The Impact of Multinational Cooperations on Global Business Politics
Name
1 Management, Texila American University, Georgetown, Guyana
2Department of MBA, KSR College of Engineering, Tamil Nadu, India
E-mail: 1
E-mail:
Abstract
This study unravels the multiple roles multinational corporations (MNCs) play in shaping global politics and economics, such as their capacity to manipulate foreign policy, trade negotiations, and local business models, among other spheres. The non-statistically significant effects of MNCs’ lobbying concerns raised the importance of corporate diplomacy and soft power by making it more intricate and complex. The strong link between the trade negotiations of MNCs and the political result of them at the international level shows their essential role in the globe’s economic diplomacy and decision-making. Nevertheless, the reports contradict the existing theories explaining the limited effect, implying the current methodological challenges and the need for a more sophisticated way of research. Their analysis of the impact of MNCs on local industries leads to a positive but non-significant correlation, indicating that MNC operations may generate value for regional economies in ways that are not readily measurable. This observation is verified by the empirical findings of the positive and the adverse effects of MNC operations on the local markets. The problem is the implications of MNCs’ trade activities on global trade dynamics and international economic policies, which imply the need for economic interdependence while the economic sovereignty problems emerge. The study’s findings justify the necessity for further studies that will eliminate the complexity of the MNC implication and provide support for longitudinal and cross-cultural studies that can capture the spectrum of their effect. Enlightening the sophistication of MNCs and their policy impacts oversees a better understanding of policy-making and corporate governance and the import of economic development and business virtues in maintaining the results.
Keywords: Multinational Corporations (MNCs), Global trade negotiations, Economic policy influence, Corporate lobbying, Local industry impact, International political economy
Introduction
MNCs have replaced the nation-state as the central player in global business politics, active in political, social, and economic domains. The current study focuses on MNCs and their relationship to their home countries regarding their contribution to domestic profitability and global ventures. Multinational corporations play an important role in creating regulatory systems, trade agreements, and diplomatic negotiations, among other issues in the ever-changing international system that might affect global political, economic, and social stability [8, 21]. This research aims to assess the extent to which multinational organizations support the interests of the home country in case of conflicts and political tensions that lead to the questions of long-term consequences, ethics, and responsibilities of corporations. Using a multidisciplinary approach that integrates liability obligations, including responsibility, stakeholders’ participation, and international cooperation, this study seeks to provide the best solutions and facilitate the debate on the strategic practices of MNCs in the global political field.
Problem to be solved?
The study sets a background for analyzing the complexity of the relationship between multinational corporations and home countries, focusing on how the MNCs make the home country profitable and keep the world operation successful. This situation gets quite complicated when global stability, socio-political changes, and peace are considered in the context of MNCs’ influence on them. In traveling, shaping, and playing regulatory regimes, treaty agreements, and diplomatic negotiations, the actions of MNCs generate massive effects not only on the countries of their origin but also on the wider international community. Under conflict and geopolitical tensions, the concept of MNCs being for or against the government further deepens the analysis of the long-term effects, ethical considerations, and the ultimate responsibility these corporations are left with. It is one of the significant factors for weighing up or assessing the balance MNCs must try to strike between their business interests and the vast socio-political impacts of their operations. One example is lobbying actions at large corporations like ExxonMobil, which have enormously impacted the U.S. foreign policy towards oil-rich countries where such companies invest [17].
Additionally, Google has to deal with European Union regulations, which may slow down its business [10]. In this sense, the economic reasoning is represented by the company’s resistance to regulations. The political support of Huawei to China shows that MNCs back their countries. The political relations also defy international access to technologies from China and lead an active position on economic issues [19]. These corporations remake the world economy through trade and employment, evidenced by Amazon’s global reach and the impact on local businesses and unemployment [10]. The research also deals with MNCs ensuring policy formation, a domain in which Facebook, for instance, participates in Internet governance discussions. Additionally, these questions will be confronted on the issue of Pfizer’s involvement in the lobbying policy, which generates concerns about the accessibility of medicines [2].
Any existing solutions to the problems?
The intertwined connection between multinational corporations (MNCs) and their home countries has necessitated several options that can help ensure these companies will work in the interest of their countries, and such solutions will also help maintain ethics in their operations. The effectiveness of one of the critical approaches includes the disclosure in terms of accountability and transparency measures, which compel governments to make public MNCs’ lobbying activities, their corporate actions, and financial transactions, such as allowing the public to watch over and scrutinize them [28]. Stakeholder engagement is another powerful strategy that aims to build bridges and channels of communication among MNCs, local communities, government officers, and civil society to facilitate mutual understanding, improve corporate behavior, and manage potential conflicts of interest [16].
These regulatory reforms include oversight enhancement, especially in critical sectors such as finance, energy, and telecommunications, to curb the risks of tax evasion and corporate misconduct. The punishment for non-compliance is strict by law and therefore encourages ethical practices [6]. Collaboration between the international parties is essential because it allows the development of global best practice guidelines and standards that regulate MNC behavior and direct sustainable economic growth, as well as how to address one common problem [15]. Finally, implementing Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) strategies pushes MNCs to weave social and environmental dimensions into their corporate strategy, making them responsible entities to stakeholders in their home and host societies [29].
