Alexander’s legacy has long been a matter of debate. Cleitarchus, a fourth-century (BCE) historian from Alexandria, portrays the king as a cruel, paranoid alcoholic. Eratosthenes of Cyrene, a third century BCE scholar at the library of Alexandria, suggests that Alexander’s conquests opened the eyes of the Greeks to other civilizations, a view that stands in contrast with Plutarch’s assertion that the Macedonian king civilized Persians, Sogdians and others.1 In Pseudo-Callisthenes’ version of the legend of Alexander, on the other hand, nowhere does the hero articulate what is behind his all-consuming desire to master the world. This lack of vision and directness is particularly noticeable at the conclusion of Book II and more persistent in Book III. Could it be as the character of Ptolemy wistfully concludes in Oliver Stone’s film Alexander, “Alexander was blessed and cursed with an eternal unsatisfied longing, a pothos, even he could not fathom? Perpetually racing the gods, Alexander’s destiny remained exactly where it served him best, just out of reach?” • Consider the qualities, actions, and exploits of the Macedonian commander in PseudoCallisthenes’ Alexander Romance and determine whether Alexander deserves to be idolized as a charismatic leader. In responding to this question, you may consider the following: a. whether Alexander’s lack of vision ought to be attributed to Providence alone b. whether Pseudo-Callisthenes would have agreed with Stone’s statement above that almost justifies Alexander’s lack of vision, citing Providence and c. why the legend of Alexander continues to inspire and fascinate today EVALUATION CRITERIA: I will consider the following criteria in evaluating your paper: a. The clarity of your argument in the introduction and throughout the paper b. The effectiveness and depth of your thesis overall—its introduction, development, analysis, and argumentation c. Your engagement with the literature at hand d. The relevance of your evidence to claims you make e. Your facility with language, especially in relation of your claims f. Your facility with grammar and the conventions of critical writing WRITING MECHANICS: ➢ Your paper should be 5-7 pages in length, typed, double-spaced, and neatly presented. The font should be Times New Roman, size 12. ➢ Consult the MLA style for writing academic papers

Case Analysis Guidelines and Rubric

 This course contains five Case Analysis assignments. You should begin working on these early. It is very important to focus on continuous improvement throughout the course. Failure to make corrections based on the instructor’s feedback for each case analysis will result is a significantly lower score in subsequent case. Therefore, based on the instructor’s feedback on each case, you are expected to exhibit continuous improvement in each of the following cases.

 There are basic rules about a case analysis to follow. First, do not submit them in question and answer format which is not appropriate for case analyses. Your case analyses must be composed in essay format and adhere to the following APA style and formatting guidelines, which will help ensure a solid grade on your first case analysis.

1.      Include a title page containing case name, course identification, date, your name, and your instructor’s name.

2.      An abstract is not necessary in a short case analysis.

3.      Write your case analysis in essay style with a tabbed first line in each paragraph. Make sure to address each case question thoroughly. You are suggested to commit a minimum of one paragraph to answer each question, two if necessary.

4.      The content of your analysis must be at least 1,000 words. This does not include the title page, main document, and sources in the Reference section.

5.      The case analysis must include at least three heading sections such as Introduction or Background, Current Issues or Issues Addressed, and Conclusion or Recommendations. The names of the headings are at your discretion but must help the reader better understand your analysis.

6.      The document must be double-spaced, the font must be in Arial, Courier, or Times New Roman, and the font size must be 12-point. There should be no extra white space anywhere in your document which includes line breaks and/or page breaks. The document must have one inch margins all around.

7.      Include a References section with your sources. Do not use the terms Bibliography or Works Cited.

8.      Include and cite at least three scholarly sources for each case, and list these in the References section. There must also be at least five citations throughout your document with at least one being a “direct quote.”

 

The aforementioned items must be followed in all assigned cases. Not adhering to these guidelines will result in deductions from your overall score. Hence, all of the aforementioned factors are used in grading your cases. Additionally, the rubric on the following page will be used to grade your case analysis. You are strongly recommended to print this document for reference.

 

Submit the assigned Case Analysis to the Dropbox no later than Sunday 11:59 PM EST/EDT of the module in which it is due. (Each Dropbox basket is linked to Turnitin.)

 

Case Analysis Grading Rubric

 

Ratings:

Exceptional corresponds to an A (90-100). Performance is outstanding; significantly above the usual expectations.

Proficient corresponds to a grade of B- to B+ (80-89%). Skills are at the level of expectation.

