Critical Reflection 3: Oral History
In the writing, Johnson has talked about the influence of oral history and its power of not only disclosing narratives but also transforming them into productions that could have closer connections with multiple aspects and can be listened or received in a more vibrant way. Oral history enables more connection from LGBTQ+ culture to identity, community and history. Johnson used the voice of African American men within a community in which stereotypes and homogeneity are often assumed.
Besides, Johnson has also used different performance arts for oral history so that it could be understood by a larger audience. Besides, he also explored on the methodologies of oral history that instead of having scholars only recording past experiences but also constructing and making connections to now. One message that Johnson has approached to oral history is about historical consciousness in which he has been focused on bringing a more inclusive understanding to the queer community and paying attention to the neutrality and dynamics of storytelling.
Johnson has looked into different communities to find a more diverse and dynamic narrative of history. In his experiences of compelling research into a narrative, he has used different research methods, including both primary and secondary research. For example, he has interviewed people directly and also referred to the previous methodologies. Since he is focused on producing oral history, primary research might be more suitable because he can gain the first-person perspective through interview, which will help him in building the story. However, secondary research might be limited in helping him to maintain the authenticity or sincerity in the narrative.
Since the use of primary research is large, the ethical considerations should be especially discussed. Ethical concerns, such as privacy and confidentiality issues, should be ensured when Johnson is interviewing people. Besides, since human is the object for this research method, we should look into formal consent and the potential impact of this interview on this person or the entire community. can arise with certain methods, particularly those involving human subjects.
The limitation of primary research should be further considered, such as longer time invested or high costs. It’s also possible that the narrative might not be able to transfer information perfectly accurately since people are communicating and Johnson is paraphrasing from different perspectives.
The post Critical Reflection 3: Oral History In the writing, Johnson has talked about appeared first on essayfab.