Which is the Best one?
The optimal answer to MNCs’ dilemmas depends on their particular circumstances. Still, an integrated approach employing accountability, transparency, and stakeholder engagement can often work well. This integration approach signifies that the transparency component is significant as it ensures that the MNCs maintain an ethical and national interest-friendly operating system. With the revelation of corporate undertakings, financial operations, and lobbying activities, it is possible to create public observation and ensure that governments do not do wrong things [14]. Furthermore, through the meaningful relationships of MNCs with communities, NGOs, and the government, organizations can prevent and manage conflicts of interest in advance and strengthen trust between the parties. Also, international cooperation programs and CSR activities combine the efforts in a multidimensional approach, considering the challenges MNCs face while doing business globally [22]. Face-to-face, such an answer can, therefore, be that particular one pre-prepared to meet the particularities of the case and address the different views and the multiple interests of all relevant stakeholders. A broad approach to this challenge helps to shape responsible corporate behaviors, protect national interests, and ensure sustainable development.
This strategy is demonstrated in practice, which shows its effectiveness. In addition, the revelation of lobbying activity by corporations such as Shell has resulted in the public being more supervised and policy reform being undertaken to reduce environmental harm [10]. Such stakeholder engagement principles practiced by corporations like Unilever have been vital to sustainable business practices advocacy and forging community confidence [22]. Regulatory changes in the telecommunications sector and among some companies, such as Facebook, after the EU introduced data privacy regulation resulted in better data privacy standards [14]. In addition, international cooperation on CSR initiatives has been the most critical factor for such companies as IKEA in promoting sustainable development and ethical supply chains [25]. These techniques are effective because they encourage moral business behavior, strengthen national interests, and promote sustainable development, thus showing the importance of the context-specific and multifaceted strategy.
Limitations
The primary intention of the study has been to highlight the complex relationships that MNCs have with their host countries, but several limitations are acknowledged. Generalizability as a concern is a salient problem that results from the presence of varying MNEs having diverse interactions with host communities, implying that the findings may not be universal [18]. Data dependability and availability problems arise because of the region’s differences and the corporate agreements’ often confidential character, which may compromise the validity of the research [9].
Within the confines of resource availability, the breadth and extent of the study may likely be constrained, impairing the quality of the analysis [13]. The resulting tendency of these qualitative methods to be methodologically biased might miss some alternative explanations and reduce the study’s completeness [3]. Furthermore, biases and subjectivity from researchers’ backgrounds may also result in partial interpretation of results that cannot maintain an objective approach [23].
External factors like new regulatory frameworks, global politics, and technological development are beyond this research`s scope. However, they could impact the level and applicability of the findings in the future [27]. The aim of future research should be focused on this issue through interdisciplinary collaboration and sophisticated instruments of analysis and data collection.
Achievements
Several significant discoveries have been made from the research focusing on the interdependence of multinational companies and their home countries. It expounded on the complex intricacies of the process, explaining how they coexist with political systems and impact economies [7]. The study presents policy implications crucial in providing guidelines to policymakers and business leaders when making actions and judgments on various economic policies.
The research strategically provided business leaders and managers with the knowledge to understand, negotiate, and respond to the ever-changing geopolitical environment affecting their business operations and the country’s interests. In academics, the study adds to the existing repository of knowledge on international political economy, globalization, and business, thus increasing the scholarly level of comprehension of the roles of MNCs in global affairs (Ghauri & Ghauri et al., 2021).
The study also enables advocacy and awareness creation such that stakeholders begin to discuss the potential damage MNC activities might cause to governance structures and local economies. In conclusion, this research gives us a perfect chance to highlight the essential components of the interaction between MNCs and their homelands and feel the necessity of a consistent policy from the policy-makers’ side.
Objectives
To analyze the influence of multinational corporations in the development of foreign policy, as well as on policy determination and international relations, lies in mechanisms such as lobbying or diplomacy.
To gain insight into the involvement of multi-national companies in policy formulation and their contribution to the world economy, including methods through which they support policies that favor their home countries, thereby improving general economic growth and stability.
To consider how multinational corporations attain their economic goals by crossing regulatory spaces and political moves concerning tax policies, favorable regulations, and trade agreements.
To study the influence of the activities of multinational corporations on trade relations within the states between themselves, negotiations between states, and local industries, and to understand how these activities change the global trade structure and inter-country economic links.
Materials and Methods
Multinational corporations (MNCs) and their role in global politics and economics research use a hybrid mixed-method approach, an extremely high-end research practice. It also requires an integrated utilization of both qualitative and quantitative tools that provide a strong foundation for deconstructing the dynamic behaviors of MNCs and their interaction with the host country’s foreign policy and national interests.
Qualitative data analysis included coding and thematic review of the organizational policies, declarations, and literature. It allowed us to thoroughly examine the nitty-gritty details of MNC behavior, their partnerships, and parallel foreign policy systems [24].
In terms of quantitative way, the research employed regression analysis to determine the association of the attributes of MNCs with the outcome of policy and economic approach [1]. This control statistics method is helpful for the investigation of the relationships between the dependent and independent variables. This information was systematically gathered from corporate reports and other sources by experienced researchers, which naturally gives credibility to the conclusions.
