1
1
1
The Role of Nutrition, Diet, and Gut Health on Mental Well-Being
Joe Nelson
College of Social Work, University of Kentucky
SW 873-201: Neuroscience for Clinical Practice
Dr. Priscila Norris, RYT, MSW, DSW, LCSW
December 10, 2023
Abstract
This research paper explores the correlation between our mental or psychological state with the nutritional pattern and mental well-being. It primarily aims to comprehend our dietary habits along with the influence of microbiota to devise particular mechanisms for the treatment of mental issues. No one can deny the significance of how an integrated strategy can be devised to involve all the elements of nutritional components to ensure mental well-being. It encourages the readers to maintain a balance between their nutritional plans, gut health, and mental well-being.
Unfortunately, this area of study did not get much attention which can be seen from the availability of a few in-depth research in this area. The core of this exploration is the Gut-Brain Axis, a fascinating pathway through which our nutritional intake and the health of our gut microbiota directly impact our mental state. The study presents a compelling argument that highlights the profound influence of our diet on mental disorders ranging from anxiety to other more complex conditions like depression. It reveals a noteworthy finding about the possible application of dietary modifications in the oversight of mental health issues. The research also highlights and confirms the relationship between diverse levels of mental disorders and specific nutritional deficits by looking at different dietary patterns and their impact on gut health. No doubt, it is a call for a paradigm shift in social work, where rehabilitation strategies should incorporate dietary and gut health issues.
Keywords: Gut-Brain Axis, Mental Health, Nutrition
The Role of Nutrition, Diet, and Gut Health on Mental Well-Being
The current attempts made by modern medicine to unravel the complex interplay between eating habits and mental health have faced certain inconsistencies. Nonetheless, nutrition and diet are highlighted as key players in improving mental health despite no adequate research on the Gut-Brain Axis and how it can affect the state of mind (Chakrabarti et al., 2022). This study examines how nutrition, dietary patterns, and gut health are related but different elements of psychological well-being.
Mental diseases ranging from severe bipolar problems and schizophrenia to general anxiety and sadness have become more prevalent in the recent past (Faraj et al., 2021). As they become more common, mental health is becoming an international issue. It also shows that factors like nutrition and gut health are important predictors of mental health rather than being secondary. Therefore, it emphasizes how social work and psychiatry can benefit greatly from dietary patterns and intestinal health as part of many treatments to prevent illness.
Empirical research provides insight into mental disorders by confirming the link between gut health, diet, nutrition, and overall well-being. By creating enhanced preventive methods that consider these factors within the current care models, this result can aid in the development of better treatment outcomes. Finally, the current study suggests that medical techniques should be inclusive to make up for individuals who only support physical interventions. This is a global concern because, as demonstrated by Faraj et al. (2021), a variety of mental diseases affect a wide range of communities and have significant socioeconomic ramifications.
Thanks to extensive research and development, today’s nutritional science has advanced to the point that we can identify the relationship between vitamins and minerals and our mood and cognitive performance. Therefore, this study aims to create dietary recommendations for the target population of this study based on the nutritional deficiencies linked to various stages of mental illness. The main topics of discussion here are the Gut-Brain Axis (GBA) and the role of gut bacteria in mental health. As a result, we must work hard and get new knowledge to guarantee our mental health with a long-term eating plan that is created via extensive research.
The treatment of neuro issues, particularly mental and brain concerns, is most complicated in the medical domain. The successful treatment of mental health is highly based on an integrated approach between various elements such as nutrition, eating habits, and cognitive processing. When we dig deeper, the science of biology incorporates dietary patterns and multiple psychological issues. Nexus to this context, the researchers have discovered a great combination between food management and its direct implications on various neuro issues comprising depression, anxiety, and sleep disorder (Mitrea et al., 2022). Interestingly, our dietary choices can determine how we feel by altering the communication between the gut and the brain.
In addition, more holistic approaches emphasize combining nutritional therapy programs with conventional treatments for psychiatric disorders. As such, these services can be mixed with traditional ones to create a more comprehensive alternative that may bring better patient results.
Integrating dietary strategies can enhance the range of conventional therapies. It is necessary to know physiological, epidemiological, and therapeutic perspectives to address this issue. This study aims to explore different approaches to mental health problems, emphasizing the direct role of our dietary practices in mental well-being. Furthermore, the research will look into how gut microbiota can be used in treating various psychological disorders. Hence, this study unravels the relationship between diet, gut health, and mental well-being that can be used as a potential therapeutic tool for preventing and treating human illnesses.
