530. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2015.06.003.

    O’Rourke, N. C., Crawford, S. L., Morris, N. S., & Pulcini, J. (2017). Political efficacy and participation of nurse practitioners. Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice, 18(3), 135–148. doi:10.1177/1527154417728514

    Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Enhancing Environmental Health Content in Nursing Practice, Pope, A. M., Snyder, M. A., & Mood, L. H. (Eds.). (n.d.). Nursing health, & environment: Strengthening the relationship to improve the public’s health.

    USA.gov. (n.d.). A-Z index of U.S. government departments and agencies. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.usa.gov/federal-agencies/a

    USA.gov. (n.d.). Executive departments. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.usa.gov/executive-departments

    The White House. (n.d.). The cabinet. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-trump-administration/the-cabinet/

    Document: Agenda Comparison Grid Template (Word document)

    Required Media
    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Setting the Agenda [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Discussion: Presidential Agendas
    Regardless of political affiliation, every citizen has a stake in healthcare policy decisions. Hence, it is little wonder why healthcare items become such high-profile components of presidential agendas. It is also little wonder why they become such hotly debated agenda items.

    Consider a topic that rises to the presidential level. How did each of the presidents (Trump, Obama, and Bush) handle the problem? What would you do differently?

    To Prepare:
    Review the Resources and reflect on the importance of agenda setting.
    Consider how federal agendas promote healthcare issues and how these healthcare issues become agenda priorities.
    By Day 3 of Week 1

    Post your response to the discussion question: Consider a topic that rises to the presidential level. How did each of the presidents (Trump, Obama, and Bush) handle the problem? What would you do differently?

    By Day 6 of Week 1

    Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days by expanding on their response and providing an example that supports their explanation or respectfully challenging their explanation and providing an example.

    *Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 1 Discussion Rubric

    Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 1

    To participate in this Discussion:

    Week 1 Discussion
    Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief
    It may seem to you that healthcare has been a national topic of debate among political leaders for as long as you can remember.

    Healthcare has been a policy item and a topic of debate not only in recent times but as far back as the administration of the second U.S. president, John Adams. In 1798, Adams signed legislation requiring that 20 cents per month of a sailor’s paycheck be set aside for covering their medical bills. This represented the first major piece of U.S. healthcare legislation, and the topic of healthcare has been woven into presidential agendas and political debate ever since.

    As a healthcare professional, you may be called upon to provide expertise, guidance and/or opinions on healthcare matters as they are debated for inclusion into new policy. You may also be involved in planning new organizational policy and responses to changes in legislation. For all of these reasons you should be prepared to speak to national healthcare issues making the news.

    In this Assignment, you will analyze recent presidential healthcare agendas. You also will prepare a fact sheet to communicate the importance of a healthcare issue and the impact on this issue of recent or proposed policy.

    To Prepare:
    Review the agenda priorities of the current/sitting U.S. president and the two previous presidential administrations.
    Select an issue related to healthcare that was addressed by each of the last three U.S. presidential administrations.
    Reflect on the focus of their respective agendas, including the allocation of financial resources for addressing the healthcare issue you selected.
    Consider how you would communicate the importance of a healthcare issue to a legislator/policymaker or a member of their staff for inclusion on an agenda.
    Week 2 Assignment
    The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Comparison Grid, 1-Page Analysis, and 1-page narrative) with a title page, an introduction, purpose statement, and a conclusion. This is an APA paper.
    Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid
    Use the Agenda Comparison Grid Template found in the Learning Resources and complete the Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid based on the current/sitting U.S. president and the two previous presidential administrations and their agendas related to the public health concern you selected. Be sure to address the following:

    Identify and provide a brief description of the population health concern you selected and the factors that contribute to it.
    Describe the administrative agenda focus related to the issue you selected.
    Identify the allocations of financial and other resources that the current and two previous presidents dedicated to this issue.
    Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.
    At least 3 resources must be used
    Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis
    Using the information you recorded in Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid on the template, complete the Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis portion of the template, by addressing the following:

    Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected?
    How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda for the current and two previous presidents? How does it stay there?
    Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected for the current and two previous presidents?
    Part 3: Narrative
    Using the information recorded on the template in Parts 1 and 2, develop a 1-page narrative that you could use to communicate with a policymaker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue. Be sure to address the following:

    Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.
    Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.
    The response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2-3 course specific resources that fully supports the summary provided.
    By Day 7 of Week 2

    Submit your final version of Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid, Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis, and Part 3: Narrative.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
    Click the Week 2 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
    Click the Week 2 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
    Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 2 Assignment Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 2 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 2

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 2 Assignment

    Next Module

    To go to the next module:

    Module 2
    Module 2: Legislation (Weeks 3-4)
    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Legislation [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Analyze how cost-benefit analysis affects legislative efforts
    Analyze legislative intent of bills
    Identify proponents and opponents of bills
    Analyze legislative process of bills
    Advocate policy position for bills
    Due By Assignment
    Week 3, Days 1-2 Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources.
    Compose your initial Discussion post.
    Week 3, Day 3 Post your initial Discussion post.
    Begin to compose your Assignment.
    Week 3, Days 4-5 Review peer Discussion posts.
    Compose your peer Discussion responses.
    Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 3, Day 6 Post at least two peer Discussion responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post).
    Week 3, Day 7 Wrap up Discussion.
    Week 4, Days 1-6 Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 4, Day 7 Deadline to submit your Assignment.
    Learning Resources

    Required Readings
    Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Chapter 3, “Government Response: Legislation” (pp. 37–56)
    Chapter 10, “Overview: The Economics and Finance of Health Care” (pp. 180–183 only)

    Congress.gov. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.congress.gov/

    Taylor, D., Olshansky, E., Fugate-Woods, N., Johnson-Mallard, V., Safriet, B. J., & Hagan, T. (2017). Corrigendum to position statement: Political interference in sexual and reproductive health research and health professional education. Nursing Outlook, 65(2), 346–350. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2017.05.003.

    United States House of Representatives. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.house.gov/

    United States Senate. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.senate.gov/

    United States Senate. (n.d.). Senate organization chart for the 115th Congress. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.senate.gov/reference/org_chart.htm

    Document: Legislation Grid Template (Word document)

    Required Media

    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Working with Legislators [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Introduction to Health Policy and Law with Joel Teitelbaum [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Credit: Provided courtesy of the Laureate International Network of Universities.

    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Contemporary Issues in Public Health Policy with Joel Teitelbaum [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Peter Beilenson: Population Health [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Discussion: Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
    Regardless of political affiliation, individuals often grow concerned when considering perceived competing interests of government and their impact on topics of interest to them. The realm of healthcare is no different. Some people feel that local, state, and federal policies and legislation can be either helped or hindered by interests other than the benefit to society.

    Consider for example that the number one job of a legislator is to be reelected. Cost can be measured in votes as well as dollars. Thus, it is important to consider the legislator’s perspective on either promoting or not promoting a certain initiative in the political landscape.

    To Prepare:
    Review the Resources and reflect on efforts to repeal/replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
    Consider who benefits the most when policy is developed and in the context of policy implementation.
    By Day 3 of Week 3

    Post an explanation for how you think the cost-benefit analysis in terms of legislators being reelected affected efforts to repeal/replace the ACA. Then, explain how analyses of the voters views may affect decisions by legislative leaders in recommending or positioning national policies (e.g., Congress’ decisions impacting Medicare or Medicaid). Remember, the number one job of a legislator is to be re-elected. Please check your discussion grading rubric to ensure your responses meet the criteria.

    By Day 6 of Week 3

    Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days by expanding on their explanation and providing an example that supports their explanation or respectfully challenging their explanation and providing an example.

    *Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 3 Discussion Rubric

    Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 3

    To participate in this Discussion:

    Week 3 Discussion
    Assignment: Legislation Grid and Testimony/Advocacy Statement
    As a nurse, how often have you thought to yourself, If I had anything to do about it, things would work a little differently? Increasingly, nurses are beginning to realize that they do, in fact, have a role and a voice.

    Many nurses encounter daily experiences that motivate them to take on an advocacy role in hopes of impacting policies, laws, or regulations that impact healthcare issues of interest. Of course, doing so means entering the less familiar world of policy and politics. While many nurses do not initially feel prepared to operate in this space effectively, the reward is the opportunity to shape and influence future health policy.

    To Prepare:
    Select a bill that has been proposed (not one that has been enacted) using the congressional websites provided in the Learning Resources.
    Week 4 Assignment
    The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Legislation Grid; 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement)
    Be sure to add a title page, an introduction, purpose statement, and a conclusion. This is an APA paper.

    Part 1: Legislation Grid
    Based on the health-related bill (proposed, not enacted) you selected, complete the Legislation Grid Template. Be sure to address the following:

    Determine the legislative intent of the bill you have reviewed.
    Identify the proponents/opponents of the bill.
    Identify the target populations addressed by the bill.
    Where in the process is the bill currently? Is it in hearings or committees?
    Part 2: Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement
    Based on the health-related bill you selected, develop a 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement that addresses the following:

    Advocate a position for the bill you selected and write testimony in support of your position.
    Describe how you would address the opponent to your position. Be specific and provide examples.
    At least 2 outside resources and 2-3 course specific resources are used.
    By Day 7 of Week 4

    Submit your completed legislation grid and testimony/advocacy statement.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
    Click the Week 4 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
    Click the Week 4 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
    Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 4 Assignment Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 4 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 4

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 4 Assignment

    Next Module

    To go to the next module:

    Module 3

    Module 3: Regulation (Weeks 5-6)
    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Regulation [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Compare state/regional board of nursing regulations
    Compare boards of nursing and professional nurse associations
    Analyze members of boards of nursing
    Analyze state regulations for healthcare
    Due By Assignment
    Week 5, Days 1–2 Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources.
    Compose your initial Discussion post.
    Week 5, Day 3 Post your initial Discussion post.
    Begin to compose your Assignment.
    Week 5, Days 4-5 Review peer Discussion posts.
    Compose your peer Discussion responses.
    Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 5, Day 6 Post at least two peer Discussion responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post).
    Week 5, Day 7 Wrap up Discussion.
    Week 6, Days 1-6 Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 6, Day 7 Deadline to submit your Assignment.
    Learning Resources

    Required Readings
    Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Chapter 4, “Government Response: Regulation” (pp. 57–84)

    American Nurses Association. (n.d.). ANA enterprise. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from http://www.nursingworld.org

    Bosse, J., Simmonds, K., Hanson, C., Pulcini, J., Dunphy, L., Vanhook, P., & Poghosyan, L. (2017). Position statement: Full practice authority for advanced practice registered nurses is necessary to transform primary care. Nursing Outlook, 65(6), 761–765.

    Halm, M. A. (2018). Evaluating the impact of EBP education: Development of a modified Fresno test for acute care nursing. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 15(4), 272–280. doi:10.1111/wvn.12291

    National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN). (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.ncsbn.org/index.htm

    Neff, D. F., Yoon, S. H., Steiner, R. L., Bumbach, M. D., Everhart, D., & Harman J. S. (2018). The impact of nurse practitioner regulations on population access to care. Nursing Outlook, 66(4), 379–385. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2018.03.001

    Peterson, C., Adams, S. A., & DeMuro, P. R. (2015). mHealth: Don’t forget all the stakeholders in the business case. Medicine 2.0, 4(2), e4. doi:10.2196/med20.4349.

    Required Media

    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). The Regulatory Process [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Healthcare economics and financing [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Quality improvement and safety [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Discussion: Professional Nursing and State-Level Regulations
    Boards of Nursing (BONs) exist in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Virgin Islands. Similar entities may also exist for different regions. The mission of BONs is the protection of the public through the regulation of nursing practice. BONs put into practice state/region regulations for nurses that, among other things, lay out the requirements for licensure and define the scope of nursing practice in that state/region.

    It can be a valuable exercise to compare regulations among various state/regional boards of nursing. Doing so can help share insights that could be useful should there be future changes in a state/region. In addition, nurses may find the need to be licensed in multiple states or regions.

    To Prepare:
    Review the Resources and reflect on the mission of state/regional boards of nursing as the protection of the public through the regulation of nursing practice.
    Consider how key regulations may impact nursing practice.
    Review key regulations for nursing practice of your state’s/region’s board of nursing and those of at least one other state/region and select at least two APRN regulations to focus on for this Discussion..
    By Day 3 of Week 5

    Post a comparison of at least two APRN board of nursing regulations in your state/region with those of at least one other state/region. Describe how they may differ. Be specific and provide examples. Then, explain how the regulations you selected may apply to Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) who have legal authority to practice within the full scope of their education and experience. Provide at least one example of how APRNs may adhere to the two regulations you selected.

    By Day 6 of Week 5

    Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days and explain how the regulatory environment and the regulations selected by your colleague differ from your state/region. Be specific and provide examples.

    *Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 5 Discussion Rubric

    Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 5

    To participate in this Discussion:

    Week 5 Discussion
    Assignment: Regulation for Nursing Practice Staff Development Meeting
    Nursing is a very highly regulated profession. There are over 100 boards of nursing and national nursing associations throughout the United States and its territories. Their existence helps regulate, inform, and promote the nursing profession. With such numbers, it can be difficult to distinguish between BONs and nursing associations, and overwhelming to consider various benefits and options offered by each.

    Both boards of nursing and national nursing associations have significant impacts on the nurse practitioner profession and scope of practice. Understanding these differences helps lend credence to your expertise as a professional. In this Assignment, you will practice the application of such expertise by communicating a comparison of boards of nursing and professional nurse associations. You will also share an analysis of your state board of nursing.

    To Prepare:
    Assume that you are leading a staff development meeting on regulation for nursing practice at your healthcare organization or agency.
    Review the NCSBN and ANA websites to prepare for your presentation.
    Week 6 Assignment
    The Assignment: (8- to 9-slide PowerPoint presentation)
    Develop a 8- to 9-slide PowerPoint Presentation that addresses the following:

    Describe the differences between a board of nursing and a professional nurse association.
    Describe the board for your specific region/area.
    Who is on the board?
    How does one become a member of the board?
    Describe at least one state regulation related to general nurse scope of practice.
    How does this regulation influence the nurse’s role?
    How does this regulation influence delivery, cost, and access to healthcare?
    Describe at least one state regulation related to Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs).
    How does this regulation influence the nurse’s role?
    How does this regulation influence delivery, cost, and access to healthcare?
    Include Speaker Notes on Each Slide (except on the title page and reference page)
    By Day 7 of Week 6

    Submit your Regulation for Nursing Practice Staff Development Meeting Presentation.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK6Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
    Click the Week 6 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
    Click the Week 6 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK6Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
    Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
    Due to the nature of this assignment, your instructor may require more than 5 days to provide you with quality feedback.
    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 6 Assignment Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 6 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 6

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 6 Assignment

    Next Module

    To go to the next module:

    Module 4

    Module 4: Healthcare Program Design and Implementation (Weeks 7-8)
    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Design and Implementation [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Analyze health policies
    Analyze opportunities for RNs and APRNs to participate in policy-making
    Analyze strategies for overcoming challenges for participating in policy-making
    Recommend strategies to improve the advocacy and communication of policy-making opportunities
    Analyze healthcare programs
    Analyze the role of the nurse in healthcare program design
    Analyze the role of the nurse as advocates for target populations of healthcare programs
    Analyze the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation
    Analyze healthcare teams necessary for implementing healthcare programs
    Due By Assignment
    Week 7, Days 1–2 Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources.
    Compose your initial Discussion 1 post.
    Week 7, Day 3 Post your initial Discussion 1 post.
    Begin to compose your Assignment.
    Week 7, Days 4-5 Review peer Discussion 1 posts.
    Compose your peer Discussion 1 responses.
    Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 7, Day 6 Post at least two peer Discussion 1 responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post).
    Week 7, Day 7 Wrap up Discussion 1.
    Week 8, Days 1–2 Compose your initial Discussion 2 post.
    Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 8, Day 3 Post your initial Discussion 2 post.
    Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 8, Days 4-5 Review peer Discussion 2 post.Compose your peer Discussion 2 post.
    Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 8, Day 6 Post at least two peer Discussion 2 responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post).
    Week 8, Day 7 Wrap up Discussion 2.
    Deadline to submit your Assignment.
    Learning Resources

    Required Readings
    Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Chapter 5, “Public Policy Design” (pp. 87–95 only)
    Chapter 8, “The Impact of EHRs, Big Data, and Evidence-Informed Practice” (pp. 137–146)
    Chapter 9, “Interprofessional Practice” (pp. 152–160 only)
    Chapter 10, “Overview: The Economics and Finance of Health Care” (pp. 183–191 only)

    American Nurses Association (ANA). (n.d.). Advocacy. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/advocacy/

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (n.d.). Step by step: Evaluating violence and injury prevention policies: Brief 4: Evaluating policy implementation. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/injury/pdfs/policy/Brief%204-a.pdf

    Congress.gov. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.congress.gov/

    Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1055–1080. doi:10.5465/AMR.1996.9704071863

    Sacristán, J., & Dilla, T. D. (2015). No big data without small data: Learning health care systems begin and end with the individual patient. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 21(6), 1014–1017.

    Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2014). Policy implementation, street level bureaucracy, and the importance of discretion. Public Management Review, 16(4), 527–547. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.841978

    Required Media

    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Getting your Program Designed and Implemented [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Health policy and politics [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Discussion 1: Evidence Base in Design
    When politics and medical science intersect, there can be much debate. Sometimes anecdotes or hearsay are misused as evidence to support a particular point. Despite these and other challenges, however, evidence-based approaches are increasingly used to inform health policy decision-making regarding causes of disease, intervention strategies, and issues impacting society. One example is the introduction of childhood vaccinations and the use of evidence-based arguments surrounding their safety.

    In this Discussion, you will identify a recently proposed health policy and share your analysis of the evidence in support of this policy.

    To Prepare:
    Review the Congress website provided in the Resources and identify one recent (within the past 5 years) proposed health policy.
    Review the health policy you identified and reflect on the background and development of this health policy.
    By Day 3 of Week 7

    Post a description of the health policy you selected and a brief background for the problem or issue being addressed. Explain whether you believe there is an evidence base to support the proposed policy and explain why. Be specific and provide examples.

    By Day 6 of Week 7

    Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days by either supporting or respectfully challenging their explanation on whether there is an evidence base to support the proposed health policy they described.

    *Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 7 Discussion Rubric

    Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 7

    To participate in this Discussion:

    Week 7 Discussion
    Discussion 2: The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy-Making
    Word cloud generators have become popular tools for meetings and team-building events. Groups or teams are asked to use these applications to input words they feel best describe their team or their role. A “word cloud” is generated by the application that makes prominent the most-used terms, offering an image of the common thinking among participants of that role.

    What types of words would you use to build a nursing word cloud? Empathetic, organized, hard-working, or advocate would all certainly apply. Would you add policy-maker to your list? Do you think it would be a very prominent component of the word cloud?

    Nursing has become one of the largest professions in the world, and as such, nurses have the potential to influence policy and politics on a global scale. When nurses influence the politics that improve the delivery of healthcare, they are ultimately advocating for their patients. Hence, policy-making has become an increasingly popular term among nurses as they recognize a moral and professional obligation to be engaged in healthcare legislation.

    To Prepare:
    Revisit the Congress.gov website provided in the Resources and consider the role of RNs and APRNs in policy-making.
    Reflect on potential opportunities that may exist for RNs and APRNs to participate in the policy-making process.
    By Day 3 of Week 8

    Post an explanation of at least two opportunities that exist for RNs and APRNs to actively participate in policy-making. Explain some of the challenges that these opportunities may present and describe how you might overcome these challenges. Finally, recommend two strategies you might make to better advocate for or communicate the existence of these opportunities to participate in policy-making. Be specific and provide examples.

    By Day 6 of Week 8

    Respond to at least two of your colleagues’* posts by suggesting additional opportunities or recommendations for overcoming the challenges described by your colleagues.

    *Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 8 Discussion Rubric

    Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 8

    To participate in this Discussion:

    Week 8 Discussion
    Assignment: Advocating for the Nursing Role in Program Design and Implementation
    As their names imply, the honeyguide bird and the honey badger both share an affinity for honey. Honeyguide birds specialize in finding beehives but struggle to access the honey within. Honey badgers are well-equipped to raid beehives but cannot always find them. However, these two honey-loving species have learned to collaborate on an effective means to meet their objectives. The honeyguide bird guides honey badgers to newly discovered hives. Once the honey badger has ransacked the hive, the honey guide bird safely enters to enjoy the leftover honey.

    Much like honeyguide birds and honey badgers, nurses and health professionals from other specialty areas can—and should—collaborate to design effective programs. Nurses bring specialties to the table that make them natural partners to professionals with different specialties. When nurses take the requisite leadership in becoming involved throughout the healthcare system, these partnerships can better design and deliver highly effective programs that meet objectives.

    In this Assignment, you will practice this type of leadership by advocating for a healthcare program. Equally as important, you will advocate for a collaborative role of the nurse in the design and implementation of this program. To do this, assume you are preparing to be interviewed by a professional organization/publication regarding your thoughts on the role of the nurse in the design and implementation of new healthcare programs.

    To Prepare:
    Review the Resources and reflect on your thinking regarding the role of the nurse in the design and implementation of new healthcare programs.
    Select a healthcare program within your practice and consider the design and implementation of this program.
    Reflect on advocacy efforts and the role of the nurse in relation to healthcare program design and implementation.
    The Assignment: (2–4 pages)

    In a 2- to 4-page paper, create an interview transcript of your responses to the following interview questions:

    Tell us about a healthcare program, within your practice. What are the costs and projected outcomes of this program?
    Who is your target population?
    What is the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of this healthcare program? Can you provide examples?
    What is your role as an advocate for your target population for this healthcare program? Do you have input into design decisions? How else do you impact design?
    What is the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation? How does this role vary between design and implementation of healthcare programs? Can you provide examples?
    Who are the members of a healthcare team that you believe are most needed to implement a program? Can you explain why?
    By Day 7 of Week 8

    Submit your interview transcript.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK8Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
    Click the Week 8 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
    Click the Week 8 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK8Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
    Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 8 Assignment Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 8 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 8

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 8 Assignment

    Next Module

    To go to the next module:

    Module 5
    Module 5: Program/Policy Evaluation (Weeks 9-10)
    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Program Policy and Evaluation [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Analyze opportunities for RNs and APRNs to participate in program/policy evaluations
    Analyze strategies for overcoming challenges for participating in program/policy evaluations
    Recommend strategies to improve the advocacy and communication of program/policy evaluations
    Describe healthcare program/policy outcomes
    Analyze healthcare program/policy evaluations
    Analyze the role of the nurse advocate in program/policy evaluation
    Due By Assignment
    Week 9, Days 1–2 Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources.
    Compose your initial Discussion post.
    Week 9, Day 3 Post your initial Discussion post.
    Begin to compose your Assignment.
    Week 9, Days 4-5 Review peer Discussion posts.
    Compose your peer Discussion responses.
    Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 9, Day 6 Post at least two peer Discussion responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post).
    Week 9, Day 7 Wrap up Discussion.
    Week 10, Days 1-6 Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 10, Day 7 Deadline to submit your Assignment.
    Learning Resources

    Required Readings
    Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Chapter 7, “Health Policy and Social Program Evaluation” (pp. 116–124 only)

    Glasgow, R. E., Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus, A. C. (2003). Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. American Journal of Public Health, 93(8), 1261–1267.

    Shiramizu, B., Shambaugh, V., Petrovich, H., Seto, T. B., Ho, T., Mokuau, N., & Hedges, J. R. (2016). Leading by success: Impact of a clinical and translational research infrastructure program to address health inequities. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 4(5), 983–991.

    Williams, J. K., & Anderson, C. M. (2018). Omics research ethics considerations. Nursing Outlook, 66(4), 386–393. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2018.05.003

    Document: Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Template (Word document)

    Required Media

    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). The Importance of Program Evaluation [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Peter Beilenson: Ethics and advocacy [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Week 9 Discussion
    Discussion: The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluation
    In the Module 4 Discussion, you considered how professional nurses can become involved in policy-making. A critical component of any policy design is evaluation of the results. How comfortable are you with the thought of becoming involved with such matters?

    Some nurses may be hesitant to get involved with policy evaluation. The preference may be to focus on the care and well-being of their patients; some nurses may feel ill-equipped to enter the realm of policy and political activities. However, as you have examined previously, who better to advocate for patients and effective programs and policies than nurses? Already patient advocates in interactions with doctors and leadership, why not with government and regulatory agencies?

    In this Discussion, you will reflect on the role of professional nurses in policy evaluation.

    To Prepare:
    In the Module 4 Discussion, you considered how professional nurses can become involved in policy-making.
    Review the Resources and reflect on the role of professional nurses in policy evaluation.
    By Day 3 of Week 9

    Post an explanation of at least two opportunities that currently exist for RNs and APRNs to actively participate in policy review. Explain some of the challenges that these opportunities may present and describe how you might overcome these challenges. Finally, recommend two strategies you might make to better advocate for or communicate the existence of these opportunities. Be specific and provide examples.

    By Day 6 of Week 9

    Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days by suggesting additional opportunities or recommendations for overcoming the challenges described by your colleagues.

    *Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 9 Discussion Rubric

    Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 9

    To participate in this Discussion:

    Week 10 Discussion
    Assignment: Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation
    Program/policy evaluation is a valuable tool that can help strengthen the quality of programs/policies and improve outcomes for the populations they serve. Program/policy evaluation answers basic questions about program/policy effectiveness. It involves collecting and analyzing information about program/policy activities, characteristics, and outcomes. This information can be used to ultimately improve program services or policy initiatives.

    Nurses can play a very important role assessing program/policy evaluation for the same reasons that they can be so important to program/policy design. Nurses bring expertise and patient advocacy that can add significant insight and impact. In this Assignment, you will practice applying this expertise and insight by selecting an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation and reflecting on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program/policy.

    To Prepare:
    Review the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template provided in the Resources.
    Select an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation or choose one of interest to you.
    Review community, state, or federal policy evaluation and reflect on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program or policy described.
    The Assignment: (2–3 pages)
    Based on the program or policy evaluation you selected, complete the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template. Be sure to address the following:

    Describe the healthcare program or policy outcomes.
    How was the success of the program or policy measured?
    How many people were reached by the program or policy selected?
    How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?
    At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted?
    What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?
    What specific information on unintended consequences was identified?
    What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.
    Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?
    Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?
    Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after 1 year of implementation.
    By Day 7 of Week 10

    Submit your completed healthcare program/policy evaluation analysis.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK10Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
    Click the Week 10 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
    Click the Week 10 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK10Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
    Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
    Due to the nature of this assignment, your instructor may require more than 5 days to provide you with quality feedback.
    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 10 Assignment Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 10 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 10

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 10 Assignment

    Module 5: Looking Ahead

    Please Note: The Module 6, Week 11 Assignment, Global Healthcare Comparison Matrix and Narrative Statement, is due on Day 5 of Week 11.

    Next Module

    To go to the next module:

    Module 6
    Module 6: Global Healthcare Issues (Week 11)
    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Global Healthcare Issues [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Compare healthcare policies related to global healthcare issues in the U.S. and abroad
    Analyze the impact of the social determinants of health on global healthcare issues
    Analyze how policy impacts the health of the global population
    Analyze how policy impacts the role of the nurse
    Compare how global health issues impact local healthcare organizations and policies in the U.S and abroad
    Recommend advocacy for the incorporation of a global perspective into local practice and the role of the nurse leader
    Analyze impacts of the incorporation of a global perspective into local practice and the role of the nurse leader
    Analyze how a global perspective represents and contributes to social change
    Due By Assignment
    Week 11, Days 1–2 Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources.
    Week 11, Day 3-4 Begin to compose your Assignment.
    Week 11, Day 5 Deadline to submit your Assignment.
    Learning Resources

    Required Readings
    Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Chapter 11, “The Impact of Globalization: Nurses Influencing Global Health Policy” (pp. 194–208)

    Corless, I. B., Nardi, D., Milstead, J. A., Larson, E., Nokes, K. M., Orsega, S., Kurth, A. E., … Woith, W. (2018). Expanding nursing’s role in responding to global pandemics. Nursing Outlook, 66(4), 412–415.

    Donkin, A., Goldblatt, P., Allen, J., Nathanson, V., & Marmot, M. (2017). Global action on the social determinants of health. BMJ Global Health, 3(1). doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000603.

    Sandoval-Almazana, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2011). Are government internet portals evolving towards more interaction, participation, and collaboration? Revisiting the rhetoric of e-government among municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29(Suppl. 1), S72–S81.