Content analysis of corporate reports, regulatory filings, and press releases has enabled the understanding of regulatory policies and trade and tax strategies, among others, supported by these businesses. A proper and detailed study was carried out to confirm the truthfulness and problems of the case studies [24].
In general, the research methods used for data analysis were based on a systematic research approach that sought to delve in-depth into the interaction of the economic interests of MNCs, national agendas, and foreign policy. Furthermore, including qualitative and quantitative techniques in elaborating the presumptions and mechanisms of MNC behavior is, thus, an adequately oriented step towards comprehending a contemporary global space, which MNCs geopolitically impact.
Sample of the Research
The purposive sampling approach was used intentionally to adopt a multi-perspective continuum from the top management and executive upper echelons of multinational corporations (MNCs) for the sample of this study (as shown in Table 1). The thematic analysis included twenty research articles, ensuring a cross-sectoral and heterogeneous perspective. These articles are extracted from well-known journals and offer theory and empirical data about the influence of multinational corporations on global business politics, their approaches to foreign policy, and economic interests [12].
A questionnaire study in the same period involved 44 managers or top officials of different MNCs. The research has the objective to get the direct information of the MNEs activities and recent evolution in world politics and economy. The data for the analysis was obtained from the leaders whose activities and guidelines basically represent the engines of these multinational corporations on global scale. The close-ended and structured questionnaire was designed to allow the respondents to be in and out and get all the way through the process without difficulty, without having to pour out their thoughts.
Thematic analysis of academic articles methodologies is integrated with primary data of MNC executives, which can be regarded as a subject image in general. The simultaneous application of two techniques provide data triangulation hence enhancing the validity of the findings. The study synthesizes the academic literature and pragmatism of the MNC leaders to address both side perspective and understand how MNCs negotiate between multiple objectives and the geopolitical environment. This methodology emphasizes the role of the theory-practice interaction in delineating the complexities of global business politics [20].
The study participant sample was quite diverse as well as the academic sources, and research has made stronger links between the strategies of organizations and their influence on various regions and industries. The systematic form of the article supports the wish of the research to provide a comprehensive overview of the MNCs activity on the global arena.
Description of Data Analysis Methods
Research has used a mixed-methods design and a research was based on the MNCs and their host communities complex relationship.
Thematic Analysis:
The qualitative study that employed thematic analysis is a quantitative part of the study. This was based on comprehensive analysis of policy papers, acts and similar sources to learn the emerging trends of MNCs activities, their participation in foreign policy making process and the emphasis on the question of national gain. Thematic analysis was useful in identifying and analyzing recurring themes and patterns within the data sources which disclosed the opportunistic behavior of MNCs [4].
The steps in thematic analysis typically include the following:
Familiarization with the data: Scientists fully engage with the data aimed at the first ideas finding.
Generating initial codes: Data is being coded disciplined across the whole data set.
Searching for themes: Codes are grouped to look for potential themes.
Reviewing themes: Themes are re-validated against a reference dataset to ensure integrity.
Defining and naming themes: The theme of each subject will be in-depth and detailed.
Writing up: As the final report is generated, conclusions are drawn, and return instructions are provided.
Regression Analysis:
The quantitative use of regression analysis was also applied to evaluate the influence of MNC activities on business relationship, economy, and diplomacy. This statistical approach is advantageous for studying the relationships between several independent variables, such as trade pacts or company profiles, and dependent variables, policy results or economic statistics [1, 26].
Regression analysis revealed the quantitative dependencies of MNC factors and their chooser characteristics, deepening the study’s findings [5].
The study also included case studies to examine the peculiarities of MNC behavior and its influence on the stages of nations and international synergies. These case studies provided a near view of the data world, giving the texture and color of the numbers in the form of contrasts and similarities by sector and country.
These approaches meshed these systems to provide a robust and systematic understanding of the contextual relationship between MNCs and their home. Methodologies were created to study the relationships of the MNCs with economic interests, national interests, and foreign policies to enhance the understanding of the modern geopolitics scenario influenced by the strategic management of the MNCs.
Results
Thematic analysis
The thematic analysis provides a comprehensive view of how MNCs’ strategies and impacts on foreign policies, governance issues, and ethics are studied. Indeed, these themes are vital in understanding MNCs’ role in global affairs, as they define both the structure and control of the strategies intended to govern their activities (see Table 2).
MNCs and Foreign Policy:
The thematic analysis shows that MNCs use politico-economic power in order to influence foreign policy. The media generated 15 extracts that quote impact on foreign policy from five articles. This may reflect MNCs’ heavy tendency of lobby and diplomacy and interest in the formulation of policies favourable for them [8, 10, 17, 21]. Such active involvement in creation of the foreign policy draws the attention on the structure of this research; therefore, there appeared a need in proper analytical scheme, aiming at assessment of a magnitude of such impact and consequences. This implies that a transparent and accountable system of lobbying activities is necessary for regulators.
Economic Strategies of MNCs:
MNCs are strategic participants whose approaches to economizing economic interests are linked to the regulatory environment, depicted in 20 references and four articles [6, 15, 16, 28]. The economic approach as a strategy shows that the political activities of MNCs are determined by economic factors. This means that the research of the results is completed when evaluating the strategy of the maneuvering of MNCs on a global basis.
