1
Final Paper Draft Outline: The Impact of Sensitivity Training on The Police Force: A Project Plan For LGBTQIA+ Charity Resources
Jasmine Adkins
PSYC 495: Psychology/Social Sciences Capstone
Franklin University
Dr. Lee
Date: 07/27/2023
Table of Contents
Introduction 3
Background Of the Research Paper 3
Research Objectives and Significance 4
Overview of the project plan and methodology 5
Literature Review 7
Goals And Importance of Sensitivity Training 7
Challenges Faced by LBTQ+ community 9
Benefits of Sensitivity Training 9
Research Methodology 9
Data Collection Methods 9
Data Analysis 9
Quantitative Data Analysis 9
Qualitative Data Analysis 9
Findings 9
Discussion 9
Conclusion 9
Appendix 12
Interview questions 12
Survey Questionnaires 12
Introduction
Background Of the Research Paper
LGBTQIA+ views have also altered; politicians, media, and other exposure have challenged stereotypes and improved understanding. LGBTQIA+ persons and allies have hosted pride festivals and other events to empower and unite. Many LGBTQIA+ and non-LGBTQIA+ organizations have vigorously advocated acceptance and inclusivity. LGBTQIA+ community centers, helplines, and counseling services serve vulnerable people. Many nations still persecute LGBTQIA+ persons. Sexual orientation and gender identity hate crimes continue to be reported, demonstrating the need to battle prejudice and intolerance.
Law enforcement-LGBTQIA+ interactions remain a concern. Some police officers may still behave and think based on LGBTQIA+ stereotypes and biases. This may lead to insensitive treatment of LGBTQIA+ victims and suspects, harming the community. Transgender and gender non-conforming persons also face misgendering, a lack of gender identity knowledge, and acceptable jail amenities. These issues demonstrate the need for specific training to provide law enforcement with the skills to handle varied situations politely and professionally. It’s crucial to recognize that LGBTQIA+ rights and acceptance vary everywhere. Some countries have made great strides in LGBTQIA+ rights, while others still ban same-sex unions and promote intolerance. Thus, efforts to reduce law enforcement-LGBTQIA+ inequities must include the global context and seek global change.
Research Objectives and Significance
This research examines how sensitivity training influences police interactions with LGBTQIA+ people in major cities, including Los Angeles and New York. This study examines law enforcement sensitivity training programs and how they affect police behavior and attitudes toward LGBTQIA+ people to promote diversity, empathy, and understanding. This research can fix LGBTQIA+ law enforcement injustice and discrimination. Some police personnel still mistreat and physically attack LGBTQIA+ individuals, despite legal and social progress. This study examines the usefulness of sensitivity training to improve police-LGBTQIA+ interactions and create a more courteous and inclusive environment.
One of this study’s main contributions is its focus on sensitivity training’s role in increasing police personnel’ LGBTQIA+ awareness. By asking police officers if they’ve participated in LGBTQIA+ sensitivity training, the study can assess their exposure to relevant education and its potential impact on their behavior and decision-making when interacting with LGBTQIA+ people. Assessing police officers’ comfort in handling LGBTQIA+ situations can help identify areas where sensitivity training may be advantageous. If officers seem more relaxed, sensitivity training has helped them communicate politely and professionally with LGBTQIA+ persons.
The LGBTQIA+ community’s interactions with law enforcement must also be considered for study enhancement. The study can identify specific challenges that sensitivity training should address to create a safer and more supportive environment for LGBTQIA+ people by evaluating how sensitive and understanding police officers are during these encounters and exploring community bias or discrimination. This study may impact LGBTQIA+ groups, policymakers, and law enforcement. The study’s findings on sensitivity training may assist police officers’ training programs to be more effective. The data should convince policymakers to include sensitivity training in police training and professional development. This will create inclusive and courteous law enforcement cultures.
LGBTQIA+ groups may utilize the study to enhance law enforcement sensitivity training and build better connections. The study’s distribution through workshops, speeches, and publications may raise awareness and encourage dialogue among stakeholders, such as law enforcement, parliamentarians, and community organizations, to promote positive change. This study examines how sensitivity training influences police interactions with LGBTQIA+ people in major cities. Providing insights on the efficiency of sensitivity training and its effects on police behavior and LGBTQIA+ views will enhance efforts to establish a more inclusive and understanding society. This research addresses LGBTQIA+ law enforcement encounters to provide a safer and more equitable environment for all persons, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity.