    World Health Organization (WHO). (n.d.). Global health agenda. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from http://www.who.int/about/vision/global_health_agenda/en/

    Document: Global Health Comparison Matrix (Word document)

    Required Media

    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Global Healthcare Issues [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Final Thoughts [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Week 11 Assignment
    Assignment: Global Healthcare Comparison Matrix and Narrative Statement
    Note: This Assignment is due on Day 5 of Week 11.

    If you talk about a possible poor health outcome, do you believe that outcome will occur? Do you believe eye contact and personal contact should be avoided?

    You would have a difficult time practicing as a nurse if you believed these to be true. But they are very real beliefs in some cultures.

    Differences in cultural beliefs, subcultures, religion, ethnic customs, dietary customs, language, and a host of other factors contribute to the complex environment that surrounds global healthcare issues. Failure to understand and account for these differences can create a gulf between practitioners and the public they serve.

    In this Assignment, you will examine a global health issue and consider the approach to this issue by the United States and by one other country.

    To Prepare:
    Review the World Health Organization’s (WHO) global health agenda and select one global health issue to focus on for this Assignment.
    Select at least one additional country to compare to the U.S. for this Assignment.
    Reflect on how the global health issue you selected is approached in the U.S. and in the additional country you selected.
    Review and download the Global Health Comparison Matrix provided in the Resources.
    The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Global Health Comparison Matrix; 1-page Plan for Social Change)
    Part 1: Global Health Comparison Matrix
    Focusing on the country you selected and the U.S., complete the Global Health Comparison Matrix. Be sure to address the following:

    Consider the U.S. national/federal health policies that have been adapted for the global health issue you selected from the WHO global health agenda. Compare these policies to the additional country you selected for study.
    Explain the strengths and weaknesses of each policy.
    Explain how the social determinants of health may impact the global health issue you selected. Be specific and provide examples.
    Using the WHO’s Organization’s global health agenda as well as the results of your own research, analyze how each country’s government addresses cost, quality, and access to the global health issue selected.
    Explain how the health policy you selected might impact the health of the global population. Be specific and provide examples.
    Explain how the health policy you selected might impact the role of the nurse in each country.
    Explain how global health issues impact local healthcare organizations and policies in both countries. Be specific and provide examples.
    Part 2: A Plan for Social Change
    Reflect on the global health policy comparison and analysis you conducted in Part 1 of the Assignment and the impact that global health issues may have on the world, the U.S., your community, as well as your practice as a nurse leader.

    In a 1-page response, create a plan for social change that incorporates a global perspective or lens into your local practice and role as a nurse leader.

    Explain how you would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into your local practice and role as a nurse leader.
    Explain how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact your local practice and role as a nurse leader.
    Explain how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into your local practice as a nurse leader represents and contributes to social change. Be specific and provide examples
    By Day 5 of Week 11

    Submit Part 1 and Part 2 of your Assignment.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
    Click the Week 11 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
    Click the Week 11 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
    Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 11 Assignment Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 11 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 5 of Week 11

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 11 Assignment

    Congratulations! After you have finished all of the assignments for this Module, you have completed the course. Please submit your Course Evaluation by Day 7.

    The post NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health appeared first on College Pal. Visit us at College Pal – Connecting to a pal for your paper

  • NURS 6051 Transforming Nursing and Healthcare Through Technology

    The post NURS 6051 Transforming Nursing and Healthcare Through Technology is a property of College Pal
    College Pal writes Plagiarism Free Papers. Visit us at College Pal – Connecting to a pal for your paper

    Evidence-based practice is an essential nurse competency that supports the provision of effective and efficient care. Through team projects and individual applications, students learn how to organize, evaluate, and use health information and knowledge to critically appraise and use information technology to enhance evidence-based practice. Students also apply evidence-based practice to improve advanced nursing practice and healthcare outcomes across organization, public-health, and consumer-health settings.

    Module 1: What Is Informatics? (Weeks 1-2)
    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). What is Informatics? [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Analyze how data collection and access can be used to derive knowledge in a healthcare setting
    Analyze the role of the nurse leader in using clinical reasoning and judgement in the formation of knowledge
    Explain the role of the nurse as a knowledge worker
    Explain concepts of nursing informatics
    Create infographics related to nursing informatics and the role of the nurse as a knowledge worker
    Due By Assignment
    Week 1, Days 1–2 Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources.
    Compose your initial Discussion post.
    Week 1, Day 3 Post your initial Discussion post.
    Begin to compose your Assignment.
    Week 1, Days 4-5 Review peer Discussion posts.
    Compose your peer Discussion responses.
    Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 1, Day 6 Post at least two peer Discussion responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post).
    Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 1, Day 7 Wrap up Discussion.
    Week 2, Day 1–6 Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 2, Day 7 Deadline to submit your Assignment.
    Learning Resources
    Required Readings
    McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Chapter 1, “Nursing Science and the Foundation of Knowledge” (pp. 7–19)
    Chapter 2, “Introduction to Information, Information Science, and Information Systems” (pp. 21–33)
    Chapter 3, “Computer Science and the Foundation of Knowledge Model” (pp. 35–62)

    Nagle, L., Sermeus, W., & Junger, A. (2017). Evolving Role of the Nursing Infomatics Specialist. In J. Murphy, W. Goosen, & P. Weber (Eds.), Forecasting Competencies for Nurses in the Future of Connected Health (212-221). Clifton, VA: IMIA and IOS Press. Retrieved from https://serval.unil.ch/resource/serval:BIB_4A0FEA56B8CB.P001/REF

    Sweeney, J. (2017). Healthcare informatics. Online Journal of Nursing Informatics, 21(1).

    Required Media
    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Health Informatics and Population Health: Trends in Population Health [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Credit: Provided courtesy of the Laureate International Network of Universities.

    Public Health Informatics Institute. (2017). Public Health Informatics: “translating” knowledge for health [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLUygA8Hpfo

    Discussion: The Application of Data to Problem-Solving
    In the modern era, there are few professions that do not to some extent rely on data. Stockbrokers rely on market data to advise clients on financial matters. Meteorologists rely on weather data to forecast weather conditions, while realtors rely on data to advise on the purchase and sale of property. In these and other cases, data not only helps solve problems, but adds to the practitioner’s and the discipline’s body of knowledge.

    Of course, the nursing profession also relies heavily on data. The field of nursing informatics aims to make sure nurses have access to the appropriate date to solve healthcare problems, make decisions in the interest of patients, and add to knowledge.

    In this Discussion, you will consider a scenario that would benefit from access to data and how such access could facilitate both problem-solving and knowledge formation.

    To Prepare:
    Reflect on the concepts of informatics and knowledge work as presented in the Resources.
    Consider a hypothetical scenario based on your own healthcare practice or organization that would require or benefit from the access/collection and application of data. Your scenario may involve a patient, staff, or management problem or gap.
    By Day 3 of Week 1

    Post a description of the focus of your scenario. Describe the data that could be used and how the data might be collected and accessed. What knowledge might be derived from that data? How would a nurse leader use clinical reasoning and judgment in the formation of knowledge from this experience?

    By Day 6 of Week 1

    Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days, asking questions to help clarify the scenario and application of data, or offering additional/alternative ideas for the application of nursing informatics principles.

    *Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 1 Discussion Rubric

    Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 1

    To participate in this Discussion:

    Week 1 Discussion
    Assignment: The Nurse Leader as Knowledge Worker
    The term “knowledge worker” was first coined by management consultant and author Peter Drucker in his book, The Landmarks of Tomorrow (1959). Drucker defined knowledge workers as high-level workers who apply theoretical and analytical knowledge, acquired through formal training, to develop products and services. Does this sound familiar?

    Nurses are very much knowledge workers. What has changed since Drucker’s time are the ways that knowledge can be acquired. The volume of data that can now be generated and the tools used to access this data have evolved significantly in recent years and helped healthcare professionals (among many others) to assume the role of knowledge worker in new and powerful ways.

    In this Assignment, you will consider the evolving role of the nurse leader and how this evolution has led nurse leaders to assume the role of knowledge worker. You will prepare a PowerPoint presentation with an infographic (graphic that visually represents information, data, or knowledge. Infographics are intended to present information quickly and clearly.) to educate others on the role of nurse as knowledge worker.

    Reference: Drucker, P. (1959). The landmarks of tomorrow. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.

    To Prepare:
    Review the concepts of informatics as presented in the Resources.
    Reflect on the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
    Consider how knowledge may be informed by data that is collected/accessed.
    The Assignment:
    Explain the concept of a knowledge worker.
    Define and explain nursing informatics and highlight the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
    Include one slide that visually represents the role of a nurse leader as knowledge worker.
    Your PowerPoint should Include the hypothetical scenario you originally shared in the Discussion Forum. Include your examination of the data that you could use, how the data might be accessed/collected, and what knowledge might be derived from that data. Be sure to incorporate feedback received from your colleagues’ responses.
    By Day 7 of Week 2

    Submit your completed Presentation.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
    Click the Week 2 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
    Click the Week 2 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
    Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 2 Assignment Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 2 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 2

    To participate in this Assignment:

    Week 2 Assignment

    Next Module

    To go to the next module:

    Module 2
    Module 2: The Role of the Informatics Specialist in Healthcare (Weeks 3-4)
    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). The Nurse Informaticist [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Analyze interactions between nurse informaticists, data/technology specialists, and other professionals in healthcare organizations
    Recommend strategies to improve interactions between nurse informaticists and other professionals
    Analyze how nursing informatics as a specialty and new technologies impact interactions between nurse informaticists and members of healthcare teams
    Recommend nursing informatics projects to improve outcomes or efficiencies in healthcare organizations
    Identify stakeholders impacted by nursing informatics projects
    Analyze how nursing informatics projects improve outcomes or efficiencies in healthcare organizations
    Identify technologies required for implementation of nursing informatics projects
    Analyze the role of the nurse informaticist in nursing informatics project teams
    Due By Assignment
    Week 3, Days 1–2 Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources.
    Compose your initial Discussion post.
    Week 3, Day 3 Post your initial Discussion post.
    Begin to compose your Assignment.
    Week 3, Days 4-5 Review peer Discussion posts.
    Compose your peer Discussion responses.
    Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 3, Day 6 Post at least two peer Discussion responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post).
    Week 3, Day 7 Wrap up Discussion.
    Deadline to submit your Assignment.
    Week 4, Days 1-6 Continue to compose your Assignment
    Week 4, Day 7 Deadline to submit your Assignment
    Learning Resources
    Required Readings
    McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Chapter 25, “The Art of Caring in Technology-Laden Environments” (pp. 525–535)
    Chapter 26, “Nursing Informatics and the Foundation of Knowledge” (pp. 537–551)

    Mosier, S., Roberts, W. D., & Englebright, J. (2019). A Systems-Level Method for Developing Nursing Informatics Solutions: The Role of Executive Leadership. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 49(11), 543-548.

    Ng, Y. C., Alexander, S., & Frith, K. H. (2018). Integration of Mobile Health Applications in Health Information Technology Initiatives: Expanding Opportunities for Nurse Participation in Population Health. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 36(5), 209-213.

    Sipes, C. (2016). Project management: Essential skill of nurse informaticists. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 225, 252-256.

    Discussion: Interaction Between Nurse Informaticists and Other Specialists
    Nature offers many examples of specialization and collaboration. Ant colonies and bee hives are but two examples of nature’s sophisticated organizations. Each thrives because their members specialize by tasks, divide labor, and collaborate to ensure food, safety, and general well-being of the colony or hive.

    Of course, humans don’t fare too badly in this regard either. And healthcare is a great example. As specialists in the collection, access, and application of data, nurse informaticists collaborate with specialists on a regular basis to ensure that appropriate data is available to make decisions and take actions to ensure the general well-being of patients.

    In this Discussion, you will reflect on your own observations of and/or experiences with informaticist collaboration. You will also propose strategies for how these collaborative experiences might be improved.

    To Prepare:
    Review the Resources and reflect on the evolution of nursing informatics from a science to a nursing specialty.
    Consider your experiences with nurse Informaticists or technology specialists within your healthcare organization.
    By Day 3 of Week 3

    Post a description of experiences or observations about how nurse informaticists and/or data or technology specialists interact with other professionals within your healthcare organization. Suggest at least one strategy on how these interactions might be improved. Be specific and provide examples. Then, explain the impact you believe the continued evolution of nursing informatics as a specialty and/or the continued emergence of new technologies might have on professional interactions.

    By Day 6 of Week 3

    Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days, offering one or more additional interaction strategies in support of the examples/observations shared or by offering further insight to the thoughts shared about the future of these interactions.

    *Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 3 Discussion Rubric

    Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 3

    To participate in this Discussion:

    Week 3 Discussion
    Assignment: The Impact of Nursing Informatics on Patient Outcomes and Patient Care Efficiencies
    In the Discussion for this module, you considered the interaction of nurse informaticists with other specialists to ensure successful care. How is that success determined?

    Patient outcomes and the fulfillment of care goals is one of the major ways that healthcare success is measured. Measuring patient outcomes results in the generation of data that can be used to improve results. Nursing informatics can have a significant part in this process and can help to improve outcomes by improving processes, identifying at-risk patients, and enhancing efficiency.

    To Prepare:
    Review the concepts of technology application as presented in the Resources.
    Reflect on how emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence may help fortify nursing informatics as a specialty by leading to increased impact on patient outcomes or patient care efficiencies.
    Week 4 Assignment
    The Assignment: (4-5 pages not including the title and reference page)
    In a 4- to 5-page project proposal written to the leadership of your healthcare organization, propose a nursing informatics project for your organization that you advocate to improve patient outcomes or patient-care efficiency. Your project proposal should include the following:

    Describe the project you propose.
    Identify the stakeholders impacted by this project.
    Explain the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies this project is aimed at improving and explain how this improvement would occur. Be specific and provide examples.
    Identify the technologies required to implement this project and explain why.
    Identify the project team (by roles) and explain how you would incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.
    Use APA format and include a title page and reference page.
    Use the Safe Assign Drafts to check your match percentage before submitting your work.
    By Day 7 of Week 4

    Submit your completed Project Proposal.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
    Click the Week 4 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
    Click the Week 4 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
    Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 4 Assignment Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 4 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 4

    To participate in this Assignment:

    Week 4 Assignment

    Next Module

    To go to the next module:

    Module 3
    Module 3: Data-Information-Knowledge-Wisdom (DIKW) (Week 5)
    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Data-Information-Knowledge-Wisdom [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Analyze benefits, challenges, and risks of using big data in clinical systems
    Recommend strategies to mitigate challenges and risks of using big data in clinical systems
    Due By Assignment
    Week 5, Days 1–2 Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources.
    Compose your initial Discussion post.
    Week 5, Day 3 Post your initial Discussion post.
    Week 5, Days 4-5 Review peer Discussion posts.
    Compose your peer Discussion responses.
    Week 5, Day 6 Post at least two peer Discussion responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post).
    Week 5, Day 7 Wrap up Discussion.
    Learning Resources
    Required Readings
    McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Chapter 22, “Data Mining as a Research Tool” (pp. 477-493)
    Chapter 24, “Bioinformatics, Biomedical Informatics, and Computational Biology” (pp. 537-551)
    Glassman, K. S. (2017). Using data in nursing practice. American Nurse Today, 12(11), 45–47. Retrieved from https://www.americannursetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/ant11-Data-1030.pdf

    Thew, J. (2016, April 19). Big data means big potential, challenges for nurse execs. Retrieved from https://www.healthleadersmedia.com/nursing/big-data-means-big-potential-challenges-nurse-execs

    Wang, Y., Kung, L., & Byrd, T. A. (2018). Big data analytics: Understanding its capabilities and potential benefits for healthcare organizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 126(1), 3–13.

    Required Media
    Laureate Education (Executive Producer). (2012). Data, information, knowledge and wisdom continuum [Multimedia file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. Retrieved from http://mym.cdn.laureate-media.com/2dett4d/Walden/NURS/6051/03/mm/continuum/index.html

    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Health Informatics and Population Health: Analyzing Data for Clinical Success [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Vinay Shanthagiri. (2014). Big Data in Health Informatics [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4W6zGmH_pOw

    Week 5 Discussion
    Discussion: Big Data Risks and Rewards
    When you wake in the morning, you may reach for your cell phone to reply to a few text or email messages that you missed overnight. On your drive to work, you may stop to refuel your car. Upon your arrival, you might swipe a key card at the door to gain entrance to the facility. And before finally reaching your workstation, you may stop by the cafeteria to purchase a coffee.

    From the moment you wake, you are in fact a data-generation machine. Each use of your phone, every transaction you make using a debit or credit card, even your entrance to your place of work, creates data. It begs the question: How much data do you generate each day? Many studies have been conducted on this, and the numbers are staggering: Estimates suggest that nearly 1 million bytes of data are generated every second for every person on earth.

    As the volume of data increases, information professionals have looked for ways to use big data—large, complex sets of data that require specialized approaches to use effectively. Big data has the potential for significant rewards—and significant risks—to healthcare. In this Discussion, you will consider these risks and rewards.

    To Prepare:
    Review the Resources and reflect on the web article Big Data Means Big Potential, Challenges for Nurse Execs.
    Reflect on your own experience with complex health information access and management and consider potential challenges and risks you may have experienced or observed.
    By Day 3 of Week 5

    Post a description of at least one potential benefit of using big data as part of a clinical system and explain why. Then, describe at least one potential challenge or risk of using big data as part of a clinical system and explain why. Propose at least one strategy you have experienced, observed, or researched that may effectively mitigate the challenges or risks of using big data you described. Be specific and provide examples.

    By Day 6 of Week 5

    Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days, by offering one or more additional mitigation strategies or further insight into your colleagues’ assessment of big data opportunities and risks.

    *Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 5 Discussion Rubric

    Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 5

    To participate in this Discussion:

    Week 5 Discussion

    Next Module

    To go to the next module:

    Module 4

    Module 4: Technologies Supporting Applied Practice and Optimal Patient Outcomes (Weeks 6-8)
    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Informatics Tools and Technologies [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Evaluate healthcare technology trends for data and information in nursing practice and healthcare delivery
    Analyze challenges and risks inherent in healthcare technology
    Analyze healthcare technology benefits and risks for data safety, legislation, and patient care
    Evaluate healthcare technology impact on patient outcomes, efficiencies, and data management
    Analyze research on the application of clinical systems to improve outcomes and efficiencies
    Due By Assignment
    Week 6, Days 1–2 Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources.
    Compose your initial Discussion post.
    Week 6, Day 3 Post your initial Discussion post.
    Begin to compose your Assignment.
    Week 6, Days 4-5 Review peer Discussion posts.
    Compose your peer Discussion responses.
    Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 6, Day 6 Post at least two peer Discussion responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post).
    Week 6, Day 7 Wrap up Discussion.
    Week 7, Days 1-7 Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 8, Days 1-6 Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 8, Day 7 Deadline to submit your Assignment.
    Learning Resources
    Required Readings
    McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Chapter 14, “The Electronic Health Record and Clinical Informatics” (pp. 267–287)
    Chapter 15, “Informatics Tools to Promote Patient Safety and Quality Outcomes” (pp. 293–317)
    Chapter 16, “Patient Engagement and Connected Health” (pp. 323–338)
    Chapter 17, “Using Informatics to Promote Community/Population Health” (pp. 341–355)
    Chapter 18, “Telenursing and Remote Access Telehealth” (pp. 359–388)

    Dykes, P. C., Rozenblum, R., Dalal, A., Massaro, A., Chang, F., Clements, M., Collins, S. …Bates, D. W. (2017). Prospective evaluation of a multifaceted intervention to improve outcomes in intensive care: The Promoting Respect and Ongoing Safety Through Patient Engagement Communication and Technology Study. Critical Care Medicine, 45(8), e806–e813. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000002449

    HealthIT.gov. (2018c). What is an electronic health record (EHR)? Retrieved from

    https://www.healthit.gov/faq/what-electronic-health-record-ehr

    Rao-Gupta, S., Kruger, D. Leak, L. D., Tieman, L. A., & Manworren, R. C. B. (2018). Leveraging interactive patient care technology to Improve pain management engagement. Pain Management Nursing, 19(3), 212–221.

    Skiba, D. (2017). Evaluation tools to appraise social media and mobile applications. Informatics, 4(3), 32–40.

    Required Media
    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Public Health Informatics [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Electronic Records and Managing IT Change [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Week 6 Discussion
    Discussion: Healthcare Information Technology Trends
    Throughout history, technological advancements have appeared for one purpose before finding applications elsewhere that lead to spikes in its usage and development. The internet, for example, was originally developed to share research before becoming a staple of work and entertainment. But technology—new and repurposed—will undoubtedly continue to be a driver of healthcare information. Informaticists often stay tuned to trends to monitor what the next new technology will be or how the next new idea for applying existing technology can benefit outcomes.

    In this Discussion, you will reflect on your healthcare organization’s use of technology and offer a technology trend you observe in your environment.

    To Prepare:
    Reflect on the Resources related to digital information tools and technologies.
    Consider your healthcare organization’s use of healthcare technologies to manage and distribute information.
    Reflect on current and potential future trends, such as use of social media and mobile applications/telehealth, Internet of Things (IoT)-enabled asset tracking, or expert systems/artificial intelligence, and how they may impact nursing practice and healthcare delivery.
    By Day 3 of Week 6

    Post a brief description of general healthcare technology trends, particularly related to data/information you have observed in use in your healthcare organization or nursing practice. Describe any potential challenges or risks that may be inherent in the technologies associated with these trends you described. Then, describe at least one potential benefit and one potential risk associated with data safety, legislation, and patient care for the technologies you described. Next, explain which healthcare technology trends you believe are most promising for impacting healthcare technology in nursing practice and explain why. Describe whether this promise will contribute to improvements in patient care outcomes, efficiencies, or data management. Be specific and provide examples.

    By Day 6 of Week 6

    Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days, offering additional/alternative ideas regarding opportunities and risks related to the observations shared.

    *Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 6 Discussion Rubric

    Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 6

    To participate in this Discussion:

    Week 7 Assignment
    Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies
    New technology—and the application of existing technology—only appears in healthcare settings after careful and significant research. The stakes are high, and new clinical systems need to offer evidence of positive impact on outcomes or efficiencies.

    Nurse informaticists and healthcare leaders formulate clinical system strategies. As these strategies are often based on technology trends, informaticists and others have then benefited from consulting existing research to inform their thinking.

    In this Assignment, you will review existing research focused on the application of clinical systems. After reviewing, you will summarize your findings.

    To Prepare:
    Review the Resources and reflect on the impact of clinical systems on outcomes and efficiencies within the context of nursing practice and healthcare delivery.
    Conduct a search for recent (within the last 5 years) research focused on the application of clinical systems. The research should provide evidence to support the use of one type of clinical system to improve outcomes and/or efficiencies, such as “the use of personal health records or portals to support patients newly diagnosed with diabetes.”
    Identify and select 4 peer-reviewed research articles from your research.
    For information about annotated bibliographies, visit https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/annotatedbibliographies
    Week 8 Assignment
    The Assignment: (4-5 pages not including the title and reference page)
    In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:

    Identify the 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed, citing each in APA format.
    Include an introduction explaining the purpose of the paper.
    Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples.
    In your conclusion, synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles.
    Use APA format and include a title page.
    Use the Safe Assign Drafts to check your match percentage before submitting your work.
    By Day 7 of Week 8

    Submit your completed Assignment.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK8Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
    Click the Week 8 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
    Click the Week 8 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK8Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
    Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 8 Assignment Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 8 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 8

    To participate in this Assignment:

    Week 8 Assignment

    Next Module

    To go to the next module:

    Module 5
    Module 5: The Nurse Leader and the System Development Life Cycle (Weeks 9-10)

    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Systems Implementation [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Analyze how inclusion of the nurse in the purchasing of health information technology systems impacts healthcare organizations
    Analyze the impact of nurse inclusion on each step of the systems development life cycle
    Due By Assignment
    Week 9, Days 1–2 Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources.
    Compose your initial Discussion post.
    Week 9, Day 3 Post your initial Discussion post.
    Begin to compose your Assignment.
    Week 9, Days 4-5 Review peer Discussion posts.
    Compose your peer Discussion responses.
    Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 9, Day 6 Post at least two peer Discussion responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post).
    Week 9, Day 7 Wrap up Discussion.
    Week 10, Days 1-6 Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 10, Day 7 Deadline to submit your Assignment.
    Learning Resources
    Required Readings
    McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Chapter 9, “Systems Development Life Cycle: Nursing Informatics and Organizational Decision Making” (pp. 175–187)
    Chapter 12, “Electronic Security” (pp. 229–242)
    Chapter 13, “Workflow and Beyond Meaningful Use” (pp. 245–261)

    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (n.d.a). Health IT evaluation toolkit and evaluation measures quick reference guide. Retrieved September 27, 2018, from

    https://healthit.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/evaluation-resources/health-it-evaluation-toolkit-and-evaluation-measures-quick-reference

    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (n.d.b). Workflow assessment for health IT toolkit. Retrieved September 27, 2018, from https://healthit.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/evaluation-resources/workflow-assessment-health-it-toolkit

    Required Media
    Louis, I. (2011, August 17). Systems development life cycle (SDLC) [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtpyjPrpyX8

    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Interoperability, Standards, and Security [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Managing Health Information Technology [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Week 9 Discussion
    Discussion: The Inclusion of Nurses in the Systems Development Life Cycle
    In the media introduction to this module, it was suggested that you as a nurse have an important role in the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC). With a focus on patient care and outcomes, nurses may not always see themselves as contributors to the development of new systems. However, as you may have observed in your own experience, exclusion of nurse contributions when implementing systems can have dire consequences.

    In this Discussion, you will consider the role you might play in systems development and the ramifications of not being an active participant in systems development.

    To Prepare:
    Review the steps of the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) as presented in the Resources.
    Reflect on your own healthcare organization and consider any steps your healthcare organization goes through when purchasing and implementing a new health information technology system.
    Consider what a nurse might contribute to decisions made at each stage of the SDLC when planning for new health information technology.
    By Day 3 of Week 9

    Post a description of what you believe to be the consequences of a healthcare organization not involving nurses in each stage of the SDLC when purchasing and implementing a new health information technology system. Provide specific examples of potential issues at each stage of the SDLC and explain how the inclusion of nurses may help address these issues. Then, explain whether you had any input in the selection and planning of new health information technology systems in your nursing practice or healthcare organization and explain potential impacts of being included or not in the decision-making process. Be specific and provide examples.

    By Day 6 of Week 9

    Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days, by offering additional thoughts regarding the examples shared, SDLC-related issues, and ideas on how the inclusion of nurses might have impacted the example described by your colleagues.

    *Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 9 Discussion Rubric

    Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 9

    To participate in this Discussion:

    Week 10 Assignment
    Portfolio Assignment: The Role of the Nurse Informaticist in Systems Development and Implementation
    Assume you are a nurse manager on a unit where a new nursing documentation system is to be implemented. You want to ensure that the system will be usable and acceptable for the nurses impacted. You realize a nurse leader must be on the implementation team.

    To Prepare:
    Review the steps of the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) and reflect on the scenario presented.
    Consider the benefits and challenges associated with involving a nurse leader on an implementation team for health information technology.
    The Assignment: (2-3 pages not including the title and reference page)
    In preparation of filling this role, develop a 2- to 3-page role description for a graduate-level nurse to guide his/her participation on the implementation team. The role description should be based on the SDLC stages and tasks and should clearly define how this individual will participate in and impact each of the following steps:

    Planning and requirements definition
    Analysis
    Design of the new system
    Implementation
    Post-implementation support
    Use APA format and include a title page and reference page.
    Use the Safe Assign Drafts to check your match percentage before submitting your work.
    By Day 7 of Week 10

    Submit your completed Role Description.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK10Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
    Click the Week 10 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
    Click the Week 10 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK10Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
    Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 10 Assignment Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 10 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 10

    To participate in this Assignment:

    Week 10 Assignment

    Next Module

    To go to the next module:

    Module 6
    Module 6: Policy and Regulation Supporting Informatics and Technology Integration (Week 11)
    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Policy and Regulation [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Evaluate legislative policies and regulations for health and nursing informatics
    Create fact sheets for health and nursing informatics
    Analyze impact of legislative policies and regulations for clinical care, patient/provider interactions, and workflows
    Evaluate healthcare organizational policies and procedures to address legislative policies and regulations
    Due By Assignment
    Week 11, Days 1–2 Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources.
    Begin to compose your Assignment.
    Week 11, Days 3-4 Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 11, Day 5 Deadline to submit your Assignment.
    Learning Resources
    Required Readings
    McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Chapter 8, “Legislative Aspects of Nursing Informatics: HITECH and HIPAA” (pp. 145–166)

    American Association of Nurse Practitioners. (2018). MACRA/MIPS: The transition from fee-for-service to quality-based reimbursement. Retrieved from https://www.aanp.org/legislation-regulation/federal-legislation/macra-s-quality-payment-program

    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (n.d.). MACRA. Retrieved January 18, 2019, from https://www.cms.gov/medicare/quality-initiatives-patient-assessment-instruments/value-based-programs/macra-mips-and-apms/macra-mips-and-apms.html

    HealthIT.gov. (2018a). Health IT legislation. Retrieved from https://www.healthit.gov/topic/laws-regulation-and-policy/health-it-legislation

    HealthIT.gov. (2018b). Meaningful use and MACRA. Retrieved from

    https://www.healthit.gov/topic/meaningful-use-and-macra/meaningful-use-and-macra

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (n.d.). Laws & Regulations. Retrieved September 27, 2018, from https://www.hhs.gov/regulations/index.html

    Required Media

    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Health Informatics & Population Health Analytics: Privacy, Security, and Ethics [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Week 11 Assignment
    Assignment: Policy/Regulation Fact Sheet
    As a professional nurse, you are expected to apply your expertise to patient care. On occasion, you will also be expected to share that expertise.