Impact on Local Industries:
The effect of MNCs activities on the local markets and employment is reflected through the content analysis of three articles with the list of ten references [7, 11, 18, 29]. This is a crucial finding for the study design, which should be based on it and needs a precise investigation of the direct and indirect impact of the MNCs activities in the local market, especially in the area of job generation and market share distribution. The evidence suggests the probable presence of another story of MNCs, which are friends and enemies for local economies.
Ethical and Regulatory Issues:
The study supported that ethical and pragmatic challenges were found in the practices of MNCs and reinforced by 12 citations in four journal articles [3, 9, 22, 27]. The many ethical dilemmas reflect the dilemma of the MNC’s function in business and politics. Addressing this complexity is imperative as it should not be neglected like this but should be considered the main focus of research on MNCs’ operations.
Corporate and Global Governance:
MNCs are significant contributors to global governance and corporate responsibility, which is an issue remarkably under-researched even though it is of great importance (16 references across four articles [10, 15, 14, 13]. This gap offers space for the study to dwell on how MNCs shape global governance and have a role in the design of international standards and norms.
The top interpretation delineates the power and complexity of MNCs, which generally have global interventions. Their impact on foreign policy, economic strategies, and local businesses, with the ethical and governance issues accompanying them, elicits the need for interdisciplinary research and policymaking. The report recommends that, for the designers of the regulatory framework and studies, a diverse approach should be taken to consider social, economic, political, and ethical aspects of MNC operation. The findings suggest that administrators should balance guiding MNCs to deliver on their development promises worldwide and ensuring they do so within an acceptable ethical framework, thus protecting the public interest.
Regression Analysis
The purpose of regression analysis in this research is to determine the extent of influence that multinational corporations (MNCs) have on global politics and international relations through their economic activities and their relations with their home countries. In the context of the previously discussed themes, the findings can be analyzed as follows (see Table 3):
Influence on Foreign Policy and Political Activities:
Contrary to this, this variable has a positive but non-significant coefficient (B = .135, p = .525), which shows a positive relationship between MNC lobbying and foreign policy influence. Still, it is not statistically significant in this model. This gels with thematic analysis that MNCs go with the shaping of the foreign policy, but the data are of little value in proving the impact of this effect.
While MNCs’ involvement in political activities for economic interests also seems to have a positive relationship with the dependent variable (B = .062, p = .713), this is not statistically significant. Hence, these activities could not be measured directly in this research framework to show their influence on global politics.
Influence on Policy-Making:
The variable that measures the impacts of MNCs on policy-making processes has a payoff coefficient of B = -.190, p = .364, but it is not statistically significant. This may indicate a reverse connection: whereas the perceived influence on policy-making increases, an individual’s perceived role in global politics decreases; however, the relationship is not strong enough to be confirmed.
Trade Relations:
The coefficient of the MNC participation in the negotiations that separate trade relations directly significance of the p = .002 (B = .556) was positive and statistically significant, indicating a high impact. This critical finding corroborates the claim that economics constitutes an effective instrument for the MNCs’ strategies to influence international politics through economic processes, particularly trade relations.
Diplomatic Engagements:
The role of the MNC in diplomatic negotiations with potential economic impact is evaluated positively at.392, implying a perceivable influence, though a significant statistical correlation does not exist (p = .189). This outcome suggests a probable relationship between constructive diplomacy and political influence internationally, though the data does not confirm it.
Impact on Local Industries:
The impact of MNC activities on the local industries can be seen as a positive relation (B = .284), which indicates that as the MNCs impose on the local industries, their influence on global politics is likely to increase. Hence, there is no strong evidence (p = .289). Therefore, the data does not give evidence of this effect.
Ethical Mechanisms and Knowledge Sharing:
The mark of the official mechanism for solving ethical dilemmas is negative and irrelevant (B = -.073, p = .800). It indicates that the presence or absence of such mechanisms does not produce a notable effect on the perceived influence of the MNCs on global political processes.
Oppositely, the backing for MNCs providing decisive knowledge to the view from various angles and policymakers is harmful (B = -.236) but not highly significant (p = .361), therefore signifying that this perspective does not change the influence of MNCs on global politics significantly.
In general, regression highlights that the direct involvement of MNCs in trade negotiations is an important point that is considered a decisive factor in international politics and world relations. Secondly, although positively related, factors such as lobbying, political activities, diplomatic movements, and effects on local industries do not show statistical significance in this model. The ethical mechanism and knowledge sharing demonstrate negative connections but are non-significant. These results indicate that MNCs conduct many activities with potential political effects. However, not all of them are the same, and it is easy to measure or identify the most influential one in this study. The most crucial finding on trade talks is especially relevant; it not only corresponds with recent views of the economic strategies but also emphasizes the role that these strategies play in designing global connections.
Discussion
The discussion section sets off on the criticism of how multinational corporations (MNCs) impact the global political arena – a topic of high relevance for the international business community and policymakers. This research examines the level of MNCs’ involvement in foreign policymaking, their strategy formulation movement for grasping economic benefits across the regulatory environment, the global economic impact of their governance, and the consequences of their activities on international trade relations and local industries.
