Criminal Justice Formal Written Paper Rubric
CMRJ100 Essay Exam Rubric
Criminal Justice Formal Written Paper Rubric
Quality of Response
No
Response
Poor/Unsatisfactory
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
Content (worth a maximum of 15% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to answer the question.
1-9 points out of 15: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to
address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
9 points out of 9: out of 50: The essay illustrates a
rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
10-14 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key
concepts/ideas
; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
15 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and
substantiating, as
necessary/useful , points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of
Sources (worth a maximum of 5% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references . Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
1-2 points out 5 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 7th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
3 out 5 points:
References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 7th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
4 out 5 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 7th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
5 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 7th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses
above the maximum
required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar
(worth
maximum of 5% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the
final paper.
1-2 points out of 5:
The paper does not communicate
ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible;
organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
3 points out 5: The paper is often unclear and difficult to
follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
4 points out of 5: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect
grammar,
spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
5 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
CMRJ100 Essay Exam Rubric (Breakdown)
Content 15 points:
Sources (APA Style) 5 Points:
Grammar 5 Points:
Total Points Earned:
The post Criminal Justice Formal Written Paper Rubric CMRJ100 Essay Exam Rubric Criminal Justice appeared first on essayfab.