    With evolving technology and continuous changes to regulations designed to keep up these changes, there is usually a need to share information and expertise to inform colleagues, leadership, patients, and other stakeholders.

    In this Assignment, you will study a recent nursing informatics-related healthcare policy, and you will share the relevant details via a fact sheet designed to inform and educate.

    To Prepare:
    Review the Resources on healthcare policy and regulatory/legislative topics related to health and nursing informatics.
    Consider the role of the nurse informaticist in relation to a healthcare organization’s compliance with various policies and regulations, such as the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA).
    Research and select one health or nursing informatics policy (within the past 5 years) or regulation for further study.
    The Assignment: (1 page not including the title and reference page)
    Create a 1-page fact sheet that your healthcare organization could hypothetically use to explain the health or nursing informatics policy/regulation you selected. Your fact sheet should address the following:

    Briefly and generally explain the policy or regulation you selected.
    Address the impact of the policy or regulation you selected on system implementation.
    Address the impact of the policy or regulation you selected on clinical care, patient/provider interactions, and workflow.
    Highlight organizational policies and procedures that are/will be in place at your healthcare organization to address the policy or regulation you selected. Be specific.
    Use APA format and include a title page, in-text citations, and reference page.
    Use the Safe Assign Drafts to check your match percentage before submitting your work.
    By Day 5 of Week 11

    Submit your completed Policy/Regulation Fact Sheet.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
    Click the Week 11 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
    Click the Week 11 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
    Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 11 Assignment Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 11 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 5 of Week 11

    To participate in this Assignment:

    Week 11 Assignment

    Congratulations! After you have finished all of the assignments for this Module, you have completed the course. Please submit your Course Evaluation by Day 7.

    The post NURS 6051 Transforming Nursing and Healthcare Through Technology appeared first on College Pal. Visit us at College Pal – Connecting to a pal for your paper

  • NURS 6053 – Interprofessional Organizational and Systems Leadership

    The post NURS 6053 – Interprofessional Organizational and Systems Leadership is a property of College Pal
    College Pal writes Plagiarism Free Papers. Visit us at College Pal – Connecting to a pal for your paper

    Students in this course prepare to exercise leadership through which they can help to ensure their organization is able to adapt and flourish in the ever-changing world of healthcare. Students explore the impact of healthcare system changes on transforming the nursing profession. They examine and discuss theories related to leadership and management and learn about empowerment strategies that assist master’s-prepared nurses to assume and succeed in leadership roles. Students engage in course assignments that focus on real-world nursing practice applications of theory.

    Module 1: Healthcare Environment (Weeks 1-2)
    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). The Healthcare Environment [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Analyze current national healthcare issues/stressors
    Analyze the impact of national healthcare issues/stressors on healthcare organizations
    Analyze strategies for addressing national healthcare issues/stressors
    Due By Assignment
    Week 1, Days 1–2 Read the Learning Resources.
    Compose your initial Discussion post.
    Week 1, Day 3 Post your initial Discussion post.
    Begin to compose your Assignment.
    Week 1, Days 4-5 Review peer Discussion posts.
    Compose your peer Discussion responses.
    Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 1, Day 6 Post two peer Discussion responses.
    Week 2, Days 1–6 Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 2, Day 7 Deadline to submit your Assignment.
    Photo Credit: [Anuska Sampedro]/[Moment]/Getty Images

    Learning Resources
    Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.

    Required Readings
    Marshall, E., & Broome, M. (2017). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter 2, “Understanding Contexts for Transformational Leadership: Complexity, Change, and Strategic Planning” (pp. 37–62)
    Chapter 3, “Current Challenges in Complex Health Care Organizations: The Triple Aim” (pp. 63–86)
    Read any TWO of the following (plus TWO additional readings on your selected issue):

    Auerbach, D. I., Staiger, D. O., & Buerhaus, P. I. (2018). Growing ranks of advanced practice clinicians—Implications for the physician workforce. New England Journal of Medicine, 378(25), 2358–2360. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1801869

    Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

    Gerardi, T., Farmer, P., & Hoffman, B. (2018). Moving closer to the 2020 BSN-prepared workforce goal. American Journal of Nursing, 118(2), 43–45. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000530244.15217.aa

    Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

    Jacobs, B., McGovern, J., Heinmiller, J., & Drenkard, K. (2018). Engaging employees in well-being: Moving from the Triple Aim to the Quadruple Aim. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 42(3), 231–245. doi:10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000303

    Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

    Norful, A. A., de Jacq, K., Carlino, R., & Poghosyan, L. (2018). Nurse practitioner–physician comanagement: A theoretical model to alleviate primary care strain. Annals of Family Medicine, 16(3), 250–256. doi:10.1370/afm.2230

    Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

    Palumbo, M., Rambur, B., & Hart, V. (2017). Is health care payment reform impacting nurses’ work settings, roles, and education preparation? Journal of Professional Nursing, 33(6), 400–404. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.11.005

    Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

    Park, B., Gold, S. B., Bazemore, A., & Liaw, W. (2018). How evolving United States payment models influence primary care and its impact on the Quadruple Aim. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 31(4), 588–604. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2018.04.170388

    Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

    Pittman, P., & Scully-Russ, E. (2016). Workforce planning and development in times of delivery system transformation. Human Resources for Health, 14(56), 1–15. doi:10.1186/s12960-016-0154-3. Retrieved from https://human-resources-health.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s12960-016-0154-3

    Poghosyan, L., Norful, A., & Laugesen, M. (2018). Removing restrictions on nurse practitioners’ scope of practice in New York state: Physicians’ and nurse practitioners’ perspectives. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 30(6), 354–360. doi:10.1097/JXX.0000000000000040

    Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

    Ricketts, T., & Fraher, E. (2013). Reconfiguring health workforce policy so that education, training, and actual delivery of care are closely connected. Health Affairs, 32(11), 1874–1880. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0531

    Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

    Required Media
    Laureate Education (Producer). (2015). Leading in Healthcare Organizations of the Future [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Discussion: Review of Current Healthcare Issues
    If you were to ask 10 people what they believe to be the most significant issue facing healthcare today, you might get 10 different answers. Escalating costs? Regulation? Technology disruption?

    These and many other topics are worthy of discussion. Not surprisingly, much has been said in the research, within the profession, and in the news about these topics. Whether they are issues of finance, quality, workload, or outcomes, there is no shortage of changes to be addressed.

    In this Discussion, you examine a national healthcare issue and consider how that issue may impact your work setting. You also analyze how your organization has responded to this issue.

    To Prepare:
    Review the Resources and select one current national healthcare issue/stressor to focus on.
    Reflect on the current national healthcare issue/stressor you selected and think about how this issue/stressor may be addressed in your work setting.

    Sample Paper – Week 1 Discussion 1
    NURS 6053 – Review of Current Healthcare Issues

    NURS 6053: Discussion 1 Review of Current Healthcare Issues

    Student’s Name:

    Institutional Affiliation:

    Healthcare Challenge
    One of the most significant national healthcare issues in the US today is burnout and stress among health care workers. Although health care is an inherently high-stress field due to witnessing patients’ agony and loss of life, there is a worsening rate of stress and burn out. Studies show that nearly half of the US healthcare workers report at least one symptom of burnout, such as emotional and physical exhaustion, low job satisfaction, and depersonalization (Dyrbye, Shanafelt, Sinsky, Cipriano, Bhatt, Ommaya & Meyers, 2017). The healthcare issue may impact the healthcare work setting. It can impair the ability of health workers to connect with patients in meaningful ways and fully concentrate on patient care, resulting in reduced productivity, increased nurse turnover, and risk of suicide among caregivers. This can compromise the quality and safety of care. It can also increase the risk of medical errors and hospital-acquired infections (Jacobs, McGovern, Heinmiller & Drenkard, 2018).

    The healthcare challenge can be attributed to various factors. The most significant factor is the rising pressures to produce better outcomes at lower costs in the U.S. health care system. As a result, care providers take the most significant role in implementing the value-based care system. Due to the pressure from the Centre of Medicare Services, healthcare organizations are putting pressure on their employees to change the method of practice. Although the shift is suitable for patients, health workers bear the most significant burden (Park, Gold, Bazemore & Liaw, 2018). In my health system work setting, several initiatives have been implemented to address the issue. Shorter work shifts have been designed to allow health workers time for personal life. Implementing an electronic health record system and employing administrators to handle clerical duties has reduced the care providers’ workload (Shanafelt & Noseworthy, 2017). To improve job satisfaction, participatory decision making where health workers’ views are considered in decision making has been adopted. Additionally, counseling and stress management programs are offered to healthcare workers in the work environment.

    References
    Dyrbye, L. N., Shanafelt, T. D., Sinsky, C. A., Cipriano, P. F., Bhatt, J., Ommaya, A., … & Meyers, D. (2017). Burnout among health care professionals: a call to explore and address this underrecognized threat to safe, high-quality care. NAM perspectives.

    Jacobs, B., McGovern, J., Heinmiller, J., & Drenkard, K. (2018). Engaging employees in well-being: moving from the triple aim to the quadruple aim. Nursing administration quarterly, 42(3), 231-245.

    Park, B., Gold, S. B., Bazemore, A., & Liaw, W. (2018). How evolving United States payment models influence primary care and its impact on the quadruple aim. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 31(4), 588-604.

    Shanafelt, T. D., & Noseworthy, J. H. (2017, January). Executive leadership and physician well-being: nine organizational strategies to promote engagement and reduce burnout. In Mayo Clinic Proceedings (Vol. 92, No. 1, pp. 129-146). Elsevier.

    By Day 3 of Week 1

    Post a description of the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected for analysis, and explain how the healthcare issue/stressor may impact your work setting. Then, describe how your health system work setting has responded to the healthcare issue/stressor, including a description of what changes may have been implemented. Be specific and provide examples.

    By Day 6 of Week 1

    Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days who chose a different national healthcare issue/stressor than you selected. Explain how their chosen national healthcare issue/stressor may also impact your work setting and what (if anything) is being done to address the national healthcare issue/stressor.

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 1 Discussion Rubric

    Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 1

    To participate in this Discussion:

    Week 1 Discussion
    Assignment: Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue
    The Quadruple Aim provides broad categories of goals to pursue to maintain and improve healthcare. Within each goal are many issues that, if addressed successfully, may have a positive impact on outcomes. For example, healthcare leaders are being tasked to shift from an emphasis on disease management often provided in an acute care setting to health promotion and disease prevention delivered in primary care settings. Efforts in this area can have significant positive impacts by reducing the need for primary healthcare and by reducing the stress on the healthcare system.

    Changes in the industry only serve to stress what has always been true; namely, that the healthcare field has always faced significant challenges, and that goals to improve healthcare will always involve multiple stakeholders. This should not seem surprising given the circumstances. Indeed, when a growing population needs care, there are factors involved such as the demands of providing that care and the rising costs associated with healthcare. Generally, it is not surprising that the field of healthcare is an industry facing multifaceted issues that evolve over time.

    In this module’s Discussion, you reviewed some healthcare issues/stressors and selected one for further review. For this Assignment, you will consider in more detail the healthcare issue/stressor you selected. You will also review research that addresses the issue/stressor and write a white paper to your organization’s leadership that addresses the issue/stressor you selected.

    To Prepare:
    Review the national healthcare issues/stressors presented in the Resources and reflect on the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected for study.
    Reflect on the feedback you received from your colleagues on your Discussion post for the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected.
    Identify and review two additional scholarly resources (not included in the Resources for this module) that focus on change strategies implemented by healthcare organizations to address your selected national healthcare issue/stressor.

    Week 2
    The Assignment (3-4 Pages):
    Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue
    Develop a 3- to 4-page paper, written to your organization’s leadership team, addressing your selected national healthcare issue/stressor and how it is impacting your work setting. Be sure to address the following:

    Describe the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected and its impact on your organization. Use organizational data to quantify the impact (if necessary, seek assistance from leadership or appropriate stakeholders in your organization).
    Provide a brief summary of the two articles you reviewed from outside resources on the national healthcare issue/stressor. Explain how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.
    Summarize the strategies used to address the organizational impact of national healthcare issues/stressors presented in the scholarly resources you selected. Explain how they may impact your organization both positively and negatively. Be specific and provide examples.

    Sample Paper – Week 2 Assignment
    NURS 6053 – Review of Current Healthcare Issues
    Curbing Healthcare Costs

    Student’s Name:

    Institutional Affiliation:

    The cost of healthcare in the U.S both at the national level and at the organizational level is astonishing. The United States ranks at number 37 among the countries with advanced healthcare systems, yet it is the largest spender in healthcare. The huge cost of healthcare causes a financial burden to households and citizens of the United States as they have to shoulder the transferred costs as organizations strive to make profits. The citizens also have to pay higher premiums, pay taxes, and also incur extra costs on other services related to healthcare, such as acquiring over the counter medication. Some of the factors that make healthcare costs high are drugs cost, administrative costs, expensive combinations of treatment, defensive medicine, and staff wages. Dividing the healthcare expenditure budget at the national level, 59% of it caters for doctors, hospitals, and clinical services (Amadeo, 2019). The expenditure on medication rises year after year at a rate of 3.3%. The increased expenditure on healthcare is not attributed to increased use of healthcare services but rather increased prices of constituent elements in the budget. This paper aims to focus more on expenditure at the organizational level to try and find strategies that may mitigate the problem.

    Impact of High Costs at the Organization
    Although hospitals have the aim of providing safe and quality care to promote public health, they at time, operate as businesses as they have to ensure they do not incur losses. The need to make profits is threatened by increasing expenditures, which is a constraint to the profit margins. Healthcare costs at the organizational level replicate that at the national level. The cost of acquiring several necessary products and services is very high, while some practices within the facility contribute to increased costs. One of the practices that replicate that at the national level is wastage. It is estimated that thirty percent of the budget on healthcare goes to waste. Some of the activities that create an avenue for wastage are on over-prescription of antibiotics, paperwork adds to administrative costs and fraud. According to the CDC (2019), the rate of Opioid Prescriptions made in 2017 was averagely 58.7 prescriptions per 100 people. Overprescribing antibiotics account for over $ 210 billion, paperwork costs $190 billion, while fraud did see expenses of nearly $200 billion annually (Amadeo, 2019).

    The other factor that increases the cost of healthcare is the heavy use of healthcare services by patients that cannot afford; hence, most of the bills are written off as bad debts. Though the outcomes may be positive health-wise on the patient, the hospital resources are used without anyone accounting for it. Some patients overspend on their insurance beyond the required limits forcing insurance companies to neglect them. On the other hand, reducing the number of medical errors reduces unnecessary expenses and wastage of resources on care and lawsuits. Physicians are afraid of lawsuits and tend to order multiple tests on a patient, yet from the diagnosis, they understand where the problem lies (Amadeo, 2019). According to a research in 2010 by Gallup survey attributed $650 billion wasted on defensive medicine. Offering quality and safe care can save the hospital the costs caused by a minor population such as the elderly who have multiple and expensive to cater for chronic illnesses.

    The cost of supplies and healthcare technology at the facility is very high, considering the need to focus more on disease prevention and health promotion rather than on disease management (Epstein et al., 2014). The center is facing a stiff challenge of acquiring current technologies, implementing I.T infrastructure and various medical devices and prescription drugs. Implementing technology in care provision has the advantage of reducing costs, minimizing wastage, reducing errors, ensuring safety, and improving the quality of care. Our facility is over utilizing old technologies as the budgets of acquiring new devices are high, but at times there are no choices left but to constrain the budget and acquire new systems to be at par with the requirement to provide quality-based care. According to the report by AHA, annually, hospitals in the U.S collectively spend over $47 billion on health I.T, and that was between 2010-2014 (LaPointe, 2017). Costs of other supplies such as food, drugs, and medical equipment at times fall beyond the control of the organization as the suppliers set their prices considering factors such as inflation, taxes, transportation, and profitability thus hiking their prices.

    The cost of remuneration of physicians, nurses, and specialists at the organization accounts for nearly half of the budget. The thought to cut back on staff is not possible considering the rising demand for care, and it may increase the workload on the few staff members, thus affecting productivity. Specialists account for higher wages; no wonder the cost of their services is high.

    Reviewed Articles
    The article by Navathe et al., (2017) uses an example case of the cost of replacing a joint to assess how a hospital can save on expenses. From the study, the most significant of savings came from supplies and implants, while post-acute care savings originated from reduced use of institutional care. The use of post-acute services and reduced prices of implants are simple measures that can be implemented without the need to invest heavily in care coordination. The study utilized 3942 patients at the Baptist Health System (BHS) with the need for lower extremity joint replacement. The study observed readmission rates, length of stay, emergency department visits, and hospital savings from reduced internal costs and post-acute care spending. The outcomes of the study are that it is possible to lower organizational cost, improve care coordination, and quality. The Baptist saw a reduction of implant costs by a 30% margin. The Institution used their surgeons to make a choice of the best implants in the market, identify manufactures with better prices, review medical evidence, and finally chose manufacturers that met the demands and price. The manufacturers engaged in online bidding at competitively lower prices while at the same time met the quality of products that surgeons required.

    According to a study by Dexter & Wachtel (2014), they propose several strategies for checking costs and increasing shared decision-making, patient safety, and quality by minimizing wastage. The authors acknowledge that the healthcare sector uses interventions with higher costs by the justification that the health outcomes will be positive on the patient. The study uses the context of a medical home with anesthesiologists in charge of care, although the strategies applied can be used in different care settings. The article focuses on specific areas and does propose that the management can capitalize on applying medical informatics and analytics. The authors suggest on first eliminating unnecessary interventions that are not of significant benefit to the patient, and they should be evidence-based.

    Data from analytics can be used to detect wastage, and the best thing when taking action is that no one can resist wastage (Dimitrov, 2016). The other factor that the authors consider is human capital. Staff needs to be coordinated such that they are scheduled, patients are booked and the right care giver assigned the task hence saving time and avoiding wastage of resources. Another strategy is to minimize the habit of cancelling patient schedules as they come at a cost. Dexter &Wachtel (2014) do also propose on reducing the time spent on given healthcare services to increase productivity. When considering healthcare, they can be accounted as variable costs, and the more time spent on a service, the costly they become. The quality of service needs to be improved to minimize a patient’s length of stay. To sum it up, the article focuses on service improvement for quality outcomes at reduced costs and on capitalizing on information and data from I.T infrastructures at the care center.

    Strategies Used To Address the Organizational Impact of the High Costs of Expenditure
    The concern for the high costs of healthcare has been there for years now, and different methods of dealing with the problem have been proposed. Various experts and scholars suggest ideas related to capitating some form of products and services. Current proposals though focus on Value-based care, population management, Accountable Care Organizations, and clinical outcomes (Epstein et al., 2014). Such proposal aims to cut back on unnecessary use of resources via quality and safe care. The management of some organizations focuses on prioritizing products and services and where necessary, use smart technologies and ideas such as recycling and tech with multi-functionality. Other approaches of cutting on healthcare costs have been on the promotion of fair competition and transparency on the suppliers’ part with the expectation that hospitals will benefit on quality products and services at lower costs. This has become a challenge as most suppliers have grown in size and network to take a monopolistic form. It is worth to note that there are healthcare organizations that have capitalized on procurement ideas such as forming group-purchasing organizations to take advantage of discounts from buying in bulk and having a higher negotiating power. Some organizations cut back on the costs of specialists by capitalizing on the ability of nurses and physicians to provide the same service as specialists at a cheaper cost.

    From the two articles by Dexter & Wachtel (2014) and Navathe et al. (2017), it is worth to note that there is no specific strategy that can reduce the cost of healthcare in an organization independently but rather a strategy of multiple solutions should be applied. The two articles share the similarity of focusing on the quality of services and competency of staff in improving the quality of care and the use of technology in streamlining care. Nurses, physicians, and other care specialists need to be involved in analysis, budgeting, and in decision making, especially when planning on acquiring supplies as they have the knowledge to review quality products. Organizations also need to have a team that specializes in procurement by reviewing terms of suppliers and make a deal with the suppliers that provide competitive prices for quality products. Since the cost of human capital remains high, the strategy should be optimally utilizing the available staff such as nurses since they have the knowledge and skill to provide various care services. Cost of supplies such as equipment and drugs among other infrastructure can be negotiated and the terms with suppliers reviewed.

    References
    Amadeo, K. (2019). Health care cost facts. Retrieved from https://www.thebalance.com/healthcare-costs-3306068

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC. (2019). U.S. Opioid Prescribing Rate Maps | Drug Overdose | CDC Injury Center. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/maps/rxrate-maps.html

    Dexter, F., &Wachtel, R. E. (2014). Strategies for net cost reductions with the expanded role and expertise of anesthesiologists in the perioperative surgical home. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 118(5), 1062-1071.

    Dimitrov, D. V. (2016). Medical internet of things and big data in healthcare. Healthcare informatics research, 22(3), 156-163.

    Epstein, A. M., Jha, A. K., Orav, E. J., Liebman, D. L., Audet, A. M. J., Zezza, M. A., &Guterman, S. (2014). Analysis of early accountable care organizations defines patient, structural, cost, and quality-of-care characteristics. Health Affairs, 33(1), 95-102.

    Navathe, A. S., Troxel, A. B., Liao, J. M., Nan, N., Zhu, J., Zhong, W., & Emanuel, E. J. (2017). Cost of joint replacement using bundled payment models. JAMA internal medicine, 177(2), 214-222.

    Looking Ahead

    The paper you develop in Module 1 will be revisited and revised in Module 2. Review the Assignment instructions for Module 2 to prepare for your revised paper.

    By Day 7 of Week 2

    Submit your paper.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
    Click the Week 2 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
    Click the Week 2 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
    Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 2 Assignment Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 2 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 2

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 2 Assignment

    Next Module

    To go to the next Module:

    Module 2

    Module 2: Professionalism (Week 3)
    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Moral Leadership [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Analyze the impact of competing needs of workforce, resources, and patients on policy development
    Analyze the impact of competing needs on healthcare issues/stressors
    Analyze policies and practices for healthcare issues/stressors
    Critique organizational policies and practices for ethical considerations
    Recommend policy or practice changes to balance competing needs and ethical considerations
    Due By Assignment
    Week 3, Days 1–2 Read the Learning Resources.
    Compose your initial Discussion post.
    Week 3, Day 3 Post your initial Discussion post.
    Begin to compose your Assignment.
    Week 3, Days 4-5 Review peer Discussion posts.
    Compose your peer Discussion responses.
    Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 3, Day 6 Post two peer Discussion responses.
    Week 3, Day 7 Deadline to submit your assignment.
    Photo Credit: on_WAL_CBLE0001_er1_EN.mov – Freeze frame

    Learning Resources

    Required Readings

    American Nurses Association. (2015). Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements. Silver Spring, MD: Author. Retrieved from https://www.nursingworld.org/coe-view-only

    Note: Review all, with special attention to “Provision 6” (pp. 23–26).

    Kelly, P., & Porr, C. (2018). Ethical nursing care versus cost containment: Considerations to enhance RN practice. OJIN: Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 23(1), Manuscript 6. doi:10.3912/OJIN.Vol23No01Man06. Retrieved from http://ojin.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Vol-23-2018/No1-Jan-2018/Ethical-Nursing-Cost-Containment.html

    Milliken, A. (2018). Ethical awareness: What it is and why it matters. OJIN: Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 23(1), Manuscript 1. doi:10.3912/OJIN.Vol23No01Man01. Retrieved from http://ojin.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Vol-23-2018/No1-Jan-2018/Ethical-Awareness.html

    Required Media
    Laureate Education (Producer). (2012). Ethical, Moral, and Legal Leadership [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Laureate Education (Producer). (2009b). Working with Individuals [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Discussion: Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues
    Quite often, nurse leaders are faced with ethical dilemmas, such as those associated with choices between competing needs and limited resources. Resources are finite, and competition for those resources occurs daily in all organizations.

    For example, the use of 12-hour shifts has been a strategy to retain nurses. However, evidence suggests that as nurses work more hours in a shift, they commit more errors. How do effective leaders find a balance between the needs of the organization and the needs of ensuring quality, effective, and safe patient care?

    In this Discussion, you will reflect on a national healthcare issue and examine how competing needs may impact the development of polices to address that issue.

    To Prepare:
    Review the Resources and think about the national healthcare issue/stressor you previously selected for study in Module 1.
    Reflect on the competing needs in healthcare delivery as they pertain to the national healthcare issue/stressor you previously examined.

    Sample Paper – Week 3 Discussion
    NURS 6053 – Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues

    Organizational Policies

    Student’s Name:

    Institutional Affiliation:

    Organizational Policies
    How Competing Needs Impact Policy Development
    Health care systems in the world face a significant challenge of how to deliver wide access to health services while enhancing the quality of care and controlling costs. The health care providers are highly determined to offer quality care (Kelly & Porr, 2018). However, the health care needs are growing with the increase of the aging population hence the need for more technology to enhance better treatment. The health care providers are not enough to fulfill these needs which cause work overload, hence medical errors which affect the quality of health care. The competing needs can trigger the development of policies that will standardize the running of the health care system. For instance, the Affordable Care Act was introduced to cater for the increasing health care costs so that patients can get quality care even if they are from middle-income homes.

    Specific Competing Need that Impacts High Health Care Costs
    There are several areas where high health care costs emerge. Examples are increased in the cost of drugs, increase in provider reimbursement, expensive nursing home care and high costs of durable medical equipment which increases expenses in health care costs and sometimes the expenses being transferred to the patients. Nurses should deliver quality health care. Nurses have a professional goal and connected ethical responsibility which should direct the nursing practice (Milliken, 2018). However, this is not the routine in practice. Nurse shortage is one of the problems which hinder that leading to overload which comprises the quality of care. Therefore one of the solutions is to employ more nurses. Other solutions would include using new staff and scheduling system through developing a staffing pool which will help in supplementing the staffing needs (Sikka, Morath, & Leape, 2015). An institution can also use more staff efficiently in an attempt to reduce labor costs and deliver quality care. For instance, In Freeman White blog post, Kristyna Culp estimated that use of nurse to move the sick to and from the emergency unit as compared to utilizing transport employees would increase hospital costs with $111690 annually. The estimation approximate that pay rate of $19.50 in a transport staff hourly and $45 per hourly for the nurses and an encircling expedition transport time of 30 minutes for every sick person. Moreover, an organization can reduce employee turnover. It is costly to train a new employee. Apart from donating competitive pay, and packages of benefit, some ways of maintaining the current staff are streaming process to simplify staff workload, rewarding and recognizing the staff as well as treating the employees with respect and promoting them (Julie, 2016).

    How Policy Might Impact the Competing Needs
    Policies can be intended to improve the quality of care and reduce health care costs at the same time. The organization should come up with policies regarding the number of hours that any health care provider should work. In that policy, they can design ways the institution will do to achieve quality care at low costs. The Affordable Care Act, for instance, designed some tools to reduce health care costs. For instance, it created The Center for Medicare and Medicaid innovation or CMMI used for testing delivery methods to lower costs and improve the health care quality of the individuals who benefited from federal health insurance programs (Kivlahan, Orlowski, Pearce, Walradt, Baker, & Kirch, 2016). This is one way of improving the health care quality but it is not related to health caregivers. Generally, it impacts the entire health care system.