This section will cover a synopsis of the study’s empirical findings about the primary objectives, discussing the role of MNCs in foreign policy formation through lobbying and diplomacy. It will then explore the strategies MNCs use to gain economic benefits in the political context and elucidate how these companies affect the political arena. Furthermore, it will examine the conduction of MNCs in local industries involving global trade dynamics with the new findings against the existing body of knowledge. This way, the assessment will refer to the literature in the field mixed with comparing it to some seminal works such as those by Kano et al. and Ghauri et al., who are widely known for the contribution that they made to our knowledge of MNCs in the international business [11, 15].
This discourse will also make sense of these findings within the broader context of the academic conversation and point out areas favorable for further research, thereby setting grounds for other studies in the fast-evolving field of study.
The Role of MNCs in Shaping Foreign Policy
MNCs are in a complex situation in global politics, manifested in their ability to influence foreign policy skillfully by lobbying and diplomacy. Regression analysis is specified as not having a statistical relevance to lobbying efforts by MNCs on foreign policy changes (p = .525). The finding is somehow contrary to what the present literature indicates. It suggests that MNCs frequently employ their economic power to influence policy decisions in their favor politically [17]. For instance, researchers point out that corporate interests are inextricably linked with the foreign policy goals of a nation or corporate diplomacy [8, 21].
The subtleties of how MNCs influence policy decisions are only sometimes quantitative in methodology, which one can measure and see. Thus, there is a possibility that there are methodologies that limit this complex dynamic. The lack of discoveries might also indicate the complexity with which MNCs interact with policy-making dynamics, similar to the soft power route where MNCs’ economic and cultural influence can shape policy contexts [10].
It is to be noted that the examples in the data that crystalize the not-so-direct routes through which MNCs can affect policy are to be considered. For instance, the interference of MNCs in policy-making, as opposed to the sign of – .190(p = .364) in the regression analysis, could signify the indirect ways MNCs use, such as engaging in policy discourse or agenda-setting rather than lobbying openly. Additionally, the intense multi-dimensional qualities of MNCs’ diplomatic operations (bilateral negotiations, relationship establishment, and cooperation), which are not grasped by the regression modeling [22], could not be accounted for.
The data seem to indicate a strong and relevant effect of MNCs’ direct participation in trade negotiations on the perceived impact of MNCs on global politics (B = .556, p = .002) but an insignificant effect of their broad involvement in diplomatic negotiations (p = .189) was found. This might be the message that MNCs remain multifaceted as global players in economic diplomacy and are not direct actors in more comprehensive diplomatic affairs [15].
This study does not reveal a direct relationship between the enterprises’ lobbying efforts and policy influence; however, it gives a fuller picture combined with the research sources and qualitative information. MNCs, however, appear to have a somewhat subtle but consequential impact on foreign policy and its outcomes in that they shape the global political arena and enlist economic policy to pursue their diplomatic goals. This endorsement is crucial for future research, as a coordinated or multi-faceted approach should be developed to reflect the complexity of MNCs in world politics.
Economic Interests and Political Activities of MNCs
The economic interests and political actions of multinational corporations (MNCs) are the main factors determining their success in influencing the formation and shaping of the regulatory landscapes. The regression findings support the significant relationship between MNCs` representation in trade talks and their global political influence (B = 0.556, p = 0.002), confirming the hypothesis that profit-making is also politically driven. The empirical support of the finding is in harmony with literature that covers the MNC’s involvement in corporate lobbying for sympathizes taxation policies and regulations; this is often viewed as a way of creating a business-friendly environment supporting their global competitive power [16, 28].
A large proportion of trade negotiations have spillover effects on global politics. Therefore, these platforms are used by MNCs not only for advancing trade interests but also for political influence, which may introduce international relations and economic diplomacy considerations. The role of MNCs in this respect is a common topic in the literature, showing them to be strategically placed to ensure that trade agreements also serve their geopolitical interests [6, 15].
The literature review finds that corporate lobbying influences domestic policies on taxes and regulation. It usually reflects a more general approach when MNCs balance trading rules and investment agreements according to their preferences [18, 29]. MNCs use lobbying to promote policies supporting their business activity and enhancing their global power [11; 7].
The complexity of the advocacy effect of the multinational corporations on the home country’s economic policy is a complex analysis. As a result, MNCs stare at the measures that align with the developing economy of their home country if they are obtained through the support of the home government for the internationalization and competitiveness of these companies [15]. However, pandemics can also come up as a result of the policies that MNCs promote, which may be beneficial to them in the short term but are against the long-term economic strategies of their home countries or their geopolitical interests [10, 22].
As a result, it is evident from the discussion above that MNCs’ economic and political participation is a rather complex aspect of their realization of the strategic objectives. Their role regarding trade negotiations and the regulatory terrain they penetrate enables them to participate actively in world politics. Alignment or internal ‘battle’ of MNCs with home country policies creates a form of the duality of MNCs, which are national and global corporations, running their activities in international political economy perception and corporate diplomacy.
MNCs’ Impact on Policy-Making and Global Economy
A feature of multinational corporations (MNCs) is their attempt to lobby more actively in shaping policies that are in their economic interest and have the power to shape the global economy and stability. Via the trade negotiations intended to yield the most favorable terms of trade, MNCs not only champion the policies supporting their foreign exchange but also the policies that would help them occupy a more advantageous position in the global market that leads to the economic growth of their home countries [16, 28].