Basic corresponds to a C to C+ (70-79%). Skills are acceptable but improvements are needed to meet expectations well. Novice corresponds to a D to C- (60-69%). Performance is weak; the skills are not sufficiently demonstrated at this time. 0 This criterion is missing or not in evidence.

 

 

Competency	Ratings and Points
	0	Novice	Basic	Proficient	Exceptional
1. Proficiency, Knowledge, and Research Depth (20% of total score)	0-11	Does not use readings and research sources to support premises.       12-13	Alludes to the readings and research sources to support premises.       14-15	Refers to specific examples and theories from the readings to support premises.     16-17	Supports premises with specific examples and theories from a diverse source of readings and research sources.   18-20
2. Synthesis, Analysis, and Comprehension (20% of total score)	0-11	Does not integrate personal observations or knowledge.     12-13	Integrates personal observations and knowledge in a cursory manner.   14-15	Integrates personal observations and knowledge in an accurate way.   16-17	Integrates personal observations and knowledge in an accurate and highly insightful way.   18-20
3. Demonstration of Theory Knowledge and Usage (25% of total score)	0-14	Theoretical terminology is ignored or misused.     15-16	Terminology partially matches the textbook and class material.   17-19	Terminology matches the textbook and class material completely.   20-22	Terminology matches. Messages are crisp and persuasive.   23-25
4. Organization, formulation, logic, and Identification of Key Points (15% of total score)	0-8	Content is disorganized, points of response are not distinct, and information is not logically sequenced.     9	Content is somewhat disorganized, points of response are distinct, but information is not logically sequenced.     10-11	Content is organized, points of response are distinct, and information is logically sequenced.       12-13	Content is organized, points of response are distinct, and information is logically sequenced; key points are made obvious.   14-15

 

5. Grammar, Composition, Word Choice, Sentence Structure, and Terminology (10% of total score)	0-5	Word choice and sentence structure are not suitable for university level work.   6	Word choice and sentence structure are not suitable for graduate level work.   7	Word choice and sentence structure are suitable for graduate level work.   8	Word choice and sentence structure are suitable for graduate level work.   9-10
6. Formatting, Layout, & APA Style (10% of total score)	0-5	Regular grammar, composition, and APA errors that create an obstacle.   6	Periodic grammar, composition, and APA errors.     7	Minimal grammar, composition, and APA errors.     8	Errors are rare.         9-10
Total					100

 

Note: Competencies 1-3 account for 65% of the total score; competencies 4-6 account for 35% of the total score.

Instructions
In a 4-5-page paper, please complete the following:
1. Assess your perspective on whether leadership is
a natural ability, a learned skill, or a response to a
challenge.
• Title this section, “Leadership Origin.”
2. Examine the role of a public leader, addressing
their responsibilities, impact on society,
challenges faced, and strategies for trust-
building.
• Title this section, “Public Leader.”
3. Recommend six characteristics that a competent
public administration leader should demonstrate,
supported by your reasoning. Please include:
• Two leadership traits.
• Two leadership behaviors.
• Two leadership styles.
• Title this section, “Leadership Traits,
Behaviors, and Styles.”
4. Examine how a skilled leader effectively applies
the Learning Behavior Theory to achieve
success.
• You may consider analyzing a successful
leader, such as Rosa Parks, Nelson
Mandela, Oprah Winfrey, Condoleezza
Rice, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Desmond
Tutu, or Betty Friedan, among others.
• Title this section “T endershin Quecess “

Description
Overview
In this activity, you will read through a scenario within
the context of a police department facing a transgender
officer’s transition. You will analyze diverse
perspectives and formulate strategies to address the
situation effectively, preparing yourself for future
leadership roles by fostering empathy, inclusivity, and
the ability to manage complex diversity issues in the
workplace.
Instructions
• Step 1: Open the Diversity Management
presentation to read about a complex Diversity
Management scenario.
• Step 2: Download the Diversity Management
Reflection Worksheet [DOCX]. Complete the
worksheet document by answering the four
questions.
Please write your responses in the worksheet in well-
developed sentences or short paragraphs, using your
own words.

Week 1 Discussion – Strategy Foundations

Read the articles Five Questions That Make Strategy RealLinks to an external site. and Strategy First. From the two articles, specify the main differences between strategy and tactics. Provide support for your response.

• Introduce yourself to your peers by sharing something unique about your background. Explain how you expect this course will help you move forward in your current or future career.
• Compare the primary characterization of strategy that both Welch and Linker present in their respective articles.
• From the articles, select a principle of strategy and provide a real business-world example that reflects that principle. For both articles, you are expected to assess the concept of the strategy, core directional choices that led to the best outcome, and specific actions implemented. Provide a rationale to support your reasoning. Present evidence and provide support for your response to strengthen your position.