    References
    Julie Henry (2016) 7 ways hospitals can reduce staffing costs without jeopardizing quality https://www.healthcaredive.com/news/7-ways-hospitals-can-reduce-staffing-costs-without-jeopardizing-quality/421236/

    Kelly, P., & Porr, C. (2018). Ethical Nursing Care Versus Cost Containment: Considerations to Enhance RN Practice. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 23(1).

    Kivlahan, C., Orlowski, J. M., Pearce, J., Walradt, J., Baker, M., & Kirch, D. G. (2016). Taking a risk: early results from teaching hospitals’ participation in the center for Medicare and Medicaid innovation bundled payments for a care improvement initiative. Academic Medicine, 91(7), 936-942.

    Milliken, A. (2018). Ethical awareness: What it is and why it matters. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 23(1).

    Sikka, R., Morath, J. M., & Leape, L. (2015). The Quadruple Aim: care, health, cost and meaning in work.

    By Day 3 of Week 3

    Post an explanation of how competing needs, such as the needs of the workforce, resources, and patients, may impact the development of policy. Then, describe any specific competing needs that may impact the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected. What are the impacts, and how might policy address these competing needs? Be specific and provide examples.

    By Day 6 of Week 3

    Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by providing additional thoughts about competing needs that may impact your colleagues’ selected issues, or additional ideas for applying policy to address the impacts described.

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 3 Discussion Rubric

    Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 3

    To participate in this Discussion:

    Week 3 Discussion
    Assignment: Developing Organizational Policies and Practices
    Competing needs arise within any organization as employees seek to meet their targets and leaders seek to meet company goals. As a leader, successful management of these goals requires establishing priorities and allocating resources accordingly.

    Within a healthcare setting, the needs of the workforce, resources, and patients are often in conflict. Mandatory overtime, implementation of staffing ratios, use of unlicensed assisting personnel, and employer reductions of education benefits are examples of practices that might lead to conflicting needs in practice.

    Leaders can contribute to both the problem and the solution through policies, action, and inaction. In this Assignment, you will further develop the white paper you began work on in Module 1 by addressing competing needs within your organization.

    To Prepare:
    Review the national healthcare issue/stressor you examined in your Assignment for Module 1, and review the analysis of the healthcare issue/stressor you selected.
    Identify and review two evidence-based scholarly resources that focus on proposed policies/practices to apply to your selected healthcare issue/stressor.
    Reflect on the feedback you received from your colleagues on your Discussion post regarding competing needs.
    The Assignment (4-5 pages):
    Developing Organizational Policies and Practices
    Add a section to the paper you submitted in Module 1. The new section should address the following:

    Identify and describe at least two competing needs impacting your selected healthcare issue/stressor.
    Describe a relevant policy or practice in your organization that may influence your selected healthcare issue/stressor.
    Critique the policy for ethical considerations, and explain the policy’s strengths and challenges in promoting ethics.
    Recommend one or more policy or practice changes designed to balance the competing needs of resources, workers, and patients, while addressing any ethical shortcomings of the existing policies. Be specific and provide examples.
    Cite evidence that informs the healthcare issue/stressor and/or the policies, and provide two scholarly resources in support of your policy or practice recommendations.

    Sample Paper – Week 3 Assignment
    NURS 6053 – Developing Organizational Policies and Practices
    Developing Organizational Policies and Practices

    Student’s Name:

    Institutional Affiliation:

    Competing Needs Impacting Hospital Expenditures
    The high cost of expenditure may have adverse effects on the performance of an organization. The reason for this is that healthcare organizations need funds for them to operate effectively. As such, the high rate of expenditure means that these facilities remain at a critical point regarding their financial stability, thus, negatively impacting the delivery of care and patient outcomes (Woolhandler et al., 2014). Many competing needs impact the high levels of expenditure incurred by healthcare organizations. The first one is the need by the facility to meet customer expectations, and thus, achieving customer satisfaction. This is a good move because the performance of any hospital depends on its ability to meet the expectations of its customers. This is achieved by offering high-quality services to every client they have. To achieve all these, the organization has to be ready to employ sufficient staff members, has to bring in highly qualified and experienced professionals, and has to ensure that it has enough resources in the form of equipment. All these require heavy investment. An organization needs to have modern equipment, which is very expensive in the market.

    Additionally, the cost of hiring qualified and experienced staff is high as compared to average candidates. All these are done by the management as they seek to guide the organization towards the achievement of its goals. Another need here is that of minimizing costs while maximizing profits (Bodenheimer, 2015). For an organization to remain competitive, it has to be financially stable. This depends on the profit margin. The success of a manager is not based solely on customer satisfaction but also on the financial performance of the organization. Therefore, as the leaders and managers strive to meet customer expectations, they also have to ensure that they meet the shareholder expectations. This is a dilemma being faced by organizations as they seek to remain competitive in promoting public health.

    This brings in another need whereby as managers seek to maximize profits, employees also want to work in a conducive and better environment. Employees are the most important stakeholders whose productivity determines the performance of an organization. As such, they ought to be treated well, and their interests are taken into consideration. The management may try to reduce the number of employees and purchase cheaper equipment as they seek to cut down expenditure (Sheikh et al., 2015). On the other hand, employees will not accept to be overworked, and they need better equipment for them to deliver high-quality services. The conflicting and competing needs may significantly impact the operational costs of an organization. In such cases, the management needs to find a solution that does not make some parties worse off.

    Relevant Policy or Practice
    The hospital has adopted various practices aimed at minimizing expenditure, and thus, increase the profit margin. One of the most recognizable practices is the move to embrace technology in most of the operations. The management has divided to cut down the operational and administrative costs by incorporating new technology. This is a good move, considering the dynamics of the modern business environment. The managers assessed the administrative processes of the organization and identified the areas that could be automated through the use of technology (Himmelstein et al., 2014). This significantly reduced the number of employees in the hospital.

    In addition to this, the hospital adopted the use of electronic health record systems and other modern technology to minimize the human resources needed. This was done with the consideration of how the move could affect the delivery of services and organizational performance. Also, the adoption of modern technology ensured that human errors are minimized, operational costs are reduced, and the delivery of services is improved (Sloan & Hsieh, 2017). These are the basic factors that the management looked at. With this, several employees lost their jobs. To some people, the move was too severe. However, to the management and the shareholders, the move was necessary because the organization needed sufficient finances for it to run effectively.

    Ethical Considerations
    Several ethical considerations exist when it comes to the use of technology in the healthcare setting. This is due to the sensitivity of the information and the activities related to health. One of the major ethical considerations is accountability and ethics of work. The use of modern technology has improved accountability and work ethics among healthcare workers. This is due to the increased accessibility and completeness of data records that have been filed electronically (Ozair et al., 2015). With this, professionals can easily follow every detail regarding a given patient. This included diagnoses, health history, symptoms, medical interventions, as well as their effects. Information can also be displayed on computer screens. In addition to this, the data display can be supported by computer-based decision-making tools and basic quality standards. Such things significantly influence accountability of healthcare professionals.

    Another ethical consideration is confidentiality or privacy encroachment. This has been the major concern with the new technology. Usually, medical records contain sensitive personal information that needs to be protected by all means. Sharing such data with a third or unauthorized party is a violation of professional ethics and patient’s trust. Modern technology offers several opportunities for the encroachment of the patient-physician relationship. This is because of the existence of many players in the healthcare sector. Once data has been entered and stored electronically, it can be retrieved at any time and by any employee in the hospital (Ozair et al., 2015). This threatens the privacy of patient information, which is a clear violation of the ethical regulations in the sector. Under the issue of privacy, information stored using modern technology can be easily retrieved by hackers. This means that an organization needs to have strong and competent IT professionals to deal with the threat of hackers and protect patient information.

    Recommendations for Policy Changes
    The facility has done well in its attempt to address the issue of high expenditure levels. The incorporation of new technology has not just addressed the problem but has also improved the delivery of services and patient safety. With this, there has been a positive impact on organizational performance. However, more needs to be done to ensure that the policy does not compromise the ethics of healthcare workers in the hospital. As such, there is a need for policy changes to deal with ethical considerations used. Here, new technology should not completely replace the workforce in the facility. There is still a need for enough staff members to deal with the increasing demand for healthcare services. People can work well with machines to improve the overall organizational performance. For instance, the IT department needs highly qualified and experienced employees who can counter any hacking attempts. This will ensure that privacy policies are not breached. Also, while adopting the new technology, it is imperative to ensure that the process does not negatively impact any stakeholders in the organization.

    References
    Bodenheimer, T. (2015). High and rising health care costs. Part 1: seeking an explanation. Annals of internal medicine, 142(10), 847-854.

    Himmelstein, D. U., Jun, M., Busse, R., Chevreul, K., Geissler, A., Jeurissen, P., … & Woolhandler, S. (2014). A comparison of hospital administrative costs in eight nations: US costs exceed all others by far. Health Affairs, 33(9), 1586-1594.

    Ozair, F. F., Jamshed, N., Sharma, A., & Aggarwal, P. (2015). Ethical issues in electronic health records: A general overview. Perspectives in clinical research, 6(2), 73.

    Sheikh, A., Sood, H. S., & Bates, D. W. (2015). Leveraging health information technology to achieve the “triple aim” of healthcare reform. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 22(4), 849-856.

    Sloan, F. A., & Hsieh, C. R. (2017). Health economics. MIT Press.

    Woolhandler, S., Campbell, T., & Himmelstein, D. U. (2014). Costs of health care administration in the United States and Canada. New England Journal of Medicine, 349(8), 768-775.

    By Day 7 of Week 3

    Submit your revised paper.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK3Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
    Click the Week 3 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
    Click the Week 3 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK3Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
    Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 3 Assignment Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 3 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 3

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 3 Assignment

    Next Module

    To go to the next Module:

    Module 3

    Module 3: Leadership (Weeks 4-6)
    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). The Leader in You [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Analyze the effectiveness and impact of leadership skills
    Assess personal leadership traits
    Analyze how leadership traits can be applied to personal leadership philosophies and behaviors
    Develop a personal leadership philosophy
    Create a development plan related to personal leadership philosophies
    Due By Assignment
    Week 4, Days 1–2 Read the Learning Resources.
    Compose your initial Discussion 1 post.
    Week 4, Day 3 Post your initial Discussion 1 post.
    Begin to compose your Assignment.
    Week 4, Days 4-5 Review peer Discussion 1 posts.
    Compose your peer Discussion 1 responses.
    Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 4, Day 6 Post two peer Discussion 1 responses.
    Week 5, Days 1-2 Compose your initial Discussion 2 post.
    Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 5, Day 3 Post your initial Discussion 2 post.
    Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 5, Days 4-5 Review peer Discussion 2 posts.
    Compose your peer Discussion 2 responses.
    Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 5, Day 6 Post two peer Discussion 2 responses.
    Week 6, Days 1- 6 Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 6, Day 7 Deadline to submit your Assignment.
    Photo Credit: sturti/Creatas Video/Getty Images

    Learning Resources

    Required Readings
    Marshall, E., & Broome, M. (2017). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter 1, “Expert Clinician to Transformational Leader in a Complex Health Care Organization: Foundations” (pp. 7–20 ONLY)
    Chapter 6, “Frameworks for Becoming a Transformational Leader” (pp. 145–170)
    Chapter 7, “Becoming a Leader: It’s All About You” (pp. 171–194)
    Duggan, K., Aisaka, K., Tabak, R. G., Smith, C., Erwin, P., & Brownson, R. C. (2015). Implementing administrative evidence-based practices: Lessons from the field in six local health departments across the United States. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1). doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0891-3. Retrieved from https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-015-0891-3

    Resources for the StrengthsFinder Assessment Tool

    Rath, T. (2007). Strengths Finder 2.0 – with Access Code.

    Purchase the access code from the Walden bookstore. Then follow the instructions in the document “How to Access the Strengths Finder 2.0.

    Document: How to Access Strengths Finder 2.0 (PDF)

    Required Media

    Laureate Education (Producer). (2014). Leadership [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Moore Foundation. (n.d.). Nurses share lessons in leadership. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLopRJPO6GaifsYPGP_jcWXZzU10H3AaX7

    Discussion 1: Leadership Theories in Practice
    A walk through the Business section of any bookstore or a quick Internet search on the topic will reveal a seemingly endless supply of writings on leadership. Formal research literature is also teeming with volumes on the subject.

    However, your own observation and experiences may suggest these theories are not always so easily found in practice. Not that the potential isn’t there; current evidence suggests that leadership factors such as emotional intelligence and transformational leadership behaviors, for example, can be highly effective for leading nurses and organizations.

    Yet, how well are these theories put to practice? In this Discussion, you will examine formal leadership theories. You will compare these theories to behaviors you have observed firsthand and discuss their effectiveness in impacting your organization.

    To Prepare:
    Review the Resources and examine the leadership theories and behaviors introduced.
    Identify two to three scholarly resources, in addition to this Module’s readings, that evaluate the impact of leadership behaviors in creating healthy work environments.
    Reflect on the leadership behaviors presented in the three resources that you selected for review.

    Sample Paper – Week 4 Discussion 1
    NURS 6053 – Leadership Theories in Practice

    Leadership Theories in Practice

    Student’s Name:

    Institutional Affiliation:

    Leadership Theories in Practice
    Leadership refers to a process where an individual influences a group to achieve a common goal (Northouse, 2018). It is not the position or the title that has been given, but something which is earned (Laureate Education, 2014). Different scholars have come up with theories to describe leadership. Examples of these theories are transformational, leader-member exchange among others. This paper will discuss the aspects of leadership and the extent to which the leadership skills of a certain leader were effective and how their practice impacted the workplace.

    Two Key Insights
    One of the things I have learned about leadership is that it is earned. Labels cannot make a person a leader. One earns leadership by knowing what matters. It does not matter what the role or the rank of an individual is, where they come from. One cannot be a leader if their behaviors do not demonstrate the integrity of doing what is right. Leaders should earn trust. They should act as examples to others and know that trustworthiness takes a character. To trust one requires vales and for none to be trusted one should earn the privilege (Rosenbach, 2018). Another insight I have learned is that leadership is not about you but it is about those that the leaders serve. It does not entail the leader ennobling but bringing others up and the best way that one can earn the title of a leader is through losing themselves in the service of uplifting others and bringing changes which are not based on self-interest but on the interest of the followers (Marshall& Broome, 2017). Besides, leaders should inspire their followers to do better. Generally, a leader should work towards transforming the followers and the organization as a whole (Winkler & Marshall, 2017).

    The Leader with who I Have Seen Such Behaviors and Skills
    One person that demonstrated the leadership skills discussed above and many others is my supervisor during my internship. He earned trust from us because of his honesty, integrity, and confidence. He stuck to ethical values and core beliefs and whenever there was an issue, good or bad; he used to call us and inform us and even allow us to voice our opinions. This leader also used to inspire and encourage us to do our best. For some of the interns, it was a difficult experiencing transition from a class to real practice. However, the supervisor was there for us and made us feel that everything is possible. With no time we got used and even started enjoying our work. Everything that he did was for the interest of the interns and not for self-interest. For instance, he once advocated for a policy where the interns would be given compensation after three months in practice since after this period the interns were working like other providers and the managers could entrust them with practice.

    How the Skills and Practice Impacted the Workplace
    Through building a strong relationship with the interns by creating trust, we could work as a team and accomplish a lot. The interns who were fast learners could willingly help the slow learners and be patient with them just like our supervisor was patient with us. One of the qualities of a leader is patience and the supervisor demonstrated that. Through having the interest of interns at hand, there was a transformation in the organization since the hospital started employing the interns because of the good work they were doing. The interns were highly motivated and they offered high-quality services.

    References
    Laureate Education (Producer). (2014). Leadership [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author

    Marshall, E., & Broome, M. (2017). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.

    Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage publications.

    Rosenbach, W. E. (2018). Contemporary issues in leadership. Routledge.

    Winkler, M., & Marshall, E. (2017). Creating and shaping the organizational environment and culture to support practice excellence. Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader, 247-267.

    By Day 3 of Week 4

    Post two key insights you had from the scholarly resources you selected. Describe a leader whom you have seen use such behaviors and skills, or a situation where you have seen these behaviors and skills used in practice. Be specific and provide examples. Then, explain to what extent these skills were effective and how their practice impacted the workplace.

    By Day 6 of Week 4

    Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by explaining how the leadership skills they described may impact your organization or your personal leadership, or by identifying challenges you see in applying the skills described.

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 4 Discussion Rubric

    Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 4

    To participate in this Discussion:

    Week 4 Discussion
    Discussion 2: Your Leadership Profile
    Do you believe you have the traits to be an effective leader? Perhaps you are already in a supervisory role, but as has been discussed previously, appointment does not guarantee leadership skills.

    How can you evaluate your own leadership skills and behaviors? You can start by analyzing your performance in specific areas of leadership. In this Discussion, you will complete Gallup’s StrengthsFinder assessment. This assessment will identify your personal strengths, which have been shown to improve motivation, engagement, and academic self-conference. Through this assessment, you will discover your top five themes—which you can reflect upon and use to leverage your talents for optimal success and examine how the results relate to your leadership traits.

    To Prepare:
    Complete the StrengthsFinder assessment instrument, per the instructions found in this Module’s Learning Resources.

    Please Note: This Assessment will take roughly 30 minutes to complete.

    Once you have completed your assessment, you will receive your “Top 5 Signature Themes of Talent” on your screen.
    Click the Download button below Signature Theme Report, and then print and save the report. We also encourage you to select the Apply tab to review action items.
    NOTE: Please keep your report. You will need your results for future courses. Technical Issues with Gallup:

    If you have technical issues after registering, please contact the Gallup Education Support group by phone at +1.866-346-4408. Support is available 24 hours/day from 6:00 p.m. Sunday U.S. Central Time through 5:00 p.m. Friday U.S. Central Time.

    Reflect on the results of your Assessment, and consider how the results relate to your leadership traits.

    Sample Paper – Week 4 Discussion 2
    NURS 6053 – Leadership Theories in Practice

    Effective Leadership

    Student’s Name:

    Institutional Affiliation:

    Course Title

    Due Date

    Effective Leadership
    Effectiveness in leadership is not achievable overnight. It involves an iterative process that requires one to assess and evaluate their strengths as collaborators and communicators continuously and their weaknesses. An ineffective leader, for example, can cost a company more fortunes than their morale. According to the Gallup research, poor management affects over 25 percent of employees by disengaging them. Such disengagement often leads to low productivity, profitability, and high employee turnovers. Effective leadership does not have a single agreed or right way of leading a team. Successful leaders have several traits that are common among themselves. Effective nursing leaders are those who help in communicating the hospital’s vision and goals, influence change, and guide their teams.

    Leadership Profile
    Similar to any other individual, I possess unique behavioral styles baked into me while growing up. Together with these styles, I also have some typical approaches, with some working in my favor throughout the advancement into my current role as a leader. Several scholars have identified different characteristics that effective leaders should possess. As a leader, I believe my most outstanding trait is the ability to identify the strengths and weaknesses of my team. This ability helps me in improving my leadership style since I am always on the front line in identifying these strengths and improving the areas of weaknesses. From the Gallup’s StrengthsFinder, my strengths as a leader include empathy, learner, connectedness, achiever, and an include (Gallup, 2019). My position as a nurse supervisor requires me to be aware of my strengths since I play a formal leadership role within the department.

    Strengths
    From the report, my two strengths are connectedness and learner. According to Gallup, a learner is someone who desires to improve their abilities by wanting to know more. Also, learning is essential as the competency of a nurse comes from the acquired skills and knowledge (Poorchangizi et al., 2017). Connectedness requires that one entrust his faith in having connections and links. A connected leader understands that everything happens for a reason, and the meaning of each event is essential. By nurturing connectedness, I am likely to influence individuals into realizing the importance of group efforts and teamwork in accomplishing assigned tasks.

    Core Values
    In the nursing profession, there are core values that act as standard requirements for all educational and clinical nursing environments. These core values not only guide individuals, but they also help in motivating the nurses’ professional behaviors depending on their fields of specialization and working environments. There are several leadership values that one can choose. The standout ones for me are the commitment to use evidence-based care and be open to different opinions. These two values work closely with being empathic and an includer.

    Characteristics
    Individualization and adaptability are the two characteristics that need strengthening. Being adaptable is equivalent to being flexible and without a fixed perspective on aspects. Working as a nurse leader, for example, in the emergency department, requires me to become accustomed to having stressful situations (Jamshidi et al., 2016). Managing to show how adaptable these situations are will influence my team by making them feel that they are not alone. Adaptability is also crucial in leadership since even stable situations may sometimes become uncomfortable, especially when new challenges arise. Individualization will allow me to understand the uniqueness of each team member and the different roles they play. Individualization requires that I pay close attention to my colleagues’ attitudes, skills, and interests to help them reach their highest potentials.

    Conclusion
    Effective leadership requires leaders to influence their teams and lead them forward with motivation, inspiration, enthusiasm, and passion. As a leader, it is necessary to invest time in the team to understand their priorities, needs, weaknesses, and strengths and help them improve. Understanding the needs and preferences of a team makes them feel valuable, and the leader will understand the best ways to keep them motivated. To understand others, a leader needs to understand himself or herself first, his areas of strength and weakness, the core values needed, and the characteristics they need to develop.

    References
    Gallup. (2019). Clifton StrengthsFinder 2.0. Retrieved from https://walden.gallup.com

    Jamshidi, N., Molazem, Z., Sharif, F., Torabizadeh, C., & Najafi Kalyani, M. (2016). The challenges of nursing students in the clinical learning environment: A qualitative study. The Scientific World Journal, 2016, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1846178

    Poorchangizi, B., Farokhzadian, J., Abbaszadeh, A., Mirzaee, M., & Borhani, F. (2017). The importance of professional values from clinical nurses’ perspective in hospitals of a medical university in Iran. BMC Medical Ethics, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0178-9

    By Day 3 of Week 5

    Post a brief description of your results from the StrengthsFinder assessment. Then, briefly describe two core values, two strengths, and two characteristics that you would like to strengthen based on the results of your StrengthsFinder assessment. Be specific.

    By Day 6 of Week 5

    Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by making recommendations for how they might strengthen the leadership behaviors profiled in their StrengthsFinder assessment, or by commenting on lessons to be learned from the results that can be applied to personal leadership philosophies and behaviors.

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 5 Discussion Rubric

    Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 5

    To participate in this Discussion:

    Week 5 Discussion
    Assignment: Personal Leadership Philosophies
    Many of us can think of leaders we have come to admire, be they historical figures, pillars of the industry we work in, or leaders we know personally. The leadership of individuals such as Abraham Lincoln and Margaret Thatcher has been studied and discussed repeatedly. However, you may have interacted with leaders you feel demonstrated equally competent leadership without ever having a book written about their approaches.

    What makes great leaders great? Every leader is different, of course, but one area of commonality is the leadership philosophy that great leaders develop and practice. A leadership philosophy is basically an attitude held by leaders that acts as a guiding principle for their behavior. While formal theories on leadership continue to evolve over time, great leaders seem to adhere to an overarching philosophy that steers their actions.

    What is your leadership philosophy? In this Assignment, you will explore what guides your own leadership.

    To Prepare:
    Identify two to three scholarly resources, in addition to this Module’s readings, that evaluate the impact of leadership behaviors in creating healthy work environments.
    Reflect on the leadership behaviors presented in the three resources that you selected for review.
    Reflect on your results of the CliftonStrengths Assessment, and consider how the results relate to your leadership traits.

    Sample Paper – Week 5 Assignment
    NURS 6053 – Personal Leadership Philosophies

    Personal Leadership Philosophies

    Student’s Name:

    Institutional Affiliation:

    Course:

    Instructor:

    Date:

    Personal Leadership Philosophy
    This paper’s main purpose is to point out some of my philosophies concerning every individual’s leadership. Leadership is a very strong thing to me. It is important to identify the kind of person I am, which usually guides me in life, my followers, what these followers expect from my leadership, and similarly what I want for my leadership.

    Core Values
    As a leader, my personal core values includes consistency, harmony, discipline, responsibility and effective communication. These particular values are essential to me since I make my own decisions in daily activities. According to my perception, good leadership should involve effective communication, discipline and a sense of responsibility. My personal values are consistent with my personal and professional philosophy, as my values have been the driving force in everything I aim at achieving. To ensure that, I usually follow my philosophies every day, I have to keep several things in my mind that we are all human beings, and no one is perfect despite the effort that everyone makes to be the best.

    Mission/Vision Statement
    My mission is to serve as a healthcare leader, champion the best outcomes all the time for my patients, and use all ethical principles to make a notable difference. My vision statement is to be a successful health care expert who can influence millions of individuals relating to their health and enact their best outcomes.

    Clifton Strengths Assessment Results Analysis
    After performing Clifton Strengths Assessment, results revealed that I was consistent, responsible, disciplined, harmonious and an effective communicator. It could also reveal that I was a continuous learner, relator, and an achiever following these strengths (Arenson 2019). These outcomes, thus, signify my key beliefs as a leader and core values that form the foundation of my leadership philosophy.

    As a learner, I significantly value disciplined constant learning as opposed to the organized learning forms that occur at a particular time. In the performance of duty, I reliably enroll in a constant learning program to expand my different areas and encourage sensible learning between my subordinates. In healthcare, disciplined continuous learning is thus significant to guarantee that organization is always familiarizing with new trends in industries and new improvements that help produce better results (Sfantou et al., 2017). Another type of disciplined continuous learning I have embraced and reliably used is learning from past mistakes. This, therefore, is possible through reliable evaluations of the previous work I conduct and inspire my team to do and seek to learn from their past insufficiencies, gaining new perceptions on how to face challenges in the future.

    As a leader, I am similarly responsible towards planning in that I am fast in taking note of trends and themes in the industry, steering my team to adjust to such trends. Being responsibly organized comes from my preference for transformational leadership behaviors and my trust that I work in a vibrant field. This thus helps me forestall the issues or challenges, draw up the solutions, and similarly layout the future objectives and plans that my team may follow. As a leader am also very consistence, a value that makes me reliably take time to find reasons for different issues and occurrences and their effects and causes. Being consistence makes me capable of finding resolutions for different challenges in the healthcare environment and reliably adopt the demands of the work environment. According to Hargett et al. (2017), the leaders must, thus, endorse logical skills between their subordinates as they will be vibrant in determining future and present problems in the organization, making the organizations more advanced.

    As a leader, I am also an excellent achiever enhanced by effective communication. I reliably set the goals and works towards achieving them in a specified time frame. As an achiever, I have involved all my team members and encouraged them to work toward a common goal. Achievement of such goals is thus measured by SMART tools (Smith et al, 2018). Lastly, as a leader, I am a harmonious relator that makes me more anxious with individual relationships during the work process. This embraces relationships with my assistants or with customers. I sustain an open correlation with the subordinates and open communication lines that helps enhance our relationship. The clients are also encouraged to afford feedback, and the workers are encouraged to begin a relationship with clients and show them they care for the clients’ plight (Hargett et al., 2017). As a leader, I believe that the relationship between all the stakeholders is the foundation of organizational success.

    Key Behaviors to Strengthen in Future
    The two key behaviors I would wish to support are embracing a more disciplined coaching attitude and practice more effective communication and listening in the organization. According to Toussaint & Ehrlich (2017), the employees’ development outcomes will be best attained when the leader is elaborate in such procedures. By approving a disciplined coaching attitude, I would thus develop a partnership with my subordinates and come up with a shared vision and how such vision could be attained. By being a more effective communicator and listener, I would also improve communication skills and good trust with the subordinates such that it would be easier to acquire them to buy into my vision as a leader (Toussaint & Ehrlich, 2017).

    Plan to Improve the two Key Behaviors and Attain Personal Vision
    To embrace a more disciplined coaching mentality, I expect to delegate in ways that develop the team members, emphasize supporting processes applied by the team members, afford constructive feedback when the team members make mistakes, and reliably offer a credit of effort. To be a more active communicator and listener, I plan to: concentrate on the speaker’s main points and make the speaker know I heard them, fully practice being present whenever talking to the subordinates and continually be open-minded and inquisitive (Toussaint & Ehrlich, 2017). To attain my mission, I will require to keep pursuing specialized excellence in the current organization to ascend to upper leadership positions and have greater influence.

    Colleague’s Feedback on the Clifton Strengths Assessment
    In relation to the results of my Clifton Strengths Assessment, my colleagues believed that my strengths of consistency, harmony, responsibility, disciplined and effective communicator revealed that I was a balanced leader who was sufficiently suited to the healthcare industry and who had a great possibility of succeeding (Strengths Finder: Gallup 2018).