The regression analysis proved the great relationship pattern between MNCs’ trade negotiations and foreign policies (B = .556, p = .002). Hence, MNCs’ activities should follow the home country’s economic goal. This correlation usually facilitates national goals, provided export promotion, secure energy supply, or acquisition of strategic materials are reduced [6, 15]. This will, nevertheless, be because the extent of MNCs’ contribution to policy shaping and support of economic development can differ based on the nature of the industry and the specific interest of a company [11; 7].
Evident from these findings, MNCs have been leveraging their resources to influence significant decisions that affect the economy beyond the national level through policy-making. This impact is most evident in tax policy, international trade agreements, and regulatory frameworks, where MNCs’ lobbying can even effect significant structural changes in the business environment [18, 29].
In contrast to the assumption that corporations have an immediate and massive impact on policy-making, predominantly in policy, our research findings are somewhat different. This can be exemplified by the finding that the effect of MNCs on policy-making was negative (B = -.190, p = .364), thus that the relationship between perceived corporate power and policy outcomes may be very complex and not entirely captured by traditional models. Such variability may be explained by the use of the specific sampling or the industry focus that characterizes the study, thereby indicating the diversity of the impact of MNCs, which is not necessarily monolithic, but rather it may vary according to the sector or context [10, 22].
MNCs’ multiple roles when making global policies are very well stated in this part. So, the need for careful approaches when scrutinizing these relationships between MNCs and the world economy is highlighted. It is true that MNCs decisively shape economic policies and trade talks, but uncovering these forces is not a straightforward matter, and it requires additional research in which the context is a crucial factor.
Effect of MNCs on Trade Relations and Local Industries
The impacts of multinational operations are profound and sweeping and are on the local industries and world trade. MNCs are often considered depictive of globalization factors, aiding regional economic integration and cross-border trade; however, their operative effect on the local front is rich and complex.
The study performed the regression analysis and found no significant (p = .289) but positive relationship between the industrial impact of MNC activity and the local industry (B = .284). This may indicate that MNC’s operations are considered to impact local economies, though such impacts may not be as direct or measurable as is commonly believed. The positive sign implies a positive impact on local industries that is supposed to come from the economic activities of MNCs through job creation, technology transfer, or infrastructure development. Nevertheless, absences of statistical significance imply that the effects may be affected by other factors, for instance, the nature of MNC’s activities, the industry in question, and the economic context of the local area.
Considering these findings from the studies and case studies about MNCs’ impact on local economics, you can see a different image. In their works, researchers have highlighted incidences where MNCs have greatly affected local businesses, supply chains, and employment rates, usually resulting in economic growth [7, 11]. Nevertheless, other research shows that FDI sometimes has poor performance that may result in market monopolization, displacement of local companies, or environmental degradation [18, 29].
Unlikely, the impact of MNCs on the global trade architecture is also implicit. The MNCs’ large networks and considerable bargaining power allow them to influence trade agreements while favoring their interests. The influence of the MNCs is also shown by their significant role in trade negotiations [6, 15]. This influence can be an advantage for international trade but may also lead to fear in the small economies’ independence and justice of trade sharing. These operations significantly affect the relations of national economies and regional trade agreements.
MNCs’ activities may stimulate economic linkages, implying that countries tend to trade with one another and, hence, work together. Nevertheless, these economic relations might widen economic disparities and tensions, especially when the interests of MNCs do not match those of their host or home countries [10, 22].
In summary, the economic activities of MNCs may not only have a positive impact on the local industry and shape the trade structure of the world, it could be diverse. The influence of MNCs can be pretty subtle and, at times, indirect, indicating the necessity of complex policy options that evaluate both the opportunities and threats posed by the MNC’s presence in local and global markets.
Consistency with Other Research
By studying the outcomes, a more complex conclusion about the MNC’s influence on policy-making and the global economy is reached, which matches the research already in existence to some extent. Trade policy-making and local economic conditions of host countries have been directly reflected in the role of MNCs, as emphasized by numerous literary works. On the other hand, the latter findings about the non-significant results of MNCs’ relationship with lobbying activities and local industries diverged from the suggested theories that nullify these interactions [11, 29].
Differences between the current study’s results and the previous research, if any, may depend on multiple factors. Such study differences in research methods could also be among the primary reasons for the absence of significant results, as the quantitative measures may not fully reveal qualitative subtleties. For example, the study size and composition might impose another factor, as studies with more subjects and a more diverse research sample might give different views. Besides, sector-specific norms might also affect the matter; for example, some industry sectors may display more salient features due to their particular economic pattern or institutional environment [18].
The implication of the empirical study, however, goes beyond the generalized impact of MNCs’ venture on the economic and political dimensions; it also suggests that the degree and character of the extent is situation-dependent.
Future Research Directions
This study further reinforces the need for more research into the dynamic complexities of MNCs with the rest of the world economy and politics by contributing to the heterogeneity of its findings. The issue of how MNCs influence policy-making through the subtle mechanisms of lobbying is being investigated on a deeper level, including the conditions under which lobbying is successful and the different impacts of MNCs on local industries in other regions and sectors.