Overview of the project plan and methodology
The research proposal will examine how sensitivity training affects LGBTQIA+ police encounters in big cities like Los Angeles and New York. The research recognizes action, advocacy, and legal advances toward LGBTQIA+ equality and acceptance. It recognizes the strengthening of anti-discrimination laws, the legalization of same-sex marriage in many countries, and the increasing visibility and representation of LGBTQIA+ persons. These positive improvements have made society more accepting and inclusive, yet law enforcement and the LGBTQIA+ community still have issues.
The research examines how sensitivity training might improve law enforcement’s diversity, empathy, and understanding of LGBTQIA+ people. This study shows how effectively sensitivity training programs function and how they improve LGBTQIA+ law enforcement interactions. By researching LGBTQIA+ community interactions with law enforcement, the project hopes to provide evidence-based solutions for a more equitable and fair society.
The project plan has many critical phases to ensure a full, in-depth study. Planning and developing the research determines its goals, scope, and methods. A thorough review of sensitivity training, LGBTQIA+ police contacts, and relevant research provides a strong foundation for the study. To ensure stakeholder involvement, urban police forces and an LGBTQIA+ organization for kids and adults form alliances.
Data collection uses quantitative and qualitative methods. LGBTQIA+ and police are surveyed. Police personnel’ replies to survey questions on sensitivity training programs, LGBTQIA+ comfort, and experiences with racism or prejudice in the police force are assessed. The LGBTQIA+ community is asked about law enforcement experiences, sensitivity and understanding, and bias or discrimination.
Qualitative interviews with police officers, LGBTQIA+ community members, and officials from the selected LGBTQIA+ charity provide in-depth viewpoints. These interviews include police enforcement, sensitivity training, and improvements. Survey and interview data are analyzed using statistical and qualitative methods to uncover trends, patterns, and correlations.
The final steps include reporting research findings and making recommendations. A detailed research report describes the project’s aims, methods, findings, and analysis. Police sensitivity training upgrades are prioritized. The LGBTQIA+ charitable organization learns from the research findings via seminars, presentations, and publications. Law enforcement, legislators, and community groups also push proposed reforms.
The research plan culminates with a meticulous and detailed examination of how sensitivity training impacts LGBTQIA+ police encounters. Surveys and in-depth interviews are used in the research to help develop a more inclusive society and improve law enforcement-LGBTQIA+ relations.
Literature Review
Goals And Importance of Sensitivity Training
The sensitivity training literature study aims to examine its objectives and comprehend its significance, especially in the context of police contact with the LGBTQIA+ population. Sensitivity training, commonly called diversity training or cultural competency training, aims to improve participants’ familiarity with, empathy for, and comprehension of persons from various backgrounds, especially marginalized groups like LGBTQIA+ people. The fundamental goal of sensitivity training is to dispel accidental assumptions, prejudices, and biases that individuals can have about others based on race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, and more. Sensitivity training aims to encourage self-reflection, and foster an inclusive and fair atmosphere for everyone, regardless of identity, by bringing these prejudices to light.
Sensitivity training is especially important for law enforcement since police personnel are responsible for the safety and welfare of the communities they serve. Positive and polite contacts with law enforcement are essential for fostering trust and confidence in the police force within the LGBTQIA+ community. Police personnel who undergo sensitivity training may better understand the difficulties that LGBTQIA+ people encounter and learn how to react politely and responsibly in various circumstances.
Research outcomes on the efficiency of sensitivity training in law enforcement have been encouraging. The use of sensitivity training to address problems like human trafficking was stressed in research by Farrell and Reichert (2017), highlighting the potential for such training to enhance responses to vulnerable groups. According to Renzetti et al. (2017), specialist training on human trafficking favorably affected law enforcement officials’ understanding of and attitudes toward assisting survivors.
Studies have shown that sensitivity training may provide fruitful results regarding encounters between LGBTQIA+ people and police enforcement. Mummolo (2018) spoke on how contemporary police strategies, such as sensitivity training, might improve interactions between officers and citizens. To change the culture of police, Normore and Scott (2021) emphasized the necessity for education and training, emphasizing the need to address prejudices and discrimination.
The research highlights that sensitivity training is a continuous process that needs continuing commitment and reinforcement rather than a one-time event. Engel, McManus, and Isaza (2020) emphasized the need to go beyond simple “best practices” and invest in evidence-based training to decrease officer-involved shootings. Isaieva (2018) spoke on the value of training for police officers’ professional growth and its favorable effects on their interactions with the general public.