Therefore, an understanding of the physiological, epidemiological, and therapeutic aspects of this problem is necessary. This research examines these different angles on psychopathology. It suggests ways in which diet and consideration of gut microbiota might form an integral part of a comprehensive strategy for managing it from various perspectives. The study presents the connection between diet, gut health, and state of mind as a range of prevention and cure options with implications for mental illness treatment.
Conceptualization Rationale
This concept paper emphasizes the imperative to incorporate an understanding of the psychological influences of gut health in modern healthcare, particularly for individuals with mental illness. Presently, most psychiatric care predominantly relies on psychological therapies and pharmacotherapy, often overlooking the biological components of mental health, as noted by Turner et al. (2015). Adding nutrition and gut health modifications into the health and wellbeing puzzle can support the mental well-being of individuals. Nutritional intakes have a decisive impact on the physical health of individuals, which supports the normal functions of an individual’s body. It implies that an understanding of the relationships between nutrition, food, and gut health can help regulate the mental health of individuals effectively. For instance, taking some healthy food items that support the production of happy hormones can help reduce stress and depression-related symptoms. This causes illness treatment planning, including preventive and curative interventions, to shift to a more holistic perspective. Currently, the majority of mental health practices are centered on treating fully developed psychiatric diseases. This is relevant because it illustrates how healthy eating and gut health might help prevent mental diseases (Creed, 2022). Preventive therapies, which target underlying causes or dangers before or after diagnosis, would lessen the societal and individual burden associated with mental diseases as opposed to treating symptoms as they arise (Creed, 2022). Although these preventative measures aim to create happier and healthier societies through healthier people, they also have significant economic effects on society and bring new challenges to the mental healthcare field. The brain-gut axis so profoundly impacts their mind.
However, even with a wealth of scientific study, this field is still relatively new, particularly in therapeutic application. Nonetheless, rather than primarily depending on medications as in the past, current advancements in mental health research place a greater emphasis on the relationship between nutrition, gut microbiota, and emotional well-being (Qui et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2019; & Maes et al., 2019). It is important to note that the new paradigm shift provides people with novel approaches to enhance their mental health and is based on cutting-edge research. About the setting, Horn et al. (2022) argue that there has been research on how eating habits and feelings are linked to gut microbiota homeostasis. One of them is the Mediterranean diet. It can help control depression due to its combination of fruits, wholesome grains, and lean protein (Garaulet et al., 2018).
Mental health has been one of the most investigated issues illustrating the impact of gut microbiota. On a similar note, it adopts some way in which it combines dietary patterns with traditional notions about mental illnesses by connecting various principles put forward by psychology, social workers, psychiatrists, and nutritionists. The point here is that these professionals must understand gut microflora’s significance in mental disease and develop certain dietary techniques for improving mental health. Therefore, this model assists healthcare practitioners and policymakers in developing comprehensive mental healthcare programs. As such, from this viewpoint, we then gain insight into the mind-body relationships as well as lay out the future direction for the management of mental illnesses, which will be largely based on nutritional and personalized drug regimes.
Literature Review
A massive increase in the interest of researchers can be witnessed when it comes to the exploration of the relationship between gut microbiota and cognitive health. For instance, Fassarella et al., 2020) highlighted the impact of balanced gut microbiota on emotional and mental health. However, there may be an imbalance due to multiple factors which can lead to changes in the population of fecal microbiota Transplantations (FMTs) and cause emotional dysregulation and other cognitive impairments. Frame et al. (2020) came up with their findings and suggested that nutritional intake of minerals and food ingredients impacts FMTs and microbiota. They asserted that changes in these factors change cognitive functions. Gao et al. (2020) defined the relationship between microbiota changes during different stages of life which supports specific functions of the body during that period while food intake supports these developments.
Góralczyk-Bińkowska et al. (2022) noted subtle reciprocal communication within GBA which is critical in cognitive function. For many readers, the idea that gut microbial composition changes could impact the brain may seem startling. It is long, intricate, and arranged engagingly. This could be the covert cause of any of our mental diseases, including attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), schizophrenia, and depression. Interestingly, in contrast to the other studies, Horn et al. (2022) present a distinct and challenging element. Their field of study was the impact of nutrition on this intricate interaction.