However, future research should innovatively improve the methodology and the way it captures how multinationals are managed by their managers. Qualitative research methods, such as in-depth interviews or ethnographic analysis of corporations, could facilitate richer insights that are more context-sensitive. Combining quantitative data with qualitative narratives, a mixed-method approach may also give a more inclusive depiction of MNCs’ influence, not just how and how far they reach in global politics and how much they contribute to local economies.
Above all, the longitudinal research is very significant because it can follow the developments in strategy that MNCs come up with and their long-term consequences on the economic and political structures. Such research findings would significantly contribute to comprehending the survival of MNCs’ role in developing economies, their transformation in the face of fast-changing policy environments, and the stability of their impact on global trade.
Cultural transnational research represents another vital field that needs to be developed. Comparative studies can shed some light on how the role and effect of MNCs are mediated by examining how cultural, institutional, and geopolitical factors come into play through multinational corporations’ activities in various political and economic contexts. The study of such variations can bring about a more diversified appreciation of the dynamics of how MNCs deal with the intricacy of global interdependencies and how they contribute to the current debate on global governance and corporate responsibility.
Taking steps to address the gaps in the studies will furnish policymakers, academics, and industry leaders with the knowledge required to reap the benefits of MNCs in global development and channel the same to mitigate the effects of MNCs on local industries and the national economy. An adequate mix of approaches is essential in promoting responsible business conduct among MNCs and ensuring that the benefits of global economics are fairly shared and that the MNCs function in an economically beneficial and ethically sound system.
Conclusion
The study has embarked upon a complex mission to name the roles of multinational corporations (MNCs) in global politics and economics. It has shown the scope and depth of their influence. Throughout the debate, key aspects on how regulating frameworks are navigated by MNCs, policy-making is greatly influenced, trade negotiations are conducted, and local industries are affected are discussed.
It stresses understanding the multifaced roles of MNCs, given that they exercise economic power, which drives global trade. Still, at the same time, they are political actors capable of shaping international relations and policies. Their double identity is a significant reminder that the strategic interests of MNCs do not exist apart from or in the absence of national economic interests and that the global economic order has the power to both influence and be influenced by MNCs.
It is expounded by the fact that the consequences of MNC activities are massive, and they have a great diversity, showing different results in different contexts. Future studies should be strategically directed at employing longitudinal and cross-cultural studies to ensure the longevity of the impact and diversity of MNC manifestations. The knowledge gained from such studies could be the strategy used by policymakers to strike the right balance between the positive and negative impacts of the inputs from MNCs that contributed to economic growth and the need to maintain the local industries and financial autonomy.
Such research justifies the continued investigation of the complex flow of MNCs across the globe, which cannot be overemphasized, as it forms the foundation for developing fair and inclusive economic policies. The ultimate application of this research stretches from informing trade agreements to guiding corporate CSR initiatives. Additionally, this research is a basis for constructing regulatory frameworks that will enable monitoring of MNC activities to make sure they will support society’s objectives and will contribute positively to the global communities.
In general, this study adds a novel perspective to the roles of MNCs in global affairs. Still, it also indicates that such roles are multifaceted and sensitive to dynamic changes, thus calling for further research. The consequences of the study can be used as a point of reference for future studies, and many disciplines can be integrated to understand the widespread effects of MNCs on the shape of our world.
Figures and Tables
Table 1. Sources of Information
Source
Description
Academic Journals
Peer-reviewed articles in the journals such Journal of International Business Studies and Global Strategy Journal provide the scholarly insights about the strategic moves of multinational corporations (MNCs) in global politics and the effect of their operations on international relations and economic policies.
Industry Reports
Information coming from agencies that compile market intelligence statistics, such as Euromonitor and Forbes Insights, assists to track the current trends in economic strategies of MNCs and their effects on global trade policies.
Case Studies
Extensive case studies based on the articles of Harvard Business Review and press releases of the large multinational companies tell the story of the role of particular companies in the formation of foreign policy and their path through geopolitical environment.
Government and Regulatory Publications
A variety of publications issued by international regulatory bodies and policy think tanks, including United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) and World Trade Organization (WTO), are essential because they offer information on the global business politics, especially on the legal frameworks and the ethical principles of globalization of MNCs.
Table 2. Thematic Analysis
Table 3. Regression Analysis
Coefficientsa
Model
Unstandardized Coefficients
Standardized Coefficients
t
Sig.
B
Std. Error
Beta
1
(Constant)
.300
.912
.329
.744
Is your MNC actively involved in lobbying for changing the foreign policy of your home country?
.135
.210
.103
.643
.525
How far is your MNC involved in political activities to safeguard its economic interests?
.062
.166
.055
.371
.713
In what way do you suppose the influence of your MNC on the policy-making process in your home country?
-.190
.207
-.141
-.921
.364
Did your MNC participate in negotiations that directly influence the trade relationship?
.556
.164
.515
3.386
.002
Is your MNC involved in diplomatic negotiations with potential economic repercussions?
.392
.293
.324
1.340
.189
How obvious is the effect of an MNC’s activity on local industries in the home country?