Overall, the research supports the need and benefit of sensitivity training in fostering diversity, empathy, and understanding among law enforcement personnel, particularly concerning contacts with the LGBTQIA+ population. A safer and more inclusive society might result from such training if it helps police personnel and residents build good connections. However, the literature also recognizes the need for a thorough and ongoing training strategy involving working with LGBTQIA+ groups and community stakeholders.
Sensitivity training is crucial for law enforcement organizations looking to foster more accepting and courteous contacts with the LGBTQIA+ community. Its objectives include cultivating empathy, enhancing cultural competence, and raising awareness of prejudices. The research underlines the value of ongoing, evidence-based methods and highlights the beneficial effects of such training on relations between police and citizens. Police forces may play a significant role in fostering acceptance, understanding, and trust with the LGBTQIA+ community by integrating sensitivity training into law enforcement procedures. This will make everyone in society feel safer and more at peace.
Challenges Faced by the LBTQ+ community
Benefits of Sensitivity Training
Research Methodology
Data Collection Methods
Surveys for police officers-
Survey for LBTQ+ Community
Data Analysis
Quantitative Data Analysis
Statistical tool – SPSS
Analysis of the response from LGBTQthe community and the police
Qualitative Data Analysis
Thematic analysis
Comparison of quantitative and qualitative Results
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Bayram, E., Weigand, A. J., & Flatt, J. D. (2023). Perceived Discrimination in Health Care for LGBTQIA+ People Living With Parkinson’s Disease. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, gbad046.
Braunstein, M. D. (2017). The five stages of LGBTQ discrimination and its effects on mass incarceration. U. Miami Race & Soc. Just. L. Rev., 7,
Brenner, N., Ross, M. H., McLachlan, E., McKinnon, R., Moulton, L., & Hammond, J. A. (2022). Physiotherapy students’ education on, exposure to, and attitudes and beliefs about providing care for LGBTQIA+ patients: a cross-sectional study in the UK. European Journal of Physiotherapy, 1-9.
Chitra, T., & Karunanidhi, S. (2021). The impact of resilience training on occupational stress, resilience, job satisfaction, and psychological well-being of female police officers. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 36(1), 8-23.
Dobek, P., Bowen, H., & Callaghan, P. (2023). Experiences and perceptions of military and emergency services personnel identifying as LGBTQIA+ and their families: a qualitative systematic review protocol. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 10-11124.
Engel, R. S., McManus, H. D., & Isaza, G. T. (2020). Moving beyond “best practice”: Experiences in police reform and a call for evidence to reduce officer-involved shootings. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 687(1), 146-165.
Farrell, A., & Reichert, J. (2017). Using US law-enforcement data: Promise and limits in measuring human trafficking. Journal of Human Trafficking, 3(1), 39-60.
Grewe, M. (2018). LGBTQIA+ support systems within higher education. The Routledge Handbook of LGBTQIA Administration and Policy, 244–259. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351258807-17
Isaieva, I. (2018). Police training in the professional training system for the Federal Police Force in Germany. Comparative Professional Pedagogy, 8(4), 54–59. https://doi.org/10.2478/rpp-2018-0054
Jacobson López, D. (2023). Enhancing inclusivity for LGBTQIA+ student survivors of color commentary: creating a university strategic plan to address relationship violence and sexual misconduct (RVSM): applying principles-focused evaluation at Michigan state university. Violence against women, 29(1), 35-43.
Mazel, O. (2022). Violence in the name of equality: The postal survey on same-sex marriage, LGBTQIA+ activism and legal redemption. Australian Feminist Law Journal, 48(1), 137-163.
Mummolo, J. (2018). Modern police tactics, police-citizen interactions, and the prospects for reform. The Journal of Politics, 80(1), 1-15.
Normore, A. H., & Scott, W. R. (2021). Police brutality and the militarization of Black and Brown communities: Transforming the culture of policing through education and training. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2021(170), 79-88.
Pasia, K. M. (2022). The Most Optimal Methods for Acknowledgement of Medical Biases Toward LGBTQIA+ Patients in United States’ Healthcare Facilities.
Renzetti, C. M., Bush, A., Castellanos, M., & Hunt, G. (2017). Does training make a difference? An evaluation of a specialized human trafficking training module for law enforcement officers. In Human Trafficking (pp. 56-72). Routledge.
Siregar, S. A., Siregar, G., & Lubis, M. A. (2020). Criminological Perspective Of Street Crime. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems-JARDCS, 12(6), 603-611.
Appendix
Interview Questions
Survey Questionnaires
The post 1 Final Paper Draft Outline: The Impact of Sensitivity Training on The appeared first on essayfab.