Food choices may cause serious mental and neurological issues for individuals. Although the significance of these alterations may not be stressed, remember that eating affects the bacteria in the stomach’s flora system. Naturally, they can result in illnesses linked to problems with cognitive function. These findings indicate that gut microbiota composition is changed by diet and has an impact on cognition. Based on their findings, the writers promote and disseminate the cautionary tale that adopting a customized diet is necessary as a potential tactic to maintain or enhance gut health for a longer, healthier life.
Likewise, the studies by Mitrea et al. (2022), Ma et al. (2019), and Limbana et al. (2020) provide comprehensive details regarding the connection between gut microbiota and mental health issues. Similarly, it offers a comprehensive analysis that connects differences in our internal microbial ecology to neurological and mental disorders. However, Gao et al. (2020) investigate this by reviewing four important studies on the connection between it and general health and cognitive development. It is a fact that these researchers conduct their research concurrently. For instance, Limbana et al. (2020) investigated if altering our microbiomes could improve mental health. Interestingly, Ma et al. (2019) reveal the following: What connection exists between college students’ risky food intake habits and mental health? They go deeply into the many facets of anxiety, bipolar disorder, depression, schizophrenia, and neurodegenerative illnesses. In a real sense, their work has set the path for the development of future psychotherapies aimed at achieving mental health balance through information exchanged between the brain and stomach via the Vagus nerve. Vagus nerves are nerves in different parts of the body and are responsible for controlling involuntary, sensory, and motor functions. For instance, in the stomach, these support the digestion function by controlling the movement of the stomach and intestinal movements.
In a preliminary investigation of the connection between diet and gut microbiota in healthy people, Frame et al. (2020) focused on how micronutrients influence the microbial community. This includes crucial physiological systems like hormone balancing, metabolism, and neurological operations. Gao et al. (2020) also examine how cognitive faculties and growth stages advance, drawing from four significant studies. Their research shows how nutrition affects cognitive functions, especially regarding the role of gut microbiota. A lot of researches discuss how the brain functions and how the gut microbiota may contribute to mental health issues. They stress the significance of researching mental health and developing novel therapeutic approaches based on this connection to link mental health in the future with gut health.
Regarding food choices for depression, Rhodes (2020) notes that probiotics can support
Intestinal equilibrium and may be involved in central nervous system (CNS) related processes. Still, diet is crucial in the management, treatment, and onset of degenerative disorders. In regards to Gastrointestinal (GI) illnesses, Tait & Sayuk (2021) investigated the dynamics inside the gut-brain-microbiota axis, which demonstrated communication by several neurological systems as well as the hormonal systems in addition to the immune system with the microflora of the intestines. Lastly, Tan et al. (2022) concentrated on depression and demonstrated how the vagus nerve might exploit gut-brain signaling pathways to induce vagal tone and inflammation. Thus, these investigations show a clear physiological connection between gut health and mental well-being. It is common knowledge that diet has a significant role in influencing the gut’s microbial ecology. It encourages the intestinal flora to proliferate, which releases short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). These SCFAs act as anti-inflammatory agents to shield nerve cells from harm or injury.
Alternatively, a high-fat and carbohydrate diet promotes the growth of pathogenic bacteria. The growth of pathogenic microorganisms results in oxidative stress and inflammation in the brain. Anxiety levels increase, mental disorders get more intense, as well as symptoms such as depression. Dietary habits have been extensively explored about overall health over time.
Notably, Mediterranean diets are associated with higher Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores, whereas diets lacking in nutritional content are related to poorer ratings (Vajdi & Farhangi, 2020). In addition, increased folate (vitamin B12) levels and other factors in blood serum indicate that a healthy diet may lower the risk of developing depressive symptoms (Khosravi et al., 2019). Moreover, we should keep in mind that it is important to understand eating patterns, especially during adolescence, which indicates that the Mediterranean diet reduces the risk of depression, and a Western diet does the opposite.
Through life, one realizes that food, gut microbiota, and mental health are closely linked to our bodies, pointing to dietary interventions as possible ways to prevent and treat psychological disorders. It is always necessary to remember that a multifactorial relationship demands a holistic approach to mental health care by blending findings on food and gut microbiome health and giving birth to new research avenues and practical implications. For this purpose, there may be a need to adopt some inclusive and dedicated approaches to support mental health which may include the integration of interdisciplinary concepts as it can provide a better and holistic understanding of what an individual needs to do to achieve these outcomes. It can help them improve their experience and actions based on a mindful and informed decision-making process.