Week 2 Discussion – Strategic Value Analysis

Read the article Drilling for Data 2020Links to an external site..

• Argue for or against this statement:
  • “A company should determine its goals and values before performing an industry analysis.”
• Explain your reasoning. You may also use examples from other industries to support your response.

Overview

This course has four assignments. Assignments 1 through 3 focus on preparing you for the fourth capstone assignment and accompanying PowerPoint presentation. In each assignment, you will apply the skills, experience, and knowledge gained from completing prerequisite program courses.

You will use the same company case study for each assignment so that your capstone assignment represents culminating research and analysis. Select one of the three recommended cases listed below, identifying the problem or issue detailed in the case as the basis for your strategic analysis and development. Each case is located in the Cases to Accompany Contemporary Strategy Analysis section of the textbook.

• Case 2: Kering SA: How Does Its Performance Compare to That of LVMH?
• Case 3: Pot of Gold? The US Legal Marijuana Industry.
• Case 12: Google Is Now Alphabet—But What’s the Corporate Strategy?

You may also use the Strayer Library or the Internet to further research articles on your chosen case. The MGT599 Library Guide provides information about using resources for your research.

After you make your selection, begin your initial research. For this activity, you will start outlining your paper as a structure to guide the rest of your work, so that each assignment in Weeks 3, 5, and 7 builds towards your final plan.

Instructions

To complete your Week 2 activity, please prepare and submit the following:

1. Draft an introduction to your final paper.
   • Describe to your reader the paper’s intent.
   • Explain the main points you will cover in the paper.
2. Outline the structure of the paper.
   • What: Summarize the facts of the case study.
   • How: Describe the problem in the case study details. How did the problem happen?
   • Where and when: How old is the problem? Describe external environmental factors at the time—local factors, cultural issues, and corporate culture within the industry. Was there a consistent corporate culture or did it vary a great deal by region? What has happened since?
3. Use at least three quality references to begin your research. Note: Wikipedia and other similar websites do not qualify as academic resources.

After you’ve outlined the structure of your paper, draft a conclusion. Your conclusion will highlight the significant findings you uncover in researching the paper.

Base your work on course materials and in-depth academic research, using critical thinking and verifiable data and proof. For help with research and writing, access the library or review library guides.

This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The library is your home for SWS assistance, including citations and formatting. Please refer to the Library site for all support. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

View RubricWeek 2 Assignment – Activity – Case SelectionWeek 2 Assignment – Activity – Case SelectionCriteriaRatingsPtsDescribe to your reader the paper’s intent.11.25 to >10.12 ptsExemplaryDescribed to your reader the paper’s intent.10.12 to >9 ptsCompetentDescribed to your reader the paper’s intent, but the description was incomplete.9 to >7.87 ptsNeeds ImprovementDescribed to your reader the paper’s intent, but the description was incorrect.7.87 to >0 ptsUnacceptableDid not describe to your reader the paper’s intent./ 11.25 ptsExplain the main points you will cover in the paper.15 to >13.5 ptsExemplaryExplained the main points you will cover in the paper.13.5 to >12 ptsCompetentExplained most of the main points you will cover in the paper.12 to >10.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementExplained some of the main points you will cover in the paper.10.5 to >0 ptsUnacceptableDid not explain the main points you will cover in the paper./ 15 ptsSummarize the facts of the case study.15 to >13.5 ptsExemplarySummarized the facts of the case study.13.5 to >12 ptsCompetentSummarized most of the facts of the case study.12 to >10.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementSummarized some of the facts of the case study.10.5 to >0 ptsUnacceptableDid not summarize the facts of the case study./ 15 ptsOutline a description of the problem the case study details and how the problem happened.15 to >13.5 ptsExemplaryOutlined a description of the problem the case study details and how the problem happened.13.5 to >12 ptsCompetentOutlined a description of the problem the case study details and how the problem happened, but with a few omissions.12 to >10.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementOutlined a description of the problem the case study details and how the problem happened, but with some significant omissions.10.5 to >0 ptsUnacceptableDid not outline a description of the problem the case study details and how the problem happened./ 15 ptsOutline an explanation of how old the problem is, the external environmental factors involved, the corporate culture, and what has happened since.15 to >13.5 ptsExemplaryOutlined an explanation of how old the problem is, the external environmental factors involved, the corporate culture, and what has happened since.13.5 to >12 ptsCompetentOutlined an explanation of how old the problem is, the external environmental factors involved, the corporate culture, and what has happened since, but with a few omissions.12 to >10.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementOutlined an explanation of how old the problem is, the external environmental factors involved, the corporate culture, and what has happened since, but with some significant omissions.10.5 to >0 ptsUnacceptableDid not outline an explanation of how old the problem is, the external environmental factors involved, the corporate culture, and what has happened since./ 15 ptsProvide at least three quality references.3.75 to >3.37 ptsExemplaryProvided quality resources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate.3.37 to >3 ptsCompetentProvided quality resources that are credible, relevant, or appropriate, but not all three.3 to >2.62 ptsNeeds ImprovementProvided references, but they are not credible, relevant, or appropriate.2.62 to >0 ptsUnacceptableNo references provided./ 3.75 pts

