NUR6077 Delivering High Quality, Safe Nursing Care within Adult Nursing Assessment
Assessment Information
Credits: 20
Semester:2&3
Module Leader:Andrea Driver – Williams, Arabella Baker,Kara Fereday
Email: nur6077@bcu.ac.uk
Overview
| Assessment(s) | Category | Type | Scope |
| 1 | Coursework | Essay | 3000 words |
Assessment 1
Essay
100%
Submission Date: Monday, the 15th of September2025 at 12.00(DSS before12 noon on the 24th September 2025).
Assessment Title:
A critical exploration of delivering safe and high quality adult nursing care.
Assessment Task
Create an evidence-informedcritical exploration of delivering safe and high quality adult nursing care through addressing the following points:
- Identify and critically discuss how a risk assessment strategyis used in adult nursing to promote safe high-quality care.
- Choose and evaluate afactorthat can influence the newly qualified nursesdelivery of safe high-quality adult nursing care
- Critically appraise underpinning research evidence used.
Submission Details
15thSeptember 2025 by 12.00 and DSS submissions 24th September 2025 by 12.00.
To allow for anonymous marking please do not put your name anywhere on your assignment/coversheet documents. Please upload two files to the NUR6077 assignment Moodle submission point as follows:
– File 1: the assignment coversheet/feedback form with your student number
– File 2: your assignment and reference list with your student number.
– If you are having IT (Information Technology) difficulties that is affecting your ability to submit this assignment to deadline, please contact IT Help Desk for support and notify NUR6077@bcu.ac.uk
Ensure you don’t leave your submission as a ‘draft’, but fully submit and tick the Turnitin declaration.”
You may wish to detail the file format i.e MS Word/ pdf/ MS PowerPoint/ mp4 etc. and other format
requirements specific to your assessment task.
You are required to use font Arial, size 11, with a 1.5 spacing. BCU Harvard referencing style should be used. More information on referencing is available here: Library Services
Assessment Support
The module includes the following opportunities to support you with your assignment submission:
- Assignment checklist to support you toward successful assignment completion. How to appraise a research study.
- Timetabled optional literature search support session with the librarian to support you to find high quality research and other peer-reviewed literature for this assignment.
- Timetabled academic writing session with the academic development department to support you to develop your academic writing.
- The module teaching team have timetabled an assignment launch,three assignment support sessions and an assignment recap session. If you have assignment questions, please ask a member of the teaching team during one of the timetabled assignment support sessions.
- You are recommended to useNUR6077 reading list material to support you with writing aspects of your assignment. The link to the reading list is:Reading List
- The module teaching team will answer assignment questions posted on Hot Question.
- The module teaching team will answer personal queries sent to the module email address NUR6077@BCU.ac.uk.
- For one-to-one assignment referencing, academic writing and critical writing at Level 6 support please book a one to one with ADD. The link is HELS ADD Tutorials (office.com). Alternatively, book a one to one with CAS. The link is: Centre for Academic Success – student support | Birmingham City University (bcu.ac.uk)
| Marking Criteria | Marking Rubric | ||||||
| Criterion 1 |
0-19% Fail |
20-39% Fail |
40-49% | 50-59% | 60-69% | 70-79% | 80-100% |
| Does not address the assignment brief. | Addresses the Assignment Brief. | ||||||
| Structure, Organisation, and Communication of Ideas. |
Very poor structure, organisation, and communication of ideas.
For example:
No introduction.
Discussions and topics are not relevant or are incomplete.
No conclusion. |
Poor structure, organisation, and communication of ideas.
For example:
No appropriate introduction.
Discussions and topics are incomplete, and most of the points are difficult to follow.
No appropriate conclusion.
|
Satisfactory structure, organisation, and communication of ideas.
For example:
Introduction is superficial.
Discussion and topics are complete and mostly relevant, but points are not always clear to follow.
Some paragraphs may include conclusions but do not connect to the next paragraph.
Conclusion is superficial. |
Good structure, organisation, and communication of ideas.
For example:
Has an introduction.
Discussions and topics are complete, relevant, and points are clear to follow.
Some paragraphs conclude, with some attempt at connections made between paragraphs.
Has a conclusion.
|
Very good structure, organisation, and communication of ideas.
For example:
Introduction connects to the points in the main body.
Discussions and topics are complete, relevant and points have some logical order.
All paragraphs conclude with some connections made between paragraphs.
Conclusion connects with the points made in the main body.
|
||