Research Gap
As noted earlier, Fassarella et al. (2020) established a link between gut health, food intake, and mental well-being. A research study by Schnorr & Bachner (2016) advocated the link between food intake and FMTs. Though these studies provided useful insight into the subject, these studies fail to demonstrate a workable framework and reliable information when it comes to the usefulness of these approaches for maintaining mental health or treating patients with mental health issues. Gao et al. (2020), Góralczyk-Bińkowska et al. (2022) and Heym et al. (2019) established that the mental well-being of an individual can be disrupted due to disturbed microbiota. The findings of these studies are indicative that there might be a relationship between gut microbiota and mental health. However, these studies do not establish such links between these factors. Some studies, like Limbana et al. (2020), investigated if altering our microbiomes could improve mental health. However, their findings are not generalizable due to the small sample of college students who largely use risky food intake behaviors. The specific population lowers the generalizability of results as these may not be replicated in cases where risky food intake is not an option.
This study explains that recent research has focused mostly on food, gut microbiome, and mental health. Naturally, these findings demand composite mind care and offer new clinical research and treatment directions. Unlike standard approaches, the reader needs to be aware that this strategy combines microbial findings with dietary viewpoints. A comprehensive approach recognizes the complex relationships between these elements, expanding our understanding of psychiatric illnesses and simultaneously leading to the development of novel preventative or therapeutic approaches. By recognizing these preventative measures in a piecemeal manner, several mental health approaches may be developed to reduce the prevalence of different mental health issues in society.
Theoretical Framework
In the early 1990s, George Engel developed a revolutionary paradigm, the Bio-Psychosocial Model. Unlike traditional biological understanding, this concept held a more comprehensive view of health. Nutritional practices, healthy gut functioning, and proper dieting influence the well-being of one’s mind. This approach promotes a holistic view of health and illness that surpasses pure biological explanations (Syed et al., 2020).
The Bio-Psychosocial Model
Our eating habits are shaped by how we were brought up, our lifestyles, and our engagements with others, for instance, friends and family members. These components together make up the food culture in a society, which further creates food norms, values, and eating habits that significantly affect individuals’ lives and society (Van Oudenhove & Cuypers, 2014). However, cases exist where dietary patterns or eating habits change due to habits, advice, lifestyle, and social norms. This modification in dietary patterns can sometimes reduce the intake of necessary ingredients and minerals that are responsible for food intake.
In this case study, the Bio-Psychosocial Model extensively describes health as it links to biological, psychological, and social elements. However, it has no exceptions to certain limitations because it does not address the specific needs of an individual’s life in varied circumstances; thus, they do not suit everyone, though many widely use them. The practical application of this wide-ranging theoretical framework can sometimes pose problems because it includes so many factors at once. In trying to incorporate all aspects of the model into a coherent treatment plan, healthcare professionals might face difficulties, especially as time and resources tend to be limited in clinical settings. Consequently, individual patients’ aspects may be ignored due to a more generalized approach adopted.
The effectiveness of the Bio-Psychosocial Model in explaining mental health ties with gut health is compromised due to limited time and resources, which limits the observation and assessment of gut function for a reasonable time (Johnstone et al., 2021). Despite covering a vast horizon and providing meaningful insights, unfortunately, the model cannot settle all the shades of an individual in different situations. It comprises the ability of the model to implement a holistic approach effectively.
The Bio-Psychosocial Model emerged from the background of Biomedical Model Theory. Mainly, this model is only concerned about physical health, and it does not explain the associated mental health aspects and social values. This is the main reason for coming up with the Bio-Psychosocial Model instead of the dichotomies of the Biomedical Model. It greatly improves our understanding of health conditions beyond a narrow biomedical perspective by incorporating evolutionary theory that offers a more comprehensive framework for understanding the causation of medical conditions. On top of that, considering complex relations between biological, psychological, and social elements, the model seeks to advance knowledge about, intervention in, or prevention of health problems.