.284
.264
.190
1.078
.289
Does your MNC have an official mechanism for dealing with ethical dilemmas in its economic and political participation?
-.073
.285
-.047
-.255
.800
Do you support that your MNC gives critical knowledge about economic development and international relations to stakeholders and policy makers?
-.236
.254
-.171
-.927
.361
Does your MNC add to the academic and industry literature on the relation between multinational corporations and their cross-national activities?
.003
.239
.002
.011
.991
a. Dependent Variable: To what extent do you agree that Multinational corporations affect global politics and international relations through their economic activities and relations with their home countries?
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest.
References
Arkes, J. (2023). Regression analysis: a practical introduction. Taylor & Francis.
Ballesteros, L., & Magelssen, C. (2022). Institutional disruptions and the philanthropy of multinational firms. Organization Science, 33(4), 1501-1522.
Bradbury-Jones, C., Aveyard, H., Herber, O. R., Isham, L., Taylor, J., & O’malley, L. (2022). Scoping reviews: the PAGER framework for improving the quality of reporting. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 25(4), 457-470.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. American Psychological Association.
Becker, S. O., Egger, P. H., & Von Ehrlich, M. (2012). Too much of a good thing? On the growth effects of the EU’s regional policy. European Economic Review, 56(4), 648-668.
Chugunov, I., Pasichnyi, M., Koroviy, V., Kaneva, T., & Nikitishin, A. (2021). Fiscal and monetary policy of economic development. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 10(1), 42-42.
Carballo Perez, A., & Corina, M. (2024). Foreign direct investment in the context of rising populism: The role of institutions and firm‐level internationalization. Global Strategy Journal, 14(1), 84-115.
Demirbag, M., & Yaprak, A. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of emerging market multinational corporations. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Duan, Y., Huang, L., Luo, X., Cheng, T. C. E., & Liu, H. (2021). The moderating effect of absorptive capacity on the technology search and innovation quality relationship in high-tech manufacturing firms. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 62, 101656.
Foley, C. F., Hines Jr, J. R., & Wessel, D. (Eds.). (2021). Global Goliaths: Multinational Corporations in the 21st Century Economy. Brookings Institution Press.
Ghauri, P., Strange, R., & Cooke, F. L. (2021). Research on international business: The new realities. International Business Review, 30(2), 101794.
Guan, A., Thomas, M., Vittinghoff, E., Bowleg, L., Mangurian, C., & Wesson, P. (2021). An investigation of quantitative methods for assessing intersectionality in health research: A systematic review. SSM-population health, 16, 100977.
Glette, M. K., & Wiig, S. (2021). The role of organizational factors in how efficiency-thoroughness trade-offs potentially affect clinical quality dimensions–a review of the literature. International Journal of Health Governance, 26(3), 250-265.
Haidar, J. I. (2012). The impact of business regulatory reforms on economic growth. Journal of the Japanese and international economies, 26(3), 285-307.
Kano, L., Tsang, E. W., & Yeung, H. W. C. (2020). Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature. Journal of international business studies, 51, 577-622.
Kujala, J., Sachs, S., Leinonen, H., Heikkinen, A., & Laude, D. (2022). Stakeholder engagement: Past, present, and future. Business & Society, 61(5), 1136-1196.
Kim, I. S., & Milner, H. V. (2019). Multinational corporations and their influence through lobbying on foreign policy. Multinational Corporations in a Changing Global Economy, 497-536.
Leung, L. (2015). Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research. Journal of family medicine and primary care, 4(3), 324.
Li, J. (2021). In pursuit of fairness: How Chinese multinational companies react to US Government bias. Harv. Int’l LJ, 62, 375.
Maxwell, J. A. (2021). Why qualitative methods are necessary for generalization. Qualitative Psychology, 8(1), 111.
Mitchell, J. R., Mitchell, R. K., Hunt, R. A., Townsend, D. M., & Lee, J. H. (2022). Stakeholder engagement, knowledge problems and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Ethics, 175, 75-94.
Noland, J., & Phillips, R. (2010). Stakeholder engagement, discourse ethics and strategic management. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 39-49.
Olmos-Vega, F. M., Stalmeijer, R. E., Varpio, L., & Kahlke, R. (2023). A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149. Medical teacher, 45(3), 241-251.
Pandey, P., & Pandey, M. M. (2021). Research methodology tools and techniques. Bridge Center.
Paulo, S. (2014). International cooperation and development: A conceptual overview. German Development Institute/Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik Discussion Paper, 13.
Sarstedt, M., Mooi, E., Sarstedt, M., & Mooi, E. (2019). Regression analysis. A concise guide to market research: The process, data, and methods using IBM SPSS Statistics, 209-256.
Suchek, N., Fernandes, C. I., Kraus, S., Filser, M., & Sjögrén, H. (2021). Innovation and the circular economy: A systematic literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3686-3702.
Suwanda, D., & Suryana, D. (2020). Human resource development in local governments: Increased transparency and public accountability. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(1).
Tourky, M., Kitchen, P., & Shaalan, A. (2020). The role of corporate identity in CSR implementation: An integrative framework. Journal of Business Research, 117, 694-706.
4
1
8
The post The Impact of Multinational Cooperations on Global Business Politics Name 1 Management, appeared first on essayfab.