This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™.Instructions
Recommend Data Network Designs that Enable Reliable Service While Catering to Safety and Growth
Background
In our modern world, data networks are like the highways of information. They connect devices, people, and organizations, allowing data to flow smoothly. But designing these networks isn’t easy. There are three main goals:
- Safety: Our networks must be secure. Think of it like locking your front door to keep intruders out. We want to protect data from cyber threats.
- Growth: Imagine a road that can handle more and more cars as the city grows. Our networks need to do the same. As companies expand, their networks should handle increased traffic and new technologies.
- Reliability: Nobody likes traffic jams or road closures. Similarly, network downtime is bad news. We want networks that rarely break down and can quickly recover if they do.
Instructions
Your objective is to propose robust data network designs prioritizing service and safety reliability while accommodating future growth. Present clear and feasible recommendations outlining how these designs can effectively balance the need for dependable service and the imperative of ensuring safety within a dynamic and expanding network environment. Include a block diagram of the proposed network design.
Instructions
Your objective is to:
- Propose robust data network designs prioritizing service and safety reliability.
- In addiution, accommodate future growth.
- Present clear and feasible recommendations outlining how these designs can effectively balance the need for dependable service and the imperative of ensuring safety within a dynamic and expanding network environment.
- Include a block diagram of the proposed network design.
Length: This assignment must be 6 pages (excluding the title and reference pages).
References: Include 3 scholarly resources.
Grading
This assignment is worth [10] points and is due on [Sunday]. Refer to the rubric for more specifics on how this will be graded.
Assignment 4 Learning Objectives:
CLO3: Identify sound network monitoring, operations, and reporting including automated resolution options.
Develop knowledge in technology based on a synthesis of current theories.
This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™.
Rubric Name: Grading Rubric
CriteriaExceeds Expectations (90%-100%) A. A-Meets Expectations (80%-89%) B+, B, B-Needs Improvement (73%-79%) C+, CDeficient (40%-72%) C-. FNot Evident (0%-39%) FCriterion ScoreRecommendations on data network designs enable reliability, safety, and growth. Leveraged current industry-accepted standards and concepts while including a block diagram of the proposed network design. (30%)3 points
Recommendations on data network designs have a high probability of enabling reliability, safety, and accommodating future growth.
Recommendations based on comprehensive analysis of drawbacks in addition to the benefits. The block diagram of the proposed network is fully representative and aligned with the narrative.
2.6 points
Recommendations on data network designs will primarily enable reliability and safety.
Recommendations analysis focuses primarily on the benefits. The block diagram of the proposed network is representative and aligned with the narrative.
2.3 points
Recommendations on data network designs that will primarily enable reliability.
Analysis primarily focuses on the benefits, but the sources/citations may not be relevant. The block diagram doesn’t fully represent or align with the proposed narrative.
1.2 points
Recommendations on data network designs minimally enable reliability, safety, and accommodate future growth.
No block diagram was presented or was incomplete.
0 points
Not attempted or needs major improvement overall.
Score of Recommendations on data network designs enable reliability, safety, and growth. Leveraged current industry-accepted standards and concepts while including a block diagram of the proposed network design. (30%),/ 3Assignment Instructions (20%)2 points
Correctly completed all the assignment instructions.
1.7 points
Correctly completed most of the assignment instructions.
1.5 points
Incorrectly completed some parts of the assignment.
0.8 points
Incorrectly completed most parts of the assignment.
0 points
Not attempted or needs major substantial improvement overall.
Score of Assignment Instructions (20%),/ 2Content and Critical Thinking (20%)2 points
Strong evidence of content knowledge.
Responses were thoughtful, thorough, and well-reasoned.
1.7 points
Good evidence of content knowledge.
In general, improvement in responses to demonstrate critical thinking is needed.
1.5 points
Some evidence of content knowledge.
Some improvement is needed to show adequate understanding of content and the use of critical thinking.
0.8 points
Little evidence of content knowledge.
Significant improvement is needed to show adequate understanding of content and the use of critical thinking.
0 points
Not attempted or needs major substantial improvement overall.
Score of Content and Critical Thinking (20%),/ 2Cohesion & Organization (20%)2 points
Effectively communicates a central idea or point that is present throughout the entirety of the assignment, in a coherent and logical manner. Overall writing is easy to understand.
1.7 points
Communicates a central idea or point that is present through most of the assignment in a coherent manner. Overall writing, for the most part, is easy to understand.
1.5 points
Communicates a central idea or point in the assignment, but may incorporate other unrelated topics. Coherence and organization are somewhat evident.
0.8 points
Communicates several unconnected ideas or points, with no apparent pattern or coherence.
0 points
Does not display a sense of organization or coherence. Non-existent, or lacks clear expression of relevant ideas or points.
Score of Cohesion & Organization (20%),/ 2Grammar, Mechanics, Formatting, APA, Integration of Resources (10%)1 point
No misspelled words, grammatical errors, formatting issues, or APA style errors. All resources are scholarly and appropriate for the assignment.
0.85 points
Some misspelled words, grammatical errors, formatting issues, or APA style errors. Most resources are scholarly and appropriate for the assignment
0.75 points
Many misspelled words, grammatical errors, formatting issues, or APA style errors. Some resources are not scholarly or appropriate for the assignment.
0.4 points
Significant number of misspelled words, grammatical errors, formatting issues, or APA style errors. Most resources are not scholarly or appropriate for the assignment.
0 points
Not attempted or needs major substantial improvement overall.
Score of Grammar, Mechanics, Formatting, APA, Integration of Resources