The three components of this model include psychological, biological, and social factors. The psychological component is the first and encompasses several aspects of food, including emotional eating styles, behaviors, and attitudes. Eating habits are related to nutritional choices, options, and patterns that greatly impact mental health (Syed et al., 2020). For instance, eating a balanced diet always benefits our health, happiness, and appearance, whereas eating food that is not good for us will have the opposite effect. The detrimental effect could result in obesity, excessive blood sugar, exhaustion, and trouble sleeping. Emotional eating has varying impacts on our lives. It discusses using food as a coping mechanism for a variety of problems, including stress, pressure, fear, anxiety, and bad emotions (Bashmi et al., 2023). Emotional eating or dietary patterns initially provide the person with relaxation and calming effects, but this pattern has distinct implications. However, over time, it also introduces detrimental aspects to the person’s mental state, resulting in feelings of depression that never go away. Moreover, social determinants characterize the outside variables that can affect a person’s food decisions and mental health. Specifically, social influences and cultural standards are important factors affecting an individual’s eating.
The individual’s diet plan is significantly influenced by societal and dietary patterns, religious values, and social conventions with whom they interact. This affects the individual’s mental health. Social eating is more substantial than psychological and emotional aspects and can have longer-lasting impacts (Van Oudenhove & Cuypers, 2014). Therefore, the Biopsychosocial Model suggests that a person’s food habits should always change. With the help of friends, family, coworkers, doctors, and other loved ones, this can be carried out, allowing an individual to maintain healthier eating habits and enhance their mental health.
The Theory of the Gut-Brain Axis
The system of communication that runs both ways between the gut and the brain is known as the “gut-brain axis.” The immune system, hormonal pathways, and gut flora all play intricate roles (Appleton, 2018). According to the hypothesis, the human brain and gut sensations or health are two distinct but related things in some respects (Zagórska et al., 2020). It explains that gut microbiota consists of trillions of microorganisms. The human body uses these microorganisms to communicate between the gut and the brain (Zagórska et al., 2020). Multiple research studies reveal that the gut microbiota seemingly produces a wide range of chemicals inside the human body that may negatively influence the individual’s mental health (Johnstone et al., 2021). It has been proved through different medical lab reports that the chemicals produced by gut microbiota induce neuro-inflammation, causing certain mental issues, especially depression and stress (Abhari & Hosseini, 2018).
During this process, the gastrointestinal tract generates a variety of hormones and neurotransmitters that control our hunger and taste (Chakrabarti et al., 2022). Besides this process, while digesting the food, the stomach produces cortisol chemicals, which are also important while responding to depression. What we eat and our nutrients greatly impact the gut flora and the signaling molecules that connect the stomach and brain. A diverse range of plant-based diets and dietary fiber consumption may support a positive gut microbiota (Gagliard et al., 2018). The Gut-Brain Axis Theory posits that the gut microbiota and its equilibrium may profoundly influence an individual’s emotional and cognitive state.
Gut bacteria were exposed as an unimaginable powerhouse through extensive investigations that produced a wide variety of chemicals. The presence of these compounds is not haphazard, as they wield a considerable influence on the psychological well-being of individuals (Johnstone et al., 2021). Extensive research has unveiled that these microbial substances possess the capacity to trigger neuro-inflammation, which is closely linked with an array of mental ailments such as depression and stress (Abhari & Hosseini, 2018). To illustrate further, scientific investigations indicate an association between certain strains of intestinal bacteria and elevated levels of cytokines – molecules indicative of inflammation typically found in heightened amounts among those afflicted by depression.
The kind of diet affects the balance and health of gut microbiota. This is believed to stimulate the growth of good bacteria in individuals who take plant-based diets and dietary fibers. This is because these kinds of foods provide all the necessary nutrients for the growth and development of helpful strains (Gagliardi et al., 2018). Therefore, the Gut-Brain Axis Theory posits that the condition or state of an individual’s gut microbiota may greatly influence how he feels generally or health-wise, which can be physical, emotional, or cognitive. Another example indicates that people on a Mediterranean diet with plenty of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains had lower rates of depression compared to those with a Western diet based mainly on processed foods and sugar (Dinan et al., 2015). In other words, what an individual eats directly affects his gut health as well as his brain’s mental status. It outlines that healthy food choices are important for a proper Gut-Brain Axis.
