|
This criterion is linked
to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism
Concept Application
|
20 to
>18.0 ptsExcellentThe student meets 90% to 100% of the required content
criteria by mastering both rudimentary and complex elements and, in addition,
applying high-level facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual
aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the
assignment instructions.
18 to
>16.0 ptsGoodThe
student meets 80% to 89% of the required content criteria by recognizing the
fundamental, rudimentary, and complex elements and applying proficient facts,
theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the
delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.
16 to
>14.0 ptsFairThe
student meets 70% to 79% of the required content criteria by recognizing
rudimentary and complex elements and demonstrating facts, theories,
definitions, and other contextual aspects. All of the delivered information
is compliant with the assignment instructions.
14 to
>12.0 ptsPoorThe
student meets less than 70% of the required content criteria with a low-level
approach of rudimentary and complex elements and a lack of application facts,
theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. However, all the
delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.
12 to
>0 ptsUnacceptableThe assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes,
was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked
to a Learning OutcomeGrammar
Written Communication
|
20 to
>18.0 ptsExcellentExcellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure.
Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.
18 to
>16.0 ptsGoodMinimal
(1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors
16 to
>14.0 ptsFairMultiple
(4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.
14 to
>12.0 ptsPoorSevere
(8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.
12 to
>0 ptsUnacceptableUnacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical,
punctuation, or translation errors.
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked
to a Learning OutcomeCommunication
Specific Formatting
|
20 to
>18.0 ptsExcellentThe assignment meets 90 % – 100% of the required
formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the
presented information is complete in all the required components and exceeds
expectations.
18 to
>16.0 ptsGoodThe
assignment meets 80% to 89% of the required formatting elements in the
assignment description. Additionally, the presented information meets all the
necessary components and formatting requirements.
16 to
>14.0 ptsFairThe
assignment meets 70% to 79% of the required formatting elements in the
assignment description. However, the presented information is missing some
key details, but overall does not disrupt the required format.
14 to
>12.0 ptsPoorThe
assignment meets at most 69% of the required formatting elements in the
description. The presented information is missing some key details that
disrupt the needed formatting.
12 to
>0 ptsUnacceptableThe assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes,
was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked
to a Learning OutcomeCritical and Logical
Thinking
Thought analysis
process
|
20 to
>18.0 ptsExcellentThe assignment meets 90% to 100% of rudimentary and
complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness that are accurate
and correctly documented. In addition, the analysis offers a clear and
concise analysis along with an impeccable and precise, well-thought process.
18 to
>16.0 ptsGoodThe
assignment meets 80% to 89% of rudimentary and complex details, situations,
problems, and diagnosis awareness which are accurate and correctly
documented. The analysis is well communicated, and the fundamental thought
process presented in the written piece clearly aligns with the assignment
expectations.
16 to
>14.0 ptsFairThe
assignment satisfies 70% to 79% of rudimentary and complex details,
situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness but may overlook some essential
parameters. The analysis and thought process presented in the written piece
is evident; however, still developing.
14 to
>12.0 ptsPoorThe
assignment meets at most 69% of rudimentary details, situations, problems, or
diagnosis awareness, but there was a severe overlook of some essential
parameters. In addition, the analysis and thought process presented in the
written piece is not evident and not founded on previous discussions or
information.
12 to
>0 ptsUnacceptableThe assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes,
was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked
to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Literacy
Quality of Sources and
APA Citations
|
20 to
>18.0 ptsExcellentSupporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to
date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and
trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount.
Additionally, all sources are recognized or cited properly.
18 to
>16.0 ptsGoodSupporting
information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible
and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what
is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the
requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title
page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text
citations or references.
16 to
>14.0 ptsFairSupporting
information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not
credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent
(depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of
sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting,
setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and
references.
14 to
>12.0 ptsPoorThe
following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to
the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the
number of sources requested was not met. The essay offers severe incorrect
APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text
citations and references.
12 to
>0 ptsUnacceptableThe assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes,
was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.
|
20 pts
|