    References
    Arenson, A. (2019). Lean Into Your Strengths: An Analysis of Clifton Strengths Data at CU Boulder. Projects in Applied Data Science: Fall 2019.

    Hargett, C. W., Doty, J. P., Hauck, J. N., Webb, A. M., Cook, S. H., Tsipis, N. E., … Taylor, D.C. (2017). Developing a model for effective healthcare leadership: a concept mapping approach. Journal of healthcare leadership, 9, 69–78. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5774455/

    Sfantou, D. F., Laliotis, A., Patelarou, A. E., Sifaki-Pistolla, D., Matalliotakis, M., & Patelarou, E. (2017). Importance of Leadership Style towards Quality of Care Measures in Healthcare Settings: A Systematic Review. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 5(4), 73.

    Smith, T., Fowler-Davis, S., Nancarrow, S., Ariss, S. M., Enderby, P., (2018). “Leadership in interprofessional health and social care teams: a literature review,” Leadership in Health Services, Vol. 31 Issue: 4, pp.452-467. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/LHS-06-2016-0026/full/html

    Strengths Finder: Gallup. (2018). https://walden.gallup.com

    Toussaint, J.S., & Ehrlich, S.P. (2017). Five Changes Great Leaders Make to Develop an Improvement Culture. Journal of healthcare leadership, 13, 15–18.

    Week 6
    The Assignment (2-3 pages):
    Personal Leadership Philosophies
    Develop and submit a personal leadership philosophy that reflects what you think are characteristics of a good leader. Use the scholarly resources on leadership you selected to support your philosophy statement. Your personal leadership philosophy should include the following:

    A description of your core values
    A personal mission/vision statement
    An analysis of your CliftonStrengths Assessment summarizing the results of your profile
    A description of two key behaviors that you wish to strengthen
    A development plan that explains how you plan to improve upon the two key behaviors you selected and an explanation of how you plan to achieve your personal vision. Be specific and provide examples.
    Be sure to incorporate your colleagues’ feedback on your CliftonStrengths Assessment from this Module’s Discussion 2.
    To Prepare:
    Identify two to three scholarly resources, in addition to this Module’s readings, that evaluate the impact of leadership behaviors in creating healthy work environments. Reflect on the leadership behaviors presented in the three resources that you selected for review. Reflect on your results of the CliftonStrengths Assessment, and consider how the results relate to your leadership traits. The Assignment (2-3 pages):

    Sample Paper – Week 6 Assignment
    NURS 6053 – Personal Leadership Philosophies

    Personal Leadership Philosophies

    Student’s Name:

    Institutional Affiliation:

    Personal Leadership Philosophies
    Nursing leadership is crucial in achieving high-quality care to the patient and ensures that there are favorable outcomes in the organization. Effective leadership ensures that there is a healthy relationship that promotes mutual benefits for both the organization and the respective employees (Duggan, Aisaka, Tabak, Smith, Erwin & Brownson, (2015). A leader promotes cohesion, influences, and advocates for patients and employee needs.

    Core Value
    Values help nurses and other nursing professionals to provide quality health care to patients. Moreover, it enhances their interaction with the other colleagues. Caring, empathy, effective communication, integrity, and servant leadership are the core values that guide my practice. Through caring and empathy values, it has enabled me to provide individualized care to the patients. Besides, I have been able to enhance career development for other nurses, although at times, it may not be favorable for me to do so (Marshall & Broome, 2017). Effective communication has significantly impacted my career. I can understand patients and provide quality health care to them. Moreover, I can understand the needs of the patients and address them.I am devoted to guiding emerging nurses to adjust to nursing practice.

    Mission / Vision Statement
    My mission is to ensure that there are holistic and mutual benefits of all nurses through influencing them to be better. Also, through this interaction, I am able to learn about my shortcomings and improve them to become a better leader.

    Analysis of Clifton Strengths Feedbacks to Colleagues
    Clifton’s assessment is essential in a nurse since it helps to discover what best for and an individual, and how they can develop their talents into strengths. Also, it enables the usage of personalized results to maximize one’s potentials (Gallup, 2019). In nursing practice, nurses should always learn from their past mistakes to become better leaders. Nurses should always influence others to become better in their day to day activities. As a leader, I strive to bring the best in students in my unit. I shape them on how to be better individuals in the future.

    Despite, the challenges that exist, nurses should work for greater of all, no matter the problems that they may experience. As a nurse, I always perform my duties professionally and follow all guidelines outlined in a nursing career. The nursing profession is ever-changing, and nurses need to adjust accordingly. The only way to do so is to ensure that I am updated with the advancements. A nurse should always take responsibility for their actions and always be accountable. I make it my obligation to promote the welfare of others, even if it does not please me (Gallup, 2019). My strategic role has been emphasized because I am a nurse in charge of the unit. This role has enabled me to manage conflicts in the group. Moreover, I can identify the issues that are of significance to the unit and solve them. Also, I learn from others, and this has made me an effective leader.

    Behaviors I wish to Strengthen
    In the unit I am in charge of, there are behaviors that I seek to promote. There is no teamwork among the employees, and this has affected operations in the unit. Moreover, I would strive to encourage my personal development as well as of those of my subordinates.

    Plans to Improve the Two Behaviors’
    Through team-building activities of the employees’ cohesion will be promoted. My subordinates will be able to offer a helping hand to each other and enhance quality health care in the clinical setting. Also, I will improve my leadership skills by advancing my education, as well as seeking political positions. This will ensure that I can effectively advocate the needs of the patients and the welfare of all employees.

    References
    Duggan, K., Aisaka, K., Tabak, R. G., Smith, C., Erwin, P., & Brownson, R. C. (2015). Implementing administrative evidence based practices: lessons from the field in six local health departments across the United States. BMC health services research, 15(1), 221.

    Gallup, G. (2019, September 21). StrengthsFinder 2.0. Retrieved from https://www.gallup.com/cliftonstrengths/en/254033/strengthsfinder.aspx

    Marshall, E., & Broome, M. (2017). Transformational Leadership in Nursing: From Expert

    Clinician to Influential Leader. (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.

    By Day 7 of Week 6

    Submit your personal leadership philosophy.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK6Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
    Click the Week 6 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
    Click the Week 6 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK6Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
    Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 6 Assignment Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 6 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 6

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 6 Assignment

    Next Module

    To go to the next Module:

    Module 4

    Module 4: Communication and Relationship Building (Weeks 7-9)
    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Diagnosis: Communication Breakdown [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Assess work environments for workplace civility
    Analyze strategies to address workplace incivility
    Analyze evidence-based theories for promoting organizational health
    Recommend strategies for improving workplace environments
    Due By Assignment
    Week 7, Days 1–2 Read the Learning Resources.
    Compose your initial Discussion post.
    Week 7, Day 3 Post your initial Discussion post.
    Begin to compose your Assignment.
    Week 7, Days 4-5 Review peer Discussion posts.
    Compose your peer Discussion responses.
    Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 7, Day 6 Post two peer Discussion responses.
    Week 8, Days 1-7 Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 9, Days 1-6 Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 9, Day 7 Deadline to submit your Assignment.
    Photo Credit: [Steve Debenport]/[ E+]/Getty Images

    Learning Resources
    Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.

    Required Readings
    Marshall, E., & Broome, M. (2017). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter 5, “Collaborative Leadership Contexts: Networks, Communication, Decision Making, and Motivation” (pp. 121–144)
    Chapter 9, “Creating and Shaping the Organizational Environment and Culture to Support Practice Excellence” (pp. 247–278)
    Chapter 10, “Building Cohesive and Effective Teams” (pp. 279–298)
    Select at least ONE of the following:

    Clark, C. M., Olender, L., Cardoni, C., & Kenski, D. (2011). Fostering civility in nursing education and practice: Nurse leader perspectives. Journal of Nursing Administration, 41(7/8), 324–330. doi:10.1097/NNA.0b013e31822509c4

    Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

    Clark, C. M. (2018). Combining cognitive rehearsal, simulation, and evidence-based scripting to address incivility. Nurse Educator. doi:10.1097/NNE.0000000000000563

    Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

    Clark, C. M. (2015). Conversations to inspire and promote a more civil workplace. American Nurse Today, 10(11), 18–23. Retrieved from https://www.americannursetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ant11-CE-Civility-1023.pdf

    Griffin, M., & Clark, C. M. (2014). Revisiting cognitive rehearsal as an intervention against incivility and lateral violence in nursing: 10 years later. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 45(12), 535–542. doi:10.3928/00220124-20141122-02

    Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

    Document: Work Environment Assessment Template (Word document)

    Required Media
    TEDx. (2017, April). Jody Hoffer Gittell: The power of a simple idea [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7nL5RC5kdE

    Laureate Education (Producer). (2009a). Working with Groups and Teams [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Week 7
    Discussion: Workplace Environment Assessment
    How healthy is your workplace?

    You may think your current organization operates seamlessly, or you may feel it has many issues. You may experience or even observe things that give you pause. Yet, much as you wouldn’t try to determine the health of a patient through mere observation, you should not attempt to gauge the health of your work environment based on observation and opinion. Often, there are issues you perceive as problems that others do not; similarly, issues may run much deeper than leadership recognizes.

    There are many factors and measures that may impact organizational health. Among these is civility. While an organization can institute policies designed to promote such things as civility, how can it be sure these are managed effectively? In this Discussion, you will examine the use of tools in measuring workplace civility.

    To Prepare:
    Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
    Review and complete the Work Environment Assessment Template in the Resources.

    Sample Paper – Week 7 Discussion
    NURS 6053 – Workplace Environment Assessment

    Work Environment Assessment
    Template

    Work Environment Assessment Template

    Use this document to complete the Module 4 Workplace Environment Assessment.

    Summary of Results – Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory The civility score for my workplace on a scale of (20-100) is 85. This score means that my work environment is moderately healthy. The workplace environment scored highly in the areas concerning how the members live by the vision and mission of the organization. There is a high level of trust among members of the workplace, as evidenced by clear and transparent communication. Employees are valued, and they are viewed as assets, while individual achievement is also collectively celebrated. On the other hand, the workplace environment got an average score on employee’s compensation and remuneration. Similarly, the workload is not equitably distributed, which makes the organization fail to retain their best talents and brightest employees.
    Identify two things that surprised you about the results. Also identify one idea that you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed. The results were surprising. Firstly, the score correctly matched the level of civility for my organization. Secondly, the results can be used as an essential tool to improve my workplace environment significantly. Before conducting the assessment, I believed that respectfully treating the employees increases the civility of an organization. The assessment confirmed my belief since my organization scored highly as a result of treating employees fairly.
    What do the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace? My workplace civility score is 85. This score implies that my workplace is moderately healthy, and it can be improved to meet the standards of a very healthy workplace environment.
    Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected.
    Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.

    The article about transformational leadership explains how nurse leaders can inspire and encourage other employees to create change, which leads to the overall growth of the organization (Clark, 2015). Clark et al. (2011) describe how the leaders can cultivate the culture of civility in the workplace environment through fair treatment and respecting the employees. Similarly, Griffin and Clark (2014) highlight some of the intervention measures to curb incivility in the workplace. This article describes how violence can contribute to incivility and how to control it.
    The theory described in the articles relates to the results I obtained for my workplace environment. Firstly, my workplace environment scored highly due to the presence of transformational leaders who inspire and cultivate the culture of civility. Secondly, workplace violence is minimized through conflict resolution and transparent communication.

    Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples. My workplace environment can use the theories in the articles above to improve the health of the organization by employing transformational leadership skills and resolving conflicts amicably. For example, my organization can achieve high retention of employees through the provision of competitive remuneration packages.
    General Notes/Comments Workplace civility is essential for the overall health of the organization. It is essential to assess the civility regularly and improve on the areas that might cause incivility.

    References
    Clark, C. M. (2015). Conversations to inspire and promote a more civil workplace. Am Nurs Today, 10.

    Clark, C. M., Olender, L., Cardoni, C., & Kenski, D. (2011). Fostering civility in nursing education and practice: Nurse leader perspectives. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 41(7/8), 324-330.

    Griffin, M., & Clark, C. M. (2014). Revisiting cognitive rehearsal as an intervention against incivility and lateral violence in nursing: 10 years later. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 45(12), 535-542.

    By Day 3 of Week 7

    Post a brief description of the results of your Work Environment Assessment. Based on the results, how civil is your workplace? Explain why your workplace is or is not civil. Then, describe a situation where you have experienced incivility in the workplace. How was this addressed? Be specific and provide examples.

    By Day 6 of Week 7

    Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by sharing ideas for how shortcomings discovered in their evaluations and/or their examples of incivility could have been managed more effectively.

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 7 Discussion Rubric

    Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 7

    To participate in this Discussion:

    Week 7 Discussion

    Assignment: Workplace Environment Assessment
    Clearly, diagnosis is a critical aspect of healthcare. However, the ultimate purpose of a diagnosis is the development and application of a series of treatments or protocols. Isolated recognition of a health issue does little to resolve it.

    In this module’s Discussion, you applied the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory to diagnose potential problems with the civility of your organization. In this Portfolio Assignment, you will continue to analyze the results and apply published research to the development of a proposed treatment for any issues uncovered by the assessment.

    To Prepare:
    Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
    Review the Work Environment Assessment Template.
    Reflect on the output of your Discussion post regarding your evaluation of workplace civility and the feedback received from colleagues.
    Select and review one or more of the following articles found in the Resources:
    Clark, Olender, Cardoni, and Kenski (2011)
    Clark (2018)
    Clark (2015)
    Griffin and Clark (2014)
    The Assignment (3-6 pages total):

    Part 1: Work Environment Assessment (1-2 pages)
    Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this Module’s Discussion.
    Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.
    Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed.
    Explain what the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace.
    Part 2: Reviewing the Literature (1-2 pages)
    Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected.
    Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.
    Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.
    Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams (1–2 pages)
    Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
    Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.

    Sample Paper – Week 9 Assignment
    NURS 6053 – Workplace Environment Assessment

    Workplace Environment Assessment

    Name of Student

    Walden University

    NURS 6053

    Interprofessional Organization & System Leadership

    Dr. Elvira G. Phelps

    (Due date)

    Workplace Environment Assessment
    Incivility is a well-recognized and common issue in clinical practice as well as nursing education. As a contrast to civility, which involves considerate and respectful participation, incivility is referred to as low-intensity behavior characterized by various behaviors like being rude, impolite, or discourteous. It can be bidirectional and take many forms. It can occur between nurses, subordinates, and those in positions of leadership as well as from leaders to nurses in lower-ranking positions. Incivility in the healthcare workplace can involve repeated disrespectful, offensive, or discouraging behavior, unfair punishments, and misuse of power that can discourage and distress receivers. It ultimately creates strain and decreases the satisfaction and confidence of employees (Raheem & Cosby, 2016). This paper aims to describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed for my workplace and explain what they suggest about the civility and health of the workplace. It will also reveal a theory relating to the results and how the organization can apply it to create stronger work teams and improve organizational health. Strategies from the literature that can be implemented to bolster successful practices and address shortcomings revealed in the assessment will also be recommended.

    Work Environment Assessment
    The overall civility score of the workplace was 56, which falls in the unhealthy score range from 50 to 59 (Clark, 2015). Two surprising things were the statements; “communication at all levels of the organization is transparent, direct, and respectful.” and “teamwork and collaboration are promoted and evident,” which had deficient scores. It can be the cause of the exceptionally high turnover, especially among registered nurses within the department, as well as decreased job satisfaction scores and retention rates. An unhealthy and uncivil work environment can negatively influence staff commitment to the organization as well as their productivity. While working on the floor, there have been experiences of miscommunication, especially in changes in shifts. One scenario that portrays the issue involved hurrying up to get patient reports and stabilize another one as an intensive care unit (ICU) patient was waiting to transfer to the floor. My work phone was frequently ringing as the ICU nurse tried to give me a report. She eventually rolled the new patient to my level and expected a report right away as she had to go home. She was uncivil as I tried to apologize, and she responded, saying, “whatever, I don’t have time for this. I want to go home.” I respectfully acknowledged her incontinence that I might have caused, but my patient’s safety was my priority. Additionally, I explained to her that she needed to address me respectfully as we are both professionals, and the wellbeing of our patients comes first. One prior belief that was confirmed by the results is that the only thing helping the organization retain staff is the benefits and competitive salaries. The statement “the organization provides competitive salaries, benefits, compensations…” had the highest score in the assessment.

    The results of the assessment suggest that the workplace is unhealthy and uncivil. Communication is lacking, and this impacts the health of the organization while the lack of teamwork harms the work environment. Broome and Marshall (2017) point out that communication and teamwork are among the critically essential core values for successful collaboration that shapes the quality of care for patients and families. Effective collaboration is not only personally and professionally satisfying to those involved, but also contributes to a unified and holistic approach to patients and clients, facilitates faster internal decision making, reduces cost through shared resources and promotes innovation. Healthcare professionals are socialized and educated in discipline-specific frameworks. They must move out of such habits for them to work together, and this requires sensitivity to other theoretical foundations as well as ways of thinking and knowing.

    Review of Literature
    Many studies have been conducted to establish the best evidence that can guide practice to decrease and address incivility in the workplace. One of the articles reviewed was titled “Revisiting cognitive rehearsal as an intervention against incivility and lateral violence in nursing: 10 years later” by Martha Griffin, and Cynthia Clark (2014). The authors had the aim of conducting a literature update on cognitive rehearsal, and they undertook reviews on the utilization of cognitive rehearsal as a strategy that is based on evidence for addressing bullying behaviors as well as incivility in nursing. Griffin and Clark (2014) point out that different kinds of negative interactions and behaviors occur between and among nurses and other care providers, including workplace mobbing, bullying, lateral violence, and incivility. Those in a higher power and authoritarian positions, including experienced nurses, managers, and physicians often present such behaviors. Many times the receiver’s or those impacted by incivility fail to address the offenders and often wish they could.

    The authors describe the cognitive rehearsal concept as productive communication activities that can be utilized by individuals in addressing lateral violence and incivility by delivering the message that it is not okay to act in an uncivil or violent manner. Examples of disrespectful behavior are provided in the study as well as the cognitive rehearsal responses that can be utilized by healthcare professionals like nurses to practice rehearsing. They argue that even though the technique can be challenging to practice, it can effectively eliminate or reduce lateral violence and incivility. According to the authors, when incivility victims implement strategies from cognitive rehearsal, such behaviors can be removed. Clark (2015) supports this view by noting that the most effective way of addressing incivility is through speaking up when it happens. The author also advocates for the use of cognitive rehearsal in challenging conversations that aim to address incivility through three process steps. They include interactive and didactic instruction and learning, repetition of particular phrases to utilize in uncivil encounters, and sessions of practice for reinforcing instructions and rehearsal.

    The concept of cognitive rehearsal relates to the results of the workplace assessment as it addresses the issues of communication and teamwork. The workplace scored very low on these domains, meaning it is unhealthy and uncivil. Clark (2015) points out that utilization of cognitive rehearsal can enable improved communications, greater nurse satisfaction, and a workforce that is more conflict-capable as well as improved patient care. One model proposed to address incivility under this concept is the DESC model. It stands for Describe, Express, State, and Consequences. The organization can apply it to create a healthier organization as well as stronger working teams. The model is part of an evidence-based teamwork system for improving communication and teamwork skills, which in turn improves on the quality of care and safety. The model will help professionally address uncivil behavior to help relieve stress and conflict within the work environment. That means, respectfully confronting and having a conversation with the uncivil coworker.

    An example can include the uncivil ICU nurse in a hurry to get home during shift changing. Describing can involve explaining that you understand she is in a hurry and apologizing for delaying, although you feel she is not giving enough information. Explaining can involve telling her she is disrespectful to a colleague. Stating can include providing an alternative like giving more information or talking with respect and decency. At the same time, consequences can involve explaining how her behavior can result in information breakdown that can harm the patient’s safety.

    Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Inter-professional Teams
    Strategies to Address Shortcomings
    Strategies that can be applied in addressing the shortcomings of poor communication and teamwork involve reflection, probing, and commitment. Clark (2015) points out that reflection on our workplace cultures, as well as the interactions and relationships we have with others is a vital step toward the improvement of team, individual, and organization success. Fundamental questions have to be asked when one is faced with the prospect of having a challenging conversation. They include inquiring about what would happen if one engages in a difficult conversation as well as what would happen if they did not. It also includes asking oneself what would happen to the patient if they stayed silent. Not speaking up during disrespectful situations has been identified as a severe breakdown of communication among care providers, and it has been asserted that such failures can have severe consequences for patient care. Creating commitment to a practice of speaking up can involve multifaceted organization approaches which foster a culture where individuals can effectively speak up when they have concerns.

    Various sources of influence, as well as recommendations, can be utilized, such as improving the ability of everyone to speak and hold their colleagues accountable to safe practices. Such skills can be acquired through training and education, development of scripts, role-playing, as well as the increased practice of communication skills in situations involving high stakes. Also, the DESC framework can be applied in uncivil scenarios to structure conversations that are based on civility. Clark (2015) notes that utilizing the cognitive rehearsal strategies in combination with the DESC model is an effective means of addressing particular incidents of incivility.

    Strategies to Bolster Successful Practices
    The workplace assessment revealed one successful practice where the organization provides competitive compensations, benefits and salaries. It can be boosted further through the involvement of all stakeholders in the decision making processes of the organization. It involves incorporating team members from all care levels in creating and sharing the goals, values, and mission of the organization. Happy employees have been described as those whose personal values or visions align with those of the organization (Black and Venture, 2017). The goal, value, and mission of respect and civility should be embraced and shared by everyone in the organization to ensure its success. Employees at all levels need to be part of what the organization seeks to achieve so they can align their behavior towards the shared objectives. The second strategy involves effectively clarifying expectations about the clinical practice to enhance workplace autonomy. Such an approach can enable nurses to organize their work and communicate more effectively to promote sound clinical decisions (Griffin & Clark, 2014). Effective communication is necessary to ensure clarity, especially between leaders and subordinates. Every employee needs to know what they are expected to achieve or do and how they can accomplish it, and this includes the type of behavior that should be practiced in the organization.

    Conclusion
    Workplace incivility negatively influences employees as well as the health of the organization with communication and inter-professional teamwork being greatly affected. Literature points to various evidence-based strategies for reducing and eliminating incivility including reflection on our workplace cultures, as well as the interactions and relationships. It also points to the involvement of all stakeholders in the decision making processes of the organization to bolster successful practices.

    References
    Black, J., & Venture, K. L. (2017). The human factor to profitability: People-centered cultures as meaningful organizations. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 17(2), 24-34.

    Broome, M. E., & Marshall, E. S. (2017). Collaborative Leadership Contexts: Networks, Communication, Decision Making, and Motivation. Transformational Leadership in Nursing: From Expert Clinician to Influential Leader, 86.

    Clark, C. M. (2015). Conversations to inspire and promote a more civil workplace. American Nurse Today, 10(11), 18-23.

    Griffin, M., & Clark, C. M. (2014). Revisiting cognitive rehearsal as an intervention against incivility and lateral violence in nursing: 10 years later. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 45(12), 535-542.

    Rahim, A. and Cosby, D. (2016), “A model of workplace incivility, job burnout, turnover intentions, and job performance”, Journal of Management Development, Vol. 35 No. 10, pp. 1255-1265. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-09-2015-0138

    By Day 7 of Week 9

    Submit your Workplace Environment Assessment Assignment.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK9Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
    Click the Week 9 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
    Click the Week 9 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK9Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
    Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 9 Assignment Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 9 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 9

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 9 Assignment

    Next Module

    To go to the next Module:

    Module 5

    Module 5: Organizational Change (Weeks 10-11)
    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Forecasting Organizational Change [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Recommend strategies to lead organizational change
    Justify plans for implementing and managing organizational change in organizational/workplace settings
    Create plans for communicating proposed changes to stakeholders
    Recommend risk mitigation plans when managing organizational changes
    Due By Assignment
    Week 10, Days 1–7 Read the Learning Resources.
    Begin to compose your Assignment.
    Week 11, Day 1 Continue to compose your Assignment.
    Week 11, Day 2 Deadline to submit your Assignment.
    Learning Resources

    Required Readings
    Marshall, E., & Broome, M. (2017). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter 8, “Practice Model Design, Implementation, and Evaluation” (pp. 195–246)

    Cullen, L., & Adams, S. L. (2012). Planning for implementation of evidence-based practice. Journal of Nursing Administration, 42(4), 222–230. Retrieved from https://medcom.uiowa.edu/annsblog/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/JONA-FINAL-Cullen-2012.pdf

    Pollack, J., & Pollack, R. (2015). Using Kotter’s eight stage process to manage an organizational change program: Presentation and practice. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 28(1), 51-66.

    Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

    Seijts, G. H., & Gandz, J. (2016). Transformational change and leader character. Business Horizons, 61(2), 239-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.11.005

    Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

    Tistad, M., Palmcrantz, S., Wallin, L., Ehrenberg, A., Olsson, C. B., Tomson, G., …Eldh, A. C. (2016). Developing leadership in managers to facilitate the implementation of national guideline recommendations: A process evaluation of feasibility and usefulness. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 5(8), 477–486. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2016.35. Retrieved from http://www.ijhpm.com/article_3183_5015382bcf9183a74ef7e79b0a941f65.pdf

    Required Media

    TEDx. (2013, January). Six keys to leading positive change: Rosabeth Moss Kanter at TEDxBeaconStreet [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owU5aTNPJbs

    Assignment: Change Implementation and Management Plan
    It is one of the most cliché of clichés, but it nevertheless rings true: The only constant is change. As a nursing professional, you are no doubt aware that success in the healthcare field requires the ability to adapt to change, as the pace of change in healthcare may be without rival.

    As a professional, you will be called upon to share expertise, inform, educate, and advocate. Your efforts in these areas can help lead others through change. In this Assignment, you will propose a change within your organization and present a comprehensive plan to implement the change you propose.

    To Prepare:
    Review the Resources and identify one change that you believe is called for in your organization/workplace.
    This may be a change necessary to effectively address one or more of the issues you addressed in the Workplace Environment Assessment you submitted in Module 4. It may also be a change in response to something not addressed in your previous efforts. It may be beneficial to discuss your ideas with your organizational leadership and/or colleagues to help identify and vet these ideas.
    Reflect on how you might implement this change and how you might communicate this change to organizational leadership.

    Week 11
    The Assignment (5-6-minute narrated PowerPoint presentation):
    Change Implementation and Management Plan
    Create a narrated PowerPoint presentation of 5 or 6 slides with video that presents a comprehensive plan to implement the change you propose.

    Your narrated presentation should be 5–6 minutes in length.

    Your Change Implementation and Management Plan should include the following:

    An executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting your organization/workplace (This can include the work you completed in your Workplace Environment Assessment previously submitted, if relevant.)
    A description of the change being proposed
    Justifications for the change, including why addressing it will have a positive impact on your organization/workplace
    Details about the type and scope of the proposed change
    Identification of the stakeholders impacted by the change
    Identification of a change management team (by title/role)
    A plan for communicating the change you propose
    A description of risk mitigation plans you would recommend to address the risks anticipated by the change you propose

    Sample Paper – Week 11 Assignment
    NURS 6053 – Change Implementation and Management Plan

    By Day 2 of Week 11

    Submit your narrated Change Implementation and Management Plan.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
    Click the Week 11 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
    Click the Week 11 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
    Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 11 Assignment Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 11 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 2 of Week 11

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 11 Assignment

    Congratulations! After you have finished all of the assignments for this Module, you have completed the course. Please submit your Course Evaluation by Day 7.

    The post NURS 6053 – Interprofessional Organizational and Systems Leadership appeared first on College Pal. Visit us at College Pal – Connecting to a pal for your paper

  • NURS 6501 –Advanced Pathophysiology

    The post NURS 6501 –Advanced Pathophysiology is a property of College Pal
    College Pal writes Plagiarism Free Papers. Visit us at College Pal – Connecting to a pal for your paper

    Advanced practice nurses must be equipped with an in-depth understanding of pathophysiological disease processes across the lifespan. In this course, students focus on understanding the bio-physiological processes, the deviations from these processes, and an in-depth examination of the scientific concepts related to the biology of disease processes. Advanced practice nursing students learn how normal organ systems function and how organ systems are interrelated to help the body maintain homeostasis.

    Through knowledge of pathophysiological disease processes, students gain the information needed to develop appropriate treatment plans for patients across the life span. Students explore a variety of topics, such as immunity, inflammation, cancer genetics, and cardiovascular disease. They also examine a range of disease processes, including hematologic, renal, neurologic, gastrointestinal, and reproductive disorders.