Implications
Understanding the relationship between nutrition, diet, gut health, and mental health has significant implications in many ways. When one considers the complexity of these relationships, it is clear that individual attentiveness to them can enable clinical social workers to perform comprehensive interventions. Nutritional education, counseling, and dietary assessments may be included in various mental health treatments to encourage healthy eating patterns. Therefore, according to Anand et al. (2022), customizable meal plans may be designed by caseworkers with their clients to address the biological aspect of mental wellness through good nutrition. Consequently, emotional eating could be counteracted by behavioral interventions instituted for an improved coping mechanism and diversion from food being used as a substitute for bad feelings or stress. In addition, community organizations and partnerships with the local government might enhance community-level social work education campaigns on nutrition or initiatives that provide more wholesome food in underserved and marginalized communities.
These programs could be developed with local governments and community groups, thereby promoting healthy eating habits among these people, eventually improving their mental health statuses. This understanding enables policymakers to develop public health policies that improve nutritional well-being as part of community mental health promotion. However, policymakers can pass policies that ensure enough availability of healthy foods while reducing unhealthy diets.
The paper also reveals the possibility of integrating nutritional care into mental health services, as described by this paper. Alternatively, insurance companies’ coverage of holistic treatment would include all aspects like “food-diet-mental health”, thus calling for payment mechanisms for each intervention category (comprehensive care). The other approach would involve politicians who can advocate for societal-based programs to improve nutrition in schools where individuals are trained on nourishment to foster well-being.
Thus, this study suggests that interdisciplinary approaches must be integrated, especially regarding gastroenterology, psychiatry, and social work. In terms of design, however, this paper takes a multidisciplinary perspective that will greatly improve our understanding of the relationship between our diet and its effect on our mental health. The role of lifestyle and its impact on mental health will also be explored, as lifestyle also has an influence on eating habits and may influence food intake patterns.
One of the most important aspects of this research is its emphasis on conducting longitudinal studies. This means that when trying to understand how changes in gut health over time have been due to different dietary practices and how they affect a person’s psychological well-being, one has to consider longitudinal studies. In contrast to studies with a short duration and limited focus, longitudinal research offers valuable insights into the long-term maintenance of excellent mental health through ongoing modifications in eating habits. Because it demonstrates the long-term relationships between nutrition, gut health, and dietary modification, this study also provides information for prompt interventions or preventive measures.
Furthermore, this study considers the significant impact of socioeconomic and cultural factors on eating habits and mental health.
This means that cultural beliefs must be respected while implementing any intervention targeting feeding instead of making assumptions about what is best for people to eat. In other words, factors such as the availability of healthy food sources or proper diet information can make up their minds or determine various gut states. Therefore, concentrating on those areas would be sensible, given that field research may provide equal access to adequate quality psychiatric solutions.
Another area that the study covers is modifying diets for improved mental health. The approaches might emanate from consistent experimental research to yield evidence-based methods in psychiatric care. Psychologists have also done behavioral studies on people with mental disabilities, focusing on changes in diet and psychological therapies.
In conclusion, our understanding of mental disorders has changed by thinking about them through a Gut-Brain Axis and nutrition. It is multi-perspective, incorporating biological, psychological, and sociological viewpoints, among others, regarding mental health. This has broadened our knowledge base and opened up new pathways for prevention and treatment; hence, all these areas must be considered in public policy, practice, or research.
Conclusion
This paper has extensively addressed the interaction between dieting, nutrition, and the mind through complex interrelations between these cores of human existence. Furthermore, we have strong scientific evidence supporting the importance of dietary choices, nutritional status, gut microbiota, and its metabolites, and gut-brain interactions in mental health. The constitution, as well as the balance of gut microbiota, may have an impact on mood regulation, like anxiety disorders or progressive neurodegenerative diseases. It is about having a good intestinal milieu and microbial diversity that interact with each other in flexible metabolic ways.
Psychological elements relate to social influences and biological mechanisms; hence, more is known about mental illnesses. This is why it simultaneously considers all three parts of human health to determine their interrelationships regarding mental health states. The gut-brain axis theory does not focus on digestion alone but on how the digestive system contributes to emotional or cognitive control. Conversely, the Gut-Brain-Axis Theory has shown once again that digestion has something more than just eating food or controlling emotions and thoughts.
Consequently, this study’s findings significantly affect clinical social work practice. Therefore, to effectively address different psychological wellness issues, there should be integrated approaches involving individual, biological, and social dimensions. Consequently, the prevention of mental disease must be given higher priority than treatment care in modernized medicine.