THIS IS THE TOPIC I CHOSE

 Case 12 Google Is Now Alphabet—But What’s the Corporate Strategy?

County Health Rankings and Roadmaps is a collaboration between the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute. The County Health Rankings and Roadmaps compares the health of nearly all counties in the United States to others within its own state and supports coalitions tackling the social, economic and environmental factors that influence health. The annual rankings provide a revealing snapshot of how health is influenced by where we live, learn, work and play. As the Rankings provide a starting point for change, the Roadmaps provide guidance and tools to understand the data and strategies that communities can use to move from education to action. 

Go the County Health Rankings websiteLinks to an external site. and select Essex County, New Jersey in the Overall Rankings in Health Outcomes section to see how it fares among other counties sin the State. Your county means where you lived before you started Kean University. 

Write 600-800 words, reflecting on your findings and thoughts of how your country’s health is ranked. For example, you can say something like “I am not surprised that X County ranked #2 on the list because …. “, “I am surprised that Y County has high rates of smoking because ….”, When I was growing up, X County had…” etc.

Use APA referencing and citations as appropriate.

Week 4 Ass 1

Prior to beginning work on this , read the Chapter 9 case study, “Cultural Models of Breast Cancer”, located in Chapter 9 (p.169) from the Social and Behavioral Foundations of Public Health textbook.

The case study presented in Chapter 9 highlights how different cultures view disease, prevention, and treatment. Health professionals must remain cognizant of these beliefs if they wish to make meaningful, positive changes.

• Compare and contrast the different cultures highlighted in the case study.
  • For example, what are differences in health beliefs across the different cultural groups?
• What are the primary communicable health conditions impacting the populations discussed?
• Discuss one social and one biological determinant not addressed in the case study.
  • Support your claim with evidence from at least one scholarly source.
• Critique the information presented in the case study by addressing the following questions:
  • How did your research findings support and dispute the information presented in the case study? Explain in detail the differences and similarities found.
  • What are possible ethical issues that may have affected the results in the case study?
  • If you were one of the researchers on the team, how would you devise a plan to address these ethical issues?
• Identify the social and biological determinants of health that likely influenced the results in the case study.
  • Were the determinants of health the same across all the cultural groups in the case study? Why or why not?

The Case Study 1

The body manages its energy supply with amazing precision. Consider that many people maintain their weight within about a 10- to 20-pound range throughout their lives. How do they do this? How does the body manage excess energy? How do bones, muscle, fat, fluid, and other tissue influence our body composition? However, overweight, and underweight both result in energy imbalance. Almost 42% of adults aged 20 and above are overweight placing them at risk of developing chronic diseases that affect quality of life.  

After studying Module 3: Lecture Materials & Resources, answer the following:

1. Conduct a nutrition/survey interview with 2 athletes and ask them a) what protein or amino acid supplements they use in their diet? and b) why do they use those supplements? Then, navigate to: www.quackwatch.orgLinks to an external site. and enter the name of the supplement. Provide 1 paragraph with your analysis of the products and what you found out about the products’ nutritional characteristics (see Chapter 5, page 132 of your textbook).
2. Search the internet for a popular weight-loss program (i.e., Jenny Craig, Weight Watchers, etc.), and submit 1 paragraph with the following:
   1. describe the diet plan
   2. evaluate whether the plan offers a nutritionally reliable way to lose weight or is it a Fad Diet (see Chapter 7, Table NP7-1, page 193 of your textbook)
3. In 1 paragraph, describe type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, and gestational diabetes by providing:
   1. characteristics
   2. definition
   3. causes & symptoms (see Chapter 20, Table 20.2, page 564 of your textbook).