    Module 1: Foundational Concepts of Cellular Pathophysiology
    What’s Happening This Module?
    This course is composed of eight (8) separate modules. Each module consists of an overarching topic and each week within the module includes specific subtopics for learning. As you work through each module, you will draw upon the knowledge you gain by completing various Knowledge Checks and Case Study Assignments.

    Module 1: Foundational Concepts of Cellular Pathophysiology is a 2-week module, Weeks 1 and 2 of the course. In this module, you will examine fundamental concepts of cellular processes and the alterations that lead to various diseases. You will evaluate the genetic environment and its impact on these diseases. You will also evaluate the impact of patient characteristics, including racial and ethnic variables, on physiological functioning.

    What do I have to do? When do I have to do it?
    Review your Learning Resources Days 1–7, Weeks 1 and 2
    Discussion: Alterations in Cellular Processes Post by Day 3 of Week 1 and respond to your colleagues by Day 6 of Week 1.
    Module 1 Assignment: Case Study Analysis You are encouraged to work on your Module 1 Assignment throughout the module. However, this Assignment is not due until Day 7 of Week 2.
    Go to the Week’s Content

    Week 1

    Week 2

    Week 1: Cellular Processes and the Genetic Environment
    One of the more common biology analogies refers to cells as the “building blocks” of life. This rightfully places an emphasis on understanding cells, cellular behavior, and the impact of the environment in which they function.

    Such an understanding helps explain how healthy cell activity contributes to good health. Just as importantly, it helps explain how breakdowns in cellular behavior and alterations to cells lead to health issues.

    This week, you examine cellular processes that are subject to alterations that can lead to disease. You evaluate the genetic environments within which these processes exist as well as the impact these environments have on disease.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Evaluate cellular processes and alterations within cellular processes
    Evaluate the impact of the genetic environment on disease
    Learning Resources
    Required Readings
    McCance, K. L. & Huether, S. E. (2019). Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby/Elsevier.

    Chapter 1: Cellular Biology; Summary Review
    Chapter 2: Altered Cellular and Tissue Biology: Environmental Agents (pp. 46-61; begin again with Manifestations of Cellular Injury pp. 83-97); Summary Review
    Chapter 3: The Cellular Environment: Fluids and Electrolytes, Acids, and Bases
    Chapter 4: Genes and Genetic Diseases (stop at Elements of formal genetics); Summary Review
    Chapter 5: Genes, Environment-Lifestyle, and Common Diseases (stop at Genetics of common diseases); Summary Review
    Chapter 7: Innate Immunity: Inflammation and Wound Healing
    Chapter 8: Adaptive Immunity (stop at Generation of clonal diversity); Summary Review
    Chapter 9: Alterations in Immunity and Inflammation (stop at Deficiencies in immunity); Summary Review
    Chapter 10: Infection (pp. 289–303; stop at Infectious parasites and protozoans); (start at HIV); Summary Review
    Chapter 11: Stress and Disease (stop at Stress, illness & coping); Summary Review
    Chapter 12: Cancer Biology (stop at Resistance to destruction); Summary Review
    Chapter 13: Cancer Epidemiology (stop at Environmental-Lifestyle factors); Summary Review

    Justiz-Vaillant, A. A., & Zito, P. M. (2019). Immediate hypersensitivity reactions. In StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513315/

    Credit Line: Immediate Hypersensitivity Reactions – StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf. (2019, June 18). Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513315/. Used with permission of Stat Pearls

    Required Media

    Module 1 Overview with Dr. Tara Harris
    Dr. Tara Harris reviews the structure of Module 1 as well as the expectations for the module. Consider how you will manage your time as you review your media and Learning Resources throughout the module to prepare for your Discussion and Assignment. (4m)

    Immunity and Inflammation
    Khan Academy (2010, February 24). Inflammatory response | Human anatomy and physiology | Health & medicine [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXSuEIMrPQk

    Note: The approximate length of the media program is 14 minutes.

    Soo, P. (2018, July 28). Pathophysiology Ch 10 alterations in immune function [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jz0wx1-jTds

    Note: The approximate length of the media program is 37 minutes.

    Acid-Base Balance #1
    MedCram. (2012, April 28). Medical acid base balance, disorders & ABGs explained clearly [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wMEMhvrQxE

    Note: The approximate length of the media program is 13 minutes.

    Acid-Base Balance #2
    MedCram. (2012, April 29). Medical acid base balance, disorders & ABGs explained clearly | 2 of 8 [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmEeKVTpOKI

    Note: The approximate length of the media program is 15 minutes.

    Hyponatremia
    MedCram. (2017, December 23). Hyponatremia explained clearly (remastered) – Electrolyte imbalances [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bLajK5Vy55M

    Note: The approximate length of the media program is 15 minutes.

    Online Media from Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children
    In addition to this week’s media, it is highly recommended that you access and view the resources included with the course text, Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children. Focus on the videos and animations in Chapters 3, 7, and 8 that relate to alterations in immunity, hyponatremia, and acid/base balance.

    Note: To access the online resources included with the text, you need to complete the FREE online registration that is located at https://evolve.elsevier.com/cs/store?role=student

    To Register to View the Content

    Go to https://evolve.elsevier.com/cs/store?role=student
    Enter the name of the textbook, Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children, or ISBN 9780323654395 (name of text without the edition number) in the Search textbox.
    Complete the registration process.
    To View the Content for This Text

    Go to https://evolve.elsevier.com/
    Click on Student Site.
    Type in your username and password.
    Click on the Login button.
    Click on the plus sign icon for Resources on the left side of the screen.
    Click on the name of the textbook for this course.
    Expand the menu on the left to locate all the chapters.
    Navigate to the desired content (checklists, videos, animations, etc.).
    Note: Clicking on the URLs in the APA citations for the Resources from the textbook will not link directly to the desired online content. Use the online menu to navigate to the desired content.

    Discussion: Alterations in Cellular Processes
    At its core, pathology is the study of disease. Diseases occur for many reasons. But some, such as cystic fibrosis and Parkinson’s Disease, occur because of alterations that prevent cells from functioning normally.

    Understanding of signals and symptoms of alterations in cellular processes is a critical step in diagnosis and treatment of many diseases. For the Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN), this understanding can also help educate patients and guide them through their treatment plans.

    For this Discussion, you examine a case study and explain the disease that is suggested. You examine the symptoms reported and explain the cells that are involved and potential alterations and impacts.

    To prepare:
    By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific scenario for this Discussion. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.
    By Day 3 of Week 1

    Post an explanation of the disease highlighted in the scenario you were provided. Include the following in your explanation:

    The role genetics plays in the disease.
    Why the patient is presenting with the specific symptoms described.
    The physiologic response to the stimulus presented in the scenario and why you think this response occurred.
    The cells that are involved in this process.
    How another characteristic (e.g., gender, genetics) would change your response.
    Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

    By Day 6 of Week 1

    Respond to at least two of your colleagues on 2 different days and respectfully agree or disagree with your colleague’s assessment and explain your reasoning. In your explanation, include why their explanations make physiological sense or why they do not

    Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 1 Discussion Rubric

    Post by Day 3 of Week 1 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 1

    What’s Coming Up in Week 2?
    Next week, you will examine alterations in the immune system and the resultant disease processes. You will also consider patient characteristics, including racial and ethnic variables, that may impact altered physiology.

    Next Week

    To go to the next week:

    Week 2

    Week 2: Altered Physiology
    With a place squarely in the spotlight for patients diagnosed with all manner of disease, APRNs must demonstrate not only support and compassion, but expertise to guide patients’ understanding of diagnoses and treatment plans.

    This expertise goes beyond an understanding of disease and sciences, such as cellular pathophysiology. APRNs must become experts in their patients, understanding their medical backgrounds, pertinent characteristics, and other variables that can be factors in their diagnoses and treatments.

    This week, you examine alterations in the immune system and the resultant disease processes. You consider patient characteristics, including racial and ethnic variables, and the impact they have on altered physiology.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Evaluate cellular processes and alterations within cellular processes
    Analyze alterations in the immune system that result in disease processes
    Identify racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning
    Evaluate the impact of patient characteristics on disorders and altered physiology
    Learning Resources
    Required Readings
    McCance, K. L. & Huether, S. E. (2019). Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby/Elsevier.

    Chapter 1: Cellular Biology; Summary Review
    Chapter 2: Altered Cellular and Tissue Biology: Environmental Agents(pp. 46-61; begin again with Manifestations of Cellular Injury pp. 83-97); Summary Review
    Chapter 3: The Cellular Environment: Fluids and Electrolytes, Acids, and Bases,
    Chapter 4: Genes and Genetic Diseases (stop at Elements of formal genetics); Summary Review
    Chapter 5: Genes, Environment-Lifestyle, and Common Diseases (stop at Genetics of common diseases); Summary Review
    Chapter 7: Innate Immunity: Inflammation and Wound Healing
    Chapter 8: Adaptive Immunity (stop at Generation of clonal diversity); Summary Review
    Chapter 9: Alterations in Immunity and Inflammation (stop at Deficiencies in immunity); Summary Review
    Chapter 10: Infection (stop at Infectious parasites and protozoans); (start at HIV); Summary Review
    Chapter 11: Stress and Disease (stop at Stress, illness & coping); Summary Review
    Chapter 12: Cancer Biology (stop at Resistance to destruction); Summary Review
    Chapter 13: Cancer Epidemiology (stop at Environmental-Lifestyle factors); Summary Review
    Note: You previously read these chapters in Week 1 and you are encouraged to review once again for this week.

    Justiz-Vaillant, A. A., & Zito, P. M. (2019). Immediate hypersensitivity reactions. In StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513315/

    ​Credit Line: Immediate Hypersensitivity Reactions – StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf. (2019, June 18). Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513315/. Used with permission of Stat Pearls.
    Note: This article was presented in the Week 1 resources. If you read it previously you are encouraged to review it this week.

    Required Media

    Immunity and Inflammation
    Khan Academy (2010, February 24). Inflammatory response | Human anatomy and physiology | Health & medicine [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXSuEIMrPQk

    Note: The approximate length of the media program is 14 minutes.

    Soo, P. (2018, July 28). Pathophysiology Ch 10 alterations in immune function [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jz0wx1-jTds

    Note: The approximate length of the media program is 37 minutes.

    Acid-Base Balance #1
    MedCram. (2012, April 28). Medical acid base balance, disorders & ABGs explained clearly [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wMEMhvrQxE

    Note: The approximate length of the media program is 13 minutes.

    Acid-Base Balance #2
    MedCram. (2012, April 29). Medical acid base balance, disorders & ABGs explained clearly | 2 of 8 [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmEeKVTpOKI

    Note: The approximate length of the media program is 15 minutes.

    Hyponatremia
    MedCram. (2017, December 23). Hyponatremia explained clearly [LK1] (remastered) – Electrolyte imbalances [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bLajK5Vy55M

    Note: The approximate length of the media program is 15 minutes.

    Online Media from Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children
    In addition to this week’s media, it is highly recommended that you access and view the resources included with the course text, Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children. Focus on the videos and animations in Chapters 3, 7, and 8 that relate to alterations in immunity, hyponatremia, and acid/base balance.

    Note: To access the online resources included with the text, you need to complete the FREE online registration that is located at https://evolve.elsevier.com/cs/store?role=student

    To Register to View the Content

    Go to https://evolve.elsevier.com/cs/store?role=student
    Enter the name of the textbook, Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children, or ISBN 9780323654395 (name of text without the edition number) in the Search textbox.
    Complete the registration process.
    To View the Content for This Text

    Go to https://evolve.elsevier.com/
    Click on Student Site.
    Type in your username and password.
    Click on the Login button.
    Click on the plus sign icon for Resources on the left side of the screen.
    Click on the name of the textbook for this course.
    Expand the menu on the left to locate all the chapters.
    Navigate to the desired content (checklists, videos, animations, etc.).
    Note: Clicking on the URLs in the APA citations for the Resources from the textbook will not link directly to the desired online content. Use the online menu to navigate to the desired content.

    Module 1 Assignment: Case Study Analysis
    An understanding of cells and cell behavior is a critically important component of disease diagnosis and treatment. But some diseases can be complex in nature, with a variety of factors and circumstances impacting their emergence and severity.

    Effective disease analysis often requires an understanding that goes beyond isolated cell behavior. Genes, the environments in which cell processes operate, the impact of patient characteristics, and racial and ethnic variables all can have an important impact.

    An understanding of the signals and symptoms of alterations in cellular processes is a critical step in the diagnosis and treatment of many diseases. For APRNs, this understanding can also help educate patients and guide them through their treatment plans.

    In this Assignment, you examine a case study and analyze the symptoms presented. You identify cell, gene, and/or process elements that may be factors in the diagnosis, and you explain the implications to patient health.

    To prepare:
    By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.

    The Assignment (1- to 2-page case study analysis)
    Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis in which you:

    Explain why you think the patient presented the symptoms described.
    Identify the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease.
    Explain the process of immunosuppression and the effect it has on body systems.
    By Day 7 of Week 2

    Submit your Case Study Analysis Assignment by Day 7 of Week 2.

    Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The sample paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “M1Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
    Click the Module 1 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
    Click the Module 1 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “M1Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
    Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Module 1 Assignment Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Module 1 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 2

    To participate in this Assignment:

    Module 1 Assignment
    What’s Coming Up in Module 2?
    In Module 2, you will analyze processes related to cardiovascular and respiratory disorders. To do this, you will analyze alterations in the cardiovascular and respiratory systems and the resultant disease processes. You will also consider patient characteristics, including racial and ethnic variables, which may impact physiological functioning and altered physiology.

    Week 3 Knowledge Check: Cardiovascular and Respiratory Disorders
    In the Week 3 Knowledge Check, you will demonstrate your understanding of the topics covered during Module 2. This Knowledge Check will be composed of a series of questions related to specific scenarios provided. It is highly recommended that you review the Learning Resources in their entirety prior to taking the Knowledge Check, since the resources cover the topics addressed. Plan your time accordingly.

    Next Module

    To go to the next Module:

    Module 2

    Module 2: Cardiovascular and Respiratory Disorders
    What’s Happening This Module?
    Module 2: Cardiovascular and Respiratory Disorders is a 2-week module, Weeks 3 and 4 of the course. In this module, you will examine fundamental concepts of cellular processes and the alterations that lead to various cardiovascular and respiratory diseases and disorders. You will evaluate the genetic environment and its impact on these diseases. You will also evaluate the impact of patient characteristics, including racial and ethnic variables, on physiological functioning.

    What do I have to do? When do I have to do it?
    Review your Learning Resources Days 1–7, Weeks 3 and 4
    Knowledge Check: Cardiovascular and Respiratory Disorders Complete by Day 7 of Week 3
    Module 2 Case Study Analysis You are encouraged to work on your Module 2 Assignment throughout the module. However, this Assignment is not due until Day 7 of Week 4.
    Go to the Week’s Content

    Week 3

    Week 4

    Week 3: Concepts of Cardiovascular and Respiratory Disorders
    The circulatory system and the respiratory system are powerful partners in health. While they work closely together in good health, a disease or disorder that manifests in one can have a significant impact on both, hampering the pair’s ability to collaborate.

    Cardiovascular and respiratory disease and disorders are among the most common reasons for hospital visits, and among the leading causes of fatality. Heart disease and pneumonias are among the most familiar, but a wide variety of issues can impact physiological functioning of one or both systems.

    This week, you examine fundamental concepts of cardiovascular and respiratory disorders. You explore common diseases and disorders that impact these systems, and you apply the key terms and concepts that help communicate the pathophysiological nature of these issues to patients.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Analyze concepts and principles of pathophysiology across the lifespan
    Learning Resources
    Required Readings
    McCance, K. L. & Huether, S. E. (2019). Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby/Elsevier.

    Chapter 32: Structure and Function of the Cardiovascular and Lymphatic Systems; Summary Review
    Chapter 33: Alterations of Cardiovascular Function (stop at Dysrhythmias); Summary Review
    Chapter 35: Structure and Function of the Pulmonary System; Summary Review
    Chapter 36: Alterations of Pulmonary Function (stop at Disorders of the chest wall and pleura); (obstructive pulmonary diseases) (stop at Pulmonary artery hypertension); Summary Review

    Inamdar, A. A. & Inamdar, A. C. (2016). Heart failure: Diagnosis, management, and utilization, 5(7). doi:10.3390/jcm5070062

    Required Media

    Module 2 Overview with Dr. Tara Harris
    Dr. Tara Harris reviews the structure of Module 2 as well as the expectations for the module. Consider how you will manage your time as you review your media and Learning Resources throughout the module to prepare for your Knowledge Check and Assignment. (4m)

    Pneumonia
    MedCram. (2015, September 14). Pneumonia explained clearly by MedCram.com [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqyPECmkSeo

    Note: The approximate length of the media program is 13 minutes.

    Online Media from Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children
    In addition to this week’s media, it is highly recommended that you access and view the resources included with the course text, Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children. Focus on the videos and animations in Chapters 32, 33, 35, and 36 that relate to cardiorespiratory systems and alteration in cardiorespiratory systems. Refer to the Learning Resources in Week 1 for registration instructions. If you have already registered, you may access the resources at https://evolve.elsevier.com/

    Knowledge Check: Cardiovascular and Respiratory Disorders
    In this exercise, you will complete a 10- to 20-essay type question Knowledge Check to gauge your understanding of this module’s content.

    Possible topics covered in this Knowledge Check include:

    myocardial infarction
    endocarditis
    myocarditis
    valvular disorders
    lipid panels
    coagulation
    clotting cascade
    deep vein thrombosis
    hypertension
    heart failure
    COPD
    asthma
    pneumonias
    Complete the Knowledge Check by Day 7 of Week 3

    To complete this Knowledge Check:

    Module 2 Knowledge Check

    What’s Coming Up in Week 4?
    Next week, you will examine the alterations in the cardiovascular and respiratory systems and the resultant disease processes through case study analysis. You will also consider patient characteristics, including racial and ethnic variables, which may impact altered physiology.

    Next Week

    To go to the next week:

    Week 4

    Week 4: Alterations in the Cardiovascular and Respiratory Systems
    Cardiovascular and respiratory disorders can quickly become dangerous healthcare matters, and they routinely land among the leading causes of hospital admissions. Disorders in these areas are complicated by the fact that these two systems work so closely as contributors to overall health. APRNs working to form a similarly close partnership with patients must demonstrate not only support and compassion, but expertise to guide the understanding of diagnoses and treatment plans. This includes an understanding of patient medical backgrounds, relevant characteristics, and other variables that can be factors in their diagnoses and treatments.

    This week, you examine alterations in the cardiovascular and respiratory systems and the resultant disease processes. You also consider patient characteristics, including racial and ethnic variables, and the impact they have on altered physiology.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Analyze processes related to cardiovascular and respiratory disorders
    Analyze alterations in the cardiovascular and respiratory systems and the resultant disease processes
    Analyze racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning
    Evaluate the impact of patient characteristics on disorders and altered physiology
    Learning Resources
    Required Readings
    McCance, K. L. & Huether, S. E. (2019). Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby/Elsevier.

    Chapter 32: Structure and Function of the Cardiovascular and Lymphatic Systems; Summary Review
    Chapter 33: Alterations of Cardiovascular Function (stop at Dysrhythmias); Summary Review
    Chapter 35: Structure and Function of the Pulmonary System; Summary Review
    Chapter 36: Alterations of Pulmonary Function (stop at Disorders of the chest wall and pleura); (obstructive pulmonary diseases) (stop at Pulmonary artery hypertension); Summary Review
    Note: The above chapters were first presented in the Week 3 resources. If you read them previously you are encouraged to review them this week.

    Inamdar, A. A. & Inamdar, A. C. (2016). Heart failure: Diagnosis, management, and utilization, 5(7). doi:10.3390/jcm5070062

    Note: The above article was first presented in the Week 3 resources. If you read it previously you are encouraged to review it this week.

    Required Media

    Pneumonia
    MedCram. (2015, September 14). Pneumonia explained clearly by MedCram [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqyPECmkSeo

    Note: The approximate length of the media program is 13 minutes.
    (Previously reviewed in Week 3)

    Online Media from Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children
    In addition to this week’s media, it is highly recommended that you access and view the resources included with the course text, Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children. Focus on the videos and animations in Chapters 32, 33, 35, and 36 that relate to cardiorespiratory systems and alteration in cardiorespiratory systems. Refer to the Learning Resources in Week 1 for registration instructions. If you have already registered, you may access the resources at https://evolve.elsevier.com/

    Module 2 Assignment: Case Study Analysis
    An understanding of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems is a critically important component of disease diagnosis and treatment. This importance is magnified by the fact that these two systems work so closely together. A variety of factors and circumstances that impact the emergence and severity of issues in one system can have a role in the performance of the other.

    Effective disease analysis often requires an understanding that goes beyond these systems and their capacity to work together. The impact of patient characteristics, as well as racial and ethnic variables, can also have an important impact.

    An understanding of the symptoms of alterations in cardiovascular and respiratory systems is a critical step in diagnosis and treatment of many diseases. For APRNs this understanding can also help educate patients and guide them through their treatment plans.

    In this Assignment, you examine a case study and analyze the symptoms presented. You identify the elements that may be factors in the diagnosis, and you explain the implications to patient health.

    Scenario 4 (week 4):
    45-year-old woman presents with the chief complaint of 3-day duration of shortness of breath, cough with thick green sputum production, and fevers. The patient has a history of COPD with a chronic cough but states the cough has gotten much worse and is interfering with her sleep. Sputum is thicker and harder for her to expectorate. CXR reveals a flattened diaphragm and an increased AP diameter. Auscultation demonstrates hyper resonance and coarse rales and rhonchi throughout all lung fields.

    Module 2 Assignment: Case Study Analysis
    An understanding of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems is a critically important component of disease diagnosis and treatment. This importance is magnified by the fact that these two systems work so closely together. A variety of factors and circumstances that impact the emergence and severity of issues in one system can have a role in the performance of the other.

    Effective disease analysis often requires an understanding that goes beyond these systems and their capacity to work together. The impact of patient characteristics, as well as racial and ethnic variables, can also have an important impact.

    An understanding of the symptoms of alterations in cardiovascular and respiratory systems is a critical step in the diagnosis and treatment of many diseases. For APRNs, this understanding can also help educate patients and guide them through their treatment plans.

    In this Assignment, you examine a case study and analyze the symptoms presented. You identify the elements that may be factored in the diagnosis, and you explain the implications to patient health.

    To prepare:
    By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study scenario for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.

    Assignment (1- to 2-page case study analysis)
    In your Case Study Analysis related to the scenario provided, explain the following

    The cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes that result in the patient presenting these symptoms.

    Any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.

    How these processes interact to affect the patient.

    By Day 7 of Week 4

    Submit your Case Study Analysis Assignment by Day 7 of Week 4

    Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The sample paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

    In your Case Study Analysis related to the scenario provided, explain the following

    The cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes that result in the patient presenting these symptoms.
    Any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.
    How these processes interact to affect the patient.
    By Day 7 of Week 4

    Submit your Case Study Analysis Assignment by Day 7 of Week 4

    Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The sample paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “M2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
    Click the Module 2 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
    Click the Module 2 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “M2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
    Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Module 2 Assignment Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Module 2 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 4

    To participate in this Assignment:

    Module 2 Assignment
    What’s Coming Up in Module 3?
    In Module 3, you will analyze processes related to gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders through case study analysis. To do this, you will analyze alterations in the relevant systems and the resultant disease processes. You will also consider patient characteristics, including racial and ethnic variables, which may impact physiological functioning and altered physiology.

    Week 5 Knowledge Check: Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Disorders
    In Week 5 Knowledge Check, you will demonstrate your understanding of the topics covered during Module 3. This Knowledge Check will be composed of a series of questions related to specific scenarios provided. It is highly recommended that you review the Learning Resources in their entirety prior to taking the Knowledge Check since the resources cover the topics addressed. Plan your time accordingly.

    Next Module

    To go to the next Module:

    Module 3

    Module 3: Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Disorders
    What’s Happening This Module?
    Module 3: Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Disorders is a 1-week module, Week 5 of the course. In this module, you will examine fundamental concepts of diseases and disorders that impact gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary systems. You will also evaluate the impact of patient characteristics, including racial and ethnic variables, on physiological functioning within these systems.

    What do I have to do? When do I have to do it?
    Review your Learning Resources Days 1–7 of Week 5
    Knowledge Check: Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Disorders Complete by Day 7 of Week 5
    Go to the Week’s Content

    Week 5

    Week 5: Concepts of Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Disorders
    Patients of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders often face life-altering changes, including changes to diet, new treatment regimens, and more. For some disorders, treatments can include surgery.

    Gastrointestinal conditions, such as ulcers, diverticulitis, and pancreatitis, often cause varying levels of pain and discomfort. Hepatobiliary conditions can also bring significant changes to patient routines and well-being.

    This week, you examine fundamental concepts of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders. You explore common disorders in these categories, and you apply the key terms and concepts that help communicate the pathophysiological nature of these issues to patients.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Analyze concepts and principles of pathophysiology across the life span
    Learning Resources
    Required Readings
    McCance, K. L. & Huether, S. E. (2019). Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby/Elsevier.

    Chapter 38: Structure and Function of the Renal and Urological Systems including Summary Review
    Chapter 39: Alteration of Renal and Urinary Function (stop at Fluids and electrolytes); Summary Review
    Chapter 41: Structure and Function of the Digestive System (stop at Tests of digestive function); Summary Review
    Chapter 42: Alterations of Digestive Function (stop at Cancer of the digestive track); Summary Review

    Osna, N. A., Donohue, T. M., Jr., & Kharbanda, K. K. (2017). Alcoholic liver disease: Pathogenesis and current management. Alcohol Research: Current Reviews, 38(2), 7–21

    Document: NURS 6501 Midterm Exam Review (PDF document)

    Note: Use this document to help you as you review for your Midterm Exam in Week 6.

    Required Media

    Module 3 Overview with Dr. Tara Harris
    Dr. Tara Harris reviews the structure of Module 3 as well as the expectations for the module. Consider how you will manage your time as you review your media and Learning Resources throughout the module to prepare for your Knowledge Check. (2m)

    Liver Function Tests
    MedCram. (2013, April 14). Liver function tests LFTs explained clearly by MedCram.com [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFdTgty0T0I

    Note: The approximate length of the media program is 11 minutes.

    Liver Diseases
    MedCram. (2019, May 15). Diagnosis of key liver diseases: Hepatitis A, B C vs. alcoholic vs. ischemic (AST vs ALT labs) [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZRHA2JvCGA

    Note: The approximate length of the media program is 13 minutes.

    Liver Pathophysiology
    MedCram. (2013, April 9). Liver explained clearly: Pathophysiology, LFTs, hepatic diseases [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BTGkB8nOu7g

    Note: The approximate length of the media program is 14 minutes.

    Online Media from Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children
    In addition to this week’s media, it is highly recommended that you access and view the resources included with the course text, Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children. Focus on the videos and animations in Chapters 41 and 42 that relate to the hepatobiliary system. Refer to the Learning Resources in Week 1 for registration instructions. If you have already registered, you may access the resources at https://evolve.elsevier.com/

    Knowledge Check: Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Disorders
    In this exercise, you will complete a 10- to 20-essay type question Knowledge Check to gauge your understanding of this module’s content.

    Possible topics covered in this Knowledge Check include:

    Ulcers
    Hepatitis markers
    After HP shots
    Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
    Pancreatitis
    Liver failure—acute and chronic
    Gall bladder disease
    Inflammatory bowel disease
    Diverticulitis
    Jaundice
    Bilirubin
    Gastrointestinal bleed – upper and lower
    Hepatic encephalopathy
    Intra-abdominal infections (e.g., appendicitis)
    Renal blood flow
    Glomerular filtration rate
    Kidney stones
    Infections – urinary tract infections, pyelonephritis
    Acute kidney injury
    Renal failure – acute and chronic
    Complete the Knowledge Check By Day 7 of Week 5

    To complete this Knowledge Check:

    Module 3 Knowledge Check

    What’s Coming Up in Module 4?
    In Module 4, you will analyze processes related to endocrine disorders. To do this, you will analyze alterations in the relevant systems and the resultant disease processes. You will also consider patient characteristics, including racial and ethnic variables, that may impact physiological functioning and altered physiology.

    Week 6 Knowledge Check: Endocrine Disorders
    In the Week 6 Knowledge Check, you will demonstrate your understanding of the topics covered during Module 4. This Knowledge Check will be composed of a series of questions related to specific scenarios provided. It is highly recommended that you review the Learning Resources in their entirety prior to taking the Knowledge Check, since the resources cover the topics addressed. Plan your time accordingly.