Additionally, this discovery may have implications for future investigations and clinical settings. This indicates that further study is required on the subject, and the body of information compels healthcare institutions to implement them immediately. Therefore, nutritional evaluation and therapies modify present psychiatric illness treatment approaches, making them more patient-centered and complete.
Overall, the relationship between diet, gut health, nutrition, and mental health is highlighted in this paper. Social work has been covered in addition to the roles that biology and society play in developing and treating mental diseases. The study’s findings demonstrate the necessity of providing comprehensive mental health care that recognizes the complexity of the circumstances that contribute to mental diseases.
References
Abhari, K., & Hosseini, H. (2018). Psychobiotics: Next Generation Treatment for Mental Disorders. Journal of Clinical Nutrition. Diet, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.4172/2472-1921.100063
Anand, N., Gorantla, V. R., & Chidambaram, S. B. (2022). The role of gut Dysbiosis in the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric disorders. Cells, 12(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12010054
Appleton, J. (2018). The gut-brain axis: Influence of microbiota on mood and mental health. Integrative Medicine: A Clinician’s Journal, 17(4), 28.
Bashmi, L., Cohn, A., Chan, S. T., Tobia, G., Gohar, Y., Herrera, N., Wen, R. Y., Ishak, W. W., & DeBonis, K. (2023). The biopsychosocial model of evaluation and treatment in psychiatry. Atlas of Psychiatry, 57-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15401-0_3
Berk, M., Williams, L. J., Jacka, F. N., O’Neil, A., Pasco, J. A., Moylan, S., Allen, N. B., Stuart, A. L., Hayley, A. C., Byrne, M. L., & Maes, M. (2013). So depression is an inflammatory disease, but where does the inflammation come from? BMC Medicine, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-200
Chakrabarti, R., Fung, T. S., Kang, T., Elonkirjo, P. W., Suomalainen, A., Usherwood, E. J., & Higgs, H. N. (2022). Mitochondrial dysfunction triggers actin polymerization necessary for rapid glycolytic activation. Journal of Cell Biology, 221(11), e202201160. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202201160
Creed, F. (2022). Risk factors for self-reported irritable bowel syndrome with prior psychiatric disorder: The lifelines cohort study. Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, 28(3), 442-453. https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm21041
Evrensel, A., Ünsalver, B. Ö., & Ceylan, M. E. (2020). Neuroinflammation, gut-brain Axis, and depression. Psychiatry Investigation, 17(1), 2-8. https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2019.08.09
Faraj, S., Renno, W., & Bhardwaj, A. (2021). Unto the breach: What the COVID-19 pandemic exposes about digitalization. Information and Organization, 31(1), 100337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2021.100337
Fassarella, M., Blaak, E. E., Penders, J., Nauta, A., Smidt, H., & Zoetendal, E. G. (2020). Gut microbiome stability and resilience: Elucidating the response to perturbations to modulate gut health. Gut, 70(3), 595-605. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321747
Frame, L. A., Costa, E., & Jackson, S. A. (2020). Current explorations of nutrition and the gut microbiome: A comprehensive evaluation of the review literature. Nutrition Reviews, 78(10), 798-812. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuz106
Gao, W., Baumgartel, K. L., & Alexander, S. A. (2020). The gut microbiome is a component of the gut–brain axis in cognitive health. Biological Research for Nursing, 22(4), 485-494. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099800420941923
Garaulet, M., Gómez-Abellán, P., Alburquerque-Béjar, J. J., Lee, Y. C., Ordovás, J. M., & Scheer, F. A. (2013). Timing of food intake predicts weight loss effectiveness. International journal of obesity, 37(4), 604-611. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2012.229
George L. Engel, “How Much Longer Must Medicine’s Science Be Bound By A Seventeenth Century World View?” Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 57/1-2 (1992), 3-16.