    Also, during this week you will take your Midterm Exam. Please make sure to finalize and complete your Knowledge Check prior to completing your exam.

    Next Module

    To go to the next Module:

    Module 4

    Module 4: Endocrine Disorders
    What’s Happening This Module?
    Module 4: Endocrine Disorders is a 1-week module, Week 6 of the course. In this module you will examine fundamental concepts of diseases and disorders that impact endocrine systems. You will also evaluate the impact of patient characteristics, including racial and ethnic variables, on physiological functioning within these systems.

    What do I have to do? When do I have to do it?
    Review your Learning Resources Days 1–7 of Week 6
    Knowledge Check: Endocrine Disorders Complete by Day 5 of Week 6
    Midterm Exam Complete by Day 7 of Week 6

    Go to the Week’s Content

    Week 6

    Week 6: Concepts of Endocrine Disorders
    Endocrine disorders are complex matters, and there is not always a one-size-fits-all treatment. Particularly in matters requiring the adjustment of hormone levels, treatment may require a custom approach tailored to individual patients. An understanding of these complications is essential to supporting these individual treatment plans.

    This week, you examine alterations in the endocrine system and the resultant disease processes. You also consider patient characteristics, including racial and ethnic variables, and the impact they have on altered physiology.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Analyze concepts and principles of pathophysiology across the lifespan
    Learning Resources
    Required Readings
    McCance, K. L. & Huether, S. E. (2019). Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby/Elsevier.

    Chapter 21: Mechanisms of Hormonal Regulation, including Summary Review
    Chapter 22: Alterations of Hormonal Regulation, including Summary Review
    Chapter 23: Obesity and Disorders of Nutrition, including Summary Review
    American Diabetes Association (2020). Standards of medical care of patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care, 26(suppl 1), pp. s33-s50. https://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/26/suppl_1/s33

    Orlander, P. R. (2018). Hypothyroidism. Retrieved from https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/122393-overview

    Hoorn, E. J., & Zietse, R. (2017). Diagnosis and treatment of hyponatremia: Compilation of the guidelines. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 28(5), 1340–1349

    Document: NURS 6501 Midterm Exam Review (PDF document)

    Note: Use this document to help you as you review for your Midterm Exam in Week 6.

    Required Media

    Module 4 Overview with Dr. Tara Harris
    Dr. Tara Harris reviews the structure of Module 4 as well as the expectations for the module. Consider how you will manage your time as you review your media and Learning Resources throughout the module to prepare for your Knowledge Check and your Midterm. (3m)

    Online Media from Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children
    In addition to this week’s media, it is highly recommended that you access and view the resources included with the course text, Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children. Focus on the videos and animations in Chapters 21 through 23 related to the endocrine system and disorders. Refer to the Learning Resources in Week 1 for registration instructions. If you have already registered, you may access the resources at https://evolve.elsevier.com/

    Optional Resources

    The following source provides various tutorials related to maximizing your time management and managing stress. Feel free to access this resource to support you as you move through this course.

    Walden University. (2019). ASC success strategies interactive tutorials. Retrieved from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/academic-skills-center/skills/tutorials/success-strategies

    Knowledge Check: Endocrine Disorders
    In this exercise, you will complete a 10- to 20-essay type question Knowledge Check to gauge your understanding of this module’s content.

    Possible topics covered in this Knowledge Check include:

    Diabetes
    Hyper- and hypothyroidism
    Adrenal disorders
    Parathyroidism (hyper and hypo)
    Checks & balances / negative feedback
    Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuretic Hormone
    Pheochromocytosis
    Diabetes insipidus
    Diabetic ketoacidosis
    (Note: It is strongly recommended that you take the Knowledge Check at least 48 hours before taking the Midterm Exam.)

    Complete the Knowledge Check By Day 5 of Week 6

    To complete this Knowledge Check:

    Module 4 Knowledge Check

    Midterm Exam
    This 101-question exam is a test of your knowledge in preparation for your certification exam. No outside resources, including books, notes, websites, or any other type of resource, are to be used to complete this exam. You are expected to comply with Walden University’s Code of Conduct.

    This exam will be on topics covered in Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Prior to starting the exam, you should review all of your materials. This exam is timed with a limit of 2 hours for completion. When time is up, your exam will automatically submit.

    (Note: It is strongly recommended that you take the Knowledge Check at least 48 hours before taking the Midterm exam.)

    To prepare:
    To help you review for your midterm exam, access the Midterm Exam Review document found in this week’s Learning Resources as well as any Knowledge Check feedback you might have received. (Note: You will also need to review all of your materials from each of these weeks to also help you better prepare for your midterm.)

    By Day 7 of Week 6

    Submit your Midterm Exam.

    To complete your exam:

    Midterm Exam

    What’s Coming Up in Module 5?
    In Module 5, you will analyze processes related to neurological and musculoskeletal disorders through case study analysis. To do this, you will analyze alterations in the relevant systems and the resultant disease processes. You will also consider patient characteristics, including racial and ethnic variables, which may impact physiological functioning and altered physiology.

    Week 7 Knowledge Check: Neurological and Musculoskeletal Disorders
    In the Week 7 Knowledge Check, you will demonstrate your understanding of the topics covered during Module 5. This Knowledge Check will be composed of a series of questions related to specific scenarios provided. It is highly recommended that you review the Learning Resources in their entirety prior to taking the Knowledge Check, since the resources cover the topics addressed. Plan your time accordingly.

    Next Module

    To go to the next Module:

    Module 5

    Module 5: Neurological and Musculoskeletal Disorders
    What’s Happening This Module?
    Module 5: Neurological and Musculoskeletal Disorders is a 2-week module, Weeks 7 and 8 of the course. In this module, you will examine fundamental concepts of diseases and disorders that impact neurological and musculoskeletal systems. You will also evaluate the impact of patient characteristics, including racial and ethnic variables, on physiological functioning within these systems.

    What do I have to do? When do I have to do it?
    Review your Learning Resources Days 1–7, Weeks 7 and 8
    Knowledge Check: Neurological and Musculoskeletal Disorders Submit your Assignment by Day 7
    Module 5 Assignment: Case Study Analysis You are encouraged to work on your Module 5 Assignment throughout the module. However, this Assignment is not due until Day 7 of Week 8.
    Go to the Week’s Content

    Week 7

    Week 8

    Week 7: Concepts of Neurological and Musculoskeletal Disorders – Part 1
    Anatomists often use the analogy of a house to explain the human body, with skeletal systems, respiratory systems, and circulatory systems represented as a home’s framing structure, ventilation, and piping, respectively. Such analogies further emphasize the point that relationships between systems can result in complications when issues arise in one system.

    With hundreds of diseases that can impact the brain, spine, and nerves, neurological disorders represent a complicated array of issues that present significant health concerns. Disorders such as strokes and Parkinson’s disease not only affect the nervous system, however; they can have secondary impacts in other areas, especially the musculoskeletal system.

    This week, you examine fundamental concepts of neurological disorders. You explore common disorders that impact these systems and you apply the key terms and concepts that help communicate the pathophysiological nature of these issues to patients.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Analyze concepts and principles of pathophysiology across the lifespan
    Learning Resources
    Required Readings
    McCance, K. L. & Huether, S. E. (2019). Pathophysiology: the biologic basis for disease in adults and children (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby/Elsevier.

    Chapter 15: Structure and Function of the Neurologic System
    Chapter 16: Pain, Temperature Regulation, Sleep, and Sensory Function (stop at Sleep); Summary Review
    Chapter 17: Alterations in Cognitive Systems, Cerebral Hemodynamics, and Motor Function (start at Acute confusional states and delirium) (stop at Alterations in neuromotor functions); (Parkinson’s Disease); Summary Review
    Chapter 18: Disorders of the Central and Peripheral Nervous Systems and the Neuromuscular Junction (stop at Degenerative disorders of the spine); (start at Cerebrovascular disorders) (stop at Tumors of the central nervous system); Summary Review
    Chapter 44: Structure and Function of the Musculoskeletal System (stop at Components of muscle function); Summary Review
    Chapter 45: Alterations of Musculoskeletal Function (stop at Bone tumors); (start at Disorders of joints); Summary Review
    Chapter 47: Structure, Function, and Disorders of the Integument (section on Lyme Disease)
    Chin, L. S. (2018). Spinal cord injuries. Retrieved from https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/793582-overview#a4

    Required Media

    Module 5 Overview with Dr. Tara Harris
    Dr. Tara Harris reviews the structure of Module 5 as well as the expectations for the module. Consider how you will manage your time as you review your media and Learning Resources throughout the module to prepare for your Knowledge Check and your Assignment. (3m)

    Khan Academy. (2019b). Ischemic stroke . Retrieved from https://www.khanacademy.org/science/health-and-medicine/circulatory-system-diseases/stroke/v/ischemic-stroke

    Note: The approximate length of the media program is 8 minutes.

    Osmosis.org. (2019, June 12). Osteoporosis – causes, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, pathology [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUQ_tt_zJDo

    Note: The approximate length of the media program is 9 minutes.

    Online Media from Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children
    In addition to this week’s media, it is highly recommended that you access and view the resources included with the course text, Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children. Focus on the videos and animations in Chapters 15, 16, 18, and sections of Chapters 44 and 45 that relate to the neurological and musculoskeletal systems. Refer to the Learning Resources in Week 1 for registration instructions. If you have already registered, you may access the resources at https://evolve.elsevier.com/

    Knowledge Check: Neurological and Musculoskeletal Disorders
    In this exercise, you will complete a 10- to 20-essay type question Knowledge Check to gauge your understanding of this module’s content.

    Possible topics covered in this Knowledge Check include:

    Stroke
    Multiple sclerosis
    Transient Ischemic Attack
    Myasthenia gravis
    Headache
    Seizure disorders
    Head injury
    Spinal cord injury
    Inflammatory diseases of the musculoskeletal system
    Osteoporosis
    Osteopenia
    Bursitis
    Tendinitis
    Gout
    Lyme Disease
    Spondylosis
    Fractures
    Parkinson’s
    Alzheimer’s
    Three basic bone-formations:

    Osteoblasts
    Osteocytes
    Osteoclasts
    Complete the Knowledge Check By Day 7 of Week 7

    To complete this Knowledge Check:

    Module 5 Knowledge Check

    Next Week

    To go to the next week:

    Week 8

    Week 8: Concepts of Neurological and Musculoskeletal Disorders – Part 2
    As homeowners know all too well, there is a continuous need for maintenance and repair. Some efforts are precautionary in nature, while others are the result of issues that surface over time.

    Similarly, musculoskeletal disorders can develop over time. For some disorders, such as osteoporosis, precautionary treatments are a potential option. But much like issues that surface in a home over time, many musculoskeletal issues can be very serious concerns, and they can have a significant impact on patients’ lives.

    This week, you continue to examine fundamental concepts of neurological and musculoskeletal disorders. You explore common disorders that impact these systems and you apply the key terms and concepts that help communicate the pathophysiological nature of these issues to patients.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Analyze processes related to neurological and musculoskeletal disorders
    Identify racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning
    Evaluate the impact of patient characteristics on disorders and altered physiology
    Learning Resources
    Note: The below resources were first presented in Week 7. If you have previously reviewed them, you are encouraged to read or view them again here.

    Required Readings
    McCance, K. L. & Huether, S. E. (2019). Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby/Elsevier.

    Chapter 15: Structure and Function of the Cardiovascular and Lymphatic Systems (stop at Aging and the nervous system)
    Chapter 16: Pain, Temperature Regulation, Sleep, and Sensory Function (stop at Sleep); Summary Review
    o Chapter 17: Alterations in Cognitive Systems, Cerebral Hemodynamics, and Motor Function; pp. 504–511, pp. 516–530 (start at Acute confusional states and delirium) (stop at Alterations in neuromotor functions); (Parkinson’s Disease); Summary Review
    Chapter 18: Disorders of the Central and Peripheral Nervous Systems and the Neuromuscular Junction (stop at Degenerative disorders of the spine); (start at Cerebrovascular disorders) (stop at Tumors of the central nervous system); Summary Review
    Chapter 44: Structure and Function of the Musculoskeletal System (stop at Components of muscle function); Summary Review
    Chapter 45: Alterations of Musculoskeletal Function (stop at Bone tumors); (start at Disorders of joints); Summary Review
    Chin, L. S. (2018). Spinal cord injuries. Retrieved from https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/793582-overview#a4

    Required Media

    Khan Academy. (2019b). Ischemic stroke. Retrieved from ttps://www.khanacademy.org/science/health-and-medicine/circulatory-system-diseases/stroke/v/ischemic-stroke

    Note: The approximate length of the media program is 8 minutes.

    Osmosis.org. (2019, June 12). Osteoporosis – causes, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, pathology [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUQ_tt_zJDo

    Note: The approximate length of the media program is 9 minutes.

    Online Media from Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children
    In addition to this week’s media, it is highly recommended that you access and view the resources included with the course text, Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children. Focus on the videos and animations in Chapters 15, 16, 18, and the sections of Chapters 44 and 45 that relate to the neurological and musculoskeletal systems. Refer to the Learning Resources in Week 1 for registration instructions. If you have already registered, you may access the resources at https://evolve.elsevier.com/

    Module 5 Assignment: Case Study Analysis
    An understanding of the neurological and musculoskeletal systems is a critically important component of disease and disorder diagnosis and treatment. This importance is magnified by the impact that that these two systems can have on each other. A variety of factors and circumstances affecting the emergence and severity of issues in one system can also have a role in the performance of the other.

    Effective analysis often requires an understanding that goes beyond these systems and their mutual impact. For example, patient characteristics such as, racial and ethnic variables can play a role.

    An understanding of the symptoms of alterations in neurological and musculoskeletal systems is a critical step in diagnosis and treatment. For APRNs this understanding can also help educate patients and guide them through their treatment plans.

    In this Assignment, you examine a case study and analyze the symptoms presented. You identify the elements that may be factors in the diagnosis, and you explain the implications to patient health.

    To prepare:
    By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study scenario for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.

    Assignment (1- to 2-page case study analysis)

    Module 5 Assignment: Case Study Analysis
    An understanding of the neurological and musculoskeletal systems is a critically important component of disease and disorder diagnosis and treatment. This importance is magnified by the impact that that these two systems can have on each other. A variety of factors and circumstances affecting the emergence and severity of issues in one system can also have a role in the performance of the other.

    Effective analysis often requires an understanding that goes beyond these systems and their mutual impact. For example, patient characteristics such as racial and ethnic variables can play a role.

    An understanding of the symptoms of alterations in neurological and musculoskeletal systems is a critical step in diagnosis and treatment. For APRNs, this understanding can also help educate patients and guide them through their treatment plans.

    In this Assignment, you examine a case study and analyze the symptoms presented. You identify the elements that may be factored in the diagnosis, and you explain the implications to patient health.

    To prepare:
    By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study scenario for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.

    Assignment (1- to 2-page case study analysis)

    In your Case Study Analysis related to the scenario provided, explain the following:

    Both the neurological and musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes that would account for the patient presenting these symptoms.

    Any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.

    How these processes interact to affect the patient.

    Week 8 Case Study:
    A 67-year-old man presents to the HCP with a chief complaint of tremors in his arms. He also has noticed some tremors in his leg as well. The patient is accompanied by his son, who says that his father has become “stiff” and it takes him much longer to perform simple tasks. The son also relates that his father needs help rising from his chair. Physical exam demonstrates tremors in the hands at rest and fingers exhibit “pill-rolling” movement. The patient’s face is not mobile and exhibits a mask-like appearance. His gait is uneven, and he shuffles when he walks and his head/neck, hips, and knees are flexed forward. He exhibits jerky or cogwheeling movement. The patient states that he has episodes of extreme sweating and flushing not associated with the activity. Laboratory data unremarkable and the HCP has diagnosed the patient with Parkinson’s Disease.

    In your Case Study Analysis related to the scenario provided, explain the following:

    Both the neurological and musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes that would account for the patient presenting these symptoms.
    Any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.
    How these processes interact to affect the patient.
    Day 7 of Week 8

    Submit your Case Study Analysis Assignment by Day 7 of Week 8.

    Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The sample paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “M5Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
    Click the Module 5 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
    Click the Module 5 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “M5Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
    Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Module 5 Assignment Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Module 5 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 8

    To participate in this Assignment:

    Module 5 Assignment

    What’s Coming Up in Module 6?
    In Module 6, you will identify processes related to psychological disorders. You will also examine the neurobiology of various psychological issues and consider variables that may impact physiological functioning and altered physiology.

    Week 9 Knowledge Check: Psychological Disorders
    In the Week 9 Knowledge Check, you will demonstrate your understanding of the topics covered during Module 6. This Knowledge Check will be composed of a series of questions related to specific scenarios provided. It is highly recommended that you review the Learning Resources in their entirety prior to taking the Knowledge Check, since the resources cover the topics addressed. Plan your time accordingly.

    Next Module

    Module 6: Psychological Disorders
    What’s Happening This Module?
    Module 6: Psychological Disorders is a 1-week module, Week 9 of the course. In this module, you will examine fundamental concepts of disorders that impact patterns of behavior or psychology that can affect multiple areas of life.

    What do I have to do? When do I have to do it?
    Review your Learning Resources Days 1–7 of Week 9
    Knowledge Check: Psychological Disorders Complete by Day 7 of Week 9

    Go to the Week’s Content

    Week 9

    Week 9: Concepts of Psychological Disorders
    Among the many risk factors for mental disorders are genetics and other pathophysiological factors. While other factors, such as environmental factors or substance abuse, can also have an impact, it is important to recognize the connections between biological factors and psychological disorders.

    Ranging from anxiety to schizophrenia, psychological disorders offer unique challenges in diagnosis and treatment. Clearly, the presence of these disorders can be life-altering for patients, but they can also significantly impact families and other loved ones.

    This week, you examine fundamental concepts of psychological disorders. You explore common psychological disorders, and you apply the key terms and concepts that help communicate the pathophysiological nature of these issues to patients.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Analyze concepts and principles of pathophysiology across the lifespan
    Learning Resources
    Required Readings
    McCance, K. L. & Huether, S. E. (2019). Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby/Elsevier.

    Chapter 19: Neurobiology of Schizophrenia, Mood Disorders, Anxiety Disorders, and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, including Summary Review

    Locke, A. B., Kirst, N., & Shultz, C. G. (2015). Diagnosis and management of generalized anxiety disorder and panic disorder in adults. American Family Physician, 91(9), 617–624. Retrieved from https://www.aafp.org/afp/2015/0501/p617.html

    Credit Line: Diagnosis and management of generalized anxiety disorder and panic disorder in adults by Locke, A. B., Kirst, N., & Shultz, C., in American Family Physician, Vol. 91/Issue 9. Copyright 2015 by American Academy of Family Physicians. Reprinted by permission of American Academy of Family Physicians via the Copyright Clearance Center.

    McIntyre, R. S. & Calabrese, J. R. (2019). Bipolar depression: The clinical characteristics and unmet needs of a complex disorder. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 1–14. doi:10.1080/03007995.2019.1636017. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03007995.2019.1636017

    Credit Line: Bipolar depression: The clinical characteristics and unmet needs of a complex disorder by McIntyre, R. S. & Calabrese, J. R., in Current Medical Research and Opinion. Copyright 2019 by Librapharm Ltd. Reprinted by permission of Librapharm Ltd via the Copyright Clearance Center.

    Required Media

    Module 6 Overview with Dr. Tara Harris
    Dr. Tara Harris reviews the structure of Module 6 as well as the expectations for the module. Consider how you will manage your time as you review your media and Learning Resources throughout the module to prepare for your Knowledge Check. (1m)

    Generalized Anxiety Syndrome
    Osmosis.org. (2016, February 29). Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) – causes, symptoms, & treatment [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9mPwQTiMSj8

    Note: The approximate length of the media program is 5 minutes.

    Knowledge Check: Psychological Disorders
    In this exercise, you will complete a 10- to 20-essay type question Knowledge Check to gauge your understanding of this module’s content.

    Possible topics covered in this Knowledge Check include:

    Generalized anxiety disorder
    Depression
    Bipolar disorders
    Schizophrenia
    Delirium and dementia
    Obsessive compulsive disease
    Complete the Knowledge Check By Day 7 of Week 9

    To complete this Knowledge Check:

    Module 6 Knowledge Check

    What’s Coming Up in Module 7?
    In Module 7, you will analyze processes related to women’s and men’s health, infections, and hematologic disorders through case study analysis. To do this, you will analyze alterations in the relevant systems and the resultant disease processes. You will also consider patient characteristics, including racial and ethnic variables, which may impact physiological functioning and altered physiology.

    Week 10 Knowledge Check: Women’s and Men’s Health, Infections, and Hematologic Disorders
    In the Week 10 Knowledge Check, you will demonstrate your understanding of the topics covered during Module 7. This Knowledge Check will be composed of a series of questions related to specific scenarios provided. It is highly recommended that you review the Learning Resources in their entirety prior to taking the Knowledge Check, since the resources cover the topics addressed. Plan your time accordingly.

    Next Module

    To go to the next module:

    Module 7

    Module 7: Women’s and Men’s Health, Infections, and Hematologic Disorders
    What’s Happening This Module?
    Module 7: Women’s and Men’s Health, Infections, and Hematologic Disorders is a 1-week module, Week 10 of the course. In this module, you will examine fundamental concepts of diseases and disorders that impact women’s and men’s health, including infections and hematologic disorders. You will also evaluate the impact of patient characteristics, including racial and ethnic variables, on physiological functioning within these populations.

    What do I have to do? When do I have to do it?
    Review your Learning Resources Days 1–7 of Week 10
    Knowledge Check: Women’s and Men’s Health, Infections, and Hematologic Disorders Complete by Day 7 of Week 10
    Module 7 Assignment: Case Study Analysis Submit by Day 7 of Week 10

    Go to the Week’s Content

    Week 10

    Week 10: Concepts of Women’s and Men’s Health, Infections, and Hematologic Disorders
    Literature, cinema, and other cultural references have long examined differences between women and men. These observations extend well beyond obvious and even inconspicuous traits to include cultural, behavioral, and biological differences that can impact pathophysiological process and, ultimately, health.

    Understanding these differences in traits and their impact on pathophysiology can better equip acute care nurses to communicate to patients of both sexes. Furthermore, APRNs who are able to communicate these differences can better guide care to patients, whatever their gender.

    This week, you examine fundamental concepts of women’s and men’s health disorders. You also explore common infections and hematologic disorders, and you apply the key terms and concepts that help communicate the pathophysiological nature of these issues to patients.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Analyze concepts and principles of pathophysiology across the life span
    Analyze processes related to women’s and men’s health, infections, and hematologic disorders
    Identify racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning
    Evaluate the impact of patient characteristics on disorders and altered physiology
    Learning Resources
    Required Readings
    McCance, K. L. & Huether, S. E. (2019). Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby/Elsevier.

    Chapter 24: Structure and Function of the Reproductive Systems (stop at Tests of reproductive function); Summary Review
    Chapter 25: Alterations of the Female Reproductive System (stop at Organ prolapse); pp. 787–788 (start at Impaired fertility) (stop at Disorders of the female breast); Summary Review
    Chapter 26: Alterations of the Male Reproductive System (stop at Hormone levels); Summary Review
    Chapter 27: Sexually Transmitted Infections, including Summary Review
    Chapter 28: Structure and Function of the Hematological System (stop at Clinical evaluation of the hematological system); Summary Review
    Chapter 29: Alterations of Erythrocytes, Platelets, and Hemostatic Function, including Summary Review
    Chapter 30: Alterations of Leukocyte and Lymphoid Function, including Summary Review

    Low, N. & Broutet N. J. (2017). Sexually transmitted infections – Research priorities for new challenges. PLoS Medicine, (12), e1002481

    Kessler, C. M. (2019). Immune thrombocytopenic purpura [LK1] (ITP). Retrieved from https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/202158-overview

    Nagalia, S. (2019). Pernicious anemia[LK1] . Retrieved from https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/204930-overview#a3

    Stauder, R., Valent, P., & Theurl, I. [LK1] (2019). Anemia at older age: Etiologies, clinical implications and management. Blood Journal, 131(5). Retrieved from http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/131/5/505?sso-checked=true

    Credit Line: Anemia at older age: Etiologies, clinical implications and management by Stauder, R., Valent, P., & Theurl, I., in Blood Journal, Vol. 131/Issue 5. Copyright 2019 by American Society of Hematology. Reprinted by permission of American Society of Hematology via the Copyright Clearance Center.

    Document: NURS 6501 Final Exam Review (PDF document)

    Note: Use this document to help you as you review for your Final Exam in Week 11.

    Required Media

    Module 7 Overview with Dr. Tara Harris
    Dr. Tara Harris reviews the structure of Module 7 as well as the expectations for the module. Consider how you will manage your time as you review your media and Learning Resources throughout the module to prepare for your Knowledge Check and your Assignment. (3m)

    Khan Academy. (2019a). Chronic disease vs iron deficiency anemia[LK1] . Retrieved from https://www.khanacademy.org/science/health-and-medicine/hematologic-system-diseases-2/iron-deficiency-anemia-and-anemia-of-chronic-disease/v/chronic-disease-vs-iron-deficiency-anemia

    Note: The approximate length of the media program is 5 minutes.

    Online Media from Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children
    In addition to this week’s media, it is highly recommended that you access and view the resources included with the course text, Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children. Focus on the videos and animations in Chapters 24, 26, 28, and 30 that relate to the reproductive and hematological systems. Refer to the Learning Resources in Week 1 for registration instructions. If you have already registered, you may access the resources at https://evolve.elsevier.com/

    Knowledge Check: Women’s and Men’s Health, Infections, and Hematologic Disorders
    In this exercise, you will complete a 10- to 20-essay type question Knowledge Check to gauge your understanding of this module’s content.

    Possible topics covered in this Knowledge Check include:

    Sexually transmitted diseases
    Prostate
    Epididymitis
    Factors that affect fertility
    Reproductive health
    Alterations and fertility
    Anemia
    ITP and TTP
    DIC
    Thrombocytopeni
    Complete the Knowledge Check By Day 7 of Week 10

    To complete this Knowledge Check:

    Module 7 Knowledge Check

    Module 7 Assignment: Case Study Analysis
    An understanding of the factors surrounding women’s and men’s health, infections, and hematologic disorders can be critically important to disease diagnosis and treatment in these areas. This importance is magnified by the fact that some diseases and disorders manifest differently based on the sex of the patient.

    Effective disease analysis often requires an understanding that goes beyond the human systems involved. The impact of patient characteristics, as well as racial and ethnic variables, can also have an important impact..

    An understanding of the symptoms of alterations in systems based on these characteristics is a critical step in diagnosis and treatment of many diseases. For APRNs, this understanding can also help educate patients and guide them through their treatment plans.

    In this Assignment, you examine a case study and analyze the symptoms presented. You identify the elements that may be factors in the diagnosis, and you explain the implications to patient health.

    To prepare:
    By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study scenario for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.

    Assignment (1- to 2-page case study analysis)
    A 32-year-old female presents to the ED with a chief complaint of fever, chills, nausea, vomiting, and vaginal discharge. She states these symptoms started about 3 days ago, but she thought she had the flu. She has begun to have LLQ pain and notes bilateral lower back pain. She denies dysuria, foul-smelling urine, or frequency. States she is married and has sexual intercourse with her husband. PMH negative. Labs: CBC-WBC 18, Hgb 16, Hct 44, Plat 325, ­ Neuts & Lymphs, sed rate 46 mm/hr, C-reactive protein 67 mg/L CMP wnl Vital signs T 103.2 F Pulse 120 Resp 22 and PaO2 99% on room air. Cardio-respiratory exam WNL with the exception of tachycardia but no murmurs, rubs, clicks, or gallops. Abdominal exam + for LLQ pain on deep palpation but no rebound or rigidity. Pelvic exam demonstrates copious foul-smelling green drainage with reddened cervix and + bilateral adenexal tenderness. + chandelier sign. Wet prep in ER + clue cells and gram stain in ER + gram negative diplococci.

    In your Case Study Analysis related to the scenario provided, explain the following:

    The factors that affect fertility (STDs).
    Why inflammatory markers rise in STD/PID.
    Why prostatitis and infection happens. Also explain the causes of systemic reaction.
    Why a patient would need a splenectomy after a diagnosis of ITP.
    Anemia and the different kinds of anemia (i.e., micro and macrocytic).