Góralczyk-Bińkowska, A., Szmajda-Krygier, D., & Kozłowska, E. (2022). The microbiota–gut– Brain Axis in psychiatric disorders. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(19), 11245. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911245
Heym, N., Heasman, B. C., Hunter, K., Blanco, S. R., Wang, G. Y., Siegert, R., Cleare, A., Gibson, G. R., Kumari, V., & Sumich, A. L. (2019). The role of microbiota and inflammation in self-judgment and empathy: Implications for understanding the brain-gut-microbiome axis in depression. Psychopharmacology, 236(5), 1459-1470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-019-05230-2
Horn, J., Mayer, D. E., Chen, S., & Mayer, E. A. (2022). Role of diet and its effects on the gut microbiome in the pathophysiology of mental disorders. Translational Psychiatry, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-022-01922-0
Khosravi, M., Sotoudeh, G., Amini, M., Raisi, F., Mansoori, A., & Hosseinzadeh, M. (2019). The relationship between dietary patterns and depression is mediated by serum level of folate and vitamin B12: A case-control study. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.12079/v1
Limbana, T., Khan, F., & Eskander, N. (2020). Gut microbiome and depression: How microbes affect the way we think. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.9966
Ma, Q., Xing, C., Long, W., Wang, H. Y., Liu, Q., & Wang, R. F. (2019). Impact of microbiota on central nervous system and neurological diseases: the gut-brain axis. Journal of Neuroinflammation, 16(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.24095/hpcdp.36.8.03
Maes, M., Nelemans, S. A., Danneel, S., Fernández-Castilla, B., Van den Noortgate, W., Goossens, L., & Vanhalst, J. (2019). Loneliness and social anxiety across childhood and adolescence: Multilevel meta-analyses of cross-sectional and longitudinal associations. Developmental psychology, 55(7), 1548. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000719
Mitrea, L., Nemeş, S., Szabo, K., Teleky, B., & Vodnar, D. (2022). Guts imbalance imbalances the brain: A review of gut microbiota association with neurological and psychiatric disorders. Frontiers in Medicine, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.813204
Qiu, W., Cai, X., Zheng, C., Qiu, S., Ke, H., & Huang, Y. (2021). Update on the relationship between depression and neuroendocrine metabolism. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.728810
Rhodes, J. M. (2020). Nutrition and gut health: The impact of specific dietary components – it’s not just five-a-day. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 80(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0029665120000026
Schnorr, S. L., & Bachner, H. A. (2016). Focus: microbiome: integrative therapies in anxiety treatment with special emphasis on the gut microbiome. The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 89(3), 397.
Syed, S., Syed, S., & Bhardwaj, K. (2020). The role of the bio-psychosocial model in public health. The Journal of Medical Research, 6(5), 252-254. https://doi.org/10.31254/jmr.2020.6517
Tait, C., & Sayuk, G. S. (2021). The brain-gut-Microbiotal Axis: A framework for understanding functional GI illness and their therapeutic interventions. European Journal of Internal Medicine, 84, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2020.12.023
Tan, C., Yan, Q., Ma, Y., Fang, J., & Yang, Y. (2022). Recognizing the role of the vagus nerve in depression from microbiota-gut-brain axis. Frontiers in Neurology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.1015175
Turner, J., Hayward, R., Angel, K., Fulford, B., Hall, J., Millard, C., & Thomson, M. (2015). The history of mental health services in modern England: Practitioner memories and the direction of future research. Medical History, 59(4), 599-624. https://doi.org/10.1017/mdh.2015.48
Vajdi, M., & Farhangi, M. A. (2020). A systematic review of the association between dietary patterns and health-related quality of life. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01581-z
Van Oudenhove, L., & Cuypers, S. (2014). The relevance of the philosophical ‘mind–body problem for the status of psychosomatic medicine: a conceptual analysis of the biopsychosocial model. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 17, 201-213.
Wang, T., Long, L., Zhang, Y., & He, W. (2019). A social exchange perspective of employee–organization relationships and employee unethical pro-organizational behavior: The moderating role of individual moral identity. Journal of Business Ethics, 159, 473-489.
Zagórska, A., Marcinkowska, M., Jamrozik, M., Wiśniowska, B., & Paśko, P. (2020). From probiotics to psychobiotics – the gut-brain axis in psychiatric disorders. Beneficial Microbes, 11(8), 717-732. https://doi.org/10.3920/bm2020.0063
Zhu, S., Jiang, Y., Xu, K., Cui, M., Ye, W., Zhao, G., Jin, L., & Chen, X. (2020). The progress of gut microbiome research related to brain disorders. Journal of Neuroinflammation, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-020-1705-z
The post 1 1 1 The Role of Nutrition, Diet, and Gut Health on appeared first on essayfab.