    Day 7 of Week 10

    Submit your Case Study Analysis Assignment by Day 7 of Week 10

    Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The sample paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “M7Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
    Click the Module 7 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
    Click the Module 7 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “M7Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
    Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Module 7 Assignment Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Module 7 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 10

    To participate in this Assignment:

    Module 7 Assignment

    What’s Coming Up in Module 8?
    In Module 8, you will examine pediatric pathophysiology. You will identify diseases, disorders and issues relevant to the treatment of children. You will also take the Final Exam for the course.

    Week 11 Knowledge Check: Pediatrics
    In the Week 11 Knowledge Check, you will demonstrate your understanding of the topics covered during Module 11. This Knowledge Check will be composed of a series of questions related to specific scenarios provided. It is highly recommended that you review the Learning Resources in their entirety prior to taking the Knowledge Check, since the resources cover the topics addressed. Plan your time accordingly.

    Week 11 Final Exam: Pediatrics
    In the Week 11 Final Exam, you will demonstrate your understanding of the topics covered during Weeks 7–11 of the course. This Final Exam will be composed of a series of questions related to specific scenarios provided. It is highly recommended that you review the Learning Resources in their entirety prior to taking the Final Exam, since the resources cover the topics addressed. Plan

    Next Module

    To go to the next module:

    Module 8

    Module 8: Pediatrics
    What’s Happening This Module?
    Module 8: Pediatrics is a 1-week module, Week 11, the final week of the course. In this module, you will examine fundamental concepts of diseases and disorders that impact the health of infants, children, and adolescents. You will also examine concepts and principles of pathophysiology across the life span. Lastly, you will take the Final Exam for the course.

    What do I have to do? When do I have to do it?
    Review your Learning Resources Days 1–7 of Week 11
    Knowledge Check: Pediatrics Complete by Day 5 of Week 11
    Final Exam Submit by Day 7 of Week 11

    Go to the Week’s Content

    Week 11

    Week 11: Concepts of Pediatrics
    Pediatric disorders can present unique challenges to patients, families, and healthcare providers. Disorders in these areas are complicated by the fact that young patients can have difficulties communicating symptoms. Furthermore, the manner in which disease and disorders manifest in children may be unique.

    APRNs working to support these patients and their loved ones must demonstrate not only support and compassion, but expertise to communicate and guide understanding of diagnoses and treatment plans. This includes an understanding of disease and disorders at the pediatric level.

    This week, you examine pathophysiology in pediatrics. You apply key terms, concepts, and principles in this area to demonstrate an understanding of the impact they have on altered physiology in children.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Analyze concepts and principles of pathophysiology across the lifespan
    Learning Resources
    Required Readings
    McCance, K. L. & Huether, S. E. (2019). Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby/Elsevier.

    Chapter 14: Cancer in Children, including Summary Review
    Chapter 20: Alterations of Neurologic Function in Children (stop at Childhood tumors); Summary Review
    Chapter 34: Alterations of Cardiovascular Function in Children (stop at Defects decreasing pulmonary blood flow); Summary Review
    Chapter 37: Alterations of Pulmonary Function in Children (stop at Congenital malformations); Summary Review
    Chapter 40: Alterations of Renal and Urinary Tract Function in Children, including Summary Review
    Chapter 43: Alterations of Digestive Function in Children, including Summary Review
    Chapter 46: Alterations of Musculoskeletal Function in Children (stop at Avascular diseases); (start at Cerebral palsy) (musculoskeletal tumors in children); Summary Review
    Chapter 48: Alterations of the Integument in Children, including Summary Review
    Chapter 50: Shock, Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome, and Burns in Children, including Summary Review

    U.S. National Library of Medicine. (2019). Normal growth and development. Retrieved from https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/002456.htm

    Document: NURS 6501 Final Exam Review (PDF document)

    Note: Use this document to help you as you review for your Final Exam in Week 11.

    Required Media

    Module 8 Overview with Dr. Tara Harris
    Dr. Tara Harris reviews the structure of Module 8 as well as the expectations for the module. Consider how you will manage your time as you review your media and Learning Resources throughout the module to prepare for your Knowledge Check and your Final Exam. (3m)

    Wyatt, K. (2018, February 4). Pediatrics – Growth and development milestones review [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZG60nC3RJwc

    Note: The approximate length of the media program is 34 minutes.

    Online Media from Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children
    In addition to this week’s media, it is highly recommended that you access and view the resources included with the course text, Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children. Focus on the videos and animations in Chapter 20, 34, 37, 40, 43, and 46 that relate to alterations in hematological function in children. Refer to the Learning Resources in Week 1 for registration instructions. If you have already registered, you may access the resources at https://evolve.elsevier.com/

    Knowledge Check: Pediatrics
    In this exercise, you will complete a 10- to 20-essay type question Knowledge Check to gauge your understanding of this module’s content.

    Possible topics covered in this Knowledge Check include:

    Growth and development
    Normal growth patterns
    Scoliosis (ortho)
    Kawasaki
    Alterations in children
    Congenital (heart syndrome)
    PDAs
    Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS)
    Asthma
    Lead poisoning and effects on neurological functioning
    Sickle cell
    Hemophilia
    (Note: It is strongly recommended that you take the Knowledge Check at least 48 hours before taking the Final Exam.)

    Complete the Knowledge Check By Day 5 of Week 11

    To complete this Knowledge Check:

    Module 8 Knowledge Check

    Final Exam
    This 101-question exam is a test of your knowledge in preparation for your certification exam. No outside resources, including books, notes, websites, or any other type of resource, are to be used to complete this exam. You are expected to comply with Walden University’s Code of Conduct.

    This exam will be on topics covered in Weeks 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11. Prior to starting the exam, you should review all of your materials. This exam is timed with a limit of 2 hours for completion. When time is up, your exam will automatically submit.

    (Note: It is strongly recommended that you take the Knowledge Check at least 48 hours before taking the Final Exam.)

    By Day 7 of Week 11

    Complete and submit your Final Exam.

    To complete your exam:

    Final Exam

    What’s Coming Up?
    Congratulations! After you have finished all of the assignments for this week, you have completed the course. Please submit your Course Evaluation by Day 7.

    The post NURS 6501 –Advanced Pathophysiology appeared first on College Pal. Visit us at College Pal – Connecting to a pal for your paper

  • NURS 6512 Week 4 Soap Note – Lab Assignment: Differential Diagnosis for Skin Conditions

    The post NURS 6512 Week 4 Soap Note – Lab Assignment: Differential Diagnosis for Skin Conditions is a property of College Pal
    College Pal writes Plagiarism Free Papers. Visit us at College Pal – Connecting to a pal for your paper

    Module 3: Approach to System-Focused Advanced Health Assessments

    What’s Happening in This Module?

    Module 3: Approach to System-Focused Advanced Health Assessments is a 7-week module that spans Weeks 4–10. In this module, you explore advanced health assessments using a system-focused approach. Assessments such as skin, hair, and nails as well as head, neck eyes, ears, nose, and throat (HEENT) help you to begin considering abnormalities as you move forward in your assessments. You continue the module by assessing the abdomen and gastrointestinal system and move to other systems—such as heart, lungs, vascular, musculoskeletal, neurologic—before finishing with other special examinations.

    What do I have to do? When do I have to do it?
    Review your Learning Resources. Days 1–7, Weeks 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10
    DCE: Health History Assessment Complete and submit your DCE: Health History Assessment by Day 7 of Week 4.
    Lab Assignment: Differential Diagnosis for Skin Conditions Submit your Lab Assignment by Day 7 of Week 4.
    Case Study Assignment: Assessing the Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose, and Throat Submit your Case Study Assignment by Day 6 of Week 5.
    DCE: Focused Exam: Cough Complete and submit your DCE: Focused Exam: Cough by Day 7 of Week 5.
    Lab Assignment: Assessing the Abdomen Submit your Lab Assignment by Day 7 of Week 6.
    Midterm Exam Complete by Day 7 of Week 6.
    DCE: Focused Exam: Chest Pain Complete and submit your DCE: Focused Exam: Chest Pain by Day 6 of Week 7.
    Discussion: Assessing Musculoskeletal Pain Post by Day 3 of Week 8 and respond to your colleagues by Day 6 of Week 8.
    Case Study Assignment: Assessing Neurological Symptoms Submit your Case Study Assignment by Day 6 of Week 9.
    DCE: Comprehensive (Head-to-Toe) Physical Assessment Complete and submit your DCE: Comprehensive Physical Assessment by Day 7 of Week 9.
    Lab Assignment: Assessing the Genitalia and Rectum Submit your Lab Assignment by Day 7 of Week 10.
    Week 4: Assessment of the Skin, Hair, and Nails
    Something as small and simple as a mole or a discolored toenail can offer meaningful clues about a patient’s health. Abnormalities in skin, hair, and nails can provide non-invasive external clues to internal disorders or even prove to be disorders themselves. Being able to evaluate such abnormalities of the skin, hair, and nails is a diagnostic benefit for any nurse conducting health assessments.

    This week, you will explore how to assess the skin, hair, and nails, as well as how to evaluate abnormal skin findings.

    Learning Objectives
    Students will:

    Apply assessment skills to diagnose skin conditions
    Apply concepts, theories, and principles relating to health assessment techniques and diagnoses for the skin, hair, and nails
    Learning Resources
    Required Readings
    Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2019). Seidel’s guide to physical examination: An interprofessional approach (9th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.

    Chapter 9, “Skin, Hair, and Nails”
    This chapter reviews the basic anatomy and physiology of skin, hair, and nails. The chapter also describes guidelines for proper skin, hair, and nails assessments.

    Colyar, M. R. (2015). Advanced practice nursing procedures. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.

    Credit Line: Advanced practice nursing procedures, 1st Edition by Colyar, M. R. Copyright 2015 by F. A. Davis Company. Reprinted by permission of F. A. Davis Company via the Copyright Clearance Center.

    This section explains the procedural knowledge needed prior to performing various dermatological procedures.

    Chapter 1, “Punch Biopsy”

    Chapter 2, “Skin Biopsy”

    Chapter 10, “Nail Removal”

    Chapter 15, “Skin Lesion Removals: Keloids, Moles, Corns, Calluses”

    Chapter 16, “Skin Tag (Acrochordon) Removal”

    Chapter 22, “Suture Insertion”

    Chapter 24, “Suture Removal”

    Dains, J. E., Baumann, L. C., & Scheibel, P. (2019). Advanced health assessment and clinical diagnosis in primary care (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.

    Credit Line: Advanced Health Assessment and Clinical Diagnosis in Primary Care, 6th Edition by Dains, J.E., Baumann, L. C., & Scheibel, P. Copyright 2019 by Mosby. Reprinted by permission of Mosby via the Copyright Clearance Center.

    Chapter 28, “Rashes and Skin Lesions”
    This chapter explains the steps in an initial examination of someone with dermatological problems, including the type of information that needs to be gathered and assessed.

    Note: Download and use the Student Checklist and the Key Points when you conduct your assessment of the skin, hair, and nails in this Week’s Lab Assignment.

    Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2019). Skin, hair, and nails: Student checklist. In Seidel’s guide to physical examination (9th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.

    Credit Line: Seidel’s Guide to Physical Examination, 9th Edition by Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. Copyright 2019 by Elsevier Health Sciences. Reprinted by permission of Elsevier Health Sciences via the Copyright Clearance Center.

    Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2019). Skin, hair, and nails: Key points. In Seidel’s guide to physical examination: An interprofessional approach (9th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.

    Credit Line: Seidel’s Guide to Physical Examination, 9th Edition by Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. Copyright 2019 by Elsevier Health Sciences. Reprinted by permission of Elsevier Health Sciences via the Copyright Clearance Center.

    Sullivan, D. D. (2019). Guide to clinical documentation (3rd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.

    · Chapter 2, “The Comprehensive History and Physical Exam” (Previously read in Weeks 1 and 3)
    VisualDx. (n.d.). Clinical decision support. Retrieved June 11, 2019, from http://www.skinsight.com/info/for_professionals

    This interactive website allows you to explore skin conditions according to age, gender, and area of the body.

    Clothier, A. (2014). Assessing and managing skin tears in older people. Nurse Prescribing, 12(6), 278–282.

    Document: Skin Conditions (Word document)

    This document contains five images of different skin conditions. You will use this information in this week’s Discussion.

    Document: Comprehensive SOAP Exemplar (Word document)

    Document: Comprehensive SOAP Template (Word document)

    Shadow Health Support and Orientation Resources
    Use the following resources to guide you through your Shadow Health orientation as well as other support resources:

    Frey, C. [Chris Frey]. (2015, September 4). Student orientation [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rfd_8pTJBkY

    Document: Shadow Health Support and Orientation Resources (PDF)

    Shadow Health. (n.d.). Shadow Health help desk. Retrieved from https://support.shadowhealth.com/hc/en-us

    Document: Shadow Health. (2014). Useful tips and tricks (Version 2) (PDF)

    Document: Shadow Health Nursing Documentation Tutorial (Word document)

    Document: Student Acknowledgement Form (Word document)

    Note: You will sign and date this form each time you complete your DCE Assignment in Shadow Health to acknowledge your commitment to Walden University’s Code of Conduct.

    Document: DCE (Shadow Health) Documentation Template for Health History (Word document)

    Use this template to complete your Assignment 2 for this week.

    Optional Resources
    LeBlond, R. F., Brown, D. D., & DeGowin, R. L. (2014). DeGowin’s diagnostic examination (10th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill Medical.

    Chapter 6, “The Skin and Nails”
    In this chapter, the authors provide guidelines and procedures to aid in the diagnosis of skin and nail disorders. The chapter supplies descriptions and pictures of common skin and nail conditions.

    Ethicon, Inc. (n.d.-a). Absorbable synthetic suture material. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20170215015223/http://academicdepartments.musc.edu/surgery/education/resident_info/supplement/suture_manuals/absorbable_suture_chart.pdf

    Ethicon, Inc. (2006). Dermabond topical skin adhesive application technique. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20150921174121/http://academicdepartments.musc.edu/surgery/education/resident_info/supplement/suture_manuals/db_application_poster.pdf

    Ethicon, Inc. (2001). Ethicon needle sales types. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20150921171922/http://academicdepartments.musc.edu/surgery/education/resident_info/supplement/suture_manuals/needle_template.pdf

    Ethicon, Inc. (n.d.-b). Ethicon sutures. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20150921202525/http://academicdepartments.musc.edu/surgery/education/resident_info/supplement/suture_manuals/suture_chart_ethicon.pdf

    Ethicon, Inc. (2002). How to care for your wound after it’s treated with Dermabond topical skin adhesive. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20150926002534/http://academicdepartments.musc.edu/surgery/education/resident_info/supplement/suture_manuals/db_wound_care.pdf

    Ethicon, Inc. (2005). Knot tying manual. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20160915214422/http://academicdepartments.musc.edu/surgery/education/resident_info/supplement/suture_manuals/knot_tying_manual.pdf

    Ethicon, Inc. (n.d.-c). Wound closure manual. Retrieved from http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/surgery/Education/facilities/measey/Wound_Closure_Manual.pdf

    The post NURS 6512 Week 4 Soap Note – Lab Assignment: Differential Diagnosis for Skin Conditions appeared first on College Pal. Visit us at College Pal – Connecting to a pal for your paper

  • NURS 6052/NURS5052/NRSE6052 Essent of Evidence

    The post NURS 6052/NURS5052/NRSE6052 Essent of Evidence is a property of College Pal
    College Pal writes Plagiarism Free Papers. Visit us at College Pal – Connecting to a pal for your paper

    Week 1 Assignment
    Evidence-Based Practice and the Quadruple Aim
    Healthcare organizations continually seek to optimize healthcare performance. For years, this approach was a three-pronged one known as the Triple Aim, with efforts focused on improved population health, enhanced patient experience, and lower healthcare costs.

    More recently, this approach has evolved to a Quadruple Aim by including a focus on improving the work life of healthcare providers. Each of these measures are impacted by decisions made at the organizational level, and organizations have increasingly turned to EBP to inform and justify these decisions.

    To Prepare:
    Read the articles by Sikka, Morath, & Leape (2015); Crabtree, Brennan, Davis, & Coyle (2016); and Kim et al. (2016) provided in the Resources.

    Reflect on how EBP might impact (or not impact) the Quadruple Aim in healthcare.

    Consider the impact that EBP may have on factors impacting these quadruple aim elements, such as preventable medical errors or healthcare delivery.

    To Complete:
    Write a brief analysis (no longer than 2 pages) of the connection between EBP and the Quadruple Aim.

    Your analysis should address how EBP might (or might not) help reach the Quadruple Aim, including each of the four measures of:

    Patient experience

    Population health

    Costs

    Work life of healthcare providers

    Week 2 & 3 Assignment
    Evidence-Based Project
    Is there a difference between “common practice” and “best practice”?

    When you first went to work for your current organization, experienced colleagues may have shared with you details about processes and procedures. Perhaps you even attended an orientation session to brief you on these matters. As a “rookie” you likely kept the nature of your questions to those with answers that would best help you perform your new role.

    Over time and with experience, perhaps you recognized aspects of these processes and procedures that you wanted to question further. This is the realm of clinical inquiry.

    Clinical inquiry is the practice of asking questions about clinical practice. To continuously improve patient care, all nurses should consistently use clinical inquiry to question why they are doing something the way they are doing it. Do they know why it is done this way, or is it just because we have always done it this way? Is it a common practice or a best practice?

    In this Assignment, you will identify clinical areas of interest and inquiry and practice searching for research in support of maintaining or changing these practices. You will also analyze this research to compare research methodologies employed.

    To Prepare:
    Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.

    Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest.

    Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research.

    Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected.

    Part 1: An Introduction to Clinical Inquiry
    Create a 4- to 5-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:

    Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.

    Describe how you used keywords to search on your chosen clinical issue of interest.

    Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

    Provide APA citations of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected.

    Part 2: Identifying Research Methodologies
    After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:

    The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.

    A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.

    A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.

    A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.

    A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

    Week 5 Assignment
    Evidence-Based Project, Part 3: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews
    Your quest to purchase a new car begins with an identification of the factors important to you. As you conduct a search of cars that rate high on those factors, you collect evidence and try to understand the extent of that evidence. A report that suggests a certain make and model of automobile has high mileage is encouraging. But who produced that report? How valid is it? How was the data collected, and what was the sample size?

    In this Assignment, you will delve deeper into clinical inquiry by closely examining your PICO(T) question. You also begin to analyze the evidence you have collected.

    To Prepare:
    Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.

    Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest for the Assignment.

    Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question.

    Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer-reviewed research.

    The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)

    Part 3: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews
    Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:

    Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.

    Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.

    Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

    Provide APA citations of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected.

    Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.

    Week 7 Assignment
    Evidence-Based Project, Part 4: Critical Appraisal of Research
    Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals—conducted using appraisal tools—to assign market values to houses and other properties. These values are then presented to buyers and sellers to set prices and initiate offers.

    Research appraisal is not that different. The critical appraisal process utilizes formal appraisal tools to assess the results of research to determine value to the context at hand. Evidence-based practitioners often present these findings to make the case for specific courses of action.

    In this Assignment, you will use appraisal tools to conduct a critical appraisal of published research. You will then present the results of your efforts.

    To Prepare:
    Review the Resources and consider the importance of critically appraising research evidence.

    Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and analyzed in Module 3.

    Review and download the Critical Appraisal Tools document provided in the Resources.

    The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)

    Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research

    Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected and analyzed by completing the Critical Appraisal Tools document. Be sure to include:

    An evaluation table

    A levels of evidence table

    An outcomes synthesis table

    Part 4B: Critical Appraisal of Research

    Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.

    Week 9 Assignment
    Evidence-Based Project, Part 5: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change
    The collection of evidence is an activity that occurs with an endgame in mind. For example, law enforcement professionals collect evidence to support a decision to charge those accused of criminal activity. Similarly, evidence-based healthcare practitioners collect evidence to support decisions in pursuit of specific healthcare outcomes.

    In this Assignment, you will identify an issue or opportunity for change within your healthcare organization and propose an idea for a change in practice supported by an EBP approach.

    To Prepare:
    Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you critically appraised in Module 4.

    Reflect on your current healthcare organization and think about potential opportunities for evidence-based change.

    The Assignment: (Evidence-Based Project)

    Part 5: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change
    Create an 8- to 9-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:

    Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness for change. (You may opt to keep various elements of this anonymous, such as your company name.)

    Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include in this description the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in general.

    Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an EBP approach to decision making. Note that you may find further research needs to be conducted if sufficient evidence is not discovered.

    Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation.

    Describe the measurable outcomes you hope to achieve with the implementation of this evidence-based change.

    Be sure to provide APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer reviewed articles you selected to support your thinking.

    Add a lessons learned section that includes the following:

    A summary of the critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed articles you previously submitted

    An explanation about what you learned from completing the evaluation table (1 slide)

    An explanation about what you learned from completing the levels of evidence table (1 slide)

    An explanation about what you learned from completing the outcomes synthesis table (1 slide)

    Week 11 Assignment
    Evidence-Based Capstone Project, Part 6: Disseminating Results
    The dissemination of EBP results serves multiple important roles. Sharing results makes the case for your decisions. It also adds to the body of knowledge, which creates opportunities for future practitioners. By presenting results, you also become an advocate for EBP, creating a culture within your organization or beyond that informs, educates, and promotes the effective use of EBP.

    To Prepare:
    Review the final PowerPoint presentation you submitted in Module 5, and make any necessary changes based on the feedback you have received and on lessons you have learned throughout the course.

    Consider the best method of disseminating the results of your presentation to an audience.

    To Complete:
    Create a 5-minute, 5- to 6-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation of your Evidence-Based Project.

    Be sure to incorporate any feedback or changes from your presentation submission in Module 5.

    Explain how you would disseminate the results of your project to an audience. Provide a rationale for why you selected this dissemination strategy.

    The post NURS 6052/NURS5052/NRSE6052 Essent of Evidence appeared first on College Pal. Visit us at College Pal – Connecting to a pal for your paper

  • What did you learn about plagiarism that you didn’t already know?

    The post What did you learn about plagiarism that you didn’t already know? is a property of College Pal
    College Pal writes Plagiarism Free Papers. Visit us at College Pal – Connecting to a pal for your paper

    In this brief journal assignment, you will demonstrate what you have learned about composing thorough paragraphs and citing sources. You will discuss what you have learned about academic integrity, especially as it relates to acknowledging sources, issues with plagiarism, and ethical concerns regarding the use of generative A.I.

    The Assignment

    To complete the exercise, review the module readings on plagiarism, generative A.I., and proper citation. Then, in a brief journal entry, discuss what you have learned. Use the included MLA Citation Guide to create citations for each source you include ( at least two sources must be cited) from the readings below.

    Consider addressing the following prompts:

    1. What did you learn about plagiarism that you didn’t already know?

    2. What did you learn about the ethical issues related to generative A.I.? How does this change how you think about the use of A.I. in your own work?

    3. What did you learn about acknowledging source material and citation?

    4. Do you have any questions about MLA style citations? Include them here so we can work on addressing them.

    Grading Criteria

    The successful assignment will accomplish the following:

    · Address some aspect of all module readings

    · Attempt to fully and completely cite module readings in MLA style according to module resources and readings

    · Include works cited page if you upload a document or list works cited at the bottom of text entry submission.

    · 200 words minimum

    Readings

    · “What Is Plagiarism?”Links to an external site. from UNC (opens in new window): an overview of different types of plagiarism and steps for avoiding plagiarism

    · “Artificial Intelligence: A Tool or a Threat to Art and Writing?”Links to an external site. from The Lance (opens in new window): an editorial exploring ethical concerns relating to generative AI and creative endeavors like art and writing

    · “Citing Sources”Links to an external site. from Sacred Heart University (opens in a new window): an overview of citation to include rationale and execution

    Resources

    · “Thesis Statements”Links to an external site. from UNC (opens in new window): An instructional text that looks at drafting strong thesis statements

    · “The Anatomy of a Paragraph”Links to an external site. by Zachary Schrag (opens in a new window): an overview of the different types of sentences that make up a paragraph

    · “MLA Citation Guide”Links to an external site. from the Online Writing Lab at Purdue University (opens in a new window): Assistance on creating MLA-style citations

    The post What did you learn about plagiarism that you didn’t already know? appeared first on College Pal. Visit us at College Pal – Connecting to a pal for your paper

  • Understanding Special Education Paper Assignment

    The post Understanding Special Education Paper Assignment is a property of College Pal
    College Pal writes Plagiarism Free Papers. Visit us at College Pal – Connecting to a pal for your paper

    Special education provides educational opportunities for students who need additional support to make academic or social progress in school. All educators need to understand the components of special education because effective special education programs include collaboration with a variety of educators, administrators, and school staff.

    Instructions

    For this assignment, you will write a research paper of at least 1,000 words that focuses on the characteristics of students receiving special education, the laws governing special education, and service delivery environments for students eligible for special education services. Your paper should also focus on the roles of general education teachers supporting students receiving special education services, and Biblical principles that support the inclusion of special education services in schools. The paper should contain the following sections:

    1. Introduction: Describe special education and why it is necessary. Include a Scriptural reference to support the necessity of special education in schools. Scripture must be supported by at least one sentence that explains how it relates to your discussion.

    2. Laws: Provide a brief history of the law that established special education in schools (IDEA) and some of the important components of that law (FAPE, LRE). Citations from two scholarly resources are required.

    3. Special Education Services: Describe the characteristics of students who receive special education services. How does a student become eligible for special education services? What kinds of services are provided under special education? Citations from two scholarly resources are required.

    4. Service Delivery Environments: Special education services can be administered in various ways. Describe three special education service delivery environments, from least restrictive to most restrictive. Discuss the type of student who would be best served in each type of environment. Citations from two scholarly resources are required.

    5. General Education Teacher’s Role in Special Education: Explain two roles or responsibilities that the general education teacher has when working with students receiving special education services. Why are these roles important, and how do they help ensure the success of students receiving special education services? Citations from two scholarly resources are required.

    6. Conclusion: Summarize the information shared in the previous sections of the paper. Include any additional information or insight you have gleaned from the process of writing this paper. Include a scriptural reference in the conclusion paragraph. Scripture should be supported by at least one sentence that explains how it applies to your discussion.

    A title page and a reference page are required for this assignment but are not included in the total word count requirement. All elements of your paper are to adhere to current APA formatting guidelines.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    The post Understanding Special Education Paper Assignment appeared first on College Pal. Visit us at College Pal – Connecting to a pal for your paper

  • Assume you have been asked by your manager to research and prepare a computer hardware and software recommendation summary and budget

    The post Assume you have been asked by your manager to research and prepare a computer hardware and software recommendation summary and budget is a property of College Pal
    College Pal writes Plagiarism Free Papers. Visit us at College Pal – Connecting to a pal for your paper

    You will perform online research on computer hardware and software using the scenario below and then develop a written proposal document detailing your findings and recommendations.

    You are required to cite all sources used in writing your essay with APA citation formatting.

    1. Assume you have been asked by your manager to research and prepare a computer hardware and software recommendation summary and budget. Using the Internet, determine an appropriate hardware and software recommendation, along with an alternative recommendation (i.e., option 1 and option 2) for each of the following three employee classes described. Search brand hardware provider Web sites, such as Dell(opens in a new tab), Lenovo(opens in a new tab), Hewlett-Packard(opens in a new tab), or others. In a Microsoft Word document, create a section for each class of employee where you list the types of computers you will purchase. Be sure to clearly label each employee class and the Option 1 and Option 2 recommendations in your document. Include hardware information, suggested software, and costs for one employee in each class of employee, along with working links to each of your product recommendations. Explain your rationale for each selection recommendation.

    a. Class A employees use the computer for email, Web browsing, Internet connectivity, and limited document reading and writing.

    b. Class B employees use the computer for all the activities of Class A, plus they need to be able to read and create complicated documents and convert documents into PDF format. They must also be able to create and process large spreadsheets, create and edit small graphics files, and participate in online video conference meetings.

    c. Class C employees are data analysts who perform all the tasks that Class A and Class B employees do. They also analyze data using programs that make extensive computations and need to be able to create and edit complex graphics.

    2. Your manager has also just returned from a regional business meeting where your company is considering moving away from providing employees with hardware/software, and instead moving to a model of employees providing their own mobile systems to perform their work and responsibilities. Your manager would like you to also include a section describing the pros and cons (advantages and disadvantages) of employee use of mobile systems at work, which should be considered.

    The post Assume you have been asked by your manager to research and prepare a computer hardware and software recommendation summary and budget appeared first on College Pal. Visit us at College Pal – Connecting